Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Mimi Schippers (2007) theorizes that hegemonic femininity operates in relation to and support of hegemonic masculinity. According to Schippers, hegemonic femininity is maintained by the containment of pariah femininities, gender non-conforming femininities that may contaminate the relationship between hegemonic masculinity and femininity. We extend Schippers’ theory by analyzing the containment practices that are used to manage pariah femininities by examining the containment of lesbians in the sorority life of a liberal arts college in the USA. Using interviews and focus groups with sorority members, we demonstrate the way sorority members engage in subtle containment practices such as silencing to prevent lesbians from joining their sorority.

Keywords

Femininity homophobia lesbian sorority women

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

(2002) Openly gay athletes. Gender & Society 1(6): 860–877.

Anderson

(2005) In the Game: Gay Athletes and the Cult of Masculinity, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Berkowitz

Padavic

(1999) Getting a man or getting ahead. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 27(4): 530–557.

Blinde

Taub

(1992) Women athletes as falsely accused deviants: Managing the lesbian stigma. Sociological Quarterly 33(4): 521–533.

Butler

(1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, New York: Routledge.

Case

Hesp

Eberly

(2005) An exploratory study of the experiences of gay, lesbian and bisexual fraternity and sorority members revisited. Oracle 1(1): 15–31.

Connell

(1995) Masculinities, Berkeley: University of California Press.

Diamond

(2008) Sexual Fluidity:Understanding Women’s Love and Desire, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Festle

(1996) Playing Nice: Politics and Apologies in Women’s Sports, New York: Columbia University Press.

10.

Griffin

(1998) Strong Women, Deep Closets: Lesbians and Homophobia in Sport, Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

11.

Hamilton

(2007) Trading on heterosexuality: College women’s gender strategies and homophobia. Gender & Society 21(2): 145–172.

12.

Handler

(1995) In the fraternal sisterhood. Gender & Society 9(2): 236–255.

13.

Hochschild

(1989) The Second Shift, New York: Viking.

14.

Kimmel

Hearn

Connell

(2005) Handbook of Studies on Men and Masculinities, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

15.

Literte

Hodge

(2012) Sisterhood and sexuality: Attitudes about homosexuality among members of historically black sororities. Journal of African American Studies 16(4): 674–699.

16.

Louderback

Whitley

BE (1997) Perceived erotic value of homosexuality and sex-role attitudes as mediators of sex differences in heterosexual college students’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. The Journal of Sex Research 34(2): 175–182.

17.

Messner

(2002) Taking the Field, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

18.

Pascoe

(2007) Dude You’re a Fag: Masculinity and Sexuality in High School, Berkeley: University of California Press.

19.

Pyke

Johnson

(2003) Asian American women and racialized femininities. Gender & Society 17(1): 33–53.

20.

Rice

Coates

(1995) Gender role attitudes in the southern United States. Gender & Society 9(6): 744–756.

21.

Schilt

Westbrook

(2009) Doing gender, doing heteronormativity. Gender & Society 23(4): 440–464.

22.

Schippers

(2007) Recovering the feminine other: Masculinity, femininity, and gender hegemony. Theory and Society 36(1): 85–102.

23.

Umbach

Kuh

(2006) Student experiences with diversity at liberal arts colleges: Another claim for distinctiveness. The Journal of Higher Education 77(1): 169–192.

24.

Ward

(2008) Respectably Queer: Diversity Culture in LGBT Activist Organizations, Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.