Conditional Cash Transfers (CCTs) are a prominent social policy in the Global South. Indonesia’s Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH), introduced in 2007. The paper reconceptualizes policy transfer by treating adoption and adaptation as mutually constitutive mechanisms. We specify two mechanism bundles. Using a qualitative case study with 15 semi-structured interviews and document analysis of government and international reports, we show that adoption without adaptation would have lacked local fit, while adaptation without adoption would have lacked legitimacy and financial support. Their interaction produced a recognizably global yet distinctly Indonesian PKH that weathered administrative fragmentation and infrastructural constraints. Our main contribution is to specify four testable interaction mechanisms linking adoption and adaptation: (1) targeting and the DTKS working with facilitators, (2) conditionalities working with Family Development Sessions and phased sanctions, (3) bank transfers working with staged digitalization, and (4) a maternal and child focus working with coverage expansion; we show that their joint operation accounts for PKH’s survival and concrete design. Theoretically, this advances a tractable framework of hybridization as a transfer outcome, moving beyond coercion versus adaptation dichotomies and yielding observable implications for program survival and design. Future work should test these mechanisms comparatively and quantify the effects of Family Development Sessions and digitalization on compliance and inclusion.
AstutikLHYNurIMashuriM (2022) Family expectation and poverty alleviation program: Approaches to family development laws, sustainable development goals, and Maqāṣid Sharīa. Justicia Islamica19(1): 38–56.
5.
Bappenas (2014) Perlindungan sosial di Indonesia : tantangan dan arah ke depan (ed KiswantiUKDD, 1st edn). Jakarta, Indonesia: Direktorat Perlindungan dan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Kementeriaan PPN/Bappenas.
6.
BastagliF (2011) Conditional cash transfers as a tool of social policy. Economic and Political Weekly46(21): 61–66.
7.
BélandDFoliRHowlettM, et al. (2018) Instrument constituencies and transnational policy diffusion: The case of conditional cash transfers. Review of International Political Economy25(4): 463–482.
8.
BélandDPowellMWaddanA (2023) Assessing policy transfer from the United States to the British National Health Service. Policy Studies46: 64–82.
9.
BeleliO (2022) Trusting relationships, learning bureaucrats: International organizations and early-stage policy diffusion. Global Social Policy22(1): 103–121.
10.
BensonDJordanA (2011) What have we learned from policy transfer research? Dolowitz and Marsh revisited. Political Studies Review9(3): 366–378.
11.
BerchtoldSPircherRStadlerC (2010) Global integration versus local adaptation: A case study of Austrian MNCs in Eastern Europe. European Journal of International Management4(5): 524–549.
12.
BissellKLeeKFreemanR (2011) Analysing policy transfer: Perspectives for operational research. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease15(9): 1140–1148.
13.
BlancFCotellaG (2023) Global urban development frameworks landing in Latin America: Insights from Ecuador and Bolivia. Development Policy Review41(1): e12632.
14.
BolognesiTMetzFNahrathS (2021) Institutional complexity traps in policy integration processes: A long-term perspective on Swiss flood risk management. Policy Sciences54(4): 911–941.
15.
CarleySNicholson-CrottySMillerCJ (2017) Adoption, reinvention and amendment of renewable portfolio standards in the American states. Journal of Public Policy37(4): 431–458.
16.
CoadyDParkerS (2009) Targeting social transfers to the poor in Mexico. IMF Working Papers9(60): 1.
17.
CraseLConnorJMichaelsS, et al. (2020) Australian water policy reform: Lessons learned and potential transferability. Climate Policy20(5): 641–651.
18.
CurryMSCadioganATGiuglianoRG (2013) Brazil’s bolsa familia and the Philippines’ ‘4Ps’ CCT programs: Considering south-south cooperation for social protection. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review13(1): 1–15.
19.
de OliveiraOP (2020) Comparing international policy transfers. In PetersBGFontaineG (eds) Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Comparative Policy Analysis. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp. 134–151.
DjuliusHLixianXLestariAN, et al. (2022) The impact of a poor family assistance program on human development in Indonesia. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research11(4): 59–70.
22.
DolowitzDMarshD (1996) Who learns what from whom: A review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies44(2): 343–357.
23.
DolowitzDPMarshD (2000) Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. An International Journal of Policy and Administration13(1): 5–24.
DuongH (2023) Shaping the policy transfer process. In DuongH (ed.) Policy Transfer Under Authoritarianism. Cham: Springer Nature, pp. 121–154.
26.
Dussauge-LagunaMI (2013) Policy transfer as a ‘contested’ process. International Journal of Public Administration36(10): 686–694.
27.
