We examined how the perception that separatist groups threaten the majority’s moral identity impacts the latter group’s support for reconciliation in separatist conflict. Two studies were conducted in Indonesia, where separatist conflict is rife. Javanese students (representing the nonseparatist majority) responded surveys regarding separatist conflicts in Aceh (Study 1, N = 679) or West Papua (Study 2, N = 500). As expected, perceived threat to the majority’s moral identity increased this particular group’s reconciliatory attitudes (Study 1), emotions, and behaviours (Study 2), through increased compensatory needs for social acceptance and restoration of moral image. These findings underline the importance of moral identity dynamics in separatist conflict. Moreover, they reveal that the majority, despite its dominant position, can experience morality threat from separatist groups which can foster positive attitudes towards the reconciliation process.
AllpressJ. A.BarlowF. K.BrownR.LouisW. R. (2010). Atoning for colonial injustices: Group-based shame and guilt motivate support for reparation. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 4, 75–88. Retrieved from http://www.ijcv.org/index.php/ijcv/article/view/59
2.
AndrighettoL.MariS.VolpatoC.BehluliB. (2012). Reducing competitive victimhood in Kosovo: The role of extended contact and common ingroup identity. Political Psychology, 33, 513–529. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9221.2012.00887.x
3.
Bar-TalD. (2000). From intractable conflict through conflict resolution to reconciliation: Psychological analysis. Political Psychology, 21, 351–365. doi:10.1111/0162–895X.00192
4.
Bar-TalD.BenninkG. (2004). Nature of reconciliation as an outcome and as a process. In Bar Siman-TovY. (Ed.), From conflict resolution to reconciliation (pp. 11–38). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
5.
BergsiekerH. B.SheltonJ. N.RichesonJ. A. (2010). To be liked versus respected: Divergent goals in interracial interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 248−264. doi:10.1037/a0018474
6.
BrambillaM.SacchiS.PagliaroS.EllemersN. (2013). Morality and intergroup relations: Threats to safety and group image predict the desire to interact with outgroup and ingroup members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 811–821. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.04.005
7.
BranscombeN. R.EllemersN.SpearsR.DoosjeB. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In EllemersN.SpearsR.DoosjeB. (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 35–58). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
8.
BrownR.CehajicS. (2008). Dealing with the past and facing the future: Mediators of the effects of collective guilt and shame in Bosnia and Herzegovina. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 669–684. doi:10.1002/ejsp.466
9.
BurnhamK. P.AndersonD. R. (2004). Multimodel inference understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods & Research, 33, 261–304. doi:10.1177/0049124104268644
10.
CastanoE.Giner-SorollaR. (2006). Not quite human: Infrahumanization in response to collective responsibility for intergroup killing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 804–814. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.90.5.804
11.
ClarkeM. (2007). China’s internal security dilemma and the great western development: The dynamics of integration, ethnic nationalism and terrorism in Xinjiang. Asian Studies Review, 31, 323–342. doi:10.1080/10357820701621350
12.
CollierP.HoefflerA. (2004). Greed and grievance in civil war. Oxford Economic Papers, 56, 563–595. doi:10.1093/oep/gpf064
13.
CottrellC. A.NeubergS. L. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 770–789. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.88.5.770
14.
DoesS.DerksB.EllemersN.ScheepersD. (2012). At the heart of egalitarianism: How morality framing shapes cardiovascular challenge versus threat in Whites. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 747–753. doi:10.1177/1948550612438924
15.
DoosjeB.BranscombeN. R.SpearsR.MansteadA. S. (1998). Guilty by association: When one’s group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 872–886. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.75.4.872
16.
DoosjeB. E.BranscombeN. R.SpearsR.MansteadA. S. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of group-based guilt: The effects of ingroup identification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9, 325–338. doi:10.1177/1368430206064637
17.
DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L.SaguyT. (2009). Commonality and the complexity of we: Social attitudes and social change. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 3–20. doi:10.1177/1088868308326751
18.
EllemersN.PagliaroS.BarretoM. (2013). Morality and behavioural regulation in groups: A social identity approach. European Review of Social Psychology, 24, 160–193. doi:10.1080/10463283.2013.841490
19.
EllemersN.SpearsR.DoosjeB. (2002). Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 161–186. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135228.
20.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.82.6.878
HarthN. S.KesslerT.LeachC. W. (2008). Advantaged group’s emotional reactions to intergroup inequality: The dynamics of pride, guilt, and sympathy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 115–129. doi:10.1177/0146167207309193
23.
