Confronted with the transformative effects of global streaming services, many countries have decided to introduce investment obligations for players such as Netflix and Amazon Prime. In this article, we analyse whether investment obligations for transnational streamers as policy measures yield any significant effects in Croatia and Poland. These are the only two cases in Central and East Europe (CEE) where investment obligations were fully implemented by the end of 2024. Several other CEE countries initiated the policy cycle, but such policies ended up blocked either in the policy-formulation phase or in the policy-implementation phase. Relying on insights from structured industry workshops, interviews and document analysis, our analysis shows that national policy responses to global streamers influence the shift of markets towards or away from being peripheral. The analysis suggests that the European Union’s (EU’s) Audiovisual Media Services Directive (AVMSD) has highlighted imbalances in Europe, where many CEE nations remain confined to peripheral positions.
AguiarLWaldfogelJ (2018) Netflix: Global hegemon or facilitator of frictionless digital trade?Journal of Cultural Economics42: 419–445.
2.
CaldwellJT (2008) Prefiguring DVD bonus tracks: Making-ofs and behind-the-scenes as historic television programming strategies prototypes. In: BennettJBrownT (eds) Film and Television after DVD Routledge. Abingdon: Routledge, pp.159–181.
3.
D’ArmaAGangremiG (2021) (Un)welcome guests: Transnational video-on-demand and the new European works quotas in Italy. Journal of Digital Media & Policy12(3): 451–470.
4.
DomazetovikjNRaatsTDondersK (2024) Global SVoD services in small audio-visual market contexts: Commissioning patterns in Flanders, Ireland and Norway. Journal of Digital Media & Policy, Special Issue: ‘European-based VoDs: Models, Alternatives and Predictions’15(2): 213–235.
5.
European Audiovisual Observatory (2022) Focus 2022–World Film Market Trends. European Audiovisual Observatory. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/focus2022/1680ab25e7
FreedmanD (2006) Dynamics of power in contemporary media policy-making. Media, Culture & Society28(6): 907–923.
12.
GoldsmithBO’ReganT (2008) International film production: Interests and motivations. In: WaskoJEmersonM (eds) Cross-border Cultural Production: Economic Runaway or Globalization?Youngstown, NY: Cambria Press, pp.13–44.
HausnerJ (2010) Culture and transformation. In: PalmerRPurchlaJ (eds) Culture and Development 20 Years after the Fall of Communism in Europe. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
ImreA (2019) Streaming freedom in illiberal Eastern Europe. Critical Studies in Television14(2): 170–186.
22.
IordanovaD (2002) Feature filmmaking within the New Europe: Moving funds and images across the East-West divide. Media, Culture & Society24(4): 515–534.
23.
IordanovaDMartin-JonesDVidalB (2010) Introduction: A peripheral view of world cinemas. In: IordanovaDMartin-JonesDVidalB (eds) Cinema at the Periphery. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press, pp.1–22.
24.
JäckelA (2019) European Film Industries. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
25.
JennerM (2023) Netflix and the Re-invention of Television. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
26.
KangJMLotzAD (2023) Relocating video cultures. International Journal of Cultural Studies27: 3–8.
27.
KatsarovaI (2014) An Overview of Europe’s Film Industry. Belgium: European Parliamentary Research Service.
28.
Kerševan SmokvinaT (2021) ‘Netflix tax’ from the perspective of national and EU audiovisual policies and what it brings to film funding in small states. Journal of Digital Media & Policy12(3): 471–488.
KostovskaI (2025) Corporate ownership in the TV production sector and cultural diversity: Analysis of consolidated companies and indies’ access to TV drama financing. Communication & Society38(1): 574–589.
31.
KostovskaIKomorowskiMRaatsT, et al. (2023) 9 ‘Netflix taxes’ as tools for supporting European audiovisual ecosystems. In: RanaivosonHRaatsTBroughton MicovaS (eds) European Audiovisual Policy in Transition. Abingdon: Routledge, pp.157–177.
32.
