Ultrasonic welding, an advanced green manufacturing technology with remarkable energy-saving characteristics, demonstrates significant advantages in welding dissimilar light alloys. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of global research advancements in ultrasonic welding technology for copper alloys over the past 15 years, systematically summarizing for their homogeneous and heterogeneous combinations, addressing key factors such as microstructure, microhardness, interface temperature, joint strength and welding mechanisms. Maximum strength of Cu/Cu joints approaches the base material; Cu/Al, Cu/Ni and Cu/Steel heterogeneous joints approach the weaker base metal, while Cu/Mg joints is lower than that of the base material. Cu/Al and Cu/Ni welding is primarily attributed to the combined effects of plastic deformation and interfacial metallurgical reactions, Cu/Mg and Cu/Steel welding mainly relies on interfacial metallurgical reactions. Strategies like optimising parameters, modifying lap joint configurations and introducing interlayers enhance strength. This work offers a valuable reference for researchers worldwide engaged in ultrasonic welding studies.
ZhouJGuoSDengZ, et al.Microstructural features and mechanical properties of in-situ remelting welding of TC4 titanium alloy and T2 copper welded joint by electron beam. J Mater Res Technol2024; 33: 6853–6866.
2.
NazarovABachurinDNiZ. Atomistic simulation of ultrasonic welding of copper. Metals (Basel)2022; 12: 2033.
3.
Ben KhalifaABraiekSFradjA,et al.Experimental investigation of joints strength obtained by ultrasonic welding and soldering under pure T-peel tests using DIC. Weld World2023; 67: 495–511.
4.
da Costa NetoLPda Silva JuniorMEde Lima SilvaGLC, et al.Evaluation of the influence of oxidation of cooper in the soldering process ultrasound in automotive industry components. Rev Mater2022; 27: 224.
5.
KumarJP. Effect of temperature distribution in ultrasonically welded joints of copper wire and sheet used for electrical contacts. Materials2018; 11(6): 1010.
6.
KumarJP. Effect of process parameter characteristics on joint strength during ultrasonic metal welding of electrical contacts. Weld World2020; 64: 73–82.
7.
PöthigPGrätzelMBergmannJP. Influence of different surface conditions on mechanical properties during ultrasonic welding of aluminum wire strands and copper terminals. Weld World2023; 67: 1427–1436.
8.
LuHYeFWangY. Orthogonal experiments and bonding analysis of ultrasonic welded multi-strand single core copper cables. J Manuf Process2022; 78: 1–10.
9.
QiHYeFLuH. Visualization of plastic flow in metal ultrasonic welding by adding interlayer. J Manuf Process2022; 83: 571–575.
10.
HeinzSWagnerGEiflerD. Ultrasonic welding of wires and cables. JOM2012; 64: 421–426.
11.
NiZLYangJJLiS, et al.A review on ultrasonic spot welding of copper alloys. Mater Sci Technol2020; 36: 264–283.
12.
ZhangCLiHLiuQ, et al.Ultrasonic welding of aluminum to steel: a review. MDPI2023; 13: 29.
13.
NiZLYeFX. Ultrasonic spot welding of aluminum alloys: a review. J Manuf Process2018; 35: 580–594.
14.
LiHChenCYiR, et al.Ultrasonic welding of fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2022; 120: 29–57.
15.
BhudoliaSKGohelGLeongKF,et al.Advances in ultrasonic welding of thermoplastic composites: a review. Materials (Basel)2020; 13: 1284.
16.
HehrANorfolkM. A comprehensive review of ultrasonic additive manufacturing. Rapid Prototyp J2019; 26: 445–458.
17.
ShakilMTariqNHAhmadM, et al.Effect of ultrasonic welding parameters on microstructure and mechanical properties of dissimilar joints. Mater Des2014; 55: 263–273.
18.
MüllerFWChenCYSchiebahnA,et al.Application of electrical power measurements for process monitoring in ultrasonic metal welding. Weld World2023; 67: 395–415.
19.
WangTYasudaKNishikawaH. Study on the SPCC and CFRTP hybrid joint performance produced with additional nylon-6 interlayer by ultrasonic plastic welding. Polymers (Basel)2022; 14: 5235.
20.
TilahunSVijayakumarMDKannanCR, et al.A review on ultrasonic welding of various materials and their mechanical properties. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng2020; 988: 012113.
21.
WagnerGBalleFEiflerD. Ultrasonic welding of hybrid joints. JOM2012; 64: 401–406.
22.
ZhangGQiuJSakaiE,et al.Interface investigation between dissimilar materials by ultrasonic thermal welding by the third phase. Int J Adhes Adhes2021; 104: 102722.
23.
GullinoAMatteisPD’AiutoF. Review of aluminum-to-steel welding technologies for car-body applications. Metals (Basel)2019; 9: 15.
24.
SelvarajSKSrinivasanKChadhaU, et al.Contemporary progresses in ultrasonic welding of aluminum metal matrix composites. Front Mater2021; 8: 647112.
25.
LiJMonaghanTNguyenTT, et al.Multifunctional metal matrix composites with embedded printed electrical materials fabricated by ultrasonic additive manufacturing. Compos B Eng2017; 113: 342–354.
