While several taxonomies of meta-discourse exist, none clearly explains speakers’ strategies in mediation. Mediators, however, seem to rely a lot on meta-discourse to manage the argument while preserving their neutrality. This article proposes corpus analyses to detect mediation participants’ discourse strategies and highlight the role and function of a meta-discourse element – the verb ‘to say’. This article is a first step towards the elaboration of a taxonomy for the analysis of argumentative meta-discourse and brings new insights into meta-discourse in argumentative dialogues and mediation discourse in general.
AakhusM (2003) Neither naïve nor critical reconstruction: Dispute mediators, impasse, and the design of argumentation. Argumentation17: 265–290.
2.
ÄdelA (2010) Just to give you kind of a map of where we are going: A taxonomy of meta-discourse in spoken and written academic English. Nordic Journal of English Studies9(2): 69–97.
3.
ÄdelA (2012) ‘What I want you to remember is …’: Audience orientation in monologic academic discourse. English Text Construction5(1): 101–127.
4.
ÄdelAMauranenA (2010) Metadiscourse: Diverse and divided perspectives. Nordic Journal of English Studies9(2): 1–11.
5.
AustinJL (1975) How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
BudzynskaKReedC (2011) Whence inference. Technical report, University of Dundee, Dundee.
7.
BudzynskaKJanierMReedCet al. (2013) Theoretical foundations for illocutionary structure parsing. In: Proceedings of Computational Models of Natural Argument (CMNA13).
8.
BudzynskaKJanierMReedCet al. (2014) A model for processing illocutionary structures and argumentation in debates. In: Proceedings of the 9th Edition of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC). Available at: http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2014/pdf/77_Paper.pdf
CliftR (2006) Indexing stance: Reported speech as an interactional evidential. Journal of Sociolinguistics10(5): 569–595.
11.
CorreiaRMamedeNBaptistaJet al. (2014) Toward automatic classification of metadiscourse. In: PrzepiórkowskiAOgrodniczukM (eds) Advances in Natural Language Processing. NLP 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8686, pp. 262–269. Berlin: Springer.
12.
CrismoreA (2004) Pronouns and metadiscourse as interpersonal rhetorical devices in fundraising letters: A corpus linguistic analysis. In: ConnorUUptonTA (eds) Discourse in the Professions: Perspectives from Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 307–330.
13.
GarciaAC (2000) Negotiating the negotiation: The collaborative production of resolution in small claims mediation hearings. Discourse & Society11(3): 315–343.
14.
Greco MorassoS (2008) Argumentative and other communicative strategies of the mediation practice. PhD Thesis, Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano.
15.
Greco MorassoS (2011) Argumentation in Dispute Mediation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
16.
JacobsS (2002) Maintaining neutrality in dispute mediation: Managing disagreement while managing not to disagree. Journal of Pragmatics34: 1403–1426.
17.
JacobsSAakhusM (2002) What mediators do with words: Implementing three models of rational discussion in dispute mediation. Conflict Resolution Quarterly20(2): 177–203.
18.
JanierMReedC (2016) Corpus resources for dispute mediation discourse. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2016), pp. 1014–1021. Available at: http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2016/pdf/305_Paper.pdf
19.
JanierMReedC (2017) Towards a theory of close analysis for dispute mediation discourse. Argumentation31: 45–82.
20.
JanierMAakhusMBudzynskaKet al. (2014a) Games mediators play: Empirical methods for deriving dialogue structure. In: METARG workshop.
21.
JanierMAakhusMBudzynskaKet al (2015) Modeling argumentative activity in mediation with Inference Anchoring Theory: The case of impasse. In: European Conference on Argumentation (ECA).
KonatBBudzynskaKSaint-DizierP (2016) Rephrase in argument structure. In: Proceedings of the Foundations of the Language of Argumentation (FLA) Workshop, pp. 32–39.
Martínez GuillemS (2009) Argumentation, meta-discourse and social cognition: Organizing knowledge in political communication. Discourse & Society20(6): 727–746.
26.
MauranenA (2010) Discourse reflexivity: A discourse universal? The case of ELF. Nordic Journal of English Studies9(2): 13–40.
ProostK (2009) Speech act verbs. In: AllanK (ed.) Concise Encyclopedia of Semantics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 912–917.
29.
Rubin DamariR (2010) Intertextual stance taking and the local negotiation of cultural identities by a binational couple. Journal of Sociolinguistics14(5): 609–629.
30.
SchiffrinD (1980) Meta-talk: Organizational and evaluative brackets in discourse. Sociological Inquiry50: 199–236.
31.
SearleJRVandervekenD (1985) Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
SmithsonJBarlowAHunterRet al. (2015) The ‘child’s best interest’ as an argumentative resource in family mediation sessions. Discourse Studies17(5): 609–623.
33.
StokoeE (2013) Overcoming barriers to mediation in intake calls to services: Research-based strategies for mediators. Negotiation Journal29: 289–314.
34.
StokoeEEdwardsD (2007) ‘Black this, black that’: Racial insults and reported speech in neighbour complaints and police interrogations. Discourse & Society18(3): 337–372.
35.
StokoeEHepburnA (2005) ‘You can hear a lot through the walls’: Noise formulations in neighbour complaints. Discourse & Society16(5): 647–673.
36.
ToulminSE (2003) The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Vande KoppleWJ (1985) Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication36: 82–93.
38.
VasilyevaAL (2010) Creating deliberation in the context of social conflict: The examination of mediator practices for shaping an interactivity in dispute mediation. PhD Thesis, New Brunswick, NJ.
39.
ZareJTavakoliM (2016) The use of personal metadiscourse over monologic and dialogic modes of academic speech. Discourse Processes54: 163–175.
