Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Guarding against deception through news literacy interventions: Impact of issue involvement and participation on young French adults’ fake news vulnerability
In the so-called post-truth age and the rise of social media, news circulates widely and quickly, leading to information overload. In this context, individuals experiencing high issue involvement tend to engage more with information. Literature has recently focused on news literacy interventions to protect people from fake news. However, few have addressed these initiatives’ immediate and differential effects simultaneously on young adults’ vulnerability to deception. Through three experiments involving undergraduate university students in France, we demonstrate that intervention-based educational methods can mitigate the impact of issue involvement on belief in fake news. Yet, they do not enable individuals to protect themselves in the long run and may even prove counterproductive by triggering information overload. Our study contributes to the research investigating preventive practices to help users arm themselves against fake news in media communication, social media, and social marketing.
AshleyS (2020) News Literacy and Democracy (Media Studies). New York; London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
2.
AshleySMakslACraftS (2017) News media literacy and political engagement: what’s the connection?Journal of Media Literacy Education9(1): 79–98.
3.
AuxierBEVitakJ (2019) Factors motivating customization and echo chamber creation within digital news environments. Social Media + Society5(2): 205630511984750.
4.
BermesA (2021) Information overload and fake news sharing: a transactional stress perspective exploring the mitigating role of consumers’ resilience during COVID-19. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services61: 102555.
5.
BoydD (2017) Did media literacy backfire?Journal of Applied Youth Studies1: 83–89.
6.
BryanovKVziatyshevaV (2021) Determinants of individuals’ belief in fake news: a scoping review determinants of belief in fake news. PLOS ONE16(6): e0253717.
7.
ChaikenS (1980) Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology39: 752–766.
8.
ChanM (2022) News literacy, fake news recognition, and authentication behaviors after exposure to fake news on social media. new media & society26: 4669–4688.
9.
ChenDWuJWangY-M (2011) Unpacking new media literacy. Journal on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics9(2): 84–88.
10.
CraftSAshleySMakslA (2017) News media literacy and conspiracy theory endorsement. Communication and the Public2(4): 388–401.
11.
DuboisEMinaeianSPaquet-LabelleA, et al (2020) Who to trust on social media: how opinion leaders and seekers avoid disinformation and echo chambers. Social Media + Society6(2): 205630512091399.
12.
DumitruE-AIvanLLoosE (2022) A generational approach to fight fake news: in search of effective media literacy training and interventions. In: GaoQZhouJ (eds) Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Design, Interaction and Technology Acceptance. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham: Springer, pp. 291–310. Available at: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-05581-2_22 (accessed 8 January 2025).
13.
EdgerlySMourãoRRThorsonE, et al (2020) When do audiences verify? How perceptions about message and source influence audience verification of news headlines. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly97(1): 52–71.
14.
FlemingJ (2014) Media literacy, news literacy, or news appreciation? A case study of the news literacy program at stony brook university. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator69(2): 146–165.
HameleersM (2022) Separating truth from lies: comparing the effects of news media literacy interventions and fact-checkers in response to political misinformation in the US and Netherlands. Information, Communication & Society25(1): 110–126.
17.
HeadAWihbeyJMetaxasPT, et al (2018) How students engage with news: five takeaways for educators, journalists, and librarians. Project Information Literacy3: ED591129.
18.
HeissRNanzAMatthesJ (2023) Social media information literacy: conceptualization and associations with information overload, news avoidance and conspiracy mentality. Computers in Human Behavior148: 107908.
19.
HitaMLRGrégoireYLussierB, et al (2022) An extended health belief model for COVID-19: understanding the media-based processes leading to social distancing and panic buying. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. Epub ahead of print 16 May 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s11747-022-00865-8.
20.
HuangYLStarbirdKOrandM, et al (2015) Connected through crisis: emotional proximity and the spread of misinformation online. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 28 February 2015, pp. 969–980. New York: ACM. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2675133.2675202 (accessed 29 May 2024).
21.
JeonYKimBXiongA, et al (2021) ChamberBreaker: Mitigating the Echo Chamber Effect and Supporting Information Hygiene through a Gamified Inoculation System. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-computer Interaction5(CSCW2): 1–26.
22.
