Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Concerns about misperceptions among the public are rampant. Yet, little work explores the correlates of misperceptions in varying contexts – that is, how do factors such as group affiliations, media exposure, and lived experiences correlate with the number of misperceptions people hold? We address these questions by investigating misperceptions about COVID-19, focusing on the role of racial/ethnic, religious, and partisan groups. Using a large survey, we find the number of correct beliefs held by individuals far dwarfs the number of misperceptions. When it comes to misperceptions, we find that minorities, those with high levels of religiosity, and those with strong partisan identities – across parties – hold a substantially greater number of misperceptions than those with contrasting group affiliations. Moreover, we show other variables (e.g., social media usage, number of COVID-19 cases in one’s county) do not have such strong relationships with misperceptions, and the group-level results do not reflect acquiescence to believing any information regardless of its truth value. Our results accentuate the importance of studying group-level misperceptions on other scientific and political issues and developing targeted interventions for these groups.

Keywords

COVID-19 misinformation misperceptions partisan social identity race religiosity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Achen

C. H.

Bartels

L. M.

(2017). Democracy for realists: Why elections do not produce responsive government. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc7770q

Allcott

Boxell

Conway

Gentzkow

Thaler

Yang

(2020). Polarization and public health: Partisan differences in social distancing during COVID-19. Journal of Public Economics, 191, Article 104254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104254

Allcott

Gentzkow

(2019). Trends in the diffusion of misinformation on social media. Research & Politics, 6(2), Article 2053168019848554. https://doi.org/10.3386/w25500

Allen

Howland

Mobius

Rothschild

Watts

D. J.

(2020). Evaluating the fake news problem at the scale of the information ecosystem. Science Advances, 6, Article eaay3539. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay3539

Allum

Besley

Gomez

Brunton-Smith

(2018). Science education disparities in science literacy. Science, 360(6391), 861–862. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar8480

Barua

Aktar

Kabir

(2020). Effects of misinformation on COVID-19 individual responses and recommendations for resilience of disastrous consequences of misinformation. Progress in Disaster Science, 8, Article 100119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100119

Bauer

M. W.

Pansegrau

Shukla

(Eds.). (2018). The cultural authority of science: Comparing across Europe, Asia, Africa and the Americas. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315163284

Beeghley

Van Velsor

Bock

E. W.

(1981). The correlates of religiosity among black and white Americans. The Sociological Quarterly, 22(3), 403–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1981.tb00670.x

Bernard

Bowsher

Sullivan

Gibson-Fall

(2020). Disinformation and epidemics: Anticipating the next phase of biowarfare. Health Security, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2020.0038

10.

Blank

J. M.

Shaw

(2015). Does partisanship shape attitudes toward science and public policy? The case for ideology and religion. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 658(1), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716214554756

11.

Barrios

J. M.

Hochberg

Y. V.

(2020). Risk perception through the lens of politics in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic. Becker-Friedman Institute, Working Paper, No. 2020-32. https://doi.org/10.3386/w27008

12.

Bode

Vraga

E. K.

(2018). See something, say something: Correction of global health misinformation on social media. Health Communication, 33(9), 1131–1140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1331312

13.

Brenes Peralta

Wojcieszak

Lelkes

de Vreese

(2017). Selective exposure to balanced content and evidence type: The case of issue and non-issue publics about climate change and health care. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(3), 833–861. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016654681

14.

Bronstein

M. V.

Pennycook

Bear

Rand

D. G.

Cannon

T. D.

(2019). Belief in fake news is associated with delusionality, dogmatism, religious fundamentalism, and reduced analytic thinking. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8, 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.09.005

15.

Calvillo

D. P.

Ross

B. J.

Garcia

R. J. B.

Smelter

T. J.

Rutchick

A. M.

(2020). Political ideology predicts perceptions of the threat of COVID-19 (and susceptibility to fake news about it). Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11, 1119–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620940539

16.

Cinelli

Quattrociocchi

Galeazzi

Valensise

C. M.

Brugnoli

Schmidt

A. L.

Zola

Zollo

Scala

(2020). The covid-19 social media infodemic. arXiv Preprint arXiv:2003.05004. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73510-5

17.

Cohen

Marquardt

Atwood

Acosta

(2020). Trump contradicts US intel community by claiming he’s seen evidence coronavirus originated in Chinese lab. CNN, May 1. https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/30/politics/trump-intelligence-community-china-coronavirus-origins/index.html

18.

Dietz

(2013). Bringing values and deliberation to science communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(Supplement 3),14081–14087. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212740110

19.

Druckman

J. N.

(2012). The politics of motivation. Critical Review, 24(2), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2012.711022

20.

Druckman

J. N.

Klar

Krupnikov

Levendusky

Ryan

J. B.

(2021). Affective polarization, local context, and public opinion in America. Nature Human Behavior, 5: 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01012-5

21.

