With the growing sophistication of social media, virality of online content has become an indicator of online message effectiveness. We argue for a comprehensive definition that extends virality to social networking and microblogging sites, by emphasizing users’ behaviors beyond shear access and viewership. Across two studies, we investigate viral behavioral intentions (VBIs) toward pro-social messages shared on Facebook and Twitter. We further explore how motivations and uses of Facebook and Twitter predict VBIs toward messages shared on these websites.
AlhabashSMcAlisterARHagerstromA. (2013) Between “likes” and “shares:” effects of emotional appeal and virality of anti-cyberbullying messages on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking16(3): 175–182.
2.
AlhabashSParkHJKononovaA. (2012) Exploring the motivations of Facebook use in Taiwan. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking15(6): 304–311.
3.
BardzellJBardzellSPageT (2008) Emotion, Engagement, and Internet Video. Charlestown, MA: OTOinsights.
4.
BollsPD (2010) Understanding emotion from a superordinate dimensional perspective: a productive way forward for communication processes and effects studies. Communication Monographs77(2): 146–152.
5.
BonchiFCastilloCIencoD (2013) Meme ranking to maximize posts virality in microblogging platforms. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems40:211–239.
6.
boydDGolderSLotanG (2010) Tweet, tweet, retweet: conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii international on system sciences (HICSS), Kauai, JI, 6 January, pp. 1–10. Manoa, HI: University of Hawai’i at Manoa.
7.
BrownMRBhaduryRKPopeNKL (2010) The impact of comedic violence on viral advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising39(Spring): 49–66.
8.
CacioppoJTBerntsonGG (1994) Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: a critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychological Bulletin115(3): 401–423.
9.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2012) Vital signs: binge drinking prevalence, frequency, and intensity among adults – US, 2010. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report61(1): 14–19.
10.
ChaikenS (1980) Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology39: 752–756.
11.
ChaikenS (1987) The heuristic model of persuasion. In: ZannaMPOlsonJMHermanCP (eds) Social Influence: The Ontario Symposium, vol. 5. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 3–39.
12.
ChaikenSLibermanAEaglyAH (1989) Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In: UlemanJSBarghJA (eds) Unintended Thought. New York: Guildford Press, pp. 212–252.
13.
CharneyTGreenbergB (2001) Uses and gratification of the Internet. In: LinCAtkinD (eds) Communication, Technology and Society: New Media Adoption and Uses. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, pp. 383–406.
14.
ChiuHCHsiehYCKaoYH. (2007) The determinants of email receivers’ disseminating behaviors on the Internet. Journal of Advertising Research47(4): 524–534.
15.
Country Time Lemonade (2013) Stand-tacular Facebook page. Available at: http://bit.ly/CTLemonadeStand (accessed 19 September 2013).
16.
De BruynALilienGL (2004) A Multi-Stage Model of Word of Mouth through Electronic Referrals. University Park, PA: eBusiness Research Center.
17.
Dicken-GarciaH (1998) The Internet and continuing historical discourse. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly75(1): 19–27.
18.
DrèzeXHussherrF-C (2003) Internet advertising: is anybody watching?Journal of Interactive Marketing17(4): 8–23.
19.
DrèzeXZufrydenF (1998) Is Internet advertising ready for prime time?Journal of Advertising Research38(3): 7–18.
20.
EcklerPBollsPD (2011) Spreading the virus: emotional tone of viral advertising and its effect on forwarding intentions and attitudes. Journal of Interactive Advertising11(2): 1–11.
21.
EcklerPRodgersS (2014) Viral advertising: a conceptualization. In: ChengH (ed.) The Handbook of International Advertising Research. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 139–160.
22.
EllisonNBSteinfieldCLampeL (2007) The benefits of Facebook “friends:” social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication12(4): 1143–1168.
23.
EllisonNBSteinfieldCLampeL (2011) Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society13(6): 873–892.
24.
EllisonNBVitakJSteinfieldCGrayRLampeC (2011) Negotiating privacy concerns and social capital needs in a social media enviornment. In: TrepteSReineckeLeonard (eds) Privacy online: Perspectives on privacy and self-disclosure in the social web. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, pp.19–32.
25.
Facebook.com (2013) Fact sheet. Available at: http://newsroom.fb.com/ (accessed 15 February 2013).
26.
FazioRHOlsonMA (2003) Attitude structure and function. In: HoggMACooperJ (eds) SAGE Handbook of Social Psychology. London: SAGE, pp. 139–160.
27.
FiskeSTTaylorSE (1984) Social Cognition. 1st ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
28.
GangadharbatlaHSmithJ (2007) eWOM: the effect of individual level factors on viral consumers’ email pass along behavior. In: SheehanKB (ed.) Proceedings of the 2007 conference of the American Academy of Advertising. Burlington, VT: American Academy of Advertising, p. 207.
29.
GolanGZaidnerZ (2008) Creative strategies in viral advertising: an application of Taylor’s six-segment message strategy wheel. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication13: 959–972.
30.
GueriniMPepeALepriB (2012) Do linguistic style and readability of scientific abstracts affect their virality? In: Proceedings of the sixth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media (ICWSM 2012), Dublin, Ireland, 4–7 June 2012 .
31.
GülnarBBalcıSÇakırV (2010) Motivations of Facebook, You Tube and similar web sites users. Bilig54(Summer): 161–184.
32.
HongJLeckenbyJD (1996) Audience measurement and media reach/frequency issues in Internet advertising. In: Proceedings of the 1996 conference of the American Academy of Advertising. Vancouver, BC, Canada: American Academy of Advertising.
33.
