This paper explores the politics of dependency in researcher–assistant relationships. By doing so, it reflects on how these dynamics are always already predicated on broad personal histories and a range of emergent dependencies. Taking the politics of dependency in fieldwork seriously charts a path towards more fully understanding the quixotic production of ethnographic knowledge. Specifically, this paper reflects on the author’s relationship with Saiful (a pseudonym), who worked with the author during research at the India-Bangladesh border. Saiful was addicted to heroin. This addiction both compromised and enabled a productive research engagement in an unstable place. But Saiful’s heroin use was only one of a series of dependencies that structured our relationship and this research project. Using the lens of dependency to unpack the construction of the field and of ethnographic knowledge more broadly, this paper reflects on a range of questions, including access, anxiety, insider-outsider politics, and entanglement.
AmitV (2000) Constructing the Field: Ethnographic Fieldwork in the Contemporary World, London: Routledge.
2.
AxelB (2002) Fantastic community. In: AxelB (eds) From the Margins: Historical Anthropology and Its Futures, Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 233–266.
3.
BornemanJHammoudiA (2009) Being There: The Fieldwork Encounter and the Making of Truth, Berkeley: University of California Press.
4.
BourgoisP (1995) In Search of Respect: Selling Crack in El Barrio, New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BourgoisPShonbergJ (2009) Righteous Dopefiend, Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
ButlerJ (2004) Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence, New York: Verso.
7.
CasagrandeJ (1960) In the Company of Man: Twenty Portraits of Anthropological Informants, New York: Harper & Row.
8.
CharmazKMitchellR (2011) The myth of silent authorship: Self, substance, and style in ethnographic writing. Symbolic Interaction19(4): 285–302.
9.
CliffordJMarcusG (1986) Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, Berkeley: University of California Press.
10.
CoffeyA (1996) The power of accounts: Authority and authorship in ethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education9(1): 61–74.
11.
ConsJ (2008) A politics of sensitivity: Ambiguity and exceptionality along the India-Bangladesh border. In: The Sarai Program (eds) Sarai Reader 07: Frontiers, Delhi: CSDS, pp. 20–29.
12.
ConsJ (2011) The Fragments and Their Nation(s): Sensitive Space along the India-Bangladesh Border, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
13.
ConsJ (2012) Histories of belonging(s): Narrating territory, possession, and dispossession at the India-Bangladesh border. Modern Asain Studies46(3): 527–558.
14.
ConsJ (2013) Narrating boundaries: Framing and contesting suffering, community, and belonging in enclaves along the India–Bangladesh border. Political Geography35: 37–46.
15.
DunnECConsJ (2014) Aleatory sovereignty and the rule of sensitive spaces. Antipode46(1): 92–109.
16.
DuPontR (1997) The Selfish Brain: Learning from Addiction, Center City: Hazelden.
17.
FaubionJMarcusG (2009) Fieldwork Is Not What It Used to Be: Learning Anthropology’s Method in a Time of Transition, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
18.
FisherM (2007) Epilogue: To live with what would otherwise be unendurable. In: BiehlJGoodBKleinmanA (eds) Subjectivity: Ethnographic Investigations, Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 423–446.
19.
GarciaA (2010) The Pastoral Clinic: Addiction and Dispossession along the Rio Grande, Berkeley: University of California Press.
20.
GreenhouseCMertzEWarrenK (2002) Ethnography in Unstable Places: Everyday Lives in Contexts of Dramatic Political Change, Durham: Duke University Press.
GuptaAFergusonJ (1997) Discipline and practice: ‘The field’ as site, method, and location in anthropology. In: GuptaAFergusonJ (eds) Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science, Berkeley: Univeristy of California Press, pp. 1–46.
23.
HammoudiABornemanJ (2009) Afterthoughts: The experience and agony of fieldwork. In: BornemanJHammoudiA (eds) Being There: The Fieldwork Encounter and the Making of Truth, Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 258–272.
24.
Hoffman D (2014) Frontline collaborations: The research relationship in unstable places. Ethnography 15(3).
25.
JonesR (2009) Sovereignty and statelessness in the border enclaves of India and Bangladesh. Political Geography28: 373–381.
26.
JonesR (2010) The border enclaves of India and Bangladesh: The forgotten lands. In: DienerAHagenJ (eds) Borderlines and Borderlands: Political Oddities at the Edge of the Nation-State, New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
27.
KrishnaS (1996) Cartographic anxiety: Mapping the body politic in India. In: AlkerHShapiroM (eds) Challenging Boundaries: Global Flows, Territorial Identities, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 193–214.
28.
Marx K (1992 [1867]) Capital, Vol. 1, trans. Fowkes B. New York: Penguin.
29.
MegoranN (2006) For ethnography in political geography: Experiencing and re-imagining Ferghana Valley boundary closures. Political Geography25: 622–640.
30.
Middleton CT (2014) Dynamic duos: On partnership and the possibilities of postcolonial ethnography. Ethnography 15(3).
31.
Middleton CT and Cons J (2014) ‘Coming to terms’: Reinserting research assistants in ethnography’s past and present. Ethnography 15(3).
32.
MillsCW (2000 [1959]) The Sociological Imagination, New York: Oxford University Press.
33.
MooreD (2005) Suffering for Territory: Race, Place, and Power in Zimbabwe, Durham: Duke University Press.
34.
MooreSF (2009) Encounter and suspicion in Tanzania. In: BornemanJHammoudiA (eds) Being There: The Fieldwork Encounter and the Making of Ethnographic Truth, Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 151–182.
35.
NordstromCRobbenA (1995) Fieldwork Under Fire: Contemporary Studies of Violence and Survival, Berkeley: University of California Press.
36.
RabinowP (1977) Reflections on Fieldwork in Morocco, Berkeley: University of California Press.
37.
ReddingN (2009) Methland: The Death and Life of an American Small Town, New York: Bloomsbury.
38.
ReddyD (2009) Caught! The predicaments of ethnography in collaboration. In: FaubionJMarcusG (eds) Fieldwork Is Not What It Used to Be: Learning Anthropology’s Method in a Time of Transition, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 89–112.
39.
Ross OwensG (2003) What! Me a spy?: Intrigue and reflexivity in Zanzibar. Ethnography4(1): 122–144.
40.
SanjekR (1993) Anthropology’s hidden colonialism: Assistants and their ethnographers. Anthropology Today9(2): 13–18.
41.
SayerA (2000) Realism and Social Science, Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
42.
StaceyJ (1988) Can there be a feminist ethnography?Women’s Studies International Forum11(1): 21–27.
43.
StolerA (1995) (Pre)facing capitalism and confrontation in 1995. Capitalism and Confrontation in Sumatra’s Plantation Belt, 1870–1979, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. vii–xxix.
44.
ThomasN (1991) Against ethnography. Cultural Anthropology6(3): 306–322.
45.
UddinMJ (2007) Addiction: Law and parctice in Bangladesh. IIUC Studies4: 59–70.
46.
Van SchendelW (2002) Stateless in South Asia: The making of the India-Bangladesh enclaves. The Journal of Asian Studies61(1): 115–147.
47.
VitelloneN (2004) Habitus and social suffering: Culture, addiction and the syringe. Sociological Review52(s2): 129–147.
48.
WhyteB (2002) Waiting for the Esquimo: An Historical and Documentary Study of the Cooch Behar Enclaves of India and Bangladesh, Melbourne: University of Melbourne School of Anthropology, Geography, and Environmental Studies.
49.
WolfM (1992) A Thrice-Told Tale: Feminism, Postmodernism, and Ethnographic Responsibility, Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
