In the evolving context of platforms’ influence on society, the digitization of fandom emerges as a crucial yet underexplored subject. Guided by fan activism and media logic theories, this study explores fan comment control in online public cultural spaces as a representative case of digital fandom in China. By investigating the digital mobilization of fan comment control and the interactions among fans, anti-fans, non-fans, and platforms, this study challenges the optimistic view in previous fan studies that regarded fan collective action as fan activism. Through participant observation and 20 in-depth interviews, this study finds fluidity in cultural identities within and outside the digital fandom and an ongoing negotiation between platforms’ efforts to regulate users and users’ strategies to adapt to algorithmic rules. Notably, under the reinforcing influence of platform dataism, fans’ diverse motivations contribute to transforming collective commenting from a potential form of activism into a struggle for discursive hegemony.
AltheideDL (2004) Media logic and political communication. Political Communication21(3): 293–296.
2.
BennettWLSegerbergA (2012) The logic of connective action: digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society15(5): 739–768.
3.
BrantsKvan PraagP (2015) Beyond media logic. Journalism Studies18(4): 395–408.
4.
ChatmanD (2017) Black Twitter and the politics of viewing scandal. In:GrayJSandvossCHarringtonCL (eds) Fandom: Identities and Communities in a Mediated Word. New York: New York University Press, pp. 299–314.
5.
ChinB (2010) Beyond kung-fu and violence: locating East Asian cinema fandom. In: GrayJSandvossCHarringtonCL (eds) Fandom: Identities and Communities in a Mediated World. New York: New York University Press, pp. 210–219.
6.
ChiuY-LChenK-HWangJ-N, et al. (2019) The impact of online movie word-of-mouth on consumer choice. International Marketing Review36(6): 996–1025.
7.
ChuaBH (2012) Structure, Audience and Soft Power in East Asian Pop Culture. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
8.
CorbinJMStraussA (1990) Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology13(1): 3–21.
9.
CouldryN (2005) Media Rituals: A Critical Approach. London: Routledge.
10.
CouldryNHeppA (2017) The Mediated Construction of Reality. Cambridge & Malden: Polity Press.
11.
CreswellJW (2013) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. 3rd ed. Sage.
12.
CristofariCGuittonMJ (2017) Aca-fans and fan communities: an operative framework. Journal of Consumer Culture17(3): 713–731.
Douban (2021) Statement Regarding the Alleged Fan Comment Control Incidents Involving the TV Series “Luoyang” and “Who Is the Murderer.” Available at: https://www.douban.com/note/821800685/?_i=7034308eA686Z- (accessed May 30).
15.
EarlJKimportK (2009) Movement societies and digital protest: fan activism and other nonpolitical protest online. Sociological Theory27(3): 220–243.
16.
GlaserBGStraussAL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
17.
GrayJ (2003) New audiences, new textualities: anti-fans and non-fans. International Journal of Cultural Studies6(1): 64–81.
18.
GrayJ (2019) How do I dislike thee? Let me count the ways. In: ClickMA (ed.) Anti-fandom: Dislike and Hate in the Digital Age. New York: New York University Press, pp. 25–41.
19.
GrayJSandvossCHarringtonCL (2007) Introduction: Why study fans? In: GrayJSandvossCHarringtonCL (eds) Fandom: Identities and Communities in a Mediated World. New York: New York University Press, pp. 1–16.
20.
Guerrero-PicoM (2017) #Fringe, audiences, and fan labor: Twitter activism to save a TV show from cancellation. International Journal of Communication11: 2071–2092.
21.
HarringtonB (2002) Obtrusiveness as strategy in ethnographic research. Qualitative Sociology25(1): 49–61.
22.
HerringL (2018) China’s cinema watchdogs on the World Wide Web: how social networking sites Weibo and Douban are helping to shape the development of the Chinese film industry. Networking Knowledge: Journal of the Meccsa Postgraduate Network11(2): 39–59.
23.
HillsM (2002) Fan Cultures. London: Routledge.
24.
HofstedeG (1980) Culture’s Consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
25.
JenkinsH (1992) Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture. New York: Routledge.
26.
JenkinsH (2006) Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.
27.
LiangYShenW (2016) Fan economy in the Chinese media and entertainment industry: how feedback from super fans can propel creative industries’ revenue. Global Media and China1(3): 331–349.
28.
LopezLK (2011) Fan activists and the politics of race in the last airbender. International Journal of Cultural Studies15(5): 431–445.
29.
MorimotoLHChinB (2017) Reimagining the imagined community: online media fandoms in the age of global convergence. In: GrayJSandvossCHarringtonCL (eds) Fandom: Identities and Communities in a Mediated Word. 2nd ed. New York: New York University Press, pp. 174–190.
30.
NobleHMitchellG (2016) What is grounded theory?Evidence-based Nursing19(2): 34–35.
31.
PattonM (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
ReddyWM (2004) The Navigation of Feeling: A Framework for the History of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
RossSM (2008) Beyond the Box: Television and the Internet. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
34.
RoweDRuddockAHutchinsB (2010) Cultures of complaint. Convergence16(3): 298–315.
35.
SongYFengY (2022) Doing participatory fandom through trans-scripting: the case of multilingual K-pop fans on Chinese social media. Chinese Language and Discourse13(1): 28–57.
StanfillM (2019) Exploiting Fandom: How the Media Industry Seeks to Manipulate Fans. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Press.
38.
SuriH (2011) Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis. Qualitative Research Journal11(2): 63–75.
39.
van DijckJ (2014) Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: big data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society12(2): 197–208.
40.
van DijckJPoellT (2013) Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication1(1): 2–14.
41.
van DijckJPoellTDe WaalM (2018) The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. New York: Oxford University Press.
42.
WangENGeL (2022) Fan conflicts and state power in China: internalized heteronormativity, censorship sensibilities, and fandom police. Asian Studies Review47(2): 355–373.
43.
WangGLiuZB (2010) What collective? Collectivism and relationalism from a Chinese perspective. Chinese Journal of Communication3(1): 42–63.
44.
YinY (2020) An emergent algorithmic culture: the data-ization of online fandom in China. International Journal of Cultural Studies23(4): 475–492.
45.
ZhangQNegusK (2020) East Asian pop music idol production and the emergence of data fandom in China. International Journal of Cultural Studies23(4): 493–511.
