Does the n-issue space in domestic European polities reduce to one, two, or more dimensions? How do these dimensions relate to each other? More broadly, how does dimensionality vary across countries? We attempt to advance our understanding of political contestation in Europe by mapping the dimensionality of the political space across 24 countries using Chapel Hill expert survey (CHES) data. We test how well different models of the European political space fit the CHES data and find that three-dimensional models best fit the data in all countries. However, there is considerable cross-national variation in how the three dimensions relate to one another. Given this, we present a new measure of dimensional complexity that captures the degree to which these three dimensions are related. In so doing, we improve our understanding of the complexity of the political space in European countries.
AdamsJFMerrillSIIIGrofmanB (2005) A Unified Theory of Party Competition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2.
AlbrightJJ (2010) The multidimensional nature of party competition. Party Politics16(6): 699–719.
3.
AldrichJ (1995) Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4.
AldrichJHRohdeDWTofiasMW(2007) One d is not enough: Measuring conditional party government, 1887–2002. In: BradyDWMcCubbinsMD (eds). Party, Process, and Political Change in CongressVolume 2: Stanford University Press. Further New Perspectives on the History of Congress.
5.
BakkerREdwardsEEDe VriesCE (2008) Fickle parties or changing dimensions? testing the comparability of the party manifesto data across time and space. Working Paper.
6.
BenoitKLaverM (2006) Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.
7.
BenoitKLaverM (2007) Estimating party policy positions: Comparing expert surveys and hand-coded content analysis. Electoral Studies26: 90–107.
8.
Benoit and Laver (2012).
9.
BollenKA (1989) Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
10.
BudgeIKlingemannH-DVolkensABaraJTanenbaumE (2001) Mapping Policy Preferences. Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945–1998. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
De VriesC (2007) Sleeping giant: Fact or fairytale? How European integration affects national elections. European Union Politics8: 363–385.
12.
De Vries and Hobolt (2012).
13.
De Vries and Marks (2012).
14.
DownsA (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Addison Wesley.
15.
FranklinM(1992) The decline of cleavage politics. In: FranklinMNMackieTTValenH (eds). Electoral Change: Responses to Evolving Social and Attitudinal Structures in Western Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
GabelMJHixS (2002) Defining the EU political space: An empirical study of the European elections manifestos, 1979–1999. Comparative Political Studies35(8): 934–964.
17.
GabelMJHuberJ (2000) Putting parties in their place: Inferring party left–right ideological positions from manifestos data. American Journal of Political Science44: 94–103.
18.
HenjakA (2010) Political cleavages and socio-economic context: How welfare regimes and historical divisions shape political cleavages. West European Politics33(3): 474–504.
19.
HinichMJMungerMC (1996) Ideology and the Theory of Political Choice. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
20.
HixS (1999a) Dimensions and alignments in European Union politics: Cognitive constraints and partisan responses. European Journal of Political Research35: 69–125.
21.
HixS (1999b) The Political System of the European Union. London: St. Martin's Press, Inc.
22.
HixSLordC (1997) Political Parties in the European Union. London: St. Martin's Press.
23.
HixSNouryARolandG (2006) Dimensions of politics in the European parliament. American Journal of Political Science50(2): 494–511.
24.
HoogheLBakkerRBrigevichADe VriesCEdwardsEMarksG (2010) Reliability and validity of measuring party positions: The Chapel Hill expert surveys of 2002 and 2006. European Journal of Political Research49(5): 687–703.
25.
HoogheLMarksG(1999) The making of a polity: The struggle over European integration. In: KitscheltHLangePMarksGStephenJ (eds). Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 70–97.
26.
HoogheLMarksG (2001) Multi-Level Governance and European Integration. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
27.
HoogheLMarksG (2009) A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science39(1): 1–23.
28.
HoogheLMarksGWilsonCJ (2002) Does left/right structure party positions on European integration?Comparative Political Studies35(8): 965–989.