EvansMDaviesJ (1999) Understanding policy transfer: A multi-level, multi-disciplinary perspective. Public Administration77(2): 361–385.
28.
FadgenTP (2020) Mental Health Public Policy in Global Context. Singapore: Springer.
29.
FiszbeinASchadyNR (2009) Conditional Cash Transfers. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
30.
GaoQ (2018) Welfare, Work, and Poverty (Vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
GavensLHolmesJBuykxP, et al. (2019) Processes of local alcohol policy-making in England: Does the theory of policy transfer provide useful insights into public health decision-making?Health & Place57: 358–364.
HadjiiskyMPalLAWalkerC (2017) Public Policy Transfer : Micro-Dynamics and Macro-Effects. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Pub.
34.
HaliimWFerdiansyahFSasmita SariAYE (2024) Power Relations between Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) Facilitators and Beneficiary Families (KPM) (Study on PKH Implementation in Malang Regency). International Journal of Current Science Research and Review7(2): 998–1009.
HartartoRBWardaniDTK (2023) Does conditional cash transfer change educational aspirations? Evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Social Economics50(1): 148–161.
37.
HartartoRBWardaniDTKAzizurrohmanM (2021) A qualitative study of conditional cash transfer and education aspirations: Evidence from Yogyakarta. Journal of Social Service Research47(6): 776–785.
38.
HauptW (2023) Policy diffusion, policy transfer, and policy mobilities revisited: A call for more interdisciplinary approaches in human geography. Geography Compass17(5): e12688.
39.
HeinrichAIsabekovaGMüllerA, et al. (2021) The agency of recipient countries in transnational policy-related knowledge transfer. Communist and Post-communist Studies54(3): 51–72.
40.
HolmemoCAcostaPGeorgeT, et al. (2020) Investing in people: Social protection for Indonesia’s 2045 vision. Available at: www.worldbank.org
41.
HowlettMSaguinK (2021) Instrument constituency and policy transfer: How a collective actor mediates the transnational movement of policy instruments. In: de OliveiraOP (ed.) Handbook of Policy Transfer, Diffusion and Circulation. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 196–213.
42.
HudangAKHariyantoTHandoyoRD (2024) Does conditional cash transfer deliver? The Indonesian evidence on PKH. Business: Theory and Practice25(2): 447–457.
43.
HulickaALucasPCarsonL (2023) Policy transfer across governance systems: An adapted approach. Policy Studies44(1): 4–25.
44.
HwangSSongH (2019) Policy transfer and role of policy entrepreneur in international aid: Exploring international development cases of Korea and Vietnam. Policy Studies40(1): 1–20.
45.
JabalAABertinoELoboJ, et al. (2023) FLAP – A federated learning framework for attribute-based access control policies. In: CODASPY 2023 – Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy, Charlotte NC, 24–26 April. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/3577923.3583641
46.
JayantiEMuhammadSNazamuddinBS, et al. (2019) Does quality of life matter for achieving sustainable development goals in Indonesia?Regional Science Inquiry11(13): 119–132.
47.
KaaschASumartoMWilmsenB (2018) Indonesian social policy development in a context of global social governance. UNRISD Working Paper, No. 2018-6. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
KemmerlingAMakszinK (2023) Repackaging in South–North policy learning: The Chilean model of pension reform as a lopsided. Exportschlager. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice25(5): 528–545.
51.
KomarawatiKNurdinMFGunawanW, et al. (2025) Transformative capacity to build an adaptive society resilience during crisis: Evidence from conditional cash transfer/PKH Indonesia. Frontiers in Sociology10: 1507177.
52.
KuhlmannJ (2021) Mechanisms of policy transfer and policy diffusion. In: de OliveiraOP (ed.) Handbook of Policy Transfer, Diffusion and Circulation. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 43–57.
53.
KusumawatiASKudoT (2019) The effectiveness of targeting social transfer programs in Indonesia. Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning3(3): 282–297.
54.
KwonHJKimWR (2015) The evolution of cash transfers in Indonesia: Policy transfer and national adaptation. Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies2(2): 425–440.
55.
LeeCLiuHVan CaoT (2025) Applying the Singapore model in Cambodia and Thailand? Implications for transnational policy transfer. Public Administration and Development45(2): 112–129.
LiuHWangT (2021) The institutionalization and effectiveness of transnational policy transfer: The China–Singapore Suzhou Industrial Park as a case study. Public Administration and Development41(3): 103–114.
58.
Marquez-PadillaFParkerSVoglT (2025) Rolling back progresa: School and work after the end of a landmark anti-poverty program. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3386/w33527
59.
