This paper examines the use of theory in social work methods geared towards promoting participation of vulnerable groups, a subject that has been barely – if at all – researched empirically. The study comprised an analysis of 46 methods documented in the database of the Netherlands Institute for Social Development and interviews with social workers and educators.
Findings
Social work methods for participation are interspersed with theoretical notions. While the study shows that there is no shortage of theories in this field, what is more problematic are their use and integration. Incorporating theories in such a way that they provide an underpinning of the work method poses a challenge. Many theories appear to be presented out of window dressing, deviate from their original source in the literature, or are narrow in their paradigmatic focus, overlooking alternative theories that could promote or offer better nuanced participation perspectives.
Applications
The paper proposes criteria for a ‘theoretical underpinning’ and provides suggestions for a proper use of theory in social work methods.
AnthonyW. A. (1993).
Recovery from mental illness: The guiding vision of the mental health system in the 1990's. Innovation & Research,
2(3), 17–24. doi: 10.1037/h0095655
2.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.
New Jersey, NJ:
Prentice-Hall. doi: 10.4135/9781446221129.n6
3.
BeckettC.HornerN. (2016). Essential theory for social work practice (2nd ed.).
London, UK:
Sage.
4.
BeeckmanT. (2015). Macht en onmacht. Een verkenning van de hedendaagse aanslag op de Verlichting.
Amsterdam/Antwerpen, The Netherlands:
De Bezige Bij.
5.
BesthornF. (2013). Ecological approach. In GrayM.WebbS. (Eds), Social theories and methods (2nd ed., pp. 173–182).
London, UK:
Sage.
6.
CalhounC. (1995). Critical social theory: Culture, history, and the challenge of difference. Twentieth-century social theory.
Cambridge, MA:
Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.2307/2076647
7.
ChanK. L.ChanC. L. W. (2004).
Social workers’ conceptions of the relationship between theory and practice in an organizational context.International Social Work,
47(4), 543–557. doi: 10.1177/0020872804046260
8.
ClementsL.ReadJ. (2003). Disabled people and European Human Rights.
Bristol, UK:
Policy Press.
9.
CollingwoodP.EmondR.WoodwardR. (2008).
The theory circle: A tool for learning and for practice.Social Work Education,
27(1), 70–83. doi: 10.1080/02615470601141409
10.
DerezotesD. S. (2017). Ecopsychology: Adding “Eco” to the biopsychosocialspiritual perspective. In TurnerF. J. (Eds), Social work treatment. Interlocking theoretical approaches (6th ed., pp. 131–142).
Oxford, UK:
Oxford University Press.
11.
DeweyJ. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry.
New York, NY:
Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
12.
De WinterM.NoomM. (2003). Iemand die je gewoon als mens behandelt…Thuisloze jongeren over het verbeteren van de hulpverlening. In de WinterM.KronemanM. (Eds), Participatief Jeugdonderzoek. Sociaal-wetenschappelijk onderzoek samen met kinderen en jongeren naar beleid voor de jeugd (pp. 37–53).Assen, The Netherlands:
Van Gorcum.
13.
FitzgeraldD.RoseN.SinghI. (2016).
Revitalizing sociology; urban life and illness between history and present.British Journal of Sociology,
67(1), 138–160. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12188
14.
Gezondheidsraad. (2014). Sociaal werk op solide basis.
Den Haag, The Netherlands:
Gezondheidsraad.
15.
GittermanA.GermainC. (2013). The life model of social work practice (3rd ed.).
New York, NY:
Columbia University Press.
16.
GreenwoodE. (1957).
Attributes of a profession. Social Work,
2(3), 44–55. doi: 10.1093/sw/2.3.45
17.
HallE. (2004).
Social geographies of learning disability: Narratives of exclusion and inclusion.Area,
36(3), 298–306. doi: 10.1111/j.0004-0894.2004.00227.x
18.
HartR. (1992). Children’s participation. From tokenism to citizenship.
Florence, Italy:
Unicef Innocenti Essays nr 4.
19.
KellyM.MorganA.EllisS.YoungerT.HuntleyJ.SwannC. (2010).
Evidence based public health: A review of the experience of the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) of developing public health guidance in England. Social Science and Medicine,
71(6), 1056–1062. doi: 10.1016/j.socsimed.2010.06.032
20.
KomterA.BurgersJ.EngbersenG. (2000). Het cement van de samenleving. Een verkennende studie over solidariteit en cohesie.
Amsterdam, The Netherlands:
Amsterdam University Press. doi: 10.5117/9789053564370
21.
LatourB. (2004).
Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern.Critical Inquiry,
30(2), 225–248. doi: 10.2307/1344358
22.
