Previous research has found that people who are ambivalent toward a group process new information about the group more carefully than people who are nonambivalent toward the group. It has been suggested that this effect occurs because people who are ambivalent toward a group (a) experience a high level of physiological arousal when they think about the group and (b) seek to reduce this arousal by carefully processing new information about the group. To test these hypotheses, we conducted a correlational study (Study 1) and an experimental study (Study 2). Unexpectedly, Study 1 found that intergroup ambivalence is negatively correlated with the physiological arousal that is experienced when target outgroups are salient. Study 2 replicated this pattern and demonstrated an effect of intergroup ambivalence on information processing, while also discovering that the effects of ambivalence on arousal and on information processing were independent. Overall, these results indicate that arousal is not a necessary mediator of the relation between intergroup ambivalence and information processing.
Bargh, J. A. , Chaiken, S., Govender, R., & Pratto, F. (1992). The generality of the automatic activation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 893-912.
2.
Baron, R. S. , Inman, M. L., Kao, C. F., & Logan, H. (1992). Negative emotion and superficial social processing. Motivation and Emotion, 16, 323-346.
3.
Bassili, J. (1996). Meta-judgmental versus operative indices of psychological attributes: The case of measures of attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 637-653.
4.
Bell, D. W. , & Esses, V. M. (1996). Ambivalence and response amplification toward Native peoples. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1063-1084.
5.
Bell, D. W. , Esses, V. M., & Maio, G. R. (1996). The utility of open-ended measures to assess intergroup ambivalence. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 28, 12-18.
6.
Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 1-62). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
7.
Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill.
8.
Blascovich, J. , & Kelsey, R. M. (1990). Using electrodermal and cardiovascular measures of arousal in social psychological research. In C. Hendrick & M. S. Clark (Eds.), Review of personality and social psychology: Vol 11. Research methods in personality and social psychology (pp. 45-73). London: Sage.
9.
Bodenhausen, G. V. (1993). Emotions, arousal, and stereotypic judgments: A heuristic model of affect and stereotyping. In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.). Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 13-37). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
10.
Boon, S. D. , & Sulsky, L. M. (1997). Attributions of blame and forgiveness in romantic relationships: A policy-capturing study. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 19-44.
11.
Breckler, S. J. (1994). A comparison of numerical indexes for measuring attitude ambivalence. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 350-365.
12.
Britt, T. W. , Boniecki, K. A., Vescio, T. K., Biernat, M., & Brown, L. M. (1996). Intergroup anxiety: A person situation approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1177-1188.
13.
Brömer, P. (1998). Ambivalent attitudes and information processing. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 57, 225-234.
14.
Cacioppo, J. T. , & Sandman, C. A. (1981). Psychophysiological functioning, cognitive responding, and attitudes. In R. E. Petty, T. M. Ostrom, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Cognitive responses in persuasion. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15.
Chaiken, S. , Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212-252). New York: Guilford.
16.
Crowne, D. P. , & Marlowe, D. (1964). The approval motive: Studies in evaluative dependence. New York: Wiley.
17.
Easterbrook, J. A. (1959). The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychological Review, 66, 183-201.
18.
Elliot, A. J. , & Devine, P. G. (1994). On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance: Dissonance as psychological discomfort. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 382-394.
19.
Esses, V. M. , Haddock, G., & Zanna, M. P. (1993). Values, stereotypes, and emotions as determinants of intergroup attitudes. In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 137-166). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
20.
Esses, V. M. , & Maio, G. R. (in press). Expanding the assessment of attitude components: The benefits of open-ended measures. European Review of Social Psychology.
21.
Fazio, R. H. (1990a). A practical guide to the use of response latency in social psychological research. In C. Hendrick & M. S. Clark (Eds.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 74-97). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22.
Fazio, R. H. (1990b). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE Model as an integrative framework. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 75-109). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23.
Festinger, L. (1964). Conflict, decision, and dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
24.
Frey, D. (1986). Recent research on selective exposure to information. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 41-80). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
25.
Gaertner, S. L. , & Dovidio, J. F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 61-89). New York: Academic Press.
26.
Glick, P. , Diebold, J., Bailey-Werner, B., & Zhu, L. (1997). The two faces of Adam: Ambivalent sexism and polarized attitudes toward women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1323-1334.
27.
Greenland, K. , & Brown, R. (2000). Categorization and intergroup anxiety in intergroup contact. In D. Capozza & R. Brown (Eds.), Social identity processes: Trends in theory and research (pp. 167-183). London: Sage.
28.
Guglielmi, R. S. (1999). Psychophysiological assessment of prejudice: Past research, current status, and future directions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 123-157.
29.
Haddock, G. , Rothman, A. J., Reber, R., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Forming judgments of attitude certainty, intensity, and importance: The role of subjective experiences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 771-782.
30.
Haddock, G. , Zanna, M. P., & Esses, V. M. (1993). Assessing the structure of prejudicial attitudes: The case of attitudes toward homosexuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1105-1118.
31.
Hass, R. G. , Katz, I., Rizzo, N., Bailey, J., & Moore, L. (1992). When racial ambivalence evokes negative affect, using a disguised measure of mood. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 786-797.
32.
Hodson, G. , Esses, V. M., & Maio, G. R. (in press). The role of attitudinal ambivalence in susceptibility to consensus information. Basic and Applied Social Psychology.
33.
Hughes, C. F. , Uhlmann, C., & Pennebaker, J. W. (1994). The body’s response to processing emotional trauma: Linking verbal text with autonomic activity. Journal of Personality, 62, 565-585.
34.
Islam, M. R. , & Hewstone, M. (1993). Dimensions of contact as predictors of intergroup anxiety, perceived outgroup variability and outgroup attitude: An integrative account. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 700-710.
