This article explores what it means to take women’s agency seriously and to fulfill the potential of intersectional politics. If we accept the central tenets of intersectionality, that axes of oppression are simultaneous and interacting, then we must interrogate the framing of current debates over women’s rights around the tension between gender and religious/cultural accommodation. It is argued that the unfulfilled potential of intersectional politics leads to the denial of intersectional voices. This potential can only be fulfilled by enabling participation that goes beyond responding to predetermined positions to permit the exercise of meaningful power in the construction of contexts. These claims are illustrated through analysis of the debate over so-called ‘shari’a tribunals’ in Canada. The debate is juxtaposed with the experiences of Somali refugee women who instead assert interacting and simultaneous challenges that combine the axes of religion, legal status, ‘race’, class and gender.
Affi, L. ( 1997) ‘The Somali Crisis in Canada: The Single Mother Phenomenon’, in H.M. Adam and R. Ford (eds) Mending Rips in the Sky: Options for Somali Communities in the 21st Century, pp. 441-48. Lawrenceville, NJ, Asmara, Eritrea: The Red Sea Press Inc.
2.
Affi, L. ( 2004) ‘Domestic Conflict in the Diaspora - Somali Women Asylum Seekers and Refugees in Canada’, in J. Gardner and J. El Bushra (eds) Somalia - The Untold Story: The War Through the Eyes of Somali Women, pp. 107-15. London: Pluto Press.
3.
Anthias, F. ( 2002) ‘Beyond Feminism and Multiculturalism: Locating Difference and the Politics Of location’, Women’s Studies International Forum25(3): 275-86.
4.
Baines, B. ( 2009) ‘Must Feminists Identify as Secular Citizens: Lessons from Ontario’, in L.C. McClain and J. Grossman (eds) Gender Equality: Dimensions of Women’s Equal Citizenship, pp. 83-106. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Bakht, N. ( 2004) ‘Family Arbitration Using Sharia Law: Explaining Ontario’s Arbitration Act and its Impact on Women’, Muslim World Journal of Human Rights1(1): 1-24.
6.
Bakht, N. ( 2005) ‘Arbitration, Religion and Family Law: Private Justice on the Backs of Women’ [http://www.nawl.ca/ns/en/publications.html#research ].
7.
Bannerji, H. ( 2000a) The Dark Side of the Nation: Essays on Multiculturalism, Nationalism and Gender. Toronto: CanadianScholars’ Press.
8.
Bannerji, H. ( 2000b) ‘The Paradox of Diversity: The Construction of a Multicultural Canada and ‘‘Women of Colour’’’ , Women’s Studies International Forum23(5): 537-60.
9.
Bassel, L. ( 2007a) ‘Refugee Women and La République: Participation in the French Public Sphere’, Parliamentary Affairs60(3): 467-81.
10.
Bassel, L. ( 2007b) ‘From Refugee Woman to Citizen: The Politics of Integration in France and Canada’, unpublished doctoral dissertation , University of Oxford, UK.
11.
Bassel, L. ( 2008a) ‘Citizenship as Interpellation: Refugee Women and the State’, Government and Opposition43(2): 293-314.
12.
Bassel, L. ( 2008b) ‘Silencing to Protect: the Debate Over Women’s Rights in France and Canada’, in G.K. Bhambra and R. Shilliam (eds) Silencing Human Rights: Critical Engagements with a Contested Project. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
13.
Benhabib, S. ( 2002) The Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global Era. Princeton, NJ; Oxford: Princeton University Press.
14.
Boyd, M. ( 2004a) ‘Dispute Resolution in Family Law: Protecting Choice, Promoting Inclusion’ [http://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/english/about/pubs/boyd/fullreport.pdf].
15.
Boyd, M. ( 2004b) ‘Executive Summary: Dispute Resolution in Family Law: Protecting Choice, Promoting Inclusion’ [ http://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/english/about/pubs/boyd/executivesummary.pdf ].
16.