Druckman

J. N.

Leeper

T. J.

(2012). Is public opinion stable? Resolving the micro/macro disconnect in studies of public opinion. Daedalus, 141, 50–68. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_00173

22.

Druckman

J. N.

Levendusky

M. S.

(2019). What do we measure when we measure affective polarization? Public Opinion Quarterly, 83(1), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfz003

23.

Finkel

E. J.

Bail

C. A.

Cikara

Ditto

P. H.

Iyengar

Klar

Mason

McGrath

M. C.

Nyhan

Rand

D. G.

Skitka

L. J.

Tucker

J. A.

Van Bavel

J. J.

Wang

C. S.

Druckman

J. N.

(2020). Political sectarianism in America: A poisonous cocktail of othering, aversion, and moralization. Science, 370, 533–536. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe1715

24.

Flynn

Nyhan

Reifler

(2017). The nature and origins of misperceptions: Understanding false and unsupported beliefs about politics.Political Psychology, 38, 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12394

25.

Fowler

Kettler

Witt

(2020). Democratic governors are quicker in responding to the coronavirus than Republicans. The Conversation. https://bit.ly/31Aiz59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532440020941794

26.

Frenkel

Alba

Zhong

(2020). Surge of virus misinformation stumps Facebook and Twitter. The New York Times. https://doi.org/10.1037/e546412011-004

27.

Gauchat

(2012). Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. American Sociological Review, 77(2), 167–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412438225

28.

Gollwitzer

Martel

Brady

W. J.

Pärnamets

Freedman

I. G.

Knowles

E. D.

Van Bavel

J. J.

(2020). Partisan differences in physical distancing are linked to health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/t3yxa

29.

Grinberg

Joseph

Friedland

Swire-Thompson

Lazer

(2019). Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 us presidential election. Science, 363(6425), 374–378. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau2706

30.

Guess

Nagler

Tucker

(2019). Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook. Science Advances, 5(1), eaau4586. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau4586

31.

Huddy

Mason

Aarøe

(2015). Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity. American Political Science Review, 109(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055414000604

32.

Hutchings

V. L.

(2003). Public opinion and democratic accountability: How citizens learn about politics. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00318_13.x

33.

Jerit

Zhao

(2020). Political misinformation. Annual Review of Political Science, 23, 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-032814

34.

Jurkowitz

Mitchell

(2020, April 1). Cable TV and COVID-19: How Americans perceive the outbreak and view media coverage differ by main news source. AM New York. https://www.amanewyork.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/20.04.01.PewResearch.CableTVAndCoronavirusHowAmericansPerceiveTheOutbreakAndViewMediaCoverageDifferByMainNewsSource.pdf https://doi.org/10.18411/a-2017-023

35.

Kahan

D. M.

(2015). Climate-science communication and the measurement problem. Advances in Political Psychology, 36, 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12244

36.

Katz

V. S.

Ang

Suro

(2012). An ecological perspective on US Latinos’ health communication behaviors, access, and outcomes. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 34(3), 437–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986312445566

37.

Kim

Y. C.

Matsaganis

M. D.

Wilkin

H. A.

Jung

J. Y.

(Eds.). (2018). The communication ecology of 21st century urban communities. Peter Lang Inc. https://doi.org/10.3726/b13168

38.

Krause

N. M.

Freiling

Beets

Brossard

(2020). Fact-checking as risk communication: The multi-layered risk of misinformation in times of COVID-19. Journal of Risk Research, 23(7–8), 1052–1059. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1756385

39.

Kroenke

Spitzer

R. L.

Williams

J. B.

(2001). The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(9), 606–613. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x

40.

Levy

Bayes

Bolsen

Druckman

J. N.

(n.d.). Science and the politics of misinformation. In Tumber

Waisbord

(Eds.), Routledge companion to media misinformation & populism. Routledge.

41.

H. O. Y.

Bailey

Huynh

Chan

(2020). YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19: A pandemic of misinformation? BMJ Global Health, 5(5), Article e002604. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002604

42.

Lipsitz

Pop-Eleches

(2020). The partisan divide in social distancing. SSRN eLibrary. https://bit.ly/3gDz3xu

43.

Lupia

(2013). Communicating science in politicized environments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(Supplement 3), 14048–14054. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212726110

44.

Lupia

(2017). Now is the time: How to increase the value of social science. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 84(3), 669–694. muse.jhu.edu/article/675031

45.

McPhetres

Zuckerman

(2017). Religious people endorse different standards of evidence when evaluating religious versus scientific claims. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(7), 836–842. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617691098

46.

Motta

Stecula

Farhart

(2020). How right-leaning media coverage of COVID-19 facilitated the spread of misinformation in the early stages of the pandemic in the US. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue Canadienne de Science Politique, 1–8. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423920000396

47.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2016). Science literacy: Concepts, contexts, and consequences. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/23595

48.