29.
Hunt WB and Laver MJ (1992) Policy and Party Competition. New York: Routledge.
30.
InglehartR (1977) The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31.
InglehartR (1990) Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
KitscheltH (1994) The Transformation of European Social Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
33.
KolenikovS (2009) Confirmatory factor analysis using CONFA. Stata Journal9(3): 329–373.
34.
KreppelATsebelisG (1999) Coalition formation in the European parliament. Comparative Political Studies32: 933–966.
35.
LaverMJHuntWB (1992) Policy and Party Competition. New York: Routledge.
36.
LaymanGCCarseyTM (2002) Party polarization and ‘conflict extension’ in the American electorate. American Journal of Political Science46(4): 786–802.
37.
LijphartA (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
38.
LipsetSMRokkanS(1967) Cleavage structures, party systems, and voter alignments. In: LipsetSMRokkanS (eds). Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press, 1–64.
39.
MarksGHoogheLNelsonMEdwardsE (2006) Party competition and European integration in east and west. different structure, same causality. Comparative Political Studies39: 155–175.
40.
MarksGHoogheLSteenbergenMRBakkerR (2007) Cross-validating data on party positioning on European integration. Electoral Studies26(1): 23–38.
41.
MarksGSteenbergenMR (2004) European Integration and Political Conflict. New York: Cambridge University Press.
42.
MeguidBM (2008) Party Competition between Unequals: Strategies and Electoral Fortunes in Western Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.
NetjesCBinnemaHA (2007) The salience of the European integration issue: Three data sources compared. Electoral Studies26(1): 39–49.
45.
PierceR(1999) Mass-elite linkages and the responsible party model of representation. In: MillerWPierceRThomassenJHerreraRHolmbergSEsaiassonP (eds). Policy Representation in Western Democracies. New York: Oxford University Press, 9–32.
46.
PooleyKTRosenthalH (1997) Congress. A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
47.
RayL (1999) Measuring party orientation towards European integration: Results from an expert survey. European Journal of Political Research36(6): 283–306.
48.
ReifKSchmittH (1980) Nine second-order national elections: A conceptual framework for the analysis of European election results. European Journal of Political Research8: 3–44.
49.
SchofieldN (1993a) Political competitition and multiparty coalition governments. European Journal of Political Research23: 1–33.
50.
SchofieldNJ(1993b) Party competition in a spatial model of coalition formation. In: BarnettWAHinichMJSchofieldNJ (eds). Political Economy. Institutions, Competition, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 135–174.
51.
Steenbergen MR and Marks G (2004) Introduction: models of political conflict in the European Union. In: MR Steenbergen and G Marks (eds) European Integration and Political Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–12.
52.
SteenbergenMMarksG (2007) Evaluating expert surveys. European Journal of Political Research46(3): 347–366.
53.
Stimson, Thiebaut and Tiberj (2012).
54.
StollH (2010) Elite-level conflict salience and dimensionality in western europe: Concepts and empirical findings. West European Politics33(3): 445–473.
55.
StollH (2011) Dimensionality and the number of parties in legislative elections. Party Politics17(3): 405–429.
56.
TaageperaR (1999) The number of parties as a function of heterogeneity and electoral system. Comparative Political Studies32(5): 531–548.
57.
TaageperaRShugartMS (1989) Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
58.
TsebelisGGarrettG (2000) Legislative politics in the European Union. European Union Politics1: 9–36.
59.
VolkensH-DVolkensABaraJBudgeIMcDonaldM (2006) Mapping Policy Preferences II. Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD 1990–2003. New York: Oxford University Press.
60.
WhitefieldSVachudovaMASteenbergenMRohrschneiderRMarksGLovelessP (2007) Do expert surveys produce consistent estimates of party stances on European integration? Comparing expert surveys in the difficult case of Central and Eastern Europe. Electoral Studies26(1): 50–61.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