Martínez-IzquierdoLTorres SánchezM (2024) The adoption of dual Vocational Education and Training in Spain: Analysis of decentralised decision-making in educational policy transfer. Research in Comparative and International Education19(4): 479–502.
60.
Mazzeo RinaldiFLeoneL (2023) Conditional cash transfers in OECD countries: A realist synthesis. Frontiers in Sociology8: 1202430.
61.
MilhoranceCHowlandFSabourinE, et al. (2022) Tackling the implementation gap of climate adaptation strategies: Understanding policy translation in Brazil and Colombia. Climate Policy22(9–10): 1113–1129.
62.
MinkmanE (Ellen)van BuurenMW (Arwin)BekkersVJJM (Victor) (2018) Policy transfer routes: An evidence-based conceptual model to explain policy adoption. Policy Studies39(2): 222–250.
63.
Morais de Sá e SilvaM (2017a) Conditional Cash Transfer programs and the poverty-reduction agenda. In: Morais de Sá e SilvaM (ed.) Poverty Reduction, Education, and the Global Diffusion of Conditional Cash Transfers. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 3–19.
64.
Morais de Sá e SilvaM (2017b) The international diffusion of conditional cash transfers. In: Morais de Sá e SilvaM (ed.) Poverty Reduction, Education, and the Global Diffusion of Conditional Cash Transfers. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 21–51.
NedleyA (2017) Policy transfer and the developing country experience gap: Taking a Southern perspective. In: EvansM (ed.) Policy Transfer in Global Perspective. London: Routledge, pp. 165–189.
67.
Niño-ZarazúaM (2020) Mexico’s Progresa-Oportunidades-Prospera programme and the rise of social assistance in Latin America. In: AnandPBFennellSComimF (eds) Handbook of BRICS and Emerging Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 547–572.
68.
NoegrohoAAdiTNParasdyaSD (2024) The role of companion communication in the cognitive achievement of family members of the Indonesian Conditional Cash Transfer program in Indonesia. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences22(1): 4695–4706.
69.
OlkenBA (2019) Designing anti-poverty programs in emerging economies in the 21st century: Lessons from Indonesia for the world. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies55(3): 319–339.
70.
Osorio GonnetC (2019) A comparative analysis of the adoption of conditional cash transfers programs in Latin America. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice21(4): 385–401.
71.
OumaM (2020) Social protection policymaking in Kenya: Power and resistance in a globalised world. Africa Development45(2): 125–141.
72.
Pacheco-VegaR (2021) Policy transfer of environmental policy: Where are we now and where are we going? Examples from water, climate, energy, and waste sectors. In: de OliveiraOP (ed.) Handbook of Policy Transfer, Diffusion and Circulation. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 386–405.
73.
PalaonHWiryonoSKFaturohmanT (2020) Boosting financial inclusion through social assistance reform: Evidence-based approach in selecting a payment system. Enterprise Development and Microfinance31(4): 284–299.
74.
PeckJTheodoreN (2015) Experimental Statecraft at the Thresholds of Neoliberalism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Porto de OliveiraO (2022) Comparing pathways of policy internationalization: The transfer of Brazilian social programs. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice24(5): 490–511.
77.
Porto de OliveiraOOsorio GonnetC (2023) Comparative transfer analysis: Policy instruments, space and time. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice25(4): 367–384.
78.
PurbaRAWidianingsihIMuhtarEA (2024) The longlasting program Keluarga Harapan as Conditional Cash Transfer in Indonesia: The existing problems and the policy recommendations. Journal La Sociale4(5). Available at: https://doi.org/10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v4i5.1539
79.
RameshM (2009) Economic crisis and its social impacts. Global Social Policy9(Suppl. 1): 79–99.
80.
RawlingsLBRubioGM (2005) Evaluating the impact of Conditional Cash Transfer programs. The World Bank Research Observer20(1): 29–55.
81.
SaguinKHowlettM (2019) Policy transfer and instrument constituency: Explaining the adoption of conditional cash transfer in the Philippines. Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies6(3): 352–366.
82.
SaguinKShaK (2021) Policy transfer in Asia. In: de OliveiraOP (ed.) Handbook of Policy Transfer, Diffusion and Circulation. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 317–336.
83.
SonHH (2008) An Effective Tool for Poverty Alleviation? Available at: www.adb.org/economics
84.
StoneD (2004) Transfer agents and global networks in the ‘transnationalization’ of policy. Journal of European Public Policy11(3): 545–566.
85.
StoneD (2012) Transfer and translation of policy. Policy Studies33(6): 483–499.
86.
StoneD (2017) Understanding the transfer of policy failure: Bricolage, experimentalism and translation. Policy and Politics45(1): 55–70.
