Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Inaccurate distribution is one of the major problems of social protection programs in developing countries. Program implementation experiences difficulties at the local level, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. This research aims to explain the institution of social protection programs in Indonesia and identify the deficiencies and ways to improve it in other developing countries. It analogically describes the institution as a phenomenon of ‘square peg for round hole’ to represent the mismatch between the state program design with local social constraints and the cultural-cognitive of the implementers. The result showed that complementing decentralization to the existing institution can overcome the problems. This study helped fill the void in understanding the crisis, which led to changing the implementation, thereby paving a way to revise the macro policy and improve the institution.

Keywords

Neo-institutionalism approach poverty analysis social protection

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abdoul-Azize

El Gamil

(2021) Social protection as a key tool in crisis management: Learnt lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. Global Social Welfare 8(1): 107–116.

Akerkar

Joshi

Fordham

(2016) Cultures of entitlement and social protection: Evidence from Flood Prone Bahraich, Uttar Pradesh, India. World Development 86: 46–58.

Al Izzati

Suryadarma

Suryahadi

(2020) The behavioral effects of unconditional cash transfers: Evidence from Indonesia. The SMERU Research Institute, Jakarta, Indonesia. Available at: https://smeru.or.id/en/publication/behavioral-effects-unconditional-cash-transfers-evidence-indonesia.

Alatas

Purnamasari

Wai-Poi

, et al. (2016) Self-targeting: Evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. Journal of Political Economy 124(2): 371–427.

Artha

DRP

Dartanto

(2018) The multidimensional approach to poverty measurement in Indonesia: Measurements, determinants and its policy implications. Journal of Economic Cooperation and Development 39(3): 1–38.

Aspinall

(2014) Health care and democratization in Indonesia. Democratization 21(5): 803–823.

Banerjee

Hanna

Kreindler

, et al. (2017) Debunking the stereotype of the lazy welfare recipient: Evidence from cash transfer programs. The World Bank Research Observer 32(2): 155–184.

Barca

(2017) Integrating data and information management for social protection: Social registries and integrated beneficiary registries. Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Barton, ACT, Australia. Available at: https://www.dfat.gov.au/about-us/publications/Pages/integrating-data-information-management-social-protection.

BPS (2021) Berita Resmi Statistik [Statistic Official News], BPS, Jakarta, Indonesia, 5 February. Available at: https://www.bps.go.id/website/materi_ind/materiBrsInd-20210205095341.pdf.

10.

Cherayi

Jose

(2016) Empowerment and social inclusion of Muslim women: Towards a new conceptual model. Journal of Rural Studies 45: 243–251.

11.

Cook

Pincus

(2014) Poverty, inequality and social protection in Southeast Asia: An introduction. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies 31(1): 1–17.

12.

Cronert

Hadenius

(2021) Institutional foundations of global well-being: Democracy, state capacity and social protection. International Political Science Review 42(5): 705–724.

13.

DellaPosta

Nee

Opper

(2017) Endogenous dynamics of institutional change. Rationality and Society 29(1): 5–48.

14.

Dinkominfo (2020a) Bansos Covid Jangan Memicu Konflik Antar Tetangga [Covid’s social assistances do not strike conflict between neighborhoods], 21 May. Available at: https://www.purbalinggakab.go.id/info/bansos-covid-jangan-memicu-konflik-antar-tetangga/.

15.

Dinkominfo (2020b) Warga Terima Bantuan Sembako Pemprov [Residents receive provincial government food assistance], 26 May. Available at: https://jatengprov.go.id/beritadaerah/warga-terima-bantuan-sembako-pemprov/.

16.

Furnari

(2016) Institutional fields as linked arenas: Inter-field resource dependence, institutional work and institutional change. Human Relations 69(3): 551–580.

17.

Gabel

(2012) Social protection and children in developing countries. Children and Youth Services Review 34(3): 537–545.

18.

Gerard

Imbert

Orkin

(2020) Social protection response to the COVID-19 crisis: Options for developing countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 36(Suppl. 1): S281–S296.

19.

Holmemo

Acosta

George

, et al. (2020) Investing in people: Social protection for Indonesia’s 2045 vision. World Bank Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia. Available at: https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/indonesia/publication/investing-in-people-social-protection-for-indonesia-2045-vision.

20.

Hossain

Brook

Garbarino

, et al. (2012) Qualitative assessment: The social impacts of cash transfer programmes in Indonesia. TNP2K, Jakarta, Indonesia. Available at: http://103.76.16.8/id/download/qualitative-assessment-the-social-impacts-of-cash-transfer-programmes-in-indonesia/.

21.

Kallio

Kouvo

(2015) Street-level bureaucrats’ and the general public’s deservingness perceptions of social assistance recipients in Finland. Social Policy & Administration 49: 316–334.

22.

Kidd

(2017) Social exclusion and access to social protection schemes. Journal of Development Effectiveness 9(2): 212–244.

23.

Koopman

(2021) The restoration of Gotong royong as a form of post-disaster solidarity in Lombok, Indonesia. South East Asia Research 29(3): 279–296.

24.

Kusumawati

Kudo

(2019) The effectiveness of targeting social transfer programs in Indonesia. Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning 3(3): 282–297.

25.

Leftwich

(2010) Beyond institutions: Rethinking the role of leaders, elites and coalitions in the institutional formation of developmental states and strategies. Forum for Development Studies 37(1): 93–111.

26.

