The aim of this article is to derive a critical standard against which institutional arrangements of e-government can be assessed in terms of democratic potential from Jürgen Habermas’ discursive model of deliberative democracy, and to illustrate how this standard can be applied through an assessment of the information and communication technology (ICT)-enabled services found on Swedish municipal websites. The assessment focuses on the potential of the ICT infrastructure to support deliberative democratic ideals and is based on a quantitative exploration of all 289 Swedish municipal websites. The results suggest that correctly designed ICT-enabled services have a deliberative democratic potential. But this does not overshadow the fact that the services existing today only to a limited extent support processes of social learning through rational argumentation, the core idea in Habermas’ discursive model of deliberative democracy.
Alexander, C. (1998) (ed.) Digital Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
2.
Åström, J. (1999) ‘Digital demokrati? Idéer och strategier i lokal IT-politik’, in E. Amnå (ed.) IT i demokratins tjänst, pp. 317-47. Stockholm: Elander Gotab.
3.
Åström, J. (2001) ‘Ideas, Intentions and Initiatives in Swedish Local Governments’ , paper presented at the Conference of the European Consortium for Political Research, Grenoble.
4.
Barber, B. (1984) Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley, CA: University of California .
5.
Barber, B. (1997) ‘The New Telecommunications Technology: Endless Frontier or the End of Democracy?’ , Constellations4(2): 208-228 .
6.
Bergström, A. (2002a) ‘Internet’, in U. Carlsson and U. Fackt (eds) Medie Sverige 2001/2002: statistik och analys, pp. 173-204. Göteborg: NORDICOM .
7.
Bergström, A. (2002b) ‘ Är svensken mätt på internet?’, in S. Holmberg and L. Weibull (eds) Det våras för politiken: Trettiotvå artiklar om politik, media och samhälle, pp. 245-58. Göteborg: SOM Institutet.
8.
Bohman, J. (1990) ‘Communication, Ideology and Democracy’ , American Political Science Review84(1): 93-104 .
9.
Bohman, J. and W. Rehg (eds) (1997) Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
10.
Burgelman, J.-C. (2000) ‘Regulating Access in the Information Society: the Need for Rethinking Public and Universal Services’ , New Media & Society2(1): 56-66 .
11.
Carleheden, M. (1996) Det andra moderna: Om Jürgen Habermas och den samhällsvetenskapliga diskursen om det moderna. Göteborg: Daidalos.
12.
Chambers, S. (1996) Reasonable Democracy: Jürgen Habermas and the Politics of Discourse. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press .
13.
Coe, A. , G. Paquet and J. Roy (2001) ‘E-Governance and Smart Communities’ , Social Science Computer Review19(1): 80-93 .
14.
Dahl, R.A. (1956) A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .
15.
Dahlberg, L. (2001a) ‘Democracy Via Cyberspace: Mapping the Rhetorics and Practices of Three Prominent Camps’ , New Media & Society2(2): 157-177 .
16.
Dahlberg, L. (2001b) ‘The Internet and Democratic Discourse: Exploring the Prospects of Online Deliberative Forums Extending the Public Sphere’ , Information, Communication & Society4(4): 615-633 .
17.
Downey, J. and N. Fenton (2003) ‘New Media, Counter Publicity and the Public Sphere’ , New Media & Society5(2): 185-202 .
18.
Downs, A. (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper .
19.
Dryzek, J. (1995) ‘Critical Theory as a Research Program’, in S.K. White (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Habermas, pp. 97-119. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
20.
Elmer, G. (2003) ‘A Diagram of Panoptic Surveillance’ , New Media & Society5(2): 231-247 .
21.
Elster, J. (1997) ‘The Market and the Forum: Three Varieties of Political Theory’, in J. Bohman and W. Rehg (eds) Deliberative Democracy. Essays on Reason and Politics, pp. 3-34. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
22.
Elster, J. (1998) (ed) Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
23.
Finley, M.I. (1973) Democracy: Ancient and Modern. London: Chatto and Windus .
24.
Fishkin, J.S. and P. Laslett (2003) (eds) Debating Deliberative Democracy. Malden: Blackwell Publishers .
25.
Friedland, L.A. (1996) ‘Electronic Democracy and the New Citizenship’ , Media, Culture & Society18(2): 185-212 .
26.
Grönlund, Å . (2003) ‘Emerging Infrastructures for E-democracy: in Search for Strong Inscriptions’ , e-Service Journal3(1): 62-89 .
27.
Gustafsson, P. (2003) ‘The Order of E-Democracy. Internet and Democracy in Swedish Local Governments’ , e-Service Journal3(1): 114-132 .
28.
Habermas, J. (1975) Legitimation Crisis. Boston, MA: Beacon Press .
29.
Habermas, J. (1990a) ‘Discourse Ethics: Notes on a Program of Philosophical Justification’, in Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, pp. 43-115. Cambridge: Polity Press .
30.
Habermas, J. (1990b) Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge: Polity Press .
31.
Habermas, J. (1996a) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press .
32.