HsuCW (2007) Staging on the Internet: research on online photo album users in Taiwan with the spectacle/performance paradigm. Cyberpsychology & Behavior10(4): 596–600.
34.
KaikatiJGKaikatiAM (2004) Stealth marketing: how to reach consumers surreptitiously. California Management Review46(4): 6–22.
35.
KatzE (1959) Mass communication research and the study of daily serial listeners: an editorial note on a possible future for this journal. Studies in Public Communication2: 1–6.
36.
KatzEBlumlerJGGurevitchM (1973) Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly37(4): 509–523.
LangoseC (2012) Cyberbullying: the challenge to define. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking15(6): 285–289.
39.
LearmonthM (2011) Beyond TV, marketers look to ‘earn’ love for video ads: with online playing a bigger role in today’s campaigns, social-sharing becomes coveted metric for web efforts. AdAge Digital. Available at: http://adage.com/article/digital/tv-marketers-earn-love-video-ads/227513/ (accessed 24 October 2012).
40.
LenhartAMaddenMSmithA. (2011) Teens, Kindness and Cruelty on Social Network Sites: How American Teens Navigate the New World of “Digital Citizenship.”Washington, DC: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project.
41.
LeungL (2009) User generated content on the Internet: an examination of gratifications, civic engagement and psychological empowerment. New Media & Society11(8): 1327–1347.
42.
LiuILBCheungCMKLeeMKO (2010) Understanding Twitter usage: what drives people to continue to tweet. In: Proceedings from Pacific Asia conference on information systems, Taipei, Taiwan, 9–12 July.
MacraeCNBodenhausenGV (2001) Social cognition: categorical person perception. British Journal of Psychology92: 239–255.
45.
MaioGRHaddockG (2007) Attitude change. In: KruglanskiAWHigginsET (eds) Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles. 2nd ed.New York: Guilford Press, pp. 565–586.
46.
MorrisMOganC (1996) The Internet as a mass medium. Journal of Communication46(1): 39–50.
47.
NabiRL (2010) The case for emphasizing discrete emotions in communication research. Communication Monographs77(2): 153–159.
48.
NewhagenJERafaeliS (1996) Why communication researchers should study the Internet: a dialogue. Journal of Communication46(1): 4–13.
49.
PalkaWKeyPDietmarW (2009) Mobile word-of-mouth: a grounded theory of mobile viral marketing. Journal of Information Technology24(2): 172–185.
50.
PapacharissiZMendesonA (2011) Toward a new(er) sociability: uses, gratifications and social capital on Facebook. In: PapathanassopoulosS (ed.) Media Perspectives for the 21st Century. New York: Routledge, pp. 212–230.
51.
PapacharissiZRubinA (2000) Predictors of Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media44(2): 175–196.
52.
ParkNKeeKFValenzuelaS (2009) Being immersed in social networking environment: Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes. Cyberpsychology & Behavior12(6): 729–733.
PempekTAYermolayevaYACalvertSL (2009) College students social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology30: 227–238.
55.
PettyRECacioppoJT (1981) Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
56.
PettyRECacioppoJT (1986) The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology19: 123–205.
57.
PhelpsJLewisRMobilioL. (2004) Viral marketing or electronic word-of-mouth advertising: examining consumer responses and motivations to pass along email. Journal of Advertising Research44(4): 333–348.
58.
PoonDCHLeungL (2011) Effects of narcissism, leisure boredom, and gratifications sought on user-generated content among net-generation users. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning1(3): 1–14.
59.
PorterLGolanGJ (2006) From subservient chickens to brawny men: a comparison of viral advertising to television advertising. Journal of Interactive Advertising6(2): 26–33.
60.
RayburnJD (1996) Uses and gratification. In: SalwenBStacksDW (eds) An Integrated Approach to Communication and Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 97–119.
61.
RosengrenKE (1974) Uses and gratifications: a paradigm outlined. In: BlumlerJGKatzE (eds) The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE, pp. 269–286.
62.
RuggieroTE (2000) Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication and Society3(1): 3–37.
63.
SchillerJSLucasJWWardBW. (2012) Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: national health interview survey, 2010. Vital and Health Statistics10(252): 1–207.
64.
SchneiderFFeldmannAKrishnamurthyB. (2009) Understanding online social network usage from a network perspective. In: Proceedings of IMC’09. Available at: http://www2.research.att.com/~bala/papers/imc09-osnf.pdf (accessed 14 January 2014).
65.
ScottDM (2013) The New Rules of Marketing and PR: How to Use Social Media, Online Video, Mobile Applications, Blogs, News Releases, and Viral Marketing. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
66.
ShaoS (2008) Understanding the appeal of user-generated media: a uses and gratifications perspective. Internet Research19(1): 7–25.
67.
SheldonS (2008) Student favorite: Facebook and motives for its use. Southwestern Journal of Mass Communication23: 39–53.
SterneJ (2010) Social Media Metrics: How to Measure and Optimize Your Marketing Investment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
72.
ThomasGMJr (2004) Building the buzz in the hive mind. Journal of Consumer Behaviour4(1): 64–72.
73.
TuckerC (2011) Virality, Network Effects and Advertising. Cambridge, MA: NET Institute, MIT.
74.
UristaMADongWDayKD (2009) Explaining why young adults use MySpace and Facebook through uses and gratifications theory. Human Communication12(2): 215–229.
75.
WelkerCB (2002) The paradigm of viral communication. Information Services and Use22(1): 3–8.
WolburgJM (2001) Misplaced marketing: why television is the “wrong” environment for public service advertising campaigns. Journal of Consumer Marketing18(6): 471–473.
