A clinical as well as forensic autopsy is a uniform medical investigation of the deceased, which mainly serves to verify the plausibility of information on the cause, mode and mechanism of death provided by the police and/or medical personnel. Despite its importance in the context of a conclusive assessment of a person’s medical history and in detecting any criminal correlation or malpractice, a significant decline in autopsies is evident in Iceland. This article gives an overview on autopsy rates in Iceland and compares the situation with European countries.
BrinkmannBDu ChesneAVennemnnB.Recent data for frequency of autopsy in Germany. Dtsch Med Wochenschr2002;127: 791–795.
5.
BlokkerBMWeustinkACHuninkMGM, et al. Autopsy rates in the Netherlands: 35 years of decline. PLoS One2017;12: e0178200.
6.
TeiglandA.Autopsies in Norway and Czech Republic: a comparison. Diploma Thesis. Forensic Department, University Hospital Vinohrady (FNKV), Prague, 2010.
7.
WaldhoerTBerzlanovichAVutucC, et al. Rates of postmortem examination in Austria: the effect of distance between location of death and site of examination. J Clin Epidemiol2003;56: 891–895.
8.
LindströmPJanzonLSternbyNH.Declining autopsy rate in Sweden: a study of causes and consequences in Malmö, Sweden. J Int Med1997;242: 157–165.
9.
WoodMJGuhaAK.Declining clinical autopsy rates versus increasing medicolegal autopsy rates in Halifax, Nova Scotia. Arch Pathol Lab Med2001;125: 924–930.
10.
JütteRDietelMRothschildMA.Lässt sich der Trend sinkender Sektionsraten umkehren?Dtsch Ärzteblatt2016;46: A2094–A2100.
11.
MoschkauNKunzSFieselerS, et al. Autopsy data from the Institute for Legal Medicine of the University of Munich from 2003. Retrospective analysis using ‘WinLIMS.net’ software. Rechtsmed2011;21: 541–548.
12.
ChariotPWittKPautotV, et al. Declining autopsy rate in a French hospital: physicians’ attitudes to the autopsy and use of autopsy material in research publications. Arch Pathol Lab Med2000;124: 739–745.
13.
Van den TweelJGWittekindC. The medical autopsy as quality assurance tool in clinical medicine: dreams and realities. Virchows Arch2016;468: 75–81.
14.
SinardJH.Factors affecting autopsy rates, autopsy request rates, and autopsy findings at a large academic medical center. Exp Mol Pathol2001;70: 333–343.
15.
JackettLMcLeanC.Hospital autopsy audit: discordant primary clinical diagnoses are found in 20% of cases in a reducing autopsy case load. Selection bias or significant findings?Pathology2015;47: 499–502.
16.
WintersBCusterJGalvagnoSMJr, et al. Diagnostic errors in the intensive care unit: a systematic review of autopsy studies. BMJ Qual Saf2012;21: 894–902.
17.
AlfsenGCMaehlenJ.The value of autopsies for determining the cause of death. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen2012;132: 147–151.
18.
LardenoyeJHKastelijnKWvan EschL, et al. Evaluation of the rate of autopsy and rate of disparity between autopsy results and clinical cause of death in a surgical ward, with the emphasis on necrological review. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd2005;149: 1549–1583.
19.
KuijpersCCFronczekJvan de GootFR, et al. The value of autopsies in the era of high-tech medicine: discrepant findings persist. J Clin Pathol2014;67: 512–519.
20.
NielsenGPBjörnssonJJonassonJG.The accuracy of death certificates. Implications for health statistics. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol1991;419: 143–146.
21.
BoveKEIeryC, Autopsy Committee, College of American Pathologists. The role of the autopsy in medical malpractice cases, I: a review of 99 appeals court decisions. Arch Pathol Lab Med2002;126: 1023–1031.
22.
LeeflangMM.Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy. Clin Microbiol Infect2014;20: 105–113.
23.
TsitsikasDABrothwellMChin AleongJA, et al. The attitudes of relatives to autopsy: a misconception. J Clin Pathol2011;64: 412–414.
24.
HolsteCPiloCPetterssonK, et al. Mother’s attitudes towards perinatal autopsy after stillbirth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand2011;90: 1287–1290.
25.
BurtonECPhillipsRSCovinskyKE, et al. The relation of autopsy rate to physicians’ beliefs and recommendations regarding autopsy. Am J Med2004;117: 255–261.
26.
LoughreyMBMcCluggageWGTonerPG.The declining autopsy rate and clinicians’ attitudes. Ulter Med J2000;69: 83–89.
27.
Al-WaheebSAl-KandaryNAljerianK.Forensic autopsy practice in the Middle East: comparison with the west. J Forensic Leg Med2015;32: 4–9.
28.
GleichSViehöverSStäblerP, et al. Incorrectly certified natural death after medical inspection of the corpse. A prevailing issue. Rechtsmedizin2017;27: 2–7.
29.
MadeaBRothschildM.The post mortem external examination: determination of the cause and manner of death. Dtsch Arztebl Int2010;107: 575–586.
30.
GrawMPeschelO.External postmortem examination: choosing between natural and unnatural causes of death. MMW Fortschr Med2016;158: 45–48.
