This article elucidates the methodological issues around reanalysis, by comparing the treatment of a corpus of 52 interviews in two European regions by two researchers. The primary data were initially analysed by the principal investigator using a method similar to content analysis and with the help of NVivo 12. It was then reanalysed by a second researcher who did not participate in the interview campaign, using a more inductive method of qualitative discourse analysis assisted by Atlas-ti 8. The overarching conclusion confirms the usefulness of combining these methods of analysis. The article is a contribution to the literature on the use of CAQDAS in the context of the reuse of data.
AbrialSBrugidouMESalomonAC (2017) Types idéologiques et classe résiduelle dans l’enquête d’Etienne Schweisguth; les Français et la politique, 1982–1988. Réanalyse à partir de deux familles de logiciels, CAQDAS et ADT. Recherches qualitatives. Hors-série 21(1): 29–53.
2.
BandeiraDeMelloRGarreauL (2011) L’utilisation d’Atlas.ti pour améliorer les recherches dans le cadre de la Méthode de la Théorisation Enracinée (MTE): panacée ou mirage?Recherches qualitatives30(2): 175–202.
3.
ColeA (2006) Beyond Devolution and Decentralisation: Building Regional Capacity in Wales and Brittany. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
4.
ColeAHarguindeguyJBPasquierR, et al. (2015) The states of convergence of territorial governance. Publius: the Journal of Federalism45(2): 297–321.
5.
ColeAHarguindeguyJBPasquierR, et al. (2018a) Territorial Governance between Convergence and Capacity. Paris: Centre de données socio-politiques, beQuali. DOI: 10.21410/dshs_2016/1H18MS
6.
ColeAHarguindéguyJBPasquierR, et al. (2018b) Towards a territorial political capacity approach for studying European regions. Regional & Federal Studies. Epub ahead of print 22 November 2018. DOI: 10.1080/13597566.2018.1548440
7.
ColeAPalmerR (2011) Europeanising devolution: Wales and the European Union. British Politics6(s): 379–396.
8.
ColeAPasquierR (2015) The Breton model between convergence and capacity. Territory, Politics, Governance3(1): 51–72.
9.
ColeAPasquierRVisscherC (2016) Les régions européennes face à la crise: une grille de lecture comparative. Revue internationale de politique comparée23(3): 285–300.
10.
CollierDLevitskyS (1997) Democracy with adjectives: conceptual innovation in comparative research. World Politics49(3): 430–451.
11.
DeleuzeGGuattariF (1980) Capitalisme et schizophrénie. Tome 2: Mille plateaux. Critique, Paris: Minuit.
12.
DuchesneS (2017) De l’analyse secondaire à la réanalyse. Une innovation méthodologique en débats ». Recherches qualitatives. Hors-série, no 21, "La réanalyse des enquêtes qualitatives à l’épreuve de l’expérimentation, 7–28.
13.
EvansTThaneP (2006) Secondary analysis of Dennis Marsden mothers alone. Methodological Innovation Online1(2): 78–82.
14.
FieldingNG (2000) The shared fate of two innovations in qualitative methodology: the relationship of qualitative software and secondary analysis of archived qualitative data. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research1(3): 1–13. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1039
15.
FieldingNGFieldingJL (2000) Resistance and adaptation to criminal identity: using secondary analysis to evaluate classic studies of crime and deviance. Sociology34(4): 671–689.
FrieseS (2014) Qualitative Data Analysis with ATLAS-ti. London: Sage.
18.
GibbsGR (2014) Chapter 19: using software in qualitative analysis. In: par Uwe Flick édité. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis. London: Sage Publications Ltd, 277–294. DOI: 10.4135/9781446282243.n19
19.
GilliesVEdwardsR (2012) Working with archived classic family and community studies: illuminating past and present conventions around acceptable research practice. International Journal of Social Research Methodology15(4): 321–330.
20.
GlaserBGJudithH (2004) Remodeling grounded theory. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research5(2): [revue en ligne]. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-5.2.607
21.
GlaserBGStraussAL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Eldin.
22.
Le RouxDVidalJ (2000) Verbatim: archiving qualitative data and secondary analysis in a French Company. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research1(3): 1–14. [revue en ligne].
23.
LejeuneC (2014) Manuel d’analyse qualitative. Analyser sans compter ni classer. Louvain-la-Neuve: De Boeck.
24.
LewinsASilverC (2014) Using Software in Qualitative Research: A Step-by-Step Guide. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
25.
MedjedovićIWitzelA (2008) Secondary analysis of interviews: using codes and theoretical concepts from the primary study. Historical Social Research33(3): 148–178.
26.
MilesMHubermanMSaldanaJ (2013) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
27.
PailléPMucchielliA (2012) L’analyse qualitative en sciences humaines et sociales. Paris: Armand Colin.
28.
PageEGoldsmithM (1987) Central and Local Government Relations. London: Sage.
29.
PasquierR (2004) La capacité politique des régions. Une comparaison France/Espagne. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
30.
RioufreytT (2019) Usages et appropriations des logiciels d’aide à l’analyse qualitative. Bulletin de méthodologie sociologique143(1): 7–27.
31.
SartoriG (1970) Concept misformation in comparative politics. The American Political Science Review64(4): 1033–1053.
32.
SavageM (2011) Identities and Social Change: The Politics of Method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33.
StakeRE (1995) The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
WassermanSFaustK (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
