In this study, a modified truncated singular value decomposition (MTSVD) method is proposed for the identification of dynamic moving forces on simply-supported beams. By regularizing the truncated singular value decomposition (TSVD) method, the MTSVD method focuses on overcoming the ill-posed problems that intrinsically exist in moving force identification. Two regularization parameters, namely, regularization matrix and truncating point are the most important regularization parameters affecting the performance of the MTSVD method. The accuracy and efficiency of the MTSVD method is shown by comparing the results with the conventional counterpart SVD and TSVD methods. In addition, the proposed method is also compared with a similar method recently proposed by the author, that is, the piecewise polynomial truncated singular value decomposition (PP-TSVD) method. Numerical simulations demonstrate that the performance of the MTSVD method is significantly improved compared with the PP-TSVD method in high noise level cases.
AucejoMDe SmetO (2018) A space-frequency multiplicative regularization for force reconstruction problems. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing104: 1–18.
2.
AucejoMDe SmetO (2019) On a general iteratively reweighted algorithm for solving force reconstruction problems. Journal of Sound and Vibration458: 376–388.
3.
BouhamidiAJbilouKReichelL, et al. (2011) An extrapolated TSVD method for linear discrete ill-posed problems with Kronecker structure. Linear Algebra and its Application434: 1677–1688.
4.
ChenZChanTHT (2017) A truncated generalized singular value decomposition algorithm for moving force identification with ill-posed problems. Journal of Sound and Vibration401: 297–310.
5.
ChenZQinLFChanTHT, et al. (2021) A novel preconditioned range restricted GMRES algorithm for moving force identification and its experimental validation. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing155: 107635.
6.
ChenZQinLFZhaoSB, et al. (2019) Toward efficacy of piecewise polynomial truncated singular value decomposition algorithm in moving force identification. Advances in Structural Engineering22: 2687–2698.
7.
DingYZhaoBYWuB, et al. (2015) Simultaneous identification of structural parameter and external excitation with an improved unscented Kalman filter. Advances in Structural Engineering18(11): 1981–1998.
8.
EldénL (1982) A weighted pseudoinverse, generalized singular values, and constrained least squares problems. Bit Numerical Mathematics22: 487–502.
9.
HansenPCMosegaardK (1996) Piecewise polynomial solutions without a priori break points. Numer. Linear Algebra and its Application3: 513–524.
10.
HansenPCSekiiTShibahashiH (1992) The modified truncated SVD method for regularization in general form. Siam Journal on Computing13: 1142–1150.
11.
HeWLingTObrienEJ, et al. (2019a) Virtual axle method for bridge weigh-in-motion systems requiring no axle detector. Journal of Bridge Engineering24: 04019086.
12.
HeZCLinXYLiE (2018) A novel method for load bounds identification for uncertain structures in frequency domain. International Journal of Computational Methods15: 1850051.
13.
HeZCZhangZMLiE (2019b) Multi-source random excitation identification for stochastic structures based on matrix perturbation and modified regularization method. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing119: 266–292.
14.
HeZCZhangZMLiE (2020) Random dynamic load identification for stochastic structural-acoustic system using an adaptive regularization parameter and evidence theory. Journal of Sound and Vibration471: 115118.
15.
HelmiKTaylorTAnsariF (2015) Shear force-based method and application for real-time monitoring of moving vehicle weights on bridges. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures26: 505–516.
16.
JiSBWangRXShuML, et al. (2020) Improvement of vehicle axle load test method based on portable WIM. Measurement173: 108626.
17.
JiangJHTangHZMohamedMS, et al. (2020) Augmented tikhonov regularization method for dynamic load identification. Applied Sciences10: 6348.
18.
KimTLeeU (2017) Dynamic analysis of a multi-span beam subjected to a moving force using the frequency domain spectral element method. Computers & Structures192: 181–195.
19.
KalhoriHAlamdariMMYeL (2018) Automated algorithm for impact force identification using cosine similarity searching. Measurement122: 648–657.