Habermas, J. (1996b) ‘Three Normative Models of Democracy’, in S. Benhabib (ed.) Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, pp. 21-30. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
33.
Habermas, J. (2001) ‘Constitutional Democracy: a Paradoxical Union of Contradictory Principles?’ , Political Theory29(6): 766-781 .
34.
Hacker, K.L. and J. van Dijk (2000) (eds) Digital Democracy: Issues of Theory and Practice. London: Sage .
35.
Hale, M. , J. Mussio and C. Weare (1999) ‘Developing Digital Democracy: Evidence from Californian Municipal Web Pages’, in B.H. Hauge and B.D. Loader (eds) Digital Democracy: Discourse and Decision-making in the Information Age, pp. 96-115. London: Routledge .
36.
Hauge, B.H. and B.D. Loader (1999) (eds) Digital Democracy: Discourse and Decision-making in the Information Age. London: Routledge .
37.
Held, D. (1996) Models of Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press .
38.
Hoff, J. , I. Horrocks and P. Tops (2000) Democratic Governance and New Technology: Technologically-mediated Innovations in Political Practice in Western Europe. London: Routledge .
39.
Holderness, M. (1998) ‘Who Are the World’s Information-poor?’, in B.D. Loader (ed.) Cyberspace Divide: Equality, Agency and Policy in the Information Society, pp. 35-56. London: Routledge .
40.
Ilshammar, L. and J. Åström (2001) ‘Lokala ambitioner, centrala restriktioner’, in Å. Grönlund and A. Ranerup (eds) Elektronisk förvaltning, elektronisk demokrati: Visioner, verklighet, vidareutveckling, pp. 89-122. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
41.
Ishida, T. and K. Isbister (2000) (eds) Digital Cities: Technology, Experiences and Future Perspectives. Berlin: Springer Verlag .
42.
Jankowski, N. and M. van Selm (2000) ‘The Promise and Practice of Public Debate in Cyberspace’, in K.L. Hacker and J. van Dijk (eds) Digital Democracy: Issues of Theory and Practice, pp. 149-165. London: Sage .
43.
Kamarck, E.C. and J.S. Nye (2002) (eds) Governance.com: Democracy in the Information Age. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution .
44.
Katz, J.E. and P. Aspden (1997) ‘Motivations for and Barriers to Internet Usage: Results of a National Public Opinion Survey’ , Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy7(3): 170-188 .
45.
Katz, J.E. , R.E. Rice and P. Aspden (2001) ‘The Internet, 1995-2000: Access, Civic Involvement, and Social Interaction’ , American Behavioral Scientist45(3): 405-420 .
46.
Kettner, M. (1993) ‘Scientific Knowledge, Discourse Ethics and Consensus Formation in the Public Domain’, in E.R. Winkler and J.R. Coombs (eds) Applied Ethics: a Reader, pp. 28-45. Oxford: Blackwell .
47.
Klein, H. (1999) ‘Tocqueville in Cyberspace: Using the Internet for Citizen Associations’ , The Information Society15(4): 213-220 .
48.
Knight, J. and J. Johnson (1994) ‘Aggregation and Deliberation: on the Possibility of Democratic Legitimacy’ , Political Theory22(2): 277-296 .
49.
LaRose, R. , D. Mastro and M.S. Eastin (2001) ‘Understanding Internet Usage: A Social-Cognitive Approach to Uses and Gratifications’ , Social Science Computer Review, 19(4): 395-413 .
50.
Lievrouw, L.A. (1998) ‘Our Own Devices: Heterotopic Communication, Discourse, and Culture in the Information Society’ , The Information Society14(2): 83-96 .
51.
McCarthy, T. (1992) ‘Practical Discourse: On the Relation of Morality to Politics’, in C. Calhoun (ed.) Habermas and the Public Sphere, pp. 51-72. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
52.
Madon, S. and S. Sahay (2000) ‘Democracy and Information: a Case Study of Local Governance Structures in Banglore’ , Information Communication & Society3(2): 173-191 .
53.
Manin, B. (1987) ‘On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation’ , Political Theory15(3): 338-368 .
54.
Miller, D. (1992) ‘Deliberative Democracy and Social Choice’ , Political Studies40 (special issue): 54-67 .
55.
Moore, R.K. (1999) ‘Democracy and Cyberspace’, in B.N. Hauge and B.D. Loader (eds) Digital Democracy: Discourse and Decision-making in the Information Age, pp. 39-59. London: Routledge .
56.
Norris, P. (2000) ‘The Internet in Europe. A North-South Divide?’ , Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics5(1): 1-12 .
57.
Norris, P. (2002) Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
58.
O’Loughlin, B. (2001) ‘The Political Implications of Digital Innovations: Trade-offs of Democracy and Liberty in the Developed World’ , Information, Communication & Society4(4): 595-614 .
59.
Öhrvall, R. (2002) Det digitala torget: en studie av kommunala debattforum på Internet. Uppsala: Department of Government, Uppsala University .
60.
Ono, H. and M. Zavodny (2003) ‘Gender and the Internet’ , Social Science Quarterly84(1): 111-122 .
