Public reactions to protests are often divided, with some viewing the protest as a legitimate response to injustice and others perceiving the protest as illegitimate. We examine how online news sources oriented to different audiences frame protest, potentially encouraging these divergent reactions. We focus on online news coverage following the 2014 police shooting of a Black teenager, Michael Brown. Preregistered analyses of headlines and images and their captions showed that sources oriented toward African Americans were more likely to include content conveying racial injustice and legitimacy of the subsequent protests than sources oriented toward a general audience. In contrast, general audience sources emphasized conflict between protesters and police, making fewer references to the protesters’ cause. Whereas much work on media segregation addresses the propensity of audiences to consume different sources, our work suggests that news sources may also contribute to information fragmentation by differentially framing the same events.
African American Policy Forum. (2015). #SayHerName: Resisting police brutality against Black women. http://aapf.org/sayhernamereport
2.
ArpanL. M.BakerK.LeeY.JungT.LorussoL.SmithJ. (2006). News coverage of social protests and the effects of photographs and prior attitudes. Mass Communication and Society, 9(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327825mcs0901_1
3.
BalcetisE.LassiterG. D. (Eds.). (2010). The social psychology of visual perception. Psychology Press.
4.
BigmanC. A.CappellaJ. N.HornikR. C. (2010). Effective or ineffective: Attribute framing and the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. Patient Education and Counseling, 81, S70–S76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2010.08.014
5.
BoyleM. P.McCluskeyM. R.McLeodD. M.SteinS. E. (2005). Newspapers and protest: An examination of protest coverage from 1960 to 1999. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 82(3), 638–653. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900508200310
6.
BradyW. J.GantmanA. P.Van BavelJ. J. (2019). Attentional capture helps explain why moral and emotional content go viral. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(4), 746–756. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000673
7.
CappellaJ. N.JamiesonK. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. Oxford University Press.
8.
ChanJ. M.LeeC. C. (1984). The journalistic paradigm on civil protests: A case study of Hong Kong. In ArnoA.DissanayakeW. (Eds.), The news media in national and international conflict (pp. 183–202). Westview.
9.
CrenshawE. (2014). American and foreign terrorists: An analysis of divergent portrayals in US newspaper coverage. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 7(3), 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2014.953306
10.
CyrD.HeadM.LimE.StibeA. (2018). Using the elaboration likelihood model to examine online persuasion through website design. Information & Management, 55(7), 807–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.03.009
11.
DavenportC.SouleS. A.ArmstrongD. A.III (2011). Protesting while Black? The differential policing of American activism, 1960 to 1990. American Sociological Review, 76(1), 152–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122410395370
12.
DiFonzoN.BourgeoisM. J.SulsJ.HomanC.StupakN.BrooksB. P.RossD. S.BordiaP. (2013). Rumor clustering, consensus, and polarization: Dynamic social impact and self-organization of hearsay. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 378–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.12.010
13.
DruryJ.ReicherS. (2000). Collective action and psychological change: The emergence of new social identities. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(4), 579–604. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466600164642
14.
DukesK. N.GaitherS. E. (2017). Black racial stereotypes and victim blaming: Implications for media coverage and criminal proceedings in cases of police violence against racial and ethnic minorities. Journal of Social Issues, 73(4), 789–807. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12248
15.
DukesK. N.KahnK.B. (2017). What social science research says about police violence against racial and ethnic minorities: Understanding the antecedents and consequences. Journal of Social Issues, 73(4), 690–700. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12242
16.
EarlJ.GarrettR. K. (2017). The new information frontier: Toward a more nuanced view of social movement communication. Social Movement Studies, 16(4), 479–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2016.1192028
17.
EberhardtJ. L.GoffP. A. (2004). Seeing race. In CrandellC. S.SchallerM. (Eds.), Social psychology of prejudice: Historical and contemporary issues (pp. 215–232). Lewinian Press.
EvansG.NeedA. (2002). Explaining ethnic polarization over attitudes towards minority rights in Eastern Europe: A multilevel analysis. Social Science Research, 31(4), 653–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0049-089X(02)00018-2
20.
FeinbergM.WillerR.KovacheffC. (2020). The activist’s dilemma: Extreme protest actions reduce popular support for social movements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000230
21.
FeldmanL.MaibachE. W.Roser-RenoufC.LeiserowitzA. (2012). Climate on cable: The nature and impact of global warming coverage on Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 17(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161211425410
22.
FletcherR.NielsenR. K. (2017). Are news audiences increasingly fragmented? A cross-national comparative analysis of cross-platform news audience fragmentation and duplication. Journal of Communication, 67(4), 476–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12315
23.
FrederickD. A.TomiyamaA. J.BoldJ. G.SaguyA. C. (2019). Can she be healthy at her weight? Effects of news media frames on antifat attitudes, dieting intentions, and perceived health risks of obesity. Stigma and Health, 5(3), 247–257.