20.
LawSSChanTHTZengQH (1997) Moving force identification: a time domain method. Journal of Sound and Vibration201: 1–22.
21.
LiJLawSSHaoH (2013) Improved damage identification in bridge structures subject to moving loads: numerical and experimental studies. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences74: 99–111.
22.
LiQFLuQH (2018) Force localization and reconstruction using a two-step iterative approach. Journal of Vibration and Control24: 3830–3841.
23.
LiuJMengXHJiangC, et al. (2016) Time-domain Galerkin method for dynamic load identification. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering105: 620–640.
24.
LiuJMengXHZhangDQ, et al. (2017) An efficient method to reduce ill-posedness for structural dynamic load identification. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing95: 273–285.
25.
LiuJSunXHanXU, et al. (2015) Dynamic load identification for stochastic structures based on Gegenbauer polynomial approximation and regularization method. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing56–57: 35–54.
26.
LourensEReyndersEDe RoeckG, et al. (2012) An augmented Kalman filter for force identification in structural dynamics. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing27: 446–460.
27.
MendrokKUhlT (2010) Load identification using a modified modal filter technique. Journal of Vibration and Control16: 89–105.
28.
NoscheseSReichelL (2014) A modified truncated singular value decomposition method for discrete ill-posed problems. Numerical Linear Algebra and Its Application21: 813–822.
29.
ObrienEJMcGetrickPJGonzálezA (2014) A drive-by inspection system via vehicle moving force identification. Smart Structures and Systems13: 821–848.
30.
OnunworEReichelL (2017) On the computation of a truncated SVD of a large linear discrete ill-posed problem. Numerical Algorithms75: 359–380.
31.
QiaoBJAoCYMaoZ, et al. (2020) Non-convex sparse regularization for impact force identification. Journal of Sound and Vibration477: 115311.
32.
QiaoBJLiuJJLiuJX, et al. (2019) An enhanced sparse regularization method for impact force identification. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing126: 341–367.
33.
QiaoBJZhangXWGaoJW, et al. (2017) Sparse deconvolution for the large-scale ill-posed inverse problem of impact force reconstruction. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing83: 93–115.
34.
RichardsonJJonesSBrownA, et al. (2014) On the use of bridge weigh-in-motion for overweight truck enforcement. International Journal of Heavy Vehicle Systems21: 83–104.
35.
ThiteANThompsonDJ (2003) The quantification of structure-borne transmission paths by inverse methods. part 1: improved singular value rejection methods. Journal of Sound and Vibration264: 41l–431.
36.
UhlT (2007) The inverse identification problem and its technical application. Archive of Applied Mechanics77: 325–337.
37.
WengSZhuHPXiaY, et al. (2020) A review on dynamic substructuring methods for model updating and damage detection of large-scale structures. Advances in Structural Engineering23(3): 584–600.
38.
WinklerJR (1997) Polynomial basis conversion made stable by truncated singular value decomposition. Applied Mathematical Modelling21: 557–568.
39.
XuPL (1998) Truncated SVD methods for discrete linear ill-posed problems. Geophysical Journal International135: 505–514.
40.
YangYBWangZLShiK, et al. (2021) State-of-the-art of the vehicle-based methods for detecting the various properties of highway bridges and railway tracks. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics20: 2041004.
41.
YangYBYangJP (2018) State-of-the-art review on modal identification and damage detection of bridges by moving test vehicles. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics18: 1850025.
42.
YuYCaiCSDengL (2016) State-of-the-art review on bridge weigh-in-motion technology. Advances in Structural Engineering19(9): 1514–1530.
43.
ZhangZMSunCHuangY (2020) Sparse signal recovery for WIM measurements from undersampled data through compressed sensing. Measurement151: 107181.
44.
ZhuXQLawSSBuJQ (2006) A state space formulation for moving loads identification. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics128: 509–520.
