Existing research emphasizes the precarity of workers engaged in the exchange of goods and services through digital platforms. Yet few studies have systematically examined how racial discrimination shapes the opportunities of platform workers. Here, we focus on influencers, or people who monetize content on social media platforms. Drawing on a mixed-method analysis of 1,082 posts crowdsourced by the @InfluencerPayGap Instagram account, we document three findings. First, while most influencers in our sample received monetary payment for sponsored campaigns, rates are significantly lower than expected based on industry estimates. Second, social media metrics are racialized to justify paying influencers of color less than white influencers. Third, influencers of color are less likely than white influencers to receive monetary compensation or succeed in their negotiations with brands. Contrary to the rhetoric of fairness and democratization promoted by digital platforms, these dynamics reproduce racial domination and undermine collective action among social media influencers.
AloisiA (2019) Negotiating the digital transformation of work: non-standard workers’ voice, collective rights and mobilisation practices in the platform economy. EUI working paper MWP 2019/03201903, 12 June. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3404990
2.
BabcockLLascheverS (2003) Women Don’t Ask: Negotiation and the Gender Divide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
BenjaminR (2019) Race after Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Cambridge: Polity Press.
4.
BishopS (2021a) Influencer management tools: algorithmic cultures, brand safety, and bias. Social Media+ Society7(1): 1–13.
boyddEllisonNB (2007) Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication13(1): 210–230.
7.
BrockA (2020) Distributed Blackness: African American Cyberculture. New York: NYU Press.
8.
BrunsA (2009) From prosumer to produser: understanding user-led content creation. In: Proceedings of the transforming audiences conference, London, 3–4September. Available at: http://eprints.qut.edu.au/27370
9.
CaplanRGillespieT (2020) Tiered governance and demonetization: the shifting terms of labor and compensation in the platform economy. Social Media+ Society6(2): 1–13.
CitronDK (2014) Hate Crimes in Cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
ClairM (2020) Privilege and Punishment: How Race and Class Matter in Criminal Court. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
CunninghamSCraigD (2019) Creator governance in social media entertainment. Social Media+ Society5(4): 1–11.
15.
DubalV (2021) The new racial wage code. Harvard Law and Policy Review2021: 3855094.
16.
DuffyBE (2017) (Not) Getting Paid to Do What You Love: Gender, Social Media, and Aspirational Work. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
17.
DuffyBEPinchASannonS, et al. (2021) The nested precarities of creative labor on social media. Social Media+ Society7(2): 1–12.
18.
DuffyBEPoellTNieborgDB (2019) Platform practices in the cultural industries: creativity, labor, and citizenship. Social Media and Society5(4): 1–8.
19.
EdelmanBLucaMSvirskyD (2017) Racial discrimination in the sharing economy: evidence from a field experiment. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics9(2): 1–22.
GillespieT (2010) The politics of “platforms.” New Media & Society12(3): 347–364.
22.
GlattZ (2022) “We’re all told not to put our eggs in one basket”: uncertainty, precarity and cross-platform labor in the online video influencer industry. International Journal of Communication16: 3853–3871.
23.
GrayMLSuriS (2019) Ghost Work: How to Stop Silicon Valley from Building a New Global Underclass. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
24.
GriesbachKReichAElliott-NegriL, et al. (2019) Algorithmic control in platform food delivery work. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World5: 1–15.
25.
HargittaiE (2020) Potential biases in big data: omitted voices on social media. Social Science Computer Review38(1): 10–24.
26.
IgoSE (2008) The Averaged American: Surveys, Citizens, and the Making of a Mass Public. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
JacksonSJBaileyMWellesBF (2020) #Hashtagactivism: Networks of Race and Gender Justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30.
JenkinsH (2006) Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.
31.
KelloggKCValentineMAChristinA (2020) Algorithms at work: the new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals14(1): 366–410.
32.
KetonenVMalikA (2020) Characterizing vaping posts on Instagram by using unsupervised machine learning. International Journal of Medical Informatics141: 104223.
33.
LareauA (2003) Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
34.
LeaverTHighfieldTAbidinC (2020) Instagram: Visual Social Media Cultures. Cambridge: Polity Press.
35.
LevyKBarocasS (2018) Refractive surveillance: monitoring customers to manage workers. International Journal of Communication12: 1166–1188.
36.
LinN (2000) Inequality in social capital. Contemporary Sociology29(6): 785–795.
McMillan CottomT (2020b) Where platform capitalism and racial capitalism meet: the sociology of race and racism in the digital society. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity6(4): 441–449.
40.
MitchellC (2008) Getting the picture and changing the picture: visual methodologies and educational research in South Africa. South African Journal of Education28(3): 365–383.
MuhammadHWahiduddinFBudiNF, et al. (2018) An integrated framework to investigate influencing factors of user’s engagements on Instagram contents. In: Proceedings of the 2018 third international conference on informatics and computing (ICIC), 1–6 October. Mew York: IEEE. Available at: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=8780511
43.
NobleSU (2018) Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: New York University Press.
44.
OmiMWinantH (2014) Racial Formation in the United States. New York: Routledge.
RobinsonCJ (1983) Black Marxism: The Making of the Black Radical Tradition. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
52.
RosenblatA (2018) Uberland: How Algorithms Are Rewriting the Rules of Work. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
53.
SalehiNIraniLCBernsteinMS, et al. (2015) We are dynamo: overcoming stalling and friction in collective action for crowd workers. In: Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI), Seoul, Republic of Korea, 18–23 April, pp. 1621–1630. Available at: https://hci.stanford.edu/publications/2015/dynamo/DynamoCHI2015.pdf
54.
SauerCValetPShamsS, et al. (2021) Categorical distinctions and claims-making: opportunity, agency, and returns from wage negotiations. American Sociological Review86(5): 934–959.
55.
SchorJ (2020) After the Gig: How the Sharing Economy Got Hijacked and How to Win It Back. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
56.
SchouPKBucherE (2022) Divided we fall: the breakdown of gig worker solidarity in online communities. New Technology, Work and Employment. Epub ahead of print 29 November. DOI: 10.1111/ntwe.12260.
57.
ShestakofskyB (2017) Working algorithms: software automation and the future of work. Work and Occupations44(4): 376–423.
58.
SobierajS (2020) Credible Threat: Attacks against Women Online and the Future of Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
59.
SorianoCRRCabañesJVA (2020) Entrepreneurial solidarities: social media collectives and Filipino digital platform workers. Social Media + Society6(2): 1–11.
TiconaJMateescuA (2018) Trusted strangers: carework platforms’ cultural entrepreneurship in the on-demand economy. New Media & Society20(11): 4384–4404.
62.
TilcsikA (2021) Statistical discrimination and the rationalization of stereotypes. American Sociological Review86(1): 93–122.
63.
VallasSSchorJB (2020) What do platforms do? Understanding the gig economy. Annual Review of Sociology46(1): 273–294.
64.
Van DoornN (2017) Platform labor: on the gendered and racialized exploitation of low-income service work in the “on-demand” economy. Information, Communication & Society20(6): 898–914.
65.
YuanYConstineJ (2021) What is the creator economy? Influencer tools and trends. Signalfire. Available at: http://signalfire.com/blog/creator-economy/ (accessed 3 November 2021).
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
