This article is a partial genealogy of the data scientist, meant as a contribution to understanding how both big data and the subject who mines it have come to be. It adds to the growing criticism of data mining by considering how big data might be used to manage the very workers who ostensibly command it. The article traces the concept of ‘sharing’ as it appears in discourses about the knowledge economy, arguing that knowledge sharing produces messy excesses of data. It then traces what is not shared: the knowledge workers capable of mining that data to produce value. It concludes by tracing how the act of sharing knowledge is used to undermine the power of the very subject called forth to command the excesses of sharing. It concludes by describing a reversal: data will become scarce while the ability to mine it ubiquitous and cheap.
AllenM (ed.) (2002) The Corporate University Handbook: Designing, Managing, and Growing a Successful Program. New York: AMACOM.
2.
AmaravadiCSLeeI (2005) The dimensions of process knowledge. Knowledge and Process Management12: 65–76.
3.
AndrejevicM (2013) Infoglut: How Too Much Information Is Changing the Way We Think and Know. New York: Routledge.
4.
BakerS (2008) The Numerati. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
5.
BellDGGiordanoRPutzP (2002) Inter-firm sharing of process knowledge: Exploring knowledge markets. Knowledge and Process Management9: 12–22.
6.
BockGWKimY-G (2002) Breaking the myths of rewards: An exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing. Information Resources Management Journal15: 14–21.
7.
CallonM (1986) Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In: LawJ (ed.) Power, Action, and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?London; Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp.169–233.
8.
ChengC-YOuT-YChenT-L. (2014) Transferring cognitive apprenticeship to manufacturing process knowledge management system. VINE44: 420–444.
9.
ChenHReidESinaiJ. (eds) (2008) Terrorism Informatics: Knowledge Management and Data Mining for Homeland Security. New York: Springer.
10.
CherletJ (2014) Epistemic and technological determinism in development aid. Science Technology Human Values39: 773–794.
11.
ChristakisNAFowlerJH (2009) Connected: The Surprising Power of Our Social Networks and How They Shape Our Lives. New York: Little, Brown and Co.
12.
ClevelandWS (2001) Data science: An action plan for expanding the technical areas of the field of statistics. International Statistical Review69: 21–26.
DalkirK (2011) Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice (2nd edn). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
DavenportTH (2005) Thinking for a Living: How to Get Better Performance and Results from Knowledge Worker. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
16.
DavenportTHHarrisJG (2007) Competing on Analytics: The New Science of Winning. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
17.
DavenportTHPatilDJ (2012) Data scientist. Harvard Business Review90: 70–76.
18.
DavenportTHPrusakL (1998) Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
19.
DenningS (2001) The Springboard: How Storytelling Ignites Action in Knowledge-Era Organizations. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
20.
DruckerPF (1992) The Age of Discontinuity: Guidelines to Our Changing Society. New Brunswick, NJ; London: Transaction Publishers.
21.
FinkCRaffoJMiguelezE (2013) Study on Intellectual Property and Brain Drain – A Mapping Exercise (No. CDIP/12/inf/4). Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization.
22.
FloridaR (2002) The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.
23.
FloridaRL (2005) The Flight of the Creative Class: The New Global Competition for Talent. New York: HarperBusiness.
24.
FolbreN (2012) The political economy of human capital. Review of Radical Political Economics44: 281–292.
25.
FowlerJH (2014, February). Connected: The surprising power of our social networks and how they shape our lives. Presentation, University of Utah, Boston, MA.
GehlRW (2014a) Power from the c-suite: The chief knowledge officer and chief learning officer as agents of noopower. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies11, 175–194.
28.
GehlRW (2014b) Reverse Engineering Social Media: Software, Culture, and Political Economy in New Media Capitalism. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
29.
GodinB (2010) The knowledge economy: Fritz Machlup’s construction of a synthetic concept. In: VialeREtzkowitzH (eds) The Capitalization of Knowledge: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government. Cheltenham; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp.261–290.
30.
HackingI (1990) The Taming of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
HallH (2001) Input-friendliness: Motivating knowledge sharing across intranets. Journal of Information Science27: 139–146.
32.
HammerbacherJ (2009) Information platforms and the rise of the data scientist. In: SegaranTHammerbacherJ (eds) Beautiful Data. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, Inc, pp.73–84.
HoribeF (1999) Managing knowledge workers: New skills and attitudes to unlock the intellectual capital in your organization. Toronto, ON, Canada; New York: John Wiley.
35.
HustedKMichailovaS (2002) Diagnosing and fighting knowledge-sharing hostility. Organizational Dynamics31: 60–73.
36.
JacobsA (2009) The pathologies of big data. Communications of the ACM52: 36–44.
37.
JohnNA (2013) Sharing and Web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword. New Media Society15: 167–182.
38.
KingKMcGrathSA (2004) Knowledge for Development? Comparing British, Japanese, Swedish and World Bank Aid. London: Zed Books; Cape Town, South Africa: HSRC Press.
39.
KoopmanC (2013) Genealogy as Critique: Foucault and the Problems of Modernity. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
40.
LeeJ-N (2001) The impact of knowledge sharing, organizational capability and partnership quality on IS outsourcing success. Information & Management38: 323–335.
41.
LiuN-CLiuM-S (2011) Human resource practices and individual knowledge-sharing behavior – An empirical study for Taiwanese R&D professionals. International Journal of Human Resource Management22: 981–997.
MoscoV (2014) To the Cloud: Big Data in a Turbulent World. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
54.
MoscoVStevensA (2007) Outsourcing knowledge work: Labor responds to the new international division of labor. In: McKercherCMoscoV (eds) Knowledge Workers in the Information Society. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, pp.147–162.
55.
O’DellCSGraysonCJEssaidesN (1998) If Only We Knew What We Know: The Transfer of Internal Knowledge and Best Practice. New York: Free Press.
56.
OffseyS (1997) Knowledge management: Linking people to knowledge for bottom line results. Journal of Knowledge Management1: 113–122.
PatilDJ (2011) Building Data Science Teams. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, Inc.
59.
PinkDH (2001) Free Agent Nation: How America’s New Independent Workers Are Transforming the Way We Live. New York: Warner Books.
60.
ReganPMMonahanT (2013) Beyond counterterrorism: Data sharing, privacy, and organizational histories of DHS fusion centers. International Journal of E-Politics4: 1–14.
61.
RossA (2010) Nice Work If You Can Get It: Life and Labor in Precarious Times. New York: New York University Press.
SantosVRSoaresALCarvalhoJÁ (2012) Knowledge sharing barriers in complex research and development projects: An exploratory study on the perceptions of project managers. Knowledge and Process Management19: 27–38.
64.
StoddartL (2001) Managing intranets to encourage knowledge sharing: Opportunities and constraints. Online Information Review25: 19–29.
65.
TiwanaA (2000) The Knowledge Management Toolkit: Practical Techniques for Building a Knowledge Management System. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall PTR.