Brouwer, A. ( 1999) ‘What’s in a Name? Identity Documents and Convention Refugees’ [http://www.caledoninst.org/Publications/PDF/whats%2Epdf ].
17.
Canadian Council of Muslim Women (2004) ‘Initial Response to Marion Boyd’s Report on the Arbitration Act’ , ‘press release, 20 December 2004 [ http://www.ccmw.com/press/press_room_2004.html].
18.
Canadian Lawyer Magazine (2005) ‘Religion and Arbitration’, August [ http://www.canadianlawyermag.com/].
19.
Canadian Press (2005) ‘McGuinty Rejects Ontario’s Use of Shariah Law and All Religious Arbitrations’ , 12 September 2005 [http://www.thecanadianpress.com/].
20.
Combahee River Collective (1986) The Combahee River Collective Statement: Black Feminist Organizing in the Seventies and Eighties. New York: Kitchen Table: Women of Color Press.
21.
Conseil des Relations Interculturelles (2005 ) ‘Laïcité et diversité religieuse: l’approche québécoise’, Journal of International Migration and Integration6(2): 327-62.
22.
Crawley, H. ( 1999) ‘Women and Refugee Status: Beyond the Public/Private Dichotomy in UK Asylum Policy’, in D. Indra (ed.) Engendering Forced Migration. Theory and Practice , pp. 308-33. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
23.
Crenshaw, K. ( 1991) ‘Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics and Violence Against Women of Color’, in M. Albertson Fineman (ed.) The Public Nature of Private Violence, pp. 93-118. New York: Routledge.
24.
Deveaux, M. ( 2006) Gender and Justice in Multicultural Liberal States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
Dryer, J. ( 1998) ‘The Undocumented Convention Refugees in Canada Class: Creating a Refugee Underclass’, Journal of Law and Social Policy13: 166-87.
26.
Dustin, M. ( 2006) Gender Equality, Cultural Diversity: European Comparisons and Lessons. London: Gender Institute, London School of Economics and Political Science [ http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/genderInstitute/NuffieldReport_final.pdf ].
27.
Dustin, M. and A. Phillips ( 2008) ‘Whose Agenda Is It? Abuses of Women and Abuses of ‘‘Culture’’ In Britain’, Ethnicities8(3): 405-24.
28.
Fraser, N. ( 2005) ‘Reframing Justice in a Globalizing World’ , New Left Review36: 69-88.
29.
Gilad, L. ( 1999) ‘The Problem of Gender-Related Persecution: A Challenge of International Protection’, in D. Indra (ed.) Engendering Forced Migration: Theory and Practice , pp. 334-342. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
30.
Guiné, A. and F.J. Moreno Fuentes ( 2007) ‘Engendering Redistribution, Recognition, and Representation: The Case of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) in the United Kingdom and France’ , Politics & Society35(3): 477-519.
31.
Hancock, A.-M. ( 2007) ‘When Multiplication Doesn’t Equal Quick Addition: Examining Intersectionality as a Research Paradigm’, Perspectives on Politics5(1): 63-79.
32.
Hill Collins, P. ( 1990) Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment. London: Harper Collins Academic.
33.
Hirschmann, N. ( 2003) The Subject of Liberty: Toward a Feminist Theory of Freedom . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
Honig, B. ( 1999) ‘My Culture Made Me Do It’, in J. Cohen, M. Howard and M. Nussbaum (eds) Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? pp. 35-40. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
Hussein, L.J., M.A.A. Shermarke and with support from the Horn of Africa Resource and Research Group (1995) Female Genital Mutilation: Report on Consultations Held in Ottawa and Montreal, WD1995-8e. Ottawa: Research and Statistics Section, Department of Justice Canada.
36.
Indra, D., ed. (1999) Engendering Forced Migration: Theory and Practice. Refugee and Forced Migration Studies . Oxford: Berghahn Books.
37.
International Campaign Against Shari’a Court in Canada (n.d.) [http://www.nosharia.com/].
38.
