Digital societies demand technological competence, including for actors in illegal activity. Inspired by Bourdieu’s theory of cultural capital and related criminological concepts such as street capital, this study analyses digital capital as a wider concept relating to digital drug markets that capture both technological and cultural competences. We pursue this empirically via interview data (N = 107) on social media and darknet drug markets. The overall need for digital competence erodes the earlier divide in drug markets based on either subculture or networks. The need to be familiar with mainstream technological tools and behaviours connects digital drug markets to more general cultural competencies. Consequently, illegal activities become connected with mainstream cultural capital because both fields value the same competencies.
AldridgeJAskewR (2017) Delivery dilemmas: How drug cryptomarket users identify and seek to reduce their risk of detection by law enforcement. International Journal of Drug Policy41: 101–109.
2.
AldridgeJDécary-HétuD (2016) Hidden wholesale: The drug diffusing capacity of online drug cryptomarkets. International Journal of Drug Policy35: 7–15.
3.
AndersonE (1990) Streetwise: Race, Class, and Change in an Urban Community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
AndersonE (1999) Code of the Street: Decency, Violence, and the Moral Life of the Inner City. New York: WW Norton.
5.
BancroftAReidPS (2016) Concepts of illicit drug quality among darknet market users: Purity, embodied experience, craft and chemical knowledge. International Journal of Drug Policy35: 42–49.
6.
BarrattMJAldridgeJ (2016) Everything you always wanted to know about drug cryptomarkets* (*but were afraid to ask). International Journal of Drug Policy35: –6.
7.
BourdieuP (1979) Les trois états du capital culturel. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales30(1): –6.
8.
BourdieuP (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
BourdieuP (1986) The forms of capital. In: RichardsonJ (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 241–258.
10.
BourdieuP (1990) The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
11.
BourdieuP (1993) Sociology in Question. London: Sage.
BourdieuPWacquantLJ (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
14.
BourgoisP (2003) In Search of Respect: Selling Crack in El Barrio (Vol. 10). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
ChildsACoomberRBullM, et al. (2020) Evolving and diversifying selling practices on drug cryptomarkets: An exploration of off-platform ‘direct dealing’. Journal of Drug Issues50(2): 173–190.
16.
CyrD (2013) Website design, trust and culture: An eight-country investigation. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications12(6): 373–385.
17.
DemantJBakkenSA (2019) Technology-facilitated drug dealing via social media in the Nordic countries. Background paper commissioned by The European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). Lisbon: EMCDDA.
18.
DemantJBakkenSAOksanenA, et al. (2019) Drug dealing on Facebook, Snapchat and Instagram: A qualitative analysis of novel drug markets in the nordic countries. Drug and Alcohol Review38(4): 377–385.
19.
FleetwoodJ (2014) Drug Mules: Women in the International Cocaine Trade. London: Springer.
20.
FuchsC (2007) Internet and Society: Social Theory in the Information Age. New York: Routledge.
21.
GarciaACStandleeAIBechkoffJ, et al. (2009) Ethnographic approaches to the internet and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography38(1): 52–84.
22.
GilbertM (2010) Theorizing digital and urban inequalities: Critical geographies of ‘race’, gender and technological capital. Information, Communication & Society13(7): 1000–1018.
23.
GrahamMDuttonWH (2019) Society and the Internet: How Networks of Information and Communication are Changing Our Lives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
GroshkovaTStoianTCunninghamA, et al. (2020) Will the current COVID-19 pandemic impact on long-term cannabis buying practices?Journal of Addiction Medicine14(4): e13–e14.
25.
HallAAntonopoulosGA (2016) Fake Meds Online. The Internet and the Transnational Market in Illicit Pharmaceuticals. London: Palegrave Macmillian.
26.
HardyRANorgaardJR (2016) Reputation in the internet black market: An empirical and theoretical analysis of the deep web. Journal of Institutional Economics12(3): 515–539.
27.
HensonBSwartzKReynsBW (2016) #Respect: Applying Anderson’s code of the street to the online context. Deviant Behavior38(7): 1–13.
28.
HillebrandJOlszewskiDSedefovR (2010) Legal highs on the internet. Substance Use & Misuse45(3): 330–340.
