As Michel Foucault and others have shown, from the seventeenth through the twentieth centuries, Western political discourse has perpetuated an art of governing aimed at societies and populations. This article argues that this modern art of governing is now coming undone, in the name of governance. The discourse on governance is taking us from an art of governing premised on producing policy for a society or a population to an art of governing premised on solving problems with no necessary reference to any kind of society or population. Tracing the evolution of that discourse, the article argues that existing social and political theory has failed to make sense of this shift. It concludes that in order to access and assess the new art of governing on its own terms we need a sociological imagination that stretches beyond societies and a political imaginary without the presupposition of collectivities.
AgambenG (2005) State of Exception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
AlbertMCedermanL-EWendtA (eds) (2010) New Systems Theories of World Politics. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
3.
AltvaterE (1999) The democratic order, economic globalization, and ecological restrictions: on the relation of material and formal democracy. In: ShapiroIHacker-CordónC (eds) Democracy’s Edges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BartelsonJ (2009) Visions of World Community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BartelsonJ (2010) The social construction of globality. International Political Sociology4: 219–35.
BeethamD (1991) The Legitimation of Power. London: Macmillan.
9.
BevirM (2010a) Democratic Governance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
BevirM (2010b) Rethinking governmentality: towards genealogies of governance. European Journal of Social Theory13: 423–41.
11.
BevirM (2011) Governance and governmentality after neoliberalism. Policy and Politics39: 457–71.
12.
BevirMGainsF (2011) Ideas into policy: governance and governmentality. Policy and Politics39: 451–56.
13.
BlackJ (2008) Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes. Regulation and Governance2: 137–64.
14.
BraithwaiteJ (1999) Accountability and governance under the new regulatory state. Australian Journal of Public Administration58: 90–7.
15.
BuchananAKeohaneR O (2006) The legitimacy of global governance institutions. Ethics and International Affairs20: 405–37.
16.
BurchellG (1991) Peculiar interests: civil society and governing ‘the system of natural liberty’. In: BurchellGGordonCMillerP (eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
BurchellG (1993) Liberal government and techniques of the self. Economy and Society22: 267–82.
18.
ButlerJ (1993) Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’. London: Routledge.
19.
Commission on Global Governance (1995) Our Global Neighborhood: The Report of the Commission on Global Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
ConsidineMAfzalK A (2011) Legitimacy. In: BevirM (ed.) The SAGE Handbook of Governance. London: SAGE.
21.
CrozierM JHuntingtonS PWatanukiJ (1975) The Crisis of Democracy: Report on the Governability of Democracies to the Trilateral Commission. New York: Columbia University Press.
22.
DahlR A (1989) Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23.
DahlR A (1999) Can international organizations be democratic? A skeptic’s view. In: ShapiroIHacker-CordónC (eds) Democracy’s Edges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
DingwerthKPattbergP (2006) Global governance as a perspective on world politics. Global Governance12: 185–203.
25.
DingwerthKPattbergP (2010) How global and why governance? Blind spots and ambivalences of the global governance concept. International Studies Review12: 701–10.
26.
DonzelotJ (1991) The mobilization of society. In: BurchellGGordonCMillerP (eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
DryzekJNiemeyerS (2010) Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
EnrothH (2010) Beyond unity in plurality: rethinking the pluralist legacy. Contemporary Political Theory9: 458–76.
29.
EnrothH (2011a) Policy network theory. In: BevirM (ed.) The SAGE Handbook of Governance. London: SAGE.
30.
EnrothH (2011b) Democratic governance. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions24: 395–8.
31.
ErmanEUhlinA (eds) (2010) Legitimacy Beyond the State? Re-Examining the Democratic Credentials of Transnational Actors. Houndmills: Palgrave.
32.
EsmarkA (2010) Systems theory. In: BevirM (ed.) The SAGE Handbook of Governance. London: SAGE.
33.
EwaldF (1991) Insurance and risk. In: BurchellGGordonCMillerP (eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34.
FasoltC (1991) Quod omnes tangit ab omnibus approbari debet: the words and the meaning. In: BowmanS BCodyB E (eds) In Iure Veritas: Studies in Canon Law in Memory of Schafer Williams. Cincinnati, OH: The University of Cincinnati, College of Law.
35.
FinkelsteinL (1995) What is global governance?Global Governance1: 367–72.
36.
FlewT (2012) Michel Foucault’s The Birth of Biopolitics and contemporary neo-liberalism debates. Thesis Eleven108: 44–65.
37.
FoucaultM (1982) The subject and power. In: DreyfusH LRabinowP (eds) Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38.
FoucaultM (1991) Governmentality. In: BurchellGGordonCMillerP (eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39.
FoucaultM (2007) Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–1978. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
40.
GordonC (1991) Governmental rationality: an introduction. In: BurchellGGordonCMillerP (eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41.
HardinR (1999) Democracy and collective bads. In: ShapiroIHacker-CordónC (eds) Democracy’s Edges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
HeldD (2005) Democratic accountability and political effectiveness from a cosmopolitan perspective. In: HeldDKoenig-ArchibugiM (eds) Global Governance and Public Accountability. Oxford: Blackwell.