Israelite, N.K., A. Herman, F. Ahmed Alim, H. Abdullahi Mohammed, Y. Khan, L. Caruso ( 1999) ‘Waiting for ‘‘Sharciga’’: Resettlement and the Roles of Somali Refugee Women’, Canadian Woman Studies19(3): 80-7.
39.
Jordan-Zachery, J.S. ( 2007) ‘Am I a Black Woman or a Woman Who Is Black? A Few Thoughts on the Meaning of Intersectionality’, Politics & Gender3(2): 254-63.
40.
Kilic, S., S. Saharso, B. Sauer ( 2008) ‘Introduction: The Veil: Debating Citizenship, Gender and Religious Diversity’, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society15(4): 397-410.
41.
Korteweg, A. ( 2008) ‘The Sharia Debate in Ontario. Gender’, Islam and Representation of Muslim Women’s Agency’, Gender & Society22(4): 434-54.
42.
Kymlicka, W. ( 1998) Finding Our Way: Rethinking Ethnocultural Relations in Canada. Don Mills, Canada: Oxford University Press.
43.
Levine, A. ( 1999) ‘Female Genital Operations: Canadian Realities, Concerns, and Policy Recommendations’, in H.M. Troper and M. Weinfeld (eds) Ethnicity, Politics, and Public Policy: Case Studies in Canadian Diversity , pp. 26-53. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
44.
Macklin, A. ( 1999) ‘A Comparative Analysis of the Canadian, US, and Australian Directives on Gender Persecution and Refugee Status’, in D. Indra (ed.) Engendering Forced Migration. Theory and Practice, pp. 272-307. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
45.
Maytree Foundation (n.d.) [http://www.maytree.com ].
46.
McCall, L. ( 2005) ‘The Complexity of Intersectionality’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society30(3): 1771-1800.
47.
McGill, S. ( 2007) ‘Family Arbitration: One Step Forward’, Two Steps Back’, Journal of Law and Social Policy21: 49-62.
48.
Ministry of the Attorney General Province of Ontario ( 2006) ‘Ontario Passes Family Statute Law Amendment Act’ , news release [http://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/english/news/2006/20060215-famend.asp].
49.
Mohamed, H.S. ( 1999) ‘Resistance Strategies: Somali Women’s Struggles to Reconstruct their Lives in Canada’, Canadian Woman Studies19(3): 52-57.
50.
Nash, K. and V. Bell ( 2007) ‘The Politics of Framing: An Interview with Nancy Fraser’, Theory, Culture and Society24(4): 73-86.
51.
Okin, S.M. ( 1999) ‘Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?’ in J. Cohen, M. Howard and M. Nussbaum (eds) Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? pp. 7-26. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52.
Phillips, A. ( 2007) Multiculturalism without Culture. Princeton, NJ; Oxford: Princeton University Press.
53.
Phillips, A. and S. Saharso ( 2008) ‘Guest Editorial: The Rights of Women and the Crisis of Multiculturalism’, Ethnicities8(3): 291-301.
54.
Razack, S. ( 1995) ‘Domestic Violence as Gender Persecution: Policing the Borders of Nation, Race and Gender’, Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit8(1): 45-88.
55.
Razack, S. ( 1999) ‘Making Canada White: Law and the Policing of Bodies of Colour in the 1990s’, Canadian Journal of Law and Society14(1): 159-184.
56.
Razack, S. ( 2000) ‘‘‘Simple Logic’’: Race, the Identity Documents Rule and the Story of a Nation Besieged and Betrayed’ , Journal of Law and Social Policy15: 181-209.
57.
Razack, S. ( 2007) ‘The ‘‘Sharia Law Debate’’ in Ontario: The Modernity/ Premodernity Distinction in Legal Efforts to Protect Women from Culture’, Feminist Legal Studies15(3): 3-32.
58.
Refuge: Canada’s Periodical on Refugees ( 1992) ‘Centre for Refugee Studies Discussion of Immigration Bill c-86’, 12(2): 6-17.