29.
HsiehJP-ARaAKeilM (2011) Addressing digital inequality for the socioeconomically disadvantaged through government initiatives: Forms of capital that affect ICT utilization. Information Systems Research22(2): 233–253.
30.
IgnatowGRobinsonL (2017) Pierre Bourdieu: Theorizing the digital. Information, Communication & Society20(7): 950–966.
31.
IlanJ (2013) Street social capital in the liquid city. ethnography14(1): 3–24.
32.
JacquesSWrightR (2015) Code of the Suburb: Inside the World of Young Middle-Class Drug Dealers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
JulienC (2015) Bourdieu, social capital and online interaction. Sociology49(2): 356–373.
34.
KeipiTKaakinenMOksanenA, et al. (2017) Social tie strength and online victimization: An analysis of young people aged 15–30 years in four nations. Social Media + Society3(1): 2056305117690013. doi: 2056305117690013.
35.
KozinetsRV (2015) Netnography. Wiley Online Library (accessed 15 February 2022).
36.
KvasnyLKeilM (2006) The challenges of redressing the digital divide: A tale of two US cities. Information Systems Journal16(1): 23–53.
37.
LaneJ (2019) Digital Street. New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
MartinJ (2014) Drugs on the Dark Net: How Cryptomarkets are Transforming the Global Trade in Illicit Drugs. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
39.
MillerHThebault-SpiekerJChangS, et al. (2016) ‘Blissfully happy’ or ‘ready to fight’: Varying interpretations of emoji. Paper presented at the Proceedings of ICWSM.
MoyleLChildsACoomberR, et al. (2019) # drugsforsale: An exploration of the use of social media and encrypted messaging apps to supply and access drugs. International Journal of Drug Policy63: 101–110.
42.
MunksgaardR, 2021. Trust and exchange: The production of trust in illicit online drug markets. Doctoral dissertation, School of Criminology, Université de Montréal.
43.
NurmiJKaskelaTPeräläJ, et al. (2017) Seller’s reputation and capacity on the illicit drug markets: 11-month study on the Finnish version of the silk road. Drug and Alcohol Dependence178: 201–207.
44.
OksanenAMillerBLSavolainenI, et al. (2021) Social media and access to drugs online: A nationwide study in the United States and Spain among adolescents and young adults. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context13(1): 29–36.
45.
ParkS (2017) Digital Capital. London: Palgrave Macmillian.
46.
ResnickP (2001) Beyond bowling together: Sociotechnical capital. HCI in the New Millennium77: 247–272.
47.
SandbergS (2008) Street capital: Ethnicity and violence on the streets of Oslo. Theoretical Criminology12(2): 153–171.
48.
SandbergSFleetwoodJ (2017) Street talk and bourdieusian criminology: Bringing narrative to field theory. Criminology & Criminal Justice17(4): 365–381.
49.
SandbergSPedersenW (2011) Street Capital: Black Cannabis Dealers in a White Welfare State. Bristol: Policy Press.
50.
ShammasVLSandbergS (2016) Habitus, capital, and conflict: Bringing bourdieusian field theory to criminology. Criminology & Criminal Justice16(2): 195–213.
51.
SterneJ (2003) Bourdieu, technique and technology. Cultural Studies17(3–4): 367–389.
52.
StrattonGPowellACameronR (2017) Crime and justice in digital society: Towards a ‘digital criminology’?International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy6(2): 17–33.
53.
TzanetakisMKamphausenGWerseB, et al. (2016) The transparency paradox. Building trust, resolving disputes and optimising logistics on conventional and online drugs markets. International Journal of Drug Policy35: 58–68.
54.
Van HoutMCBinghamT (2014) Responsible vendors, intelligent consumers: Silk road, the online revolution in drug trading. International Journal of Drug Policy25: 183–189.
55.
WacquantL (2002) Scrutinizing the street: Poverty, morality, and the pitfalls of urban ethnography. American Journal of Sociology107(6): 1468–1532.
56.
WallD (2007) Cybercrime: The Transformation of Crime in the Information Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
57.
YarMSteinmetzKF (2019) Cybercrime and Society. London: Sage.