35.
Ito, T. A. , Cacioppo, J. T., & Lang, P. J. (1998). Eliciting affect using the international affective picture system: Trajectories through evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 855-879.
36.
Jonas, K. , Broemer, P., & Diehl, M. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 35-74).
37.
Jonas, K. , Diehl, M., & Brömer, P. (1997). Effects of attitudinal ambivalence on information processing and attitude-intention consistency. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 190-210.
38.
Kaplan, K. J. (1972). On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: A suggested modification of the semantic differential technique. Psychological Bulletin, 77, 361-372.
39.
Katkin, E. S. (1975). Electrodermal liability: A psychophysiological analysis of individual differences in response to stress. In I. G. Sarason & C. D. Speilberger (Eds.), Stress and anxiety (pp. 141-176). Washington, DC: Wiley.
40.
Katz, I. , & Hass, R. G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 893-905.
41.
Lacey, J. L. , & Lacey, B. C. (1958). The relationship of resting autonomic activity to motor impulsivity. Research Publications of the Association for Nervous and Mental Diseases, 36, 144-209.
42.
Lang, P. J. (1995). The emotion probe: Studies of motivation and attention. American Psychologist, 50, 372-385.
43.
Lang, P. J. , Greenwald, M. K., Bradley, M. M., & Hamm, A. O. (1993). Looking at pictures: Affective, facial, visceral, and behavioral reactions. Psychophysiology, 30, 261-273.
44.
Maio, G. R. , Bell, D. W., & Esses, V. M. (1996). Ambivalence and persuasion: The processing of messages about immigrant groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 513-536.
45.
Maio, G. R. , Esses, V. M., & Bell, D. W. (1994). The formation of attitudes toward new immigrant groups. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1762-1776.
46.
Maio, G. R. , Esses, V. M., & Bell, D. W. (2000a). Examining conflict between components of attitudes: Ambivalence and inconsistency are distinct constructs. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 32, 71-83.
47.
Maio, G. R. , Fincham, F. D., & Lycett, E. J. (2000b). Attitudinal ambivalence toward parents and attachment styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1451-1464.
48.
Martin, L. L. , & Whitaker, D. (2000). Availability as input: The experience of cognitive effort can either strengthen or weaken evaluations. In H. Bless & J. Forgas (Eds.), The message within: The role of subjective experience in social cognition and behavior (pp. 88-109). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
49.
McGregor, I. , Newby-Clark, I. R., & Zanna, M. P. (1999). ‘Remembering’ dissonance: Simultaneous accessibility of inconsistent cognitive elements moderates epistemic discomfort. In E. Harmon-Jones & J. Mills (Eds.), Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology (pp. 325-353). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
50.
Michela, J. L. (1990). Within-person correlational design and analysis. In C. Hendrick & M. S. Clark (Eds.), Review of personality and social psychology: Vol 11. Research methods in personality and social psychology (pp. 279-311). London: Sage.
51.
Monteith, M. J. (1996). Contemporary forms of prejudice-related conflict: In search of a nutshell. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 461-473.
52.
Nisbett, R. E. , & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.
53.
Olson, J. M. , & Zanna, M. P. (1993). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 117-154.
54.
Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598-609.
55.
Pennebaker, J. W. (1989). Confession, inhibition, and disease. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 211-244). New York: Academic Press.
56.
Petty, R. E. , & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
57.
Pomerantz, E. M. , Chaiken, S., & Tordesillas, R. S. (1995). Attitude strength and resistance processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 408-419.
58.
Porier, G. W. , & Lott, A. J. (1967). Galvanic skin responses and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 253-259.
59.
Rankin, R. E. , & Campbell, D. T. (1955). Galvanic skin response to Negro and White experimenters. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 30-33.
60.
Richards, J. M. , & Gross, J. J. (1999). Composure at any cost? The cognitive consequences of emotion suppression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1033-1044.
61.
Smith, E. R. , & Miller, F. D. (1978). Limits on perception of cognitive processes: A reply to Nisbett and Wilson. Psychological Review, 85, 355-362.
62.
Spielberger, C. D. , Gorsuch, R. L., & Luscene, R. E. (1970). State-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
63.
Stangor, C. , Sullivan, L. A., & Ford, T. E. (1991). Affective and cognitive determinants of prejudice. Social Cognition, 9, 359-380.
64.
Stephan, W. G. , & Stephan, C. W. (1985). Intergroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 157-177.
65.
Thayer, R. E. (1996). The origin of everyday moods: Managing energy, tension, and stress. New York: Oxford University Press.
66.
Thompson, E. P. , Kruglanski, A. W., & Spiegel, S. (2000). Attitudes as knowledge structures and persuasion as a specific case of subjective knowledge acquisition. In G. R. Maio & J. M. Olson (Eds.), Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes (pp. 59-96). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
67.
Thompson, M. M. , & Zanna, M. P. (1995). The conflicted individual: Personality-based and domain-specific antecedents of ambivalent social attitudes. Journal of Personality, 63, 259-288.
68.
Thompson, M. M. , Zanna, M. P., & Griffin, D. W. (1995). Let’s not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 361-386). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
69.
Vanman, E. J. , Dawson, M. E., & Brennan, P. A. (1998). Affective reactions in the blink of an eye: Individual differences in subjective experience and physiological responses to emotional stimuli. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 994-1005.
70.
Westie, F. R. , & De Fleur, M. L. (1959). Autonomic responses and their relationship to race attitudes. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 340-347.
71.
Wilder, D. A. (1993). The role of anxiety in facilitating stereotypic judgments of outgroup behaviour. In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 87-109). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