Local Regulation of Purbalingga District Head No. 050-171-2020 concerning the Formation of Team and Secretariat of the Poverty Reduction Coordination Team in Purbalingga District (Pembentukan Tim dan Sekretariat Tim Koordinasi Penanggulangan Kemiskinan Kabupaten Purbalingga).

27.

McCarthy

Sumarto

(2018) Distributional politics and social protection in Indonesia: Dilemma of layering, nesting and social fit in Jokowi’s poverty policy. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies 35(2): 223–236.

28.

McLaren

Qonitah

Widianingsih

(2020) Incentive-based social welfare administration in Indonesia: Implications for sustainable development in women’s and children’s protection. International Social Work 65: 510–524.

29.

Mahoney

Thelen

(2009) A theory of gradual institutional change. In: Mahoney

Thelen

(eds) Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–37.

30.

Ministry of Finance (2021) Kerangka Ekonomi Makro dan Pokok-Pokok Kebijakan Fiskal Tahun 2021 [Macroeconomic framework and the basics of fiscal policy, 2021]. Ministry of Finance, Jakarta, Indonesia.

31.

North

(1991) Institutions. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 5(1): 97–112.

32.

Rai

Smucker

(2016) Empowering through entitlement? The micro-politics of food access in rural Maharashtra, India. Journal of Rural Studies 45: 260–269.

33.

Ramesh

(2014) Social protection in Indonesia and the Philippines: Work in progress. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies 31(1): 40–56.

34.

Razavi

Behrendt

Bierbaum

, et al. (2020) Reinvigorating the social contract and strengthening social cohesion: Social protection responses to COVID 19. International Social Security Review 73(3): 55–80.

35.

Regulation of the Ministry of Village No. 6/2020 concerning the Amendment to Regulation No. 11/2019 concerning Priorities for Use of Village Funds in 2020 (Perubahan Atas Peraturan Nomor 11 Tahun 2019 Tentang Prioritas Penggunaan Dana Desa Tahun 2020).

36.

Schwan

(2018) Social protection as a strategy to address climate-induced migration. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management 10(1): 43–64.

37.

Scott

(2010) Reflections: The past and future of research on institutions and institutional change. Journal of Change Management 10(1): 5–21.

38.

Shankar

Gaiha

Jha

(2011) Information, access and targeting: The National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme in India. Oxford Development Studies 39(1): 69–95.

39.

Skoufias

Lindert

Shapiro

(2010) Globalization and the role of public transfers in redistributing income in Latin America and the Caribbean. World Development 38(6): 895–907.

40.

Sparrow

Dartanto

Hartwig

(2020) Indonesia under the new normal: Challenges and the way ahead. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 56(3): 269–299.

41.

Sumarto

(2017) Welfare regime change in developing countries: Evidence from Indonesia. Social Policy & Administration 51(6): 940–959.

42.

Sumarto

Suryadarma

Suryahadi

(2007) Predicting consumption poverty using non-consumption indicators: Experiments using Indonesian data. Social Indicators Research 81(3): 543–578.

43.

Sutiyo

Maharjan

(2014) Capacity of rural institutions in implementing decentralized development in Indonesia: Case of three villages in Purbalingga District, Central Java Province. In: Maharjan

(ed.) Communities and Livelihood Strategies in Developing Countries. Tokyo, Japan: Springer, pp. 143–167.

44.

Sutiyo

Rahardjanto

Sinaga

, et al. (2018) Does community cohesion present challenges for social protection programs? Case of the program of subsidized rice for the poor in Purbalingga District. Komunitas: International Journal of Indonesian Society and Culture 10(2): 225–232.

45.

Sutiyo

Sinaga

Raharjanto

(2020) Does decentralisation in Indonesia give the poor a voice? Evidence from the Purbalingga District. Institutions and Economies 12(2): 41–66.

46.

Tirivayi

Richardson

Gavrilovic

, et al. (2020) A rapid review of economic policy and social protection responses to health and economic crises and their effects on children: Lessons for the COVID-19 pandemic response. UNICEF Innocenti, Florence. Available at: https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/1095-rapid-review-economic-policy-social-protection-responses-to-health-and-economic-crises.html.

47.

TNP2K (2014) Reaching Indonesia’s poor and vulnerable and reducing inequality: Improving programme targeting, design, and processes. Secretariat of the Vice President of the Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia. Available at: http://tnp2k.go.id/downloads/reaching-indonesia-poor-and-vulnerable-and-reducing-inequality-improving-programme-targeting,-design,-and-processes.

48.

TNP2K (2015) Indonesia’s unified database for social protection programmes: Management standards. Secretariat of the Vice President of the Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia. Available at: http://www.tnp2k.go.id/downloads/indonesias-unified-database-for-social-protection-programmes-management-standards.

49.

TNP2K (2018) The future of the social protection system in Indonesia: Social protection for all. Office of the Vice President of the Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia. Available at: http://tnp2k.go.id/downloads/the-future-of-the-social-protection-system-in-indonesia.

50.

Van Oorschot

WJH

(2000) Who should get what, and why? On deservingness criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the public. Policy & Politics 28(1): 33–48.

51.

Wardhana

(2021) Entitlement programmes for garnering votes? The impact of local elections on targeted social protection in decentralised Indonesia. International Journal of Development Issues 20(1): 143–155.

52.

Yuda

Damanik

Nurhadi (2021) Examining emerging social policy during COVID-19 in Indonesia and the case for a community-based support system. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development 31(1-2): 13–22.