26.
de LeonMShinH-S. Review of the advancements in aluminum and copper ultrasonic welding in electric vehicles and superconductor applications. J Mater Process Technol2022; 307: 117691.
27.
ShakilMTariqNHAhmadM, et al.Effect of ultrasonic welding parameters on microstructure and mechanical properties of dissimilar joints. Mater Des2014; 55: 263–273.
28.
ZhaoDRenDZhaoK, et al.Effect of welding parameters on tensile strength of ultrasonic spot welded joints of aluminum to steel – by experimentation and artificial neural network. J Manuf Process2017; 30: 63–74.
29.
FaesKNunesRMeesterSD, et al.Influence of the process parameters on the properties of Cu–Cu ultrasonic welds. J Manufact Mat Process2023; 7: 19.
30.
TangMZhangPYuZ, et al.Study on ultrasound welding process of aluminum/copper dissimilar metals. Phys Met Metall2020; 121: 1400–1410.
31.
VillegasIF. Ultrasonic welding of thermoplastic composites. Front Mater2019; 6: 291.
32.
ChengXMYangKWangJ, et al.Ultrasonic system and ultrasonic metal welding performance: a status review. J Manuf Process2022; 84: 1196–1216.
33.
NiZLLiuYWangYH,et al.Interfacial bonding mechanism and fracture behavior in ultrasonic spot welding of copper sheets. Mater Sci Eng A2022; 833: 142536.
34.
LiuJYangJCaoB,et al.Relative motion and its relation to microstructure evolution during high-power ultrasonic welding of copper sheets. Hanjie Xuebao/Trans China Weld Inst2018; 39: 41–44.
35.
ChengXMYangKLiuSZ, et al.Effect of ultrasonic welding process parameters on properties of copper conductor joint. Zhongguo Youse Jinshu Xuebao/Chin J Nonferr Met2022; 32: 3341–3351.
36.
MaQCaoYZhangW, et al.Low energy ultrasonic welding for Cu–Cu joining accelerated via Cu nanoparticles. J Mater Process Technol2021; 296: 117210.
37.
NiZLWangXXLiS,et al.Mechanical strength enhancement of ultrasonic metal welded Cu/Cu joint by Cu nanoparticles interlayer. J Manuf Process2019; 38: 88–92.
38.
SuZZhuZZhangY, et al.Recrystallization behavior of a pure cu connection interface with ultrasonic welding. Metals (Basel)2021; 11: 1–17.
39.
XiaoQKZhuZQLiMF. Study on microstructure evolution and recrystallization of purple copper ultrasonic welding. J Mater Introduction2020; 34: 10157–10161.
40.
XiaoQKZhuZQLiMF. Ultrasonic welding process and forming mechanism of purple copper. J Nanchang Univ2019; 41: 281–284.
41.
XiaoQK. Research on ultrasonic welding and recrystallization of Copper. Nanchang University, 2019 (in Chinese).
42.
YangJNiZNazarovAA,et al.Effect of alcohol on the mechanical and electrical properties of ultrasonic spot welded Cu/Cu joints. Metals (Basel)2023; 13: 21.
43.
MaQMaJZhouJ,et al.Abnormal dislocation substructure in the ultrasonically welded joints of Cu single crystals. Sci Technol Weld Joining2022; 27: 606–614.
44.
MaQMaJZhouJ,et al.Intrinsic dependence of welding quality and recrystallization on the surface-contacted micro-asperity scale during ultrasonic welding of Cu–Cu joints. J Mater Res Technol2022; 17: 353–364.
45.
NunesRFaesKMeesterSD, et al.Influence of welding parameters and surface preparation on thin copper–copper sheets welded by ultrasonic welding process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2022; 123: 373–388.
46.
SangaBWattalRNageshDS. Weld joint characterization in ultrasonic welding of phosphor bronze sheets. Eng Sci Technol2022; 30: 101040.
47.
RajNMKumaraswamidhasLAVendanSA. Experimental studies and finite element simulation of ultrasonic welding of Cu alloy. Bull Pol Acad Sci Tech Sci2016; 64: 535–546.
48.
YeFLuHQiH. Joints formation and bonding mechanism of ultrasonic welded multi-strand single core copper cables with copper terminals. Mater Lett2022; 327: 133015.
49.
NiZLYeFX. Weldability and mechanical properties of ultrasonic spot welded Cu/Cu joints. Mater Express2019; 9: 81–84.
50.
LiuJCaoBYangJ. Effects of vibration amplitude on microstructure evolution and mechanical strength of ultrasonic spot welded Cu/Al joints. Metals (Basel)2017; 7: 71.
51.
LiuJCaoBYangJ. Texture and intermetallic compounds of the Cu/Al dissimilar joints by high power ultrasonic welding. J Manuf Process2022; 76: 34–45.
52.
MaQSongCZhouJ, et al.Dynamic weld evolution during ultrasonic welding of Cu–Al joints. Mater Sci Eng A2021; 823: 141724.
53.
