This article illustrates participant reflexivity in an interview. Even though scholars have called for ‘a consideration of real-time reflexivity as a means of reconfiguring the participant within epistemological research debates’ (Riach, 2009: 366) illustrations of real-time reflexivity are hard to locate in literature. Most accounts of reflexivity focus on the researcher, and are generally post-research reflections on the research process. This article presents a closely-analysed segment of a semi-structured interview, where the participant changes her position on militarisation in Sri Lankan universities during the interview. This is presented as an instance of realtime participant reflexivity. Using this interview, factors contributing towards reflexivity in interviews are examined and a case made for closer examination of the participant’s reflexivity in qualitative research.
AnthonyAKDanaherWF (2016) Rules of the road: doing fieldwork and negotiating interactions with hesitant public figures. Qualitative Research16(4): 392–410.
BengtssonTTFynboL (2017) Analysing the significance of silence in qualitative interviewing: questioning and shifting power relations. Qualitative Research18(1): 19–35.
4.
BergerR (2015) Now I see it, now I don’t: researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research15(2): 219–234.
5.
BishopECShepherdML (2011) Ethical reflections: examining reflexivity through the narrative paradigm. Qualitative Health Research21(9): 1283–1294.
6.
BlakelyHMolesK (2017) Interviewing in the ‘interview society’ : making visible the biographical work of producing accounts for interviews. Qualitative Research17(2): 159–172.
7.
BlommaertJ (2004) Workshopping: Professional Vision, Practices and Critique in Discourse Analysis. Gent: Academic Press.
8.
BlommaertJ (2005) Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
CourtDAbbasR (2013) Whose interview is it, anyway? Methodological and ethical challenges of insider-outsider research, multiple languages, and dual-researcher cooperation. Qualitative Inquiry19(6): 480–488.
10.
CruickshankJ (2012) The role of qualitative interviews in discourse theory. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines6(1): 38–52.
11.
DaviesBHarréR (1990) Positioning: the discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour20(1): 43–63.
12.
DenzinNK (2001) The reflexive interview and a performative social science. Qualitative Research1(1): 23–46.
13.
FinlayL (2002) Negotiating the swamp: the opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research2(2): 209–230.
14.
GuilleminMGillamL (2004) Ethics, reflexivity, and ‘ethically important moments’ in research. Qualitative Inquiry10(2): 261–280.
15.
HoltA (2010) Using the telephone for narrative interviewing: a research note. Qualitative Research10(1): 113–121.
16.
KingingerC (2004) Alice doesn’t live here anymore: foreign language learning and identity reconstruction. In: PavlenkoABlackledgeA (eds) Negotiation of Identities in Multilingual Contexts. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 219–242.
17.
LarsonCL (1997) Re-presenting the subject: problems in personal narrative inquiry. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education10(4): 455–470.
18.
Lee-TreweekGLinkogleS (eds) (2000) Danger in the Field: Risk and Ethics in Social Research. New York: Routledge.
19.
Lucius-HoeneGDeppermannA (2000) Narrative identity empiricized: a dialogical and positioning approach to autobiographical research interviews. Narrative Inquiry10(1): 199–222.
20.
MazzeiLA (2003) Inhabited silences: in pursuit of a muffled subtext. Qualitative Inquiry9(3): 355–368.
de MelN (2007) Militarizing Sri Lanka: Popular Culture, Memory and the Narrative in the Armed Conflict. New Delhi: Sage.
23.
Mero-JaffeI (2011) ‘Is that what I said?’ Interview transcript approval by participants: an aspect of ethics in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods10(3): 231–247.
24.
MorisonTMacleodC (2013) When veiled silences speak: reflexivity, trouble and repair as methodological tools for interpreting the unspoken in discourse-based data. Qualitative Research14(6): 694–711.
25.
NairnKMunroJSmithAB (2005) A counter-narrative of a ‘failed’ interview. Qualitative Research5(2): 221–244.
26.
PezallaAEPettigrewJMiller-DayM (2012) Researching the researcher-as-instrument: an exercise in interviewer self-reflexivity. Qualitative Research12(2): 165–185.
27.
RiachK (2009) Exploring participant-centred reflexivity in the research interview. Sociology43(2): 356–370.
28.
RoulstonK (2014) Interactional problems in research interviews. Qualitative Research14(3): 277–293.
29.
SilversteinMUrbanG (eds) (1996) Natural Histories of Discourse. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
30.
TracySJRiveraKD (2010) Endorsing equity and applauding stay-at-home moms: how male voices on work-life reveal aversive sexism and flickers of transformation. Management Communication Quarterly24(1): 3–43.
31.
WalbyK (2010) Interviews as encounters: issues of sexuality and reflexivity when men interview men about commercial same sex relations. Qualitative Research10(6): 639–657.
32.
WayAZwierRKTracyS (2015) Dialogic interviewing and flickers of transformation: an examination and delineation of interactional strategies that promote participant self-reflexivity. Qualitative Inquiry21(8): 720–731.
33.
WetherellM (1998) Positioning and interpretative repertoires: conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society9(3): 387–412.
34.
WitharanaD (2015) The story of the ‘6% t-shirt’ : the hundred day struggle of the Federation of University Teachers’ Association, Sri Lanka. The South Asianist4(1): 1–24.
35.
YangK-H (2015) Participant reflexivity in community-based participatory research: insights from reflexive interview, dialogical narrative analysis, and video ethnography. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology25(5): 447–458.
36.
YatesSHilesD (2010) Towards a ‘critical ontology of ourselves’ ? Foucault, subjectivity and discourse analysis. Theory & Psychology20(1): 52–75.
37.
Yeadon-LeeT (2009) Doing extra-ordinariness: trans-men’s accomplishment of ‘authenticity’ in the research interview. Qualitative Research9(3): 243–261.
38.
ZienkowskiJ (2017a) Articulations of Self and Politics in Activist Discourse: A Discourse Analysis of Critical Subjectivities in Minority Debates. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
39.
ZienkowskiJ (2017b) Reflexivity in the transdisciplinary field of critical discourse studies. Palgrave Communications3(17007). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2017.7