JohnsonNRPaalKWaggonerE, et al (2021) Scales for assessing news literacy education in the digital era. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator76(2): 156–175.
Jones-JangSMMortensenTLiuJ (2021) Does media literacy help identification of fake news? Information literacy helps, but other literacies don’t. American Behavioral Scientist65(2): 371–388.
25.
KhanMLIdrisIK (2019) Recognise misinformation and verify before sharing: a reasoned action and information literacy perspective. Behaviour & Information Technology38(12): 1194–1212.
26.
KlurfeldJSchneiderH (2014) News literacy: Teaching the internet generation to make reliable information choices. Research Paper, 3 July, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
27.
LaatoSIslamAKMNFarooqA, et al (2020) Unusual purchasing behavior during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: The stimulus-organism-response approach. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services57: 102224.
28.
LoosEIvanL (2023) Using media literacy to fight digital fake news in later life: a mission impossible? In: GaoQZhouJ (eds) Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham: Springer, pp. 233–247. Available at: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-34866-2_18 (accessed 9 January 2025).
29.
LoosENijenhuisJ (2020) Consuming fake news: a matter of age? The perception of political fake news stories in Facebook Ads. In: GaoQZhouJ (eds) Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Technology and Society. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham: Springer, pp. 69–88. Available at: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-50232-4_6 (accessed 8 January 2025).
30.
LoosEIvanLLeuD (2018) “Save the Pacific Northwest tree octopus”: a hoax revisited. Or: How vulnerable are school children to fake news?Information and Learning Science119(9–10): 514–528.
31.
LuCHuBBaoM-M, et al (2024) Can media literacy intervention improve fake news credibility assessment? A meta-analysis. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking27(4): 240–252.
32.
McDermottR (2019) Psychological underpinnings of post-truth in political beliefs. PS: Political Science & Politics52(2): 218–222.
33.
McGrewSBreakstoneJOrtegaT, et al (2018) Can students evaluate online sources? Learning from assessments of civic online reasoning. Theory & Research in Social Education46: 165–193.
34.
MachetePTurpinM (2020) The use of critical thinking to identify fake news: a systematic literature review. In: HattinghMMattheeMSmutsH, et al (eds) Responsible Design, Implementation and Use of Information and Communication Technology (Lecture Notes in Computer Science). Cham: Springer, pp.235–246.
35.
MakslAAshleySCraftS (2015) Measuring news media literacy. Journal of Media Literacy Education6: 29–45.
36.
MartelCPennycookGRandDG (2020) Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications5(1): 47.
37.
MihailidisPViottyS (2017) Spreadable spectacle in digital culture: civic expression, fake news, and the role of media literacies in “Post-Fact” Society. American Behavioral Scientist61(4): 441–454.
Oeldorf-HirschADeVossCL (2020) Who posted that story? Processing layered sources in Facebook news posts. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly97(1): 141–160.
40.
PennycookGCannonTDRandDG (2018) Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General147(12): 1865–1880.
41.
PentinaITarafdarM (2014) From “information” to “knowing”: exploring the role of social media in contemporary news consumption. Computers in Human Behavior35: 211–223.
42.
PettyRECacioppoJT (1979) Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology37(10): 1915–1926.
43.
PettyRECacioppoJT (1981) Issue involvement as a moderator of the effects on attitude of advertising content and context. Advances in Consumer Research8(1): 20–24.
44.
PettyRECacioppoJT (1986) The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In: PettyRECacioppoJT (eds) Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York: Springer, pp.1–24. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1_1 (accessed 29 May 2024).
45.
PettyRECacioppoJTSchumannD (1983) Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: the moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research10(2): 135.
46.
Radanielina HitaMLKareklasIPinkletonB (2018) Parental mediation in the digital era: increasing children’s critical thinking may help decrease positive attitudes toward alcohol. Journal of Health Communication23(1): 98–108.
47.
RoozenbeekJLindenSvan der GoldbergB, et al (2022) Psychological inoculation improves resilience against misinformation on social media. Science Advances8(34): eabo6254.
48.