87.
StoneDPortodeOliveiraOPalLA (2020) Transnational policy transfer: The circulation of ideas, power and development models. Policy and Society39(1): 1–18.
88.
StreetA (2017) Policy transfer in Kyrgyzstan: The case of general practice fundholding. In: EvansM (ed.) Policy Transfer in Global Perspective. London: Routledge, pp. 113–127.
89.
SugiyamaNB (2011) The diffusion of conditional cash transfer programs in the Americas. Global Social Policy11(2–3): 250–278.
90.
SugiyamaNBHunterW (2020) Do Conditional Cash Transfers empower women? Insights from Brazil’s Bolsa Família. Latin American Politics and Society62(2): 53–74.
91.
SuhartoE (2018) Development of social welfare in Indonesia: The rise of conditional cash transfer. In: HsuS (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Sustainable Development in Asia. London: Routledge, pp. 345–353.
92.
SumartoM (2021) Welfare and Conflict: Policy Failure in the Indonesian Cash Transfer. Journal of Social Policy50(3):533–551. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279420000252
93.
SumartoM (2023) Conditional Cash Transfers, global politics and the development of Indonesia’s social protection policy. In McCarthyJFNooteboomGMcWilliamA (eds) The Paradox of Agrarian Change. Singapore: National University of Singapore Press, pp. 349–368.
94.
SyamsulhakimEKhadijahN (2021) Graduating from a Conditional Cash Transfer Program in Indonesia. Washington, DC: World Bank.
95.
SyukriMArifSRosfadhilaM, et al. (2010) Making the best of all resources: How Indonesian household recipients use the CCT allowance. IDS Bulletin41(4): 84–94.
96.
TakagiS (2016) Applying the lessons of Asia: The IMF’s crisis management strategy following the global financial crisis. International Economic Journal30(3): 409–428.
97.
TeerawichitchainanBPothisiriW (2021) Expansion of Thailand’s social pension policy and its implications for family support for older persons. International Journal of Social Welfare30(4): 428–442.
98.
TimmsP (2011) Urban transport policy transfer: ‘Bottom-up’ and ‘top-down’ perspectives. Transport Policy18(3): 513–521.
99.
TiovildaNCMelissaE (2025) Investigating the Technology Acceptance of QRIS Payment among Indonesian Generation X. In: Proceedings of the 2025 19th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication, IMCOM 2025, Bangkok, Thailand, 3–5 January. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/IMCOM64595.2025.10857494
100.
TsumaL (2018) The Political Economy of the World Bank’s Legal Framework for Economic Development. In KelseyJ (ed). International Economic Regulation. London: Routledge, pp. 179–200. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315183930-15
101.
Turner-WalkerSAnantasariERetnowatiA (2021) Integration into development: Translating international frameworks into village-level adaptation (pp. 53–77). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55536-8_4
102.
Umusya’adahLJuwaedahAJubaedahY, et al. (2018) Designing an Elderly Assistance Program Based-on Home Care. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering306(1): 012074.
Vinke-De KruijfJAugustijnDCMBressersHTA (2012) Evaluation of policy transfer interventions: Lessons from a Dutch-Romanian planning project. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning14(2): 139–160.
105.
WangYZhangH (2024) Individual agency in South-South policy transfer: China and Ethiopia’s industrial park development. Review of International Political Economy31(5): 1544–1568.
106.
WidyaningsihDRuhmaniyati ToyamahN (2023) Promoting continuous and systematic updates of integrated social welfare data. SMERU Working Paper No. 1/2023. Jakarta, Indonesia: The SMERU Research Institute.
107.
WitterSAndersonIAnnearP, et al. (2019) What, why and how do health systems learn from one another? Insights from eight low- and middle-income country case studies. Health Research Policy and Systems17(1): 9.
YudaTK (2023) Beyond path dependency: Analysing Indonesia’s social policy responses to two crises. Social Policy & Administration57(5): 727–743.
117.
YuliaLRusyidiBSulastriS (2022) Social assistance system in poverty reduction in Indonesia and the Philippines. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-journal5(2): 9897–9906.
118.
ZakiahKLestariVPPutraHD (2020) Akuntabilitas Pelaksanaan Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) Komponen Kesejahteraan Sosial (Lanjut Usia dan Disabilitas Berat) di Indonesia.
119.
ZhangJLiXLiuX, et al. (2024) International evaluation of the National Natural Science Foundation of China: A process of evaluation-enabled policy transfer. Journal of Asian Public Policy17(3): 541–564.
120.
ZhangYMarshD (2016) Learning by doing: The case of administrative policy transfer in China. Policy Studies37(1): 35–52.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
