Social integration is a contested concept that has been defined in various ways by different stakeholders. Drawing on research with Australian Muslim leaders, we argue that social integration can be usefully conceptualised as both a process of normalisation and the end product of this process. In this paper, we first discuss the identity aspect of social integration and then outline the discursive strategies the Muslim leaders utilise in their attempts to achieve the goal of being viewed as normal Australians. We illustrate how the leaders exercise agency in challenging dominant negative discourses, which assign to them a stigmatised position in Australia. The empirical evidence comes from 30 interviews conducted in Melbourne and Sydney in 2010 and 2011 with prominent Australian Muslim leaders.
BergerPL (1998) Conclusion: general observation on normative conflicts and mediation. In: BergerPL (ed.) The Limits of Social Cohesion: Conflicts and Mediation In Pluralist Societies, Colorado: Westview Press, pp. 352–372.
5.
BillingM (1995) Banal Nationalism, London: Sage.
6.
BrastedH (2001) Contested representations in historical perspective: images of Islam and the Australian press 1950–2000. In: SaeedAAkbarzadehS (eds) Muslim Communities in Australia, Sydney: UNSW Press, pp. 206–227.
7.
ClairJABeattyJEMacLeanTL (2005) Out of sight but not out of mind: managing invisible social identities in the workplace. Academy of Management Review30(1): 78–95.
Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (2004) Transnational terrorism: the threat to Australia, chapter 6: The threat to Australia and Australia's interest. Available at: http://www.dfat.gov.au/publications/terrorism/chapter6.html (accessed 6 Apr 2014).
10.
DunnKKlockerNSalabayT (2007) Contemporary racism and Islamophobia in Australia. Ethnicities7(4): 564–589.
GeertzC (1968) Islam Observed: Religious Development in Morocco and Indonesia, New Haven: Yale University Press.
15.
GoffmanE (1963) Stigma, Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity, Middlesex: Penguin Books.
16.
HackingI (1990) The Taming of Chance, New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
HallS (1993) Deviance, politics, and the media. In: AbeloveHBaraleMIAHalperinDM (eds) The Lesbian and Gay Studies Reader, New York: Routledge, pp. 261–305..
18.
HomseyMJHoggMA (2000) Assimilation and diversity: an integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review4(2): 143–156.
19.
HuntingtonSP (1993) The clash of civilizations. Foreign Affairs72(3): 22–49.
20.
Institute for American values (2002) What we're fighting for: a letter from America. Institute for American Values. Available at: http://americanvalues.org/search/item.php?id=858 (accessed 6 April 2014).
ParekhB (2005) Europe, liberalism and the Muslim question. In: ModoodTTriandafyllidouAZapate-BarreroR (eds) Multiculturalism, Muslims and Citizenship, Hoboken: Routledge, pp. 179–203.
28.
PutnamRD (2007) E Pluribus Unum: diversity and community in the twenty-first century, the 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies30(2): 137–174.
29.
RamadanT (2003) Western Muslims and the Future of Islam, New York: Oxford University Press.
30.
SaidE (1978) Orientalism, England: Penguin books.
31.
SimonB (2004) Identity in Modern Society, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
32.
TaylorC (2006) Religion and modern identity struggles. In: GoleNAmmannL (eds) Islam in Public, Turkey, Iran, and Europe, Istanbul: Istanbul Bilgi University Press, pp. 481–522.