59.
Renaud, J., V. Piché, et al (2003) ‘One’s Bad and the Other One’s Worse’: Differences in Economic Integration Between Asylum Seekers and Refugees Selected Abroad’, Canadian Ethnic Studies35: 86-99.
60.
Shachar, A. ( 2001) Multicultural Jurisdictions: Cultural Differences and Women’s Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61.
Shachar, A. ( 2008) ‘Privatizing Diversity: A Cautionary Tale from Religious Arbitration in Family Law’, Theoretical Inquiries in Law9(2): 573-607.
62.
Siim, B. ( 2009) ‘Citizenship, Diversity and Gender Equality - National Belongings and Intersections of Gender, Ethnicity and Religion’, paper presented to ECPR Joint Session, Lisbon 2009: Governing Religious Differences at the Intersection of Gender and Ethnicity. 15-19 April 2009.
63.
Snow, D.A. and R.D. Benford ( 1988) ‘Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization’ , in B. Klandermans, H. Kriesi and S. Tarrow (eds) International Social Movement Research, pp. 197-217. Greenwich, CT : JAI Press.
64.
Snow, D.A. and R.D. Benford ( 1992) ‘Master Frames and Cycles of Protest’, in A.D. Morris and C.M. Mueller (eds) Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, pp. 133-155. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
65.
Song, S. ( 2007) Justice, Gender, and the Politics of Multiculturalism . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66.
The Globe and Mail (2005a) ‘Sharia Opponents Demand Apology for Elmasry’s Critical Remarks’, 26 October 2005 [http://www.theglobeandmail.com/ ].
67.
The Globe and Mail (2005b) ‘Muslims Arbitration: Don’t Ban, Supervise’, 9 September [http://www.theglobeandmail.com/].
68.
The Globe and Mail (2005c) ‘The Sharia Debate Deserves a Proper Hearing’, 15 September 2005 [http://www.theglobeandmail.com/].
69.
The Globe and Mail (2005d) ‘Ontario Urged to Spurn Sharia’, 9 September 2005 [http://www.theglobeandmail.com/].
70.
The National Post (2005) ‘Quebec Bans Sharia’, 27 May 2005 [http://www.national-post.com/ ].
71.
The Toronto Star (2005a) ‘Sharia Tribunals and Human Rights’, 8 September 2005 [http://www.thestar.com/].
72.
The Toronto Star (2005b) Liberal Women ‘‘Loud Voice’’ on Sharia’, 13 September 2005 [http://www.thestar.com/].
73.
United Nations General Assembly (2004) World Survey on the Role of Women in Development: Report of the Secretary-General, Addendum Women and International Migration (04-53127 (E) 151104). New York: United Nations.
74.
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees ( 1951) Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and the 1967 Protocol [http://www.unhcr.org/3b66c2aa10.html ].
75.
Verloo, M. and C. Roggeband ( 2007) ‘Dutch Women are Liberated, Migrant Women are a Problem: The Evolution of Policy Frames on Gender and Migration in the Netherlands 1995-2005’, Social Policy and Administration41(3): 271-88.
76.
Weldon, S.L. ( 2006) ‘The Structure of Intersectionality: A Comparative Politics of Gender’, Politics & Gender2(2): 235-48.
77.
Women’s Human Rights Net (2005) ‘Women’s Rights and Sharia Tribunals in Ontario. An interview with Jasmin Zine’ [http://www.awid.org/eng/Issues-and-Analysis/Library/Women-s-Rights-and-Sharia-Tribunals-in-Ontario-Canada/(language)/eng-GB].
78.
Yuval-Davis, N., F. Anthias and E. Kofman ( 2005) ‘‘Secure borders and safe haven and the gendered politics of belonging: beyond social cohesion’’, Ethnic and Racial Studies28(3): 513-35.
79.
Young, I.M. ( 1997) Intersecting Voices: Dilemmas of Gender, Political Philosophy, and policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
