In this article, the two authors who come from different generations of biologists who are committed to the fields of ecology and feminism reflect on the history of feminist knowledge on ecology. They contend that, while theoretical explorations and innovations in thinking across ecology and feminism have prospered and proliferated, disciplinary barriers prevent both the ecological sciences and feminist studies from embracing these innovations and critiques. They explore a brief history of engagements between ecology and feminism and the promise of these theorisations. They examine three contemporary sites of theorising nature—popular imaginations of a loving and caring (indeed maternal) nature; current work in the ecological sciences; and recent work in indigenous, queer, and trans ecologies. They share their dissatisfaction with how each is limited in its impact for varying reasons. They conclude with some reflections on a feminist future for ecology, within the academy and beyond.
AlaimoSHekmanSJ (eds) (2008) Material Feminisms. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
2.
AlcoffL (1988) The identity crisis in feminist theory. Signs13(3): 405–436.
3.
AllanBMNimmoDGIerodiaconouD, et al. (2018) Futurecasting ecological research: The rise of technoecology. Ecosphere9(5): e02163.
4.
AnzaldúaGMoragaC (1981) This Bridge Called My Back. New York, NY: Kitchen Table.
5.
AsherKRamamurthyP (2020) Rethinking decolonial and postcolonial knowledges beyond regions to imagine transnational solidarity.Hypatia35(3): 542–547.
6.
BraultC (2017) Feminist imaginations in a heated climate: Parody, idiocy, and climatological possibilities.Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience3(2): 1–33.
7.
CarsonR (1962) Silent Spring. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
8.
CeddiaGM (2020) Investments’ role in ecosystem degradation. Science368(6489): 377.
9.
ChapinFS, Zavaleta ES, Eviner VT, et al. (2000) Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature405: 234–242.
10.
CombertiCThorntonTFde EcheverriaVW, et al. (2015) Ecosystem services or services to ecosystems? Valuing cultivation and reciprocal relationships between humans and ecosystems. Global Environmental Change34: 247–262.
11.
CuomoC (2002) On ecofeminist philosophy.Ethics and the Environment7(2): 1–11.
12.
DalyM (1978) Gyn/Ecology: The Metaethics of Radical Feminism. Boston: Beacon Press.
13.
d’EaubonneF (2022) Feminism or Death: How the Women’s Movement Can Save the Planet. New York: Verso.
14.
De la CadenaMarisol (2015) Earth Beings: Ecologies of Practice Across Andean Worlds. Durham: Duke University Press.
15.
DeloriaV (1992) Ethnoscience and Indian realities. Winds of Change7(3): 12–18.
16.
De MeeûsTRenaudF (2002) Parasites within the new phylogeny of eukaryotes. Trends in Parasitology18: 247–251.
17.
DíazS, Settele J, Brondizio ES, et al. (2019) Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change. Science366(6471): eaax3100.
18.
DíazS, Settele J, Brondizio ES, et al. (2020) Response: Investments’ role in ecosystem degradation. Science368(6489): 377.
19.
DirzoRYoungHSGalettiM, et al. (2014) Defaunation in the Anthropocene. Science345(6195): 401–406.
FaJEWatsonJEMLeiperI, et al. (2020) Importance of indigenous peoples’ lands for the conservation of intact forest landscapes. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment18(3): 135–140.
22.
FarleySSDawsonAGoringSJ, et al. (2018) Situating ecology as a big-data science: Current advances, challenges, and solutions. Bioscience68(8): 563–576. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biy068
23.
FosterEKerrP (2024) Queer/green collaboration as a radical response to climate crisis: Foregrounding the green stripe.Global Political Economy3(1): 73–91.
24.
GaardG (2011) Ecofeminism revisited: Rejecting essentialism and re-placing species in a material feminist environmentalism. Feminist Formations23(2): 26–53.
GaglianoM (2018) Thus Spoke the Plant: A Remarkable Journey of Groundbreaking Scientific Discoveries and Personal Encounters with Plants. Berkeley: North Atlantic Books.
GouldE, Fraser HS, Parker TH, et al. (2025) Same data, different analysts: Variation in effect sizes due to analytical decisions in ecology and evolutionary biology. EcoEvoRxiv 23: Article number 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-024-02101-x
29.
GriffinS (1980) Woman and Nature: The Roaring Inside Her. New York, NY, USA: Harper Collins.
30.
HarawayD (1988) Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14(3): 575–599
31.
HarawayD (1991) Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.
HazardCW (2022) Underflows: Queer Trans Ecologies and River Justice. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
34.
hooksb (2000) Feminism Is for everybody: Passionate Politics. London: Pluto Press.
35.
Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) (n.d.) Knowledge gaps. Available at: https://www.ipbes.net/knowledge-gaps (accessed May 4 2024).
36.
IrwinA (2024) The ‘mother tree’ idea is everywhere – but how much of it is real?Nature627(8005): 718–721.
37.
JenningsL, Anderson T, Martinez A, et al. (2023) Applying the ‘CARE principles for indigenous data governance’ to ecology and biodiversity research. Nature Ecology and Evolution7: 1547–1551. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02161-2
38.
JessenTDBanNCClaxtonNX, et al. (2022) Contributions of indigenous knowledge to ecological and evolutionary understanding. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment20(2): 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2435
39.
KimmererR (2011) Restoration and reciprocity: The contributions of traditional ecological knowledge. In: D Egan, E Hjerpe and J Abrams (eds) Human Dimensions of Ecological Restoration: Integrating Science, Nature, and Culture. Washington, DC: Island Press, 225–276.
40.