KostovskaIRaatsTDondersK (2020) The rise of the ‘Netflix tax’ and what it means for sustaining European audiovisual markets. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research33(4): 423–441.
LobatoRDouglasJScarlataA, et al. (2023) Cultural policy between television and digital platforms: The case of SVOD regulation in Australia. International Journal of Cultural Policy. Epub ahead of print 20 January. DOI: 10.1080/10286632.2022.2160715.
35.
LotzAD (2019) Teasing apart television industry disruption: Consequences of meso-level financing practices before and after the US multiplatform era. Media, Culture & Society41(7): 923–938.
36.
LotzADEklundO (2023) Beyond Netflix: Ownership and content strategies among non-US-based video streaming services. International Journal of Cultural Studies27: 119–140.
37.
LoweGFNissenCS (2011) Small among Giants: Television Broadcasting in Smaller Countries. Gothenburg: Nordicom, University of Gothenburg.
38.
McDonaldPDonoghueCBHavensT, et al. (2021) Digital Media Distribution: Portals, Platforms, Pipelines. New York: NYU Press.
39.
MazierskaE (2007) Polish Postcommunist Cinema: From Pavement Level (Vol. 4): Peter Lang.
40.
MitkusTMaditinosD (2017) Analysis of state aid policy to stimulate innovation and internationalization in Lithuanian animation industry. Oeconomia Copernicana8: 433–446.
41.
MitkusTNedzinskaitė-MitkėV (2016) The impact of globalization to creative industries: The analysis of film industries of Central and Eastern Europe. Creativity Studies9(1): 64–74.
42.
MitricP (2017) Between YU and EU: Europeanisation of Serbian film policy. In: MingantNTirtaineC (eds) Reconceptualising Film Policies. London: Routledge, pp.183–197.
43.
MitricP (2020) The policy of internationalisation of East European film industries: East-West co-productions 2009–2019. Studies in Eastern European Cinema12(1): 64–82.
44.
MitricPKolaricT (2021) A popular post-Yugoslav cinema: Does it exist and why (not)?Iluminace33(1): 35–62.
OrankiewiczAMajerA (2018) Trends in film industry development in Poland. Humanities and Social Sciences25(4): 265–276.
49.
ParkJHKimKALeeY (2022) Theorizing the Korean wave| Netflix and platform imperialism: How Netflix alters the ecology of the Korean TV drama industry. International Journal of Communication 17.
50.
ParvulescuCHanzlíkJ (2021) The peripheralization of east-central European film cultures on VOD platforms. Iluminace33(2): 5–25.
51.
ParvulescuCHanzlíkJ (2022) Beyond postsocialist and small: Recent film production practices and state support for cinema in Czechia and Romania. Studies in European Cinema19(2): 129–146.
52.
PrimoracJ (2020) Film globally, work locally: Factors influencing the effectiveness of the production incentive programme in the Croatian audio-visual industry. Cultural Trends29(4): 287–301.
53.
RedvallENSørensenIE (2021) Structured industry workshops as methodology: Researching national screen agencies and policies. Media Industries8(1): 47–66.
SzczepanikP (2020) 16 HBO Europe’s original programming in the era of streaming wars. In: BarraLScaglioniM (eds) A European Television Fiction Renaissance: Premium Production Models and Transnational Circulation. Abingdon: Routledge, pp.233–260.
58.
SzczepanikP (2021) Screen Industries in East-Central Europe. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
59.
SzczepanikPZahrádkaPMacekJ, et al. (2020) Digital Peripheries: The Online Circulation of Audiovisual Content from the Small Market Perspective. Berlin: Springer Nature, p.302.
60.
SzostakS (2014) The Polish TV fictionscape: From programme importation to domestic revival. In: MeeLWalkerJ (eds) Cinema, Television and History: New Approaches. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp.67–84.
61.
VlassisA (2023) Why to regulate Netflix: The cross-national politics of the audiovisual media governance in the light of streaming platforms. Media, Culture & Society45(7): 1511–1521.
