Information and communication technologies (ICTs) are increasingly important for people with disabilities (PWDs), suggesting digital inclusion as a possible social mechanism against the social exclusion of disability. This study suggests a more complicated relationship between ICTs and disability. Situated in a Chinese context and based on research methods of ethnographic participant observation and in-depth interviews, this study explains why and how social exclusion of disability in China leads to PWDs’ exodus to the Internet, where they find a possible habitat of digital and social inclusion notwithstanding the risk of more profound social exclusion. The study finally argues that the Internet habitat of PWDs is both a material enclave and a discourse heterotopia for understanding Chinese society, disability, and ICTs. In addition, future studies should further include PWDs in this field.
AbramsLS (2010) Sampling “hard to reach” populations in qualitative research: the case of incarcerated youth. Qualitative Social Work9(4): 536–550.
2.
AdamAKrepsD (2009) Disability and discourses of web accessibility. Information, Communication & Society12(7): 1041–1058.
3.
AdkinsBSummervilleJKnoxMet al. (2013) Digital technologies and musical participation for people with intellectual disabilities. New Media & Society15(4): 501–518.
BarnesC (2007) Disability, higher education and the inclusive society. British Journal of Sociology of Education28(1): 135–145.
9.
BartonL (1998) Sociology, disability studies and education. In: ShakespeareT (ed.) The Disability Reader: Social Science Perspectives. London: Cassell, pp. 53–65.
10.
BowkerNTuffinK (2007) Understanding positive subjectivities made possible online for disabled people. New Zealand Journal of Psychology36(2): 63–71.
11.
BoysJ (2014) Doing Disability Differently: An Alternative Handbook on Architecture, Dis/Ability and Designing for Everyday Life. London; New York: Routledge.
12.
ChadwickDWessonC (2016) Digital inclusion and disability. In: AlisonAChrisF (eds) Applied Cyberpsychology: Practical Applications of Cyberpsychological Theory and Research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–23.
13.
ChadwickDWessonCFullwoodC (2013) Internet access by people with intellectual disabilities: inequalities and opportunities. Future Internet5: 376–397.
14.
ChangHH (2017) From advocacy to service provision: state transformation and the disability rights movement in Taiwan. Disability & Society32(3): 308–322.
15.
CharltonJ (1998) Nothing about Us without Us. London: University of California Press.
16.
ChenX (2012) Social Protest and Contentious Authoritarianism in China. New York: Cambridge University Press.
ClementsLReadJ (eds) (2008) Disabled People and the Right to Life: The Protection and Violation of Disabled People’s Most Basic Human Rights. London: Routledge.
22.
D’AubinA (2007) Working for barrier removal in the ICT area: creating a more accessible and inclusive Canada. Information Society23: 193–201.
23.
DavisLJ (1995) Enforcing Normalcy: Disability, Deafness and the Body. New York: Verso Books.
24.
DayG (2006) Community and Everyday Life. New York: Routledge.
25.
DeanJ (2005) Communicative capitalism: circulation and the foreclosure of politics. Cultural Politics1(1): 51–74.
26.
Disability Rights Commission (DRC) (2006) Disability Briefing March 2006. Leeds: DRC.
27.
DispenzaML (2002) Overcoming the new digital divide: technology accommodations and the undue hardship defense under the Americans with disabilities act. Syracuse Law Review52: 159–181.
28.
DobranskyKHargittaiE (2006) The disability divide in internet access and use. Information, Communication & Society9(3): 313–334.
29.
EastonC (2013) An examination of the Internet’s development as a disabling environment in the context of the social model of disability and anti-discrimination legislation in the UK and USA. Universal Access in the Information Society12: 105–144.
30.
EllcessorE (2010) Bridging disability divides: a critical history of web content accessibility through 2001. Information, Communication & Society13(3): 289–308.
31.
EllcessorE (2016) Restricted Access: Media, Disability, and the Politics of Participation. New York: New York University Press.
32.
EllcessorE (2017) Cyborg hoaxes: disability, deception, and critical studies of digital media. New Media & Society19(11): 1761–1777.
33.
EllisKKentM (2010) Disability and New Media. New York: Routledge.
34.
ErevellesN (2011) Disability and Difference in Global Contexts: Enabling a Transformative Body Politic. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
35.
FeelyM (2016) Disability studies after the ontological turn: a return to the material world and material bodies without a return to essentialism. Disability & Society31(7): 863–883.
36.
FisherKJingL (2008) Chinese disability independent living policy. Disability & Society23(2): 171–185.
37.
FoleyAFerriBA (2012) Technology for people, not disabilities: ensuring access and inclusion. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs12(4): 192–200.
38.
GogginGNewellC (2000) An end to disabling policies? Toward enlightened universal service. Information Society16(2): 127–133.