SchwarzN (2012) Feelings-as-information theory. In: Van LangePAMKruglanskiAWHigginsET (eds) Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, Vol. 1, London: Sage, pp. 289–308. Available at: https://sk.sagepub.com/reference/hdbk_socialpsychtheories1/n15.xml (accessed 26 April 2024).
49.
SongHJungJKimY (2017) Perceived news overload and its cognitive and attitudinal consequences for news usage in South Korea. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly94(4): 1172–1190.
50.
SwartJ (2023) Tactics of news literacy: How young people access, evaluate, and engage with news on social media. new media & society25(3): 505–521.
51.
TamboerSLKleemansMDaalmansS (2022) ‘We are a neeeew generation’: Early adolescents’ views on news and news literacy. Journalism23(4): 806–822.
52.
TamboerSLVlaanderenABevelanderKE, et al (2024) Do you know what fake news is? An exploration of and intervention to increase youth’s fake news literacy. Youth & Society56(4): 774–792.
53.
TandocEC (2019) Tell me who your sources are: perceptions of news credibility on social media. Journalism Practice13(2): 178–190.
54.
TandocECKimHK (2022) Avoiding real news, believing in fake news? Investigating pathways from information overload to misbelief. Journalism24: 1174–1192.
55.
TullyMVragaEK (2017) Effectiveness of a news media literacy advertisement in partisan versus nonpartisan online media contexts. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media61(1): 144–162.
56.
TullyMVragaEBodeL (2020) Designing and testing news literacy messages for social media. Mass Communication and Society23(1): 22–46.
57.
VafeiadisMXiaoA (2021) Fake news: how emotions, involvement, need for cognition and rebuttal evidence (story vs. informational) influence consumer reactions toward a targeted organization. Public Relations Review47(4): 102088.
58.
VafeiadisMBortreeDSBuckleyC, et al (2019) Refuting fake news on social media: nonprofits, crisis response strategies and issue involvement. Journal of Product & Brand Management29(2): 209–222.
59.
Van DuynECollierJ (2019) Priming and fake news: the effects of elite discourse on evaluations of news Media. Mass Communication and Society22(1): 29–48.
60.
VidigalRJeritJ (2022) Issue importance and the correction of misinformation. Political Communication39(6): 715–736.
61.
VisentinMPizziGPichierriM (2019) Fake news, real problems for brands: the impact of content truthfulness and source credibility on consumers’ behavioral intentions toward the advertised brands. Journal of Interactive Marketing45: 99–112.
62.
VragaETullyM (2021) News literacy, social media behaviors, and skepticism toward information on social media. Information, Communication & Society24(2): 150–166.
63.
VragaETullyMBodeL (2022) Assessing the relative merits of news literacy and corrections in responding to misinformation on Twitter. new media & society24(10): 2354–2371.
64.
VragaETullyMKotcherJ, et al (2015) A multi-dimensional approach to measuring news media literacy. Journal of Media Literacy Education7: 41–53.
65.
VragaETullyMMakslA, et al (2021) Theorizing news literacy behaviors. Communication Theory31(1): 1–21.
66.
WangWHuangY (2023) Comparing the effects of simple and refutational narratives in misinformation correction: the moderating roles of correction placement and issue involvement. Public Understanding of Science32(8): 985–1002.
67.
WeiLGongJXuJ, et al (2023) Do social media literacy skills help in combating fake news spread? Modelling the moderating role of social media literacy skills in the relationship between rational choice factors and fake news sharing behaviour. Telematics and Informatics76: 101910.
68.
WenjuanLZhaotongYYuhuaD, et al (2023) The influence of involvement and emotional valence on accuracy judgments and sharing intention of fake news. Journal of Cognitive Psychology35: 839–855.
69.
WineburgSMcGrewS (2019) Lateral reading and the nature of expertise: reading less and learning more when evaluating digital information. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education121(11): 1–40.
XiaoXSuYLeeDKL (2021) Who consumes new media content more wisely? Examining personality factors, SNS use, and new media literacy in the era of misinformation. Social Media + Society7(1): 205630512199063.
72.
ZaichkowskyJL (1985) Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research12: 341–352.
73.
ZhangSZhaoLLuY, et al (2016) Do you get tired of socializing? An empirical explanation of discontinuous usage behaviour in social network services. Information & Management53(7): 904–914.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