NiZLYangJJGaoZT, et al.Joint formation in ultrasonic spot welding of aluminum to copper and the effect of particle interlayer. J Manuf Process2020; 50: 57–67.
54.
NiZZhaoHMiP,et al.Microstructure and mechanical performances of ultrasonic spot welded Al/Cu joints with Al 2219 alloy particle interlayer. Mater Des2016; 92: 779–786.
55.
AoSLiCZhangW, et al.Microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of Al/Cu ultrasonic spot welded joints during thermal processing. J Manuf Process2019; 41: 307–314.
56.
SatpathyMPSahooSK. Microstructural and mechanical performance of ultrasonic spot welded Al–Cu joints for various surface conditions. J Manuf Process2016; 22: 108–114.
57.
LiuJCaoB. Microstructure characteristics and mechanical properties of the Cu/Al dissimilar joints by electric current assisted ultrasonic welding. J Mater Process Technol2021; 297: 117239.
58.
LiHCaoBYangJW,et al.Modeling of resistance heat assisted ultrasonic welding of Cu–Al joint. J Mater Process Technol2018; 256: 121–130.
59.
ChenKKZhangYSWangHZ. Study of plastic deformation and interface friction process for ultrasonic welding. Sci Technol Weld Joining2017; 22: 208–216.
60.
GoBSKimKHRoCS,et al.Influence of process parameters on formation of Al/Cu dissimilar weld using ultrasonic welding. Int J Prec Eng Manuf2022; 23: 1359–1365.
61.
FengMNXieYZhaoCF,et al.Microstructure and mechanical performance of ultrasonic spot welded open-cell Cu foam/Al joint. J Manuf Process2018; 33: 86–95.
62.
YangJWCaoBHeXC,et al.Microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of Cu–Al joints by ultrasonic welding. Sci Technol Weld Joining2014; 19: 500–504.
63.
ZhaoYYLiDZhangYS. Effect of welding energy on interface zone of Al–Cu ultrasonic welded joint. Sci Technol Weld Joining2013; 18: 354–360.
64.
NiZLYeFX. Effect of lap configuration on the microstructure and mechanical properties of dissimilar ultrasonic metal welded copper–aluminum joints. J Mater Process Technol2017; 245: 180–192.
65.
Mohan KumarARajasekarRKarthikV,et al.Optimization of process parameters of ultrasonic welding on dissimilar metal joints. Arch Metall Mater2021; 66: 887–892.
66.
BalasundaramRPatelVKBholeSD,et al.Effect of zinc interlayer on ultrasonic spot welded aluminum-to-copper joints. Mater Sci Eng A2014; 607: 277–286.
67.
DuYWenMJiH, et al.Effects of Pd addition on the interfacial reactions between Cu and Al during ultrasonic welding. J Mater Sci-Mater El2019; 30: 12840–12850.
68.
DasAMastersIWilliamsD. Process robustness and strength analysis of multi-layered dissimilar joints using ultrasonic metal welding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2019; 101: 881–900.
69.
DharaSDasA. Impact of ultrasonic welding on multi-layered Al–Cu joint for electric vehicle battery applications: a layer-wise microstructural analysis; 2020. [Online]. Available: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/138713.
70.
MacwanAChenDL. Microstructure and mechanical properties of ultrasonic spot welded copper-to-magnesium alloy joints. Mater Des2015; 84: 261–269.
71.
PanM. Ultrasonic welding technology of light alloy. Dalian University of Technology, 2017 (in Chinese).
72.
ZhaoDJiangCZhaoK. Ultrasonic welding of AZ31B magnesium alloy and pure copper: microstructure, mechanical properties and finite element analysis. J Mater Res Technol2023; 23: 1273–1284.
73.
MengZY. Study on microstructure, properties and connection mechanism of USW joints of Mg/Ti and Mg/Cu. Jilin University, 2020 (in Chinese).
74.
BakavosDPrangnellPB. Mechanisms of joint and microstructure formation in high power ultrasonic spot welding 6111 aluminium automotive sheet. Mater Sci Eng A2010; 527: 6320–6334.
75.
NiZLLiuYLiH, et al.Characteristics of ultrasonic spot welding of Cu/Ni dissimilar metals. Sci Technol Weld Joining2021; 26: 529–539.
76.
NiZLYangJJWangXX, et al.Formation of refined grain size less than 5 nm and nano-sized undulations in the bonding interface region of an ultrasonic spot welded Cu/Ni joint. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci2020; 51: 5606–5611.
77.
NiZLYangJJYeFX. Microstructure and mechanical properties of copper to nickel ultrasonic spot welds. Mater Sci Eng A2020; 796: 140207.
78.
YeFWangYLuH,et al.Study on the bonding mechanism of multilayer copper with nickel sheet in ultrasonic welding process. Mater Res Express2022; 9: 026527.
79.
GaoW. Research on ultrasonic welding of Cu/SS with Ni Interlayer. Jilin University, 2021 (in Chinese).
80.
SatpathyMPKumarASahooSK. Effect of brass interlayer sheet on microstructure and joint performance of ultrasonic spot-welded copper-steel joints. J Mater Eng Perform2017; 26: 3254–3262.