43.
JönssonCTallbergJ (eds) (2010) Transnational Actors in Global Governance: Patterns, Explanations, and Implications. Houndmills: Palgrave.
44.
KaaseM (1980) The crisis of authority: myth and reality. In: RoseR (ed.) Challenge to Governance: Studies in Overload Politics. London: SAGE.
45.
KalmoHSkinnerQ (eds) (2010) Sovereignty in Fragments: The Past, Present and Future of a Contested Concept. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
KeaneJ (2003) Global Civil Society?Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
47.
KickertW J MKlijnE-HKoppenjanJ F M (eds) (1997) Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector. London: SAGE.
48.
Koenig-ArchibugiM (2005) Transnational corporations and public accountability. In: HeldDKoenig-ArchibugiM (eds) Global Governance and Public Accountability. Oxford: Blackwell.
49.
KooimanJ (ed.) (1993) Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions. London: SAGE.
50.
KooimanJ (2003) Governing as Governance. London: SAGE.
51.
LathamR (1999) Politics in a floating world: toward a critique of global governance. In: HewsonMSinclairT J (eds) Approaches to Global GovernanceTheory. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
52.
LingisA (1998) The Imperative. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
53.
MayntzR (2003) New challenges to governance theory. In: BangH P (ed.) Governance as Social and Political Communication. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
54.
MeyerJ (2009) World Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55.
NäsströmS (2011) The challenge of the all-affected principle. Political Studies59: 116–34.
56.
OffeC (2009) Governance: an empty signifier?Constellations16: 550–62.
57.
PasquinoP (1991) Theatrum politicum: the genealogy of capital – police and the state of prosperity. In: BurchellGGordonCMillerP (eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
58.
PaulyL W (2005) Financial crises, the United Nations, and transnational authority. In: GrandeEPaulyL W (eds) Complex Sovereignty: Reconstituting Political Authority in the Twenty-First Century. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
59.
PetersB G (2011) Institutional theory. In: BevirM (ed.) The SAGE Handbook of Governance. London: SAGE.
60.
PierreJ (2000) Introduction: understanding governance. In: PierreJ (ed.) Debating Governance: Authority, Steering, and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
61.
PierreJPetersB G (2000) Governance, Politics, and the State. Houndmills: Palgrave.
62.
PizzornoA (1987) Politics unbound. In: MaierC S (ed.) Changing Boundaries of the Political: Essays on the Evolving Balance between the State and Society, Public and Private in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63.
PocockJ G A (1975) The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
64.
RhodesR A W (1997) Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity, Accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.
65.
RoseN (1993) Government, authority, and expertise in advanced liberalism. Economy and Society22: 283–99.
66.
RoseN (1999) Governing ‘advanced liberal’ democracies. In: BarryAOsborneTRoseN (eds) Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism, and Rationalities of Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
67.
RoseNMillerP (1992) Political power beyond the state: problematics of government. British Journal of Sociology43: 173–205.
68.
RoseR (ed.) (1980) Challenge to Governance: Studies in Overload Politics. London: SAGE.
69.
RosenauJ N (1995) Governance in the twenty-first century. Global Governance1: 13–43.
70.
SchmittC (2005) Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
71.
ShawM (2000) Theory of the Global State: Globality as an Unfinished Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
72.
SkogstadG (2005) Contested political authority, risk society, and the transatlantic divide in the regulation of genetic engineering. In: GrandeEPaulyL W (eds) Complex Sovereignty: Reconstituting Political Authority in the Twenty-first Century. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
73.
SlaughterA-M (2004) Disaggregated sovereignty: towards the public accountability of global government networks. Government and Opposition39: 159–90.
74.
SmoutsM-C (1998) The proper use of governance in international relations. International Social Science Journal50: 81–9.
75.
StokerG. (1998) Governance as theory: five propositions. International Social Science Journal50: 17–28.
76.
TaylorC (1987) Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
77.
TriantafillouP (2007) Governing the formation and mobilization of governance networks. In: SørensenETorfingJ (eds) Theories of Democratic Network Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
78.
UrryJ (2000) Sociology beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty-First Century. London: Routledge.
79.
ViroliM (1992) The revolution in the concept of politics. Political Theory20: 473–95.
80.
WagnerP (2000) ‘An entirely new object of consciousness, of volition, of thought’: on the coming into being and (almost) passing away of ‘society’ as a scientific object. In: DastonL (ed.) Biographies of Scientific Objects. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
81.
WeissT G (2000) Governance, good governance, and global governance: conceptual and actual challenges. Third World Quarterly21(5): 795–814.
82.
ZürnM (2005) Global governance and legitimacy problems. In: HeldDKoenig-ArchibugiM (eds) Global Governance and Public Accountability. Oxford: Blackwell.
83.
ZürnMStephenM (2010) The view of old and new powers on the legitimacy of international institutions. Politics30: 91–101.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