HarthN. S.ShnabelN. (2015). Third-party intervention in intergroup reconciliation: The role of neutrality and common identity with the other conflict party. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18, 676–695. doi:10.1177/1368430215583151
24.
HjermM.SchnabelA. (2010). Mobilizing nationalist sentiments: Which factors affect nationalist sentiments in Europe?Social Science Research, 39, 527–539. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.03.006
25.
HopkinsN.ReicherS.HarrisonK.CassidyC.BullR.LevineM. (2007). Helping to improve the group stereotype: On the strategic dimension of prosocial behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 776–788. doi:10.1177/0146167207301023
26.
HorowitzD. L. (1981). Patterns of ethnic separatism. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 23, 165–195. doi:10.1017/S0010417500013268
27.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
28.
IyerA.LeachC. W. (2010). Helping disadvantaged groups challenge unjust inequality: The role of group-based emotions. In StürmerS.SnyderM. (Eds.), The psychology of prosocial behavior: Group processes, intergroup relations, and helping (pp. 337–353). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
29.
JohnsM.SchmaderT.LickelB. (2005). Ashamed to be an American? The role of identification in predicting vicarious shame for anti-Arab prejudice after 9–11. Self and Identity, 4, 331–348. doi:10.1080/15298860500145822
30.
KesslerT.MummendeyA.FunkeF.BrownR.BinderJ.ZagefkaH.. . .MaquilA. (2010). We all live in Germany but. . . Ingroup projection, group-based emotions and prejudice against immigrants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 985–997. doi:10.1002/ejsp.673
31.
KingsburyD.AvelingH. (Eds.). (2003). Autonomy and disintegration in Indonesia. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
32.
KingsburyD.LaoutidesC. (2015). Territorial separatism in global politics: Causes, outcomes and resolution. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
KishtonJ. M.WidamanK. F. (1994). Unidimensional versus domain representative parceling of questionnaire items: An empirical example. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 757–765. doi:10.1177/0013164494054003022
35.
KuzioT. (2015). Competing nationalisms, Euromaidan, and the Russian–Ukrainian conflict. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism, 15, 157–169. doi:10.1111/sena.12137
36.
LeachC. W.BilaliR.PagliaroS. (2015). Groups and morality. In SimpsonJ.DovidioJ. F. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Interpersonal relationships and group processes (pp. 123–149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
37.
LeachC. W.EllemersN.BarretoM. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234–249. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.93.2.234
38.
LeidnerB.CastanoE.ZaiserE.Giner-SorollaR. (2010). Ingroup glorification, moral disengagement, and justice in the context of collective violence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1115–1129. doi:10.1177/0146167210376391
39.
LittleT. D.CunninghamW. A.ShaharG.WidamanK. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1
40.
MalloyT. E. (2008). Intergroup relations and reconciliation: Theoretical analysis and methodological implications. In NadlerA.MalloyT. E.FisherJ. D. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 345–365). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
41.
McGartyC.PedersenA.Wayne LeachC.MansellT.WallerJ.BliucA. M. (2005). Group-based guilt as a predictor of commitment to apology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 659–680. doi:10.1348/014466604X18974
42.
MoninB.JordanA. H. (2009). The dynamic moral self: A social psychological perspective. In NarvaezD.LapsleyD. K. (Eds.), Personality, identity, and character: Explorations in moral psychology (pp. 341–354). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
43.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
44.
NadlerA.ShnabelN. (2008). Instrumental and socioemotional paths to intergroup reconciliation and the needs-based model of socioemotional reconciliation. In NadlerA.MalloyT.FisherJ. D. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 37–57). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
45.
PrattoF.GlasfordD. (2008). How needs can motivate intergroup reconciliation in the face of intergroup conflict. In NadlerA.MalloyT. E.FisherJ. D. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 117–144). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
46.
RoccasS.KlarY.LiviatanI. (2006). The paradox of group-based guilt: Modes of national identification, conflict vehemence, and reactions to the in-group’s moral violations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 698–711. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.91.4.698
47.
RouhanaN. N. (2004). Group identity and power asymmetry in reconciliation processes: The Israeli–Palestinian case. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 10, 33–52. doi:10.1207/s15327949pac1001_3
48.
SaguyT.Chernyak-HaiL.AndrighettoL.BrysonJ. (2013). When the powerful feels wronged: The legitimization effects of advantaged group members’ sense of being accused for harboring racial or ethnic biases. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 292–298. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1948
49.
SaniF. (2005). When subgroups secede: Extending and refining the social psychological model of schism in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1074–1086. doi:10.1177/0146167204274092
50.
SaniF.PuglieseA. C. (2008). In the name of Mussolini: Explaining the schism in an Italian right-wing political party. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 12, 242–253. doi:10.1080/15534510.2013.842495
51.