39.
GogginGNewellC (2003) Digital Disability: The Social Construction of Disability in New Media. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
40.
GogginGNewellC (2006) Disability, identity, and interdependence: ICTs and new social forms. Information, Communication & Society9(3): 309–311.
HoppestadBS (2013) Current perspective regarding adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities accessing computer technology. Disability and Rehabilitation8: 190–194.
43.
HughesBPatersonK (1997) The social model of disability and the disappearing body: towards a sociology of impairment. Disability & Society12(3): 325–340.
44.
KimE (2016) Curative Violence: Rehabilitating Disability, Gender, and Sexuality in Modern Korea. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
45.
LevittJM (2017) Exploring how the social model of disability can be re-invigorated: in response to Mike Oliver. Disability & Society32(4): 589–594.
46.
LivingstoneSHaddonL (2009) EU Kids Online Final Report. London: EU Kids Online; LSE.
47.
McClimensAGordonF (2009) People with intellectual disabilities as bloggers: what’s social capital got to do with it anyway?Journal of Intellectual Disabilities13(1): 19–30.
48.
MacdonaldSJClaytonJ (2013) Back to the future, disability and the digital divide. Disability & Society28(5): 702–718.
49.
MagnussonLHansonEBorgM (2004) A Literature review study of information and communication technology as a support for frail older people living at home and their family carers. Technology and Disability16: 223–235.
MorozovE (2011) The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. New York: Public Affairs.
52.
MoserI (2006) Disability and the promises of technology: technology, subjectivity and embodiment within an order of the normal. Information, Communication & Society9(3): 373–395.
53.
OliverM (1996) Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.
54.
OliverM (2013) The social model of disability: thirty years on. Disability & Society28(7): 1024–1026.
55.
OliverMBarnesC (1997) All we are saying is give disabled researchers a chance. Disability & Society12(5): 811–814.
56.
OliverMBarnesC (2010) Disability studies, disabled people and the struggle for inclusion. British Journal of Sociology of Education31(5): 547–560.
57.
OliverMBarnesC (2012) The New Politics of Disablement. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
58.
PearsonVWongYCPieriniJ (2002) The structure and content of social inclusion: voices of young adults with learning difficulties in Guangzhou. Disability & Society17(4): 365–382.
59.
PieriniJPearsonVWongYC (2001) Glorious work: employment of adults with a learning disability in Guangzhou from the perspective of their parents. Disability & Society16(2): 255–272.
60.
PinchevskiAPetersJD (2016) Autism and new media: disability between technology and society. New Media & Society18(11): 2507–2523.
61.
PullinG (2009) Design Meets Disability. Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.
62.
RaoDB (2008) Education for All: Issues & Trends. New Delhi, India: APH Publishing.
63.
RitchieHBlanckP (2003) The promise of the Internet for disability: a study of on-line services and web site accessibility at centers for independent living. Behavioral Sciences & the Law21(1): 5–26.
64.
SaichT (2000) Negotiating the state: the development of social organizations in China. China Quarterly161: 124–141.
65.
SevronLJ (2002) Bridging the Digital Divide: Technology, Community and Public Policy. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
66.
ShakespeareTWatsonN (1997) Defending the social model. Disability & Society12(2): 293–300.
SiebersT (2008) Disability Theory. Michigan, MI: University of Michigan Press.
69.
StoneE (1996) A law to protect, a law to prevent: contextualising disability legislation in China. Disability & Society11(4): 469–483.
70.
ThomsonRG (1997) Extraordinary Bodies: Figuring Physical Disability in American Culture and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press.
71.
ThoreauE (2006) Ouch! An examination of the self-representation of disabled people on the Internet. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication11(2): 442–468.
72.
VincenteMRLópezAJ (2010) A multidimensional analysis of the disability digital divide: some evidence for Internet use. Information Society26(1): 48–64.
73.
WellmanBHaythornthwaiteC (eds) (2008) The Internet in Everyday Life. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
74.
XunZ (2002) The discourse of disability in modern China. Patterns of Prejudice36(1): 104–112.
75.
YangG (2011) The Power of the Internet in China: Citizen Activism Online. New York: Columbia University Press.
76.
YeoRBoltonA (2008) I Don’t Have a Problem, the Problem is Theirs’: The Lives and Aspirations of Bolivian Disabled People in Words and Pictures. Leeds: The Disability Press.
77.
YoungN (2001) Disability and civil society. China Review19: 28–30.
78.
ZhangC (2017) “Nothing about us without us”: the emerging disability movement and advocacy in China. Disability & Society32(7): 1096–1101.
79.
ZhangZ (2015) “Internet plus” helps PWDs’ employment. Guangzhou Daily, 13July, p. F02 (in Chinese).