LawC. K. (Ed.) (1994). Theory and practice: Programmes in children and youth centres. Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China: Hong Kong Christian Service.
23.
LubV. (2014). The plausibility of policy. Case studies from the social domain.
The Hague, The Netherlands:
Eleven International Publishing.
24.
LubV. (2017). Vaste grond. Theorie en theoriegebruik in maatschappelijke activering.
Utrecht, The Netherlands:
Movisie.
25.
LubV.UyterlindeM. (2012).
Evaluating state-promoted civic engagement and participation of vulnerable groups. The paradoxical policies of the social support act in the Netherlands. Journal of Social Policy,
41(2), 373–390. doi: 1017/s0047279411000997
26.
MertonR. K. (1975). Structural analysis in sociology. In R. K. Merton (Ed.), Sociological ambivalence and other essays (pp. 119-129). New York, NY: Free Press. doi: 10.1093/sf/57.1.310
27.
MichieS.JohnstonM.FrancisJ.HardemanW.EcclesM. (2008).
From theory to intervention: Mapping theoretically derived behavioural determinants to behaviour change techniques. Applied Psychology – An International Review-Psychologie Appliquée-Revue Internationale,
57(4), 660–680. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00341
MillerN. E.DollardJ. (1945). Social learning and imitation.
London, UK:
Kegan Paul.
30.
MilnerP.KellyB. (2009).
Community participation and inclusion: People with disabilities defining their place. Disability andSociety,
24(1), 47–62. doi: 10.1080/09687590802535410
31.
MontañoC. (2012).
Social work theory-practice relationship: Challenges to overcoming positivist and postmodern fragmentation.International Social Work,
55(3), 306–319. doi: 10.1177/0020872812437226
Movisie. (2012). Eigen Kracht-conferentie [Family group conference]. Methodebeschrijving Databank Effectieve sociale interventies.
Utrecht, The Netherlands:
Movisie.
34.
Movisie. (2013). Wijk en psychiatrie. Methodebeschrijving Databank Effectieve sociale interventies.
Utrecht, The Netherlands:
Movisie.
35.
OliverM.SapeyB.ThomasP. (2012). Social work with disabled people (4th ed.).
London, UK:
Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978-1-349-86058-6
36.
ParkerS.FookJ.PeaseB. (2016). Empowerment: The modern social work concept par excellence. In B.PeaseJ.Fook (Eds), Transforming social work practice (pp. 150–160).
New York:
Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203279281
PayneM. (2014). Modern social work theory (4th ed.).
Basingstoke, UK:
Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978-1-137-40603-3
39.
PeaseB.FookJ. (2016). Social work practice. Postmodern critical perspectives.
New York, NY:
Routledge.
40.
PerkinsH. W.BerkowitzA. D. (1986).
Perceiving the community norms of alcohol use among students: Some research implications for campus alcohol education programming.International Journal of the Addictions,
21(9&10), 961–976. doi: 10.3109/10826088609077249
41.
PinkerS. (2002). The blank slate. The modern denial of human nature.
New York, NY:
Viking. doi: 10.1353/lan.2004.0207
42.
RortyR. (1992). The pragmatist’s progress. In U.Eco (Ed.), Interpretation and Overinterpretation (pp. 89–109).
Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/cbo9780511581755.007
43.
SpearL. P. (2007). The developing brain and adolescent-typical behavior patterns: An evolutionary approach. In E.WalkerD.Romer (Eds), Adolescent psychopathology and the developing brain: Integrating brain and prevention science (pp. 9–30).
New York, NY:
Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195306255.001.001
44.
SpiroR. J.FeltovichP. J.JacobsenM. J.CoulsonR. L. (1992). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In T. MDuffyD. H.Jonassen (Eds), Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation (pp. 57–76).
New Jersey, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. doi: 10.4324/9780203461976
TurnerF. J. (2017). Social work treatment. Interlocking theoretical approaches (6th ed.).
Oxford, UK:
Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/sw/25.3.249-a
47.
WeberM. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology.
California:
University of California. doi: 10.1002/9780470755697
48.
WeissC. H. (1995). Nothing as practical as good theory: Exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for children and families. In ConnellJ.KubischA.SchorrL.WeissC. (Eds), New approaches to evaluating community initiatives (pp. 65–106).Washington, DC:
The Aspen Institute.
49.
WestR.BrownJ. (2013). Theory of addiction (2nd ed.).
Oxford, UK:
Wiley-Blackwell.
50.
YoungI. M. (1992). Equality, empowerment and social services. Some questions and problems.
Utrecht, The Netherlands:
NIZW.
51.
ZuckermanM. (2005). Psychobiology of personality.
New York, NY:
Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/cbo9780511813733