SatorraA.BentlerP. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507–514. doi:10.1007/BF02296192
52.
ScottD.BishopJ. W.ChenX. (2003). An examination of the relationship of employee involvement with job satisfaction, employee cooperation, and intention to quit in US invested enterprise in China. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 11, 3–19. doi:10.1108/eb028960
53.
ShnabelN.NadlerA. (2008). A needs-based model of reconciliation: Satisfying the differential emotional needs of victim and perpetrator as a key to promoting reconciliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 116–132. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.94.1.116
54.
ShnabelN.NadlerA.UllrichJ.DovidioJ. F.CarmiD. (2009). Promoting reconciliation through the satisfaction of the emotional needs of victimized and perpetrating group members: The needs-based model of reconciliation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1021–1030. doi:10.1177/0146167209336610
55.
ShnabelN.UllrichJ. (2013). Increasing intergroup cooperation toward social change by restoring advantaged and disadvantaged groups’ positive identities. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 1, 216–238. doi:10.5964/jspp.v1i1.187
56.
SindicD.ReicherS. D. (2009). Our way of life is worth defending: Testing a model of attitudes towards superordinate group membership through a study of Scots’ attitudes towards Britain. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 114–129. doi:10.1002/ejsp.503
57.
StephanW. G. (2008). The road to reconciliation. In NadlerA.MalloyT. E.FisherJ. D. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 369–394). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
58.
StephanW. G.StephanC. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In OskampS. (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23–46). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
59.
StephanW. G.YbarraO.RiosK. (2016). Intergroup threat theory. In NelsonT. D. (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (2nd ed., pp. 255–278). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
60.
StewartA. L.PrattoF.ZeineddineF. B.SweetmanJ.EicherV.LicataL.. . .CichockaA. (2016). International support for the Arab uprisings: Understanding sympathetic collective action using theories of social dominance and social identity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19, 6–26. doi:10.1177/1368430214558310
61.
SubašićE.SchmittM. T.ReynoldsK. J. (2011). Are we all in this together? Co-victimization, inclusive social identity and collective action in solidarity with the disadvantaged. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 707–725. doi:10.1111/j.2044–8309.2011.02073.x
62.
SullivanD.LandauM. J.BranscombeN. R.RothschildZ. K. (2012). Competitive victimhood as a response to accusations of ingroup harm doing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 778–795. doi:10.1037/a0026573
63.
SuryadinataL.ArifinE. N.AnantaA. (2003). Indonesia’s population: Ethnicity and religion in a changing political landscape. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
64.
SwimJ. K.MillerD. L. (1999). White guilt: Its antecedents and consequences for attitudes toward affirmative action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 500–514. doi:10.1177/0146167299025004008
65.
TamT.HewstoneM.KenworthyJ.CairnsE. (2009). Intergroup trust in Northern Ireland. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 45–59. doi:10.1177/0146167208325004
66.
TanA. (2000). Armed Muslim separatist rebellion in Southeast Asia: Persistence, prospects, and implications. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 23, 267–288. doi:10.1080/10576100050174986
67.
Van LeeuwenE.MashuriA. (2013). Intergroup helping in response to separatism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 1647–1655. doi:10.1177/0146167213499613
68.
Van LeeuwenE.TäuberS. (2012). Outgroup helping as a tool to communicate ingroup warmth. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 772–783. doi:10.1177/0146167211436253
69.
Van LeeuwenE.van DijkW.KaynakÜ. (2013). Of saints and sinners: How appeals to collective pride and guilt affect outgroup helping. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16, 781–76. doi:10.1177/1368430213485995
70.
VerkuytenM. (2009). Support for multiculturalism and minority rights: The role of national identification and out-group threat. Social Justice Research, 22, 31–52. doi:10.1007/s11211–008–0087–7
71.
VorauerJ. D. (2006). An information search model of evaluative concerns in intergroup interaction. Psychological Review, 113, 862–886. doi:10.1037/0033–295x.113.4.862
72.
VorauerJ. D.MainK. J.O’ConnellG. B. (1998). How do individuals expect to be viewed by members of lower status groups? Content and implications of meta-stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 917–937. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.75.4.917
73.
WenzelM.MummendeyA.WaldzusS. (2007). Superordinate identities and intergroup conflict: The ingroup projection model. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 331–372. doi:10.1080/10463280701728302
74.
WohlM. J.BranscombeN. R. (2005). Forgiveness and collective guilt assignment to historical perpetrator groups depend on level of social category inclusiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 288–303. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.88.2.288
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