61.
Östlund, B. (1999) ‘Vidgar IT gapet mellan generationerna?’, in E. Amnå (ed.) IT i demokratins tjänst, pp. 157-82. Stockholm: Elander Gotab.
62.
Papacharissi, Z. (2002) ‘The Virtual Public Sphere: The Internet as a Public Sphere’ , New Media & Society4(2): 5-23 .
63.
Pateman, C. (1970) Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
64.
Philip, H. , E.N. Rainie and S. Jones (2001) ‘Days and Nights on the Internet: The Impact of a Diffusing Technology’ , Social Science Computer Review19(3): 383-405 .
65.
Phipps, L. (2000) ‘New Communication Technologies: A Conduit for Social Inclusion’ , Information, Communication & Society, 3(1): 39-68 .
66.
Postmes, T. and S. Brunsting (2002) ‘Collective Action in the Age of the Internet: Mass Communication and Online Mobilization’ , Social Science Computer Review20(3): 290-301 .
67.
Pruijt, H. (2002) ‘Social Capital and the Equalising Potential of the Internet’ , Social Science Computer Review20(2): 109-115 .
68.
Putnam, R. (2002) Democracy in Flux: the Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
69.
Ranerup, A. (2000) ‘On-line Forums as an Arena for Political Discussions’, in T. Ishida and K. Isbister (eds) Digital Cities: Technologies, Experiences and Future Perspectives. Berlin: Springer Verlag .
70.
Ranerup, A. (2001) ‘Elektroniska mötesplatser för kommunal debatt’, in Å. Grönlund and A. Ranerup (eds) Elektronisk förvaltning, elektronisk demokrati: Visioner, verklighet, vidareutveckling, pp. 317-42. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
71.
Richard, E. (1999) ‘Tools of Governance’, in B.N. Hauge and B.D. Loader (eds) Digital Democracy: Discourse and Decision-making in the Information Age, pp. 87-95. London: Routledge .
72.
Sassi, S. (2000) ‘The Controversies of the Internet and the Revitalization of Local Political Life’, in K.L. Hacker and J. van Dijk (eds) Digital Democracy: Issues of Theory and Practice, pp. 90-104. London: Sage .
73.
Schalken, K. (2000) ‘Virtual Communities: New Public Spheres on the Internet?’ in J. Hoff , I. Horrocks and P. Tops (eds) Democratic Governance and New Technology: Technologically Mediated Innovations in Political Practice in Western Europe, pp. 153-170. London: Routledge .
74.
Schumpeter, J. (1976[1942]) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper .
75.
Statistics Sweden (2001) IT at Home and in the Enterprise - a Statistical Description of Sweden. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden .
76.
Statistics Sweden (2003) Privatpersoner och användning av datorer och Internet 2002. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden.
77.
Steyaert, J. (2000) ‘Local Governments Online and the Role of the Resident: Government Shop Versus Electronic Community’ , Social Science Computer Review18(1): 3-16 .
78.
Swedish Agency for Public Management (2002a) Utveckling av 24-timmarsmyndigheter: Lägesrapport December 2002. Sweden: Swedish Agency for Public Management .
79.
Swedish Agency for Public Management (2002b) Utveckling av 24-timmarsmyndigheter: Lägesrapport juni 2002. Sweden: Swedish Agency for Public Management.
80.
Swedish Government Official Reports Series (2001) Att vara med på riktigt: demokratiutveckling i kommuner och landsting. Stockholm: Fritzes.
81.
Swedish National Union of Local Government Officers (2001) Om demokratiska processer och offentlig service på Sveriges kommunala webbplatser. Stockholm: Swedish National Union of Local Government Officers.
82.
Swedish National Union of Local Government Officers (2002) Hur står det till med edemokratin? Om elektronisk demokrati i samtliga svenska kommuner och i Stockholms och Göteborgs stadsdelar. Stockholm: Swedish National Union of Local Government Officers.
83.
Tsagarousianou, R. , D. Tambini and C. Bryan (1998) (eds) Cyberdemocracy: Technology, Cities and Civic Networks. London: Routledge .
84.
Van Dijk, J. (2000) ‘Widening Information Gaps and Policies of Prevention’, in K.L. Hacker and J. van Dijk (eds) Digital Democracy: Issues of Theory and Practice, pp. 166-183. London: Sage .
85.
Weber, L.M. , A. Loumakis and J. Bergman (2003) ‘Who Participates and Why? An Analysis of Citizens on the Internet and the Mass Public’ , Social Science Computer Review21(1): 26-42 .
86.
Wiklund, H. (2002) Arenas for Democratic Deliberation: Decision-making in an Infrastructure Project in Sweden. Jönköping: Jönköping University Press .
87.
Wilhelm, A.G. (1998) ‘Virtual Sounding Boards: How Deliberative Is On-line Political Discussion?’ , Information, Communication & Society1(3): 313-338 .
88.
Wilhelm, A.G. (2000) Democracy in the Digital Age: Challenges to Political Life in Cyberspace. London: Routledge .
