The physics-informed neural network (PINN) method, which is a powerful approach for solving partial differential equations with deep learning, has been recently applied to modeling of electrodynamic interaction problems including a relativistic beam in charged particle accelerators. In the present study, the transfer learning (TL) is applied to the PINN based on the total-field (TF) formulation. It is shown that TL can accelerate significantly the training process of the TF-PINN in the simulation of the space charge impedances of an infinitely long beam pipe of elliptical and rectangular cross section.
RaissiMPerdikarisPKarniadakisGE. Physics-informed neural networks: a deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. J Comput Phys2019; 378: 686–707.
2.
KarniadakisGEKevrekidisIGLuL, et al.Physics-informed machine learning. Nature Rev Phys2021; 3: 422–440.
3.
FujitaK. Physics-informed neural network method for space charge effect in particle accelerators. IEEE Access2021; 9: 164017–164025.
4.
FujitaK. Physics-informed neural network method for modelling beam-wall interactions. Electron Lett2022; 58: 390–392.
5.
FujitaK. Electromagnetic field computation of multilayer vacuum chambers with physics-informed neural networks. Front Phys2022; 10: 967645.
6.
FujitaK. Impedance modeling of accelerator beams with discontinuous charge density using scattered-field physics-informed neural networks.IEICE Electron Expr2023; 20: 1–6.
7.
WeissKKhoshgoftaarTMWangDD. A survey of transfer learning. J Big Data2016; 3:Article 9.
8.
MarkidisS. The old and the new: can physics-informed deep-learning replace traditional linear solvers?Front Big Data2021; 4: article no.669097.
9.
ZotterBWKheifetsSA. Impedance and Wakes in High-Energy Accelerators. Singapore: World Scientific, 1998.
10.
AggarwalCC. Neural networks and deep learning: A textbook. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG, 2018.
11.
GoodfellowIBengioYCourvilleA. Deep learning (Adaptive computation and machine learning series). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2016.
12.
BaydinAGPearlmutterBARadulAA, et al.Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a survey. J Mach Learn Res2017; 18: 5595–5637.
13.
KochenderferMJWheelerTA. Algorithms for Optimization. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2019.
14.
RamachandranPZophBLeQ. Searching for activation functions. In: Proc. ICLR. 2018.
15.
FujitaK. Impedance computation of cryogenic vacuum chambers using boundary element method. Phys Rev Accel Beams2022; 25: 064601.