KingYPlantJ (1989) The ecology of feminism and the feminism of ecology. Environmentalism: Critical Concepts2: 18–28.
41.
KochM (2019) Forest Talk: How Trees Communicate. Nashville: Twenty-First Century Books.
42.
LiboironM (2021) Pollution is Colonialism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
43.
LiboironMLepawskyJ (2022) Discard Studies: Wasting, Systems, and Power. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44.
LichteAN (2024) The ‘mother tree’ idea is everywhere – how much is real?Nature 628: 718–721.
45.
LordeA (1981) An open letter to Mary Daly. In: C Moraga and G Anzaldua (eds)This Bridge Called my Back: Writings by Radical Women of Colour. Watertown, USA: Persephone.
46.
Luyssaert S, Jammet M, Stoy P,et al. (2014) Land management and land-cover change have impacts of similar magnitude on surface temperature. Nature Climate Change4: 389–393.
47.
MacGregarS (ed.) (2017) Routledge Handbook of Gender and Environment. New York: Routledge.
48.
MalloryC (2018) What’s in a name? In defense of ecofeminism (not ecological feminisms, feminist ecology, or gender and the environment): Or “why ecofeminism need not be ecofeminine—but so what if it is?Ethics and the Environment23(2): 11–35.
49.
McCordSE, Webb NP, Van See JW, et al. (2021) Provoking a cultural shift in data quality. BioScience71(6): 647–657.
NashRF (1989) The Rights of Nature: A History of Environmental Ethics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
58.
NixonR (2021) The less selfish gene: Forest altruism, neoliberalism, and the tree of life. Environmental Humanities13(2): 348–371.
59.
NorbergJBlencknerTCornellSE, et al. (2022) Failures to disagree are essential for environmental science to effectively influence policy development. Ecology Letters25(5): 1075–1093.
60.
PariseAGGaglianoMSouzaGM (2020) Extended cognition in plants: Is it possible?Plant Signaling & Behavior15(2): 1710661.
61.
PlumwoodV (1986) Ecofeminism: An overview and discussion of positions and arguments. Australasian Journal of Philosophy64(Supp 1): 120–138.
62.
PlumwoodV (2002) Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. New York: Routledge.
63.
PlumwoodV (2006) The concept of a cultural landscape: Nature, culture and agency of the land.Ethics & the Environment11(2): 115–150.
64.
PlumwoodV (2018) Ecofeminist analysis and the culture of ecological denial. Feminist Ecologies: Changing Environments in the Anthropocene97–112.
ReoNJOgdenLA (2018) Anishnaabe Aki: An indigenous perspective on the global threat of invasive species. Sustainability Science13: 1443–1452.
67.
RobinsonDGAmmerCPolle A, et al. (2024) Mother trees, altruistic fungi, and the perils of plant personification. Trends in Plant Science29(1): 20–31.
68.
SallehAK (1984a) From feminism to ecology. Social Alternatives4(3): 8–12.
69.
SallehAK (1984b) Deeper than deep ecology: The eco-feminist connection. Environmental Ethics6(4): 339–345.
70.
SallehA (1992) The ecofeminism/deep ecology debate. Environmental Ethics14(3): 195–216.
71.
SalmónE (2000) Kincentric ecology: Indigenous perceptions of the human nature relationship. Ecological Applications10(5): 1327–1332.
72.
SandilandsC (2016) Queer ecology. In: AdamsonJGleasonWAPellowDN (eds) Keywords for Environmental Studies. New York: NYU Press, 169–171.
73.
SargissonL (2001) What’s wrong with ecofeminism. Environmental Politics10(1): 52–64.
74.
SeymourN (2020) “Good animals”: The past, present, and futures of trans ecology. In: VakochD (ed.) Transecology. New York: Routledge, pp.190–204.
75.
ShivaV (1988) Staying Alive: Women, Ecology, and Survival in India (Vol. 84). Delhi: Kali for Women.
76.
SimardS (2016) Exploring how and why trees ‘talk’ to each other. Interview with Diane Toomey. Yale E360. 1 September 2016.
77.
SimardS (2021) Finding the Mother Tree: Uncovering the Wisdom and Intelligence of the Forest. London: Penguin UK.
78.
SimhaAJamesAMonkJD, et al. (2024) When the window is a mirror: how do dominant theories limit our understanding of nature? ESA 2023 INS23, 105(3):e02145.
79.
SimhaAPardo-de la HozCJCarleyL (2022) Moving beyond the “diversity paradox”: The limits of competition-based theories in understanding species diversity. American Naturalist200(1): 89–100.
Starhawk (2013) The Earth Path: Grounding Your Spirit in the Rhythms of Nature. San Francisco: Harper One.
82.
StrykerS (2004) Transgender studies: Queer theory’s evil twin. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies10(2): 212–215.
83.
SturgeonN (1997) Ecofeminist Natures: Race, Gender, Feminist Theory and Political Action. New York, NY: Routledge.
84.
SubramaniamB (2014) Ghost Stories for Darwin: The Science of Variation and the Politics of Diversity. Champaign IL: University of Illinois Press.
85.
SubramaniamB (2024) Botany of Empire: Plant Worlds and the Scientific Legacies of Colonialism. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
86.
TallBearK (2019) Caretaking relations, not American dreaming. Kalfou6(1): 24–41.
87.
ToddZ (2018) Refracting the state through human-fish relations: Fishing, indigenous legal orders and colonialism in north/western Canada. DIES: Decolonization, Indigeneity, Education, and Society7(1): 60–75.
88.
TodmanLCBushAHoodASC (2023) ‘Small data’ for big insights in ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution38(7): 615–622.
