The effects of electronic appointment booking systems on the time management
activities of health professionals have received little attention to date. We
report on time management practices in three outpatient physiotherapy
departments with different paper and electronic systems. The study has
identified a set of time management activities and associated social behaviours
common to physiotherapy departments. The convenience, flexibility and expressive
nature of paper diary systems is of significant value to users, whilst the
clarity and superior database functionality of electronic systems are valued by
staff using this medium. The study highlights several potential barriers to the
effective deployment of electronic booking systems in physiotherapy departments,
including poor resource and training provision, concerns regarding restrictive
diary control measures, the continued reliance on burdensome duplication
procedures and the need to coordinate multiple information artefacts, which need
to be addressed if such technology is to be successfully designed and deployed.
Department of Health
. Delivering IT to the NHS: A Summary of the National Programme for
IT. 2002.
http://www.doh.gov.uk/ipu/whatnew/deliveringit/deliveringit.htm, April 2003.
2.
Latchford G.CPIAG Access Survey Report, Computers at Work Survey: Positive Thoughts,
Negative Experiences. August 2002.
Library and Information Services, Chartered Society of
Physiotherapy, London
.
3.
Blandford A E
,
Green T R G.Group and individual time management tools: what you get is not what you need
. Personal & Ubiquitous Computing2001; 5 (4);
213-230
.
4.
Adams A
,
Blandford A.Acceptability of medical digital libraries
. Health Informatics Journal2002; 8 (2);
58-66
.
5.
McNulty T
,
Ferlie E.Reengineering Health Care: The Complexities of Organisational
Transformation.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
, 2002.
6.
Schein E.Organizational culture
. American Psychologist1990; 45;
109-119
.
7.
Harrison G S.The Winchester experience with the TDS hospital information system
. British Journal of Urology1991; 67 (5);
532-535
.
8.
Gremy F
,
Bonnin M.Evaluation of automatic health information systems: what and how. Assessment
and evaluation of information technologies. In
Gennip E
,
Talmon J L.
eds Medicine Van9-20.
Amsterdam: IOS Press
, 1995.
9.
Heathfield H.The rise and fall of expert systems in medicine
. Expert Systems1999; 16 (3);
183-188
.
10.
Heathfield H
,
Pitty D
,
Hanka R.Evaluating information technology in health care: barriers and challenges
. BMJ1998; 316;
1959-1961
.
11.
Symon G
,
Long K
,
Ellis J.The coordination of work activities: cooperation and conflict in a hospital context
. Computer Supported Cooperative Work1996; 5 (1);
1-31
.
12.
Adams A
,
Blandford A
,
Lunt P.Social empowerment and exclusion: a case study on digital libraries
. ACM Transactions on CHI in press.
13.
Wenger E.Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
, 1999.
Kling R.Organisational analysis in computer science
. The Information Society1993; 9 (2);
71-87
.
16.
Garner R.Garner Project: Scoping Information Management Needs in Occupational Therapy
and Physiotherapy.
London: Chartered Society of Physiotherapy,
College of Occupational Therapy
, 1999.
17.
Chartered Society of Physiotherapy
.
Garner to raise IT awareness
. Physiotherapy Frontline Journal1999; 5 (3 March);
21
.
18.
Adams A
,
Sasse M A.The user is not the enemy
. Communications of ACM1999; December;
40-46
.
19.
Payne S J.Understanding calendar use
. Human-Computer Interaction1993; 8;
83-100
.
20.
Palen L.Social, individual and technological issues for groupware calendar systems
. Proceedings of Computer Human Interaction ’9917-24
. New York: ACM Press, 1999.
21.
Kelley J F
,
Chapanis A.How professional persons keep their calendars: implications for computerization
. Journal of Occupational Psychology1982; 55;
241-256
.
22.
Kincaid C M
,
Dupont P B
,
Kaye A R.Electronic calendars in the office: an assessment of user needs and current technology
. ACM Transactions on the Office Information Systems1985; 3 (1);
89-102
.