24.
FreelonD.McIlwainC. D.ClarkM. D. (2016). Beyond the hashtags: #Ferguson, #Blacklivesmatter, and the online struggle for offline justice. Center for Media & Social Impact, School of Communication, American University. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2747066
GayeM. (1971). What’s going on [Song]. On What’s going on. Tamla Motown.
27.
GoldbergD. T. (2002). The racial state. Blackwell.
28.
GollustS. E.DempseyA. F.LantzP. M.UbelP. A.FowlerE. F. (2010). Controversy undermines support for state mandates on the human papillomavirus vaccine. Health Affairs, 29(11), 2041–2046. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0174
29.
GoffP. A.JacksonM. C.Di LeoneB. A. L.CulottaC. M.DiTomassoN. A. (2014). The essence of innocence: Consequences of dehumanizing Black children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(4), 526–545. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035663
HanJ.YzerM. (2019). Media-induced misperception further divides public opinion: A test of self-categorization theory of attitude polarization. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 32(2), 70–81.
32.
HmielowskiJ. D.FeldmanL.MyersT. A.LeiserowitzA.MaibachE. (2014). An attack on science? Media use, trust in scientists, and perceptions of global warming. Public Understanding of Science, 23(7), 866–883. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513480091
IyerA.OldmeadowJ. (2006). Picture this: Emotional and political responses to photographs of the Kenneth Bigley kidnapping. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 635–647. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.316
38.
JostJ. T.BarberáP.BonneauR.LangerM.MetzgerM.NaglerJ.SterlingJ.TuckerJ. A. (2018). How social media facilitates political protest: Information, motivation, and social networks. Political Psychology, 39, 85–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12478
39.
KendeA.UjhelyiA.JoinsonA.GreitemeyerT. (2015). Putting the social (psychology) into social media. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(3), 277–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2097
McLeodD. M.HertogJ. K. (1992). The manufacture of “public opinion” by reporters: Informal cues for public perceptions of protest groups. Discourse & Society, 3(3), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003003001
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123–205). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2
R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
ReinkaM. A.LeachC. W. (2017). Race and reaction: Divergent views of police violence and protest against. Journal of Social Issues, 73(4), 768–788. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12247
57.
ReinkaM. A.LeachC. W. (2018). Racialized images: Tracing appraisals of police force and protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115, 763–787. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000131
58.
RichesonJ. A.SommersS. R. (2016). Toward a social psychology of race and race relations for the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 439–463. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115115
SchäferS. (2020). Illusion of knowledge through Facebook news? Effects of snack news in a news feed on perceived knowledge, attitude strength, and willingness for discussions. Computers in Human Behavior, 103, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.031
61.
SchäferS.SülflowM.MüllerP. (2017). The special taste of snack news: An application of niche theory to understand the appeal of Facebook as a news source. First Monday, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v22i4.7431
62.
ShoemakerP. J. (1982). The perceived legitimacy of deviant political groups: Two experiments on media effects. Communication Research, 9(2), 249–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365082009002004
63.
ShoemakerP.J.ReeseS. D. (2013). Mediating the message in the 21st century: A media sociology perspective. Routledge.
64.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175043
65.
SmithJ.McCarthyJ. D.McPhailC.AugustynB. (2001). From protest to agenda building: Description bias in media coverage of protest events in Washington, D.C. Social Forces, 79(4), 1397–1423. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2001.0053
66.
SmithL. G. E.McGartyC.ThomasE. F. (2018). After Aylan Kurdi: How Tweeting about death, threat, and harm predict increased expressions of solidarity with refugees over time. Psychological Science, 29(4), 623–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617741107
TeixeiraC. P.SpearsR.YzerbytV. (2019). Is Martin Luther King or Malcom X the more acceptable face of protest? High status groups’ reactions to low status groups’ collective action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000195
69.
TewksburyD. (2005). The seeds of audience fragmentation: Specialization in the use of online news sites. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49(3), 332–348. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4903_5
70.
ThomasE. F.CaryN.SmithL. G.SpearsR.McGartyC. (2018). The role of social media in shaping solidarity and compassion fade: How the death of a child turned apathy into action but distress took it away. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3778–3798. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818760819
71.
TuretskyK. M.RiddleT. A. (2018). Porous chambers, echoes of valence and stereotypes: A network analysis of online news coverage interconnectedness following a nationally polarizing race-related event. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(2), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617733519
72.
VästfjällD.SlovicP.MayorgaM.PetersE. (2014). Compassion fade: Affect and charity are greatest for a single child in need. PLOS ONE, 9(6), Article e100115. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.010011
73.
WeinerB. (1995). Inferences of responsibility and social motivation. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 27, pp. 1–47). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60402-5
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
