This article examines the transnational flow of social policy ideas, in particular their importance in advancing gender equality policies in countries with strong conservative gender norms that have a history of neglecting reproductive rights. Focusing on the case of Argentina, it illustrates how internationally sanctioned ideas contributed to these important policy changes helping in the adoption of a federal programme of contraception; yet abortion remains illegal. New policies have been adopted, but important elements of the old regime have been preserved. While the study demonstrates the importance of travelling policy ideas, it is also a reminder of the continued importance of national politics and policy legacies.
BélandD (2005) Ideas and social policy: An institutionalist perspective. Social Policy and Administration39(1): 1–18.
5.
BlofieldM (2006) The Politics of Moral Sin: Abortion and Divorce in Spain, Chile and Argentina. New York: Routledge.
6.
BorlandESuttonB (2007) Quotidian disruption and women’s activism in times of crisis, Argentina 2002–3. Gender and Society21(5): 700–722.
7.
Buenos Aires Legislature Debate (2000) Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires. Legislatura. Acta de la 15 Sesión Ordinaria del 22 de Junio de 2000. Versión taquigráfica.
8.
Cairo (1994) Programme of Action of the United International Conference on Population and Development. Available at: www.iisd.ca/cairo/program/p00000.html.
9.
Cámara de Diputados de la Nación, Honorable Congreso de la Nación Argentina (2001) 18 de Abril de 2001. Versión taquigráfica.
10.
Cámara de Senadores de la Nación, Honorable Congreso de la Nación Argentina (2002) 31 Reunión – 16 Sesión Ordinaria, 30 de Octubre de 2002. Versión taquigráfica.
11.
CEDAW (1979) Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. United Nations.
12.
CollierRBCollierD (2002) Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America, 2nd edn.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
CoxR (2001) The social construction of an imperative: Why welfare reform happened in Denmark and the Netherlands but not in Germany. World Politics53(3): 463–498.
14.
DeaconB (2007) Global Social Policy and Governance. London: Sage.
15.
De la DehezaR (2007) Global communities and hybrid cultures: Early gay and lesbian electoral activism in Brazil and Mexico. Latin American Research Review42(1): 29–51.
16.
Della PortaDKriesiHRuchtD (eds) (1999) Social Movements in a Globalizing World. New York: St Martin’s Press.
17.
DodgsonR (2000) Contesting neoliberal globalization at UN global conferences: The women’s health movement, United Nations and the International Conference on Population and Development. Global Society14(3): 443–463.
18.
FisherF (2003) Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
Fundación Illia/Plural (1987) Políticas Públicas Dirigidas a la Mujer. Fundación Arturo Illia para la Democracia y la Paz and Fundación Plural para la Participación Democrática. Buenos Aires: Gráfica Yanina.
20.
GibsonE (1996) Class and Conservative Parties: Argentina in Comparative Perspective. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
21.
GibsonE (2008) Sub-national authoritarianism and territorial politics: Charting the theoretical landscape. In: 2008 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA, 28–31 August.
22.
HaussmanM (2005) Abortion Politics in North America. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
23.
HtunM (2003) Sex and the State: Abortion, Divorce, and the Family under Latin American Dictatorships and Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
JensonJ (1986) Gender and reproduction or babies and the state. Studies in Political Economy20(1): 9–45.
25.
KardamK (2004) The emerging global gender equality regime from neoliberal and constructivist perspectives in international relations. International Feminist Journal of Politics6(1): 85–109.
26.
KeckMSikkinkK (1998) Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. New York: Cornell University Press.
27.
KhagramSRikerJSikkinkK (eds) (2002) Restructuring World Politics: Transnational Social Movements, Networks, and Norms. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
LavrinA (1995) Women, Feminism and Social Change in Argentina, Chile and Uruguay (1890–1940). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
31.
LukerK (1984) Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
32.
McIntoshCAFinkleJL (1995) The Cairo Conference on Population and Development: A new paradigm?Population and Development Review21(2): 223–260.
33.
MahoneyJ (2000) Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society29(4): 507–548.
34.
PROFAM (2001) Argentina: Family strengthening and social capital promotion project. World Bank Document.
35.
RousseauS (2007) The politics of reproductive health in Peru: Gender and social policy in the global south. Social PoliticsSpring: 93–125.
36.
Schwindt-BayerL (2006) Still supermadres? Gender and the policy priorities of Latin American legislators. American Journal of Political Science50(3): 570–585.
37.
SikkinkK (2008) From pariah state to global protagonist: Argentina and the struggle for international human rights. Latin American Politics and Society50(1): 1–29.
38.
SnowDBenfordR (1988) Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research1: 197–217
39.
TorradoS (2004) La Herencia del Ajuste: Cambios en la Sociedad y la Familia. Claves Para Todos. Buenos Aires: Capital Intelectual.
40.
ZaratuzaC (1998) El derecho como garantía: de los derechos sexuales y reproductivos: ¿Utopía o estrategia?, In: BiancoMDurandTGutierrezMAFeimCZ (eds) Mujeres Sanas, Ciudadanas Libres (o el Poder para Decider). Cladem and FNUAP, pp. 45–72.
41.
ZwingelS (2005) From intergovernmental negotiations to (sub) national change: A transnational perspective on the impact of CEDAW. International Feminist Journal of Politics7(3): 400–424.