Nyhan

(2020). Facts and myths about misperceptions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 34(3), 220–236. 10.1257/jep.34.3.220

49.

Nyhan

Reifler

(2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32(2), 303–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2

50.

Ognyanova

Perlis

R. H.

Baum

M. A.

Lazer

Druckman

J. N.

Santillana

Volpe

J. D.

(2020). The state of the nation: A 50-state COVID-19 survey report #4. Covidstates.org. https://covidstates.net/COVID19%20CONSORTIUM%20REPORT%20JUNE%202020.pdf

51.

Oliver

J. E.

Wood

T. J.

(2018). Enchanted America: How intuition and reason divide our politics. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226578644.001.0001

52.

Pennycook

McPhetres

Zhang

J. G.

Rand

D. G.

(2020). Fighting COVID-19 misinformation on social media: Experimental evidence for a scalable accuracy-nudge intervention. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/uhbk9

53.

Pennycook

Rand

D. G.

(2019). Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(7), 2521–2526. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1806781116

54.

Pew Research Center. (2020, August 7). Americans oppose religious exemptions from coronavirus-related restrictions. Pew Forum. https://www.pewforum.org/2020/08/07/attending-and-watching-religious-services-in-the-age-of-the-coronavirus

55.

Plutzer

(2013). The racial gap in confidence in science: Explanations and implications. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 33(5–6), 146–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467614528902

56.

Ricard

Medeiros

(2020). Using misinformation as a political weapon: COVID-19 and Bolsonaro in Brazil. The Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-013

57.

Ripberger

J. T.

Jenkins-Smith

H. C.

Silva

C. L.

Carlson

D. E.

Gupta

Carlson

Dunlap

R. E.

(2017). Bayesian versus politically motivated reasoning in human perception of climate anomalies. Environmental Research Letters, 12(11), Article 114004. 10.1088/1748-9326/aa8cfc

58.

Romer

Jamieson

K. H.

(2020). Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of COVID-19 in the US. Social Science & Medicine, 263, Article 113356. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113356

59.

Rutjens

B. T.

Preston

J. L.

(2020). Science and religion: A rocky relationship shaped by shared psychological functions. In Vail

Routledge

(Eds.), The science of religion, spirituality, and existentialism. Elsevier Academic Press. https://psyarxiv.com/qp4n5/

60.

Scheufele

D. A.

Krause

N. M.

(2019). Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(16), 7662–7669. 10.1073/pnas.1805871115

61.

Schumaker

(2019, November 10). Anti-vaccine leaders targeting minority becomes growing concern at NYC forum: Anti-vaccine leaders exploit historical fears about the medical establishment. ABC News. https://abcnews.go.com/Health/rfk-jrs-york-city-vaccine-forum-highlights-concerns/story?id=66158336

62.

Sherkat

D. E.

(2011). Religion and scientific literacy in the united states. Social Science Quarterly, 92(5), 1134–1150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2011.00811.x

63.

Simonov

Sacher

S. K.

Dubé

J.-P. H.

Biswas

(2020). The persuasive effect of Fox News: Non-compliance with social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://bfi.uchicago.edu/working-paper/the-persuasive-effect-of-fox-news-non-compliance-with-social-distancing-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/

64.

Singh

Bansal

Bode

Budak

Chi

Kawintiranon

Padden

Vanarsdall

Vraga

E. K.

Wang

(2020). A first look at COVID-19 information and misinformation sharing on Twitter. arXiv Preprint arXiv:2003.13907.

65.

Soper

G. A.

(1919). The lessons of the pandemic. Science, 49(1274): 501–506. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.49.1274.501

66.

Swire-Thompson

Lazer

(2020). Public health and online misinformation: Challenges and recommendations. Annual Review of Public Health, 41, 433–451. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094127

67.

Tomz

Wittenberg

King

(2003). Clarify: Software for interpreting and presenting statistical results. Journal of Statistical Software, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v008.i01.

68.

Van Bavel

J. J.

Baicker

Boggio

P. S.

Capraro

Cichocka

Cikara

Crockett

M. J.

Crum

A. J.

Douglas

K. M.

Druckman

J. N.

Drury

Dube

Ellemers

Finkel

E. J.

Fowler

J. H.

Gelfand

Han

Haslam

S. A.

Jetten

Willer

(2020). Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(5), 460–471. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z

69.

Walter

Ball-Rokeach

S. J.

Broad

G. M.

(2018). Communication ecologies: Analyzing adoption of false beliefs in an information-rich environment. Science Communication, August, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547018793427

70.

Yonder. (2018, December 17). The disinformation report. Yonder. https://www.yonder-ai.com/resources/the-disinformation-report

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.72 MB

0.00 MB