Cameo is part of a growing set of new media platforms trending toward direct routes for monetizing fame. Cameo allows fans to book personalized shout-out videos and provides celebrities—celetoids and reality stars in particular—access to new modes of income, which became increasingly important amid the pandemic. This research explores how the direct monetization of the fan-celebrity relationship is re-shaping the power dynamic of these parasocial relationships. Using digital ventriloquism as an analytical lens to study reality stars (e.g. Real Housewives) on Cameo, this study introduces the concept of paid puppeteering on digital platforms, defined as a form of digital ventriloquism in which a celebrity’s public persona is manipulated and incentivized through financial means on a paid digital platform for the illusion of close parasocial connections with fans. Paid puppeteering reinforces celebrities as gig workers as Cameo mitigates fan access to celebrities—for a fee.
AndrejevicM (2004) Reality TV: The Work of Being Watched. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
2.
BainottiLCaliandroAGandiniA (2020) From archive cultures to ephemeral content, and back: studying Instagram Stories with digital methods. New Media & Society. Epub ahead of print 20 September. DOI: 10.1177/1461444820960071.
3.
BielbyDDHarringtonCL (2008) Global TV: Exporting Television and Culture in the World Market. New York: New York University Press.
4.
BonifacioRWohnDY (2020) Digital patronage platforms. In: Conference companion publication of the 2020 on computer supported cooperative work and social computing (CSCW ’20 companion), New York, 17 October, pp. 221–226. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
5.
CampbellCGrimmPE (2019) The challenges native advertising poses: exploring Potential Federal Trade Commission responses and identifying research needs. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing38(1): 110–123.
6.
ChunWHK (2017) Updating to Remain the Same: Habitual New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
ChungSChoH (2017) Fostering parasocial relationships with celebrities on social media: implications for celebrity endorsement. Psychology & Marketing34(4): 481–495.
8.
CollinsK (2018) Comedian hosts and the demotic turn. In: LlinaresDFoxNBerryR (eds) Podcasting: New Aural Cultures and Digital Media. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 227–250.
9.
ConnorS (2000) Dumbstruck: A Cultural History of Ventriloquism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
CoorenF (2010) Action and Agency in Dialogue: Passion, Incarnation and Ventriloquism. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing.
11.
CoorenF (2012) Communication theory at the center: ventriloquism and the communicative constitution of reality. Journal of Communication62(1): 1–20.
12.
CoorenF (2020) Reconciling dialogue and propagation: a ventriloquial inquiry. Language and Dialogue10(1): 9–28.
13.
CurnuttH (2011) Durable participants: a generational approach to reality TV’s “ordinary” labor pool. Media, Culture & Society33(7): 1061–1076.
14.
DayA (2018) Throwing our voices: ventriloquism as new media activism. Media, Culture & Society40(4): 617–628.
15.
DeCordovaR (1990/2007) The emergence of the star system in America. In: GledhillC (ed.) Stardom: Industry of Desire. London: Routledge, pp. 132–140.
16.
DrentenJGurrieriLTylerM (2020) Sexualized labour in digital culture: Instagram influencers, porn chic and the monetization of attention. Gender, Work & Organization27(1): 41–66.
17.
DyerR (2004) Heavenly Bodies: Film Stars and Society. London: Routledge.
18.
FrostC (2020) The power of voice: bots, democracy and the problem of political ventriloquism. Journal of Political Power13(1): 6–21.
19.
GamsonJ (2011) The unwatched life is not worth living: the elevation of the ordinary in celebrity culture. PMLA126(4): 1061–1069.
20.
HackleyCHackleyRABassiouniDH (2018) Implications of the selfie for marketing management practice in the era of celebrity. Marketing Intelligence & Planning36(1): 49–62.
21.
HearnA (2016) Witches and bitches: reality television, housewifization and the new hidden abode of production. European Journal of Cultural Studies20(1): 10–24.
22.
HearnASchoenhoffS (2015) From celebrity to influencer. In: MarshallPDRedmondS (eds) A Companion to Celebrity. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 194–211.
23.
IravantchiYGoelMHarrisonC (2020) Digital ventriloquism: giving voice to everyday objects. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI ’20: CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, New York, 21 April, pp. 1–10. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
24.
JenkinsH (2006) Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.
25.
JianMLiuCD (2009) “Democratic entertainment” commodity and unpaid labor of reality TV: a preliminary analysis of China’s Supergirl. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies10(4): 524–543.
26.
KhamisSAngLWellingR (2016) Self-branding, “micro-celebrity” and the rise of social media influencers. Celebrity Studies82(2): 191–208.
27.
LeeMJMoscowitzL (2013) The “Rich Bitch”: Class and gender on the Real Housewives of New York City. Feminist Media Studies. 13(1): 64–82.
28.
LehdonvirtaV (2018) Flexibility in the gig economy: managing time on three online piecework platforms. New Technology, Work and Employment33(1): 13–29.
29.
LeppänenS (2015) Dog blogs as ventriloquism: authentication of the human voice. Discourse, Context & Media8(3): 63–73.
MarwickAboydd (2012) To see and be seen: celebrity practice on Twitter. Convergence17(2): 139–158.
32.
MavroudisJ (2018) Fame labor. In: AbidinCLindsay BrownM (eds) Microcelebrity around the Globe. Bingley: Emerald Publishing, pp. 83–93.
33.
PenningtonDR (2016) Coding of non-text data. In: SloanLQuan-HasseA (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Social Media Research Methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, pp. 232–250.
PsarrasE (2014) We all want to be big stars: the desire for fame and the draw to the real housewives. Clothing Cultures2(1): 51–72.
36.
PsarrasE (2020) “It’s a mix of authenticity and complete fabrication” Emotional camping: the cross-platform labor of the Real Housewives. New Media & Society. Epub ahead of print 4 December. DOI: 10.1177/1461444820975025.
37.
RiszkoL (2017) Breaching bodily boundaries: posthuman (dis)embodiment and ecstatic speech in lip-sync performances by boychild. International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media13(2): 153–169.
38.
RojekC (2001) Celebrity. London: Reaktion Books.
39.
RojekC (2012) Fame Attack: The Inflation of Celebrity and Its Consequences. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
40.
RojekC (2015) Presumed Intimacy: Parasocial Interaction in Media, Society and Celebrity Culture. Cambridge: Polity.
41.
SchickelR (1985) Intimate Strangers: The Culture of Celebrity. New York: Doubleday & Company.
42.
TaylorBC (2021) Defending the state from digital Deceit: the reflexive securitization of deepfake. Critical Studies in Media Communication38(1): 1–17.
43.
ThomasS (2014) Celebrity in the “Twitterverse”: history, authenticity and the multiplicity of stardom situating the “newness” of Twitter. Celebrity Studies5(3): 242–255.
44.
ThompsonAStringfellowLMacleanM, et al. (2015) Puppets of necessity? Celebritisation in structured reality television. Journal of Marketing Management31(5–6): 478–501.
