In the marketplace, money serves as a utilitarian tool, but when it enters the home, it takes on different social and cultural meanings depending on its origin, earner, and allocation. In today’s digital landscape, digital platforms facilitate the conversion of domestic items and activities into commodities, creating new forms of money with unique meanings. Drawing upon Zelizer’s “special monies” model and recent research on platform-earned money, this qualitative study explores the meaning of an emerging form of money earned by Turkish housewives engaging in digital secondhand marketplaces (DSMs). Through thirteen in-depth interviews, DSM money is investigated across three dimensions: its domestic origins, the earners themselves, and the allocation patterns. The study introduces “upgrade money” as special money derived from the “commodification of home”—the transformation of their culturally designated domain into a source of income and power. While upgrade money operates as an undervalued domestic currency, housewives strategically use it to enhance the social status of their homes, children, and themselves while maintaining sociocultural norms. Although their connection to the domestic sphere persists, housewives perceive this transformation as empowering, shifting from “cashless money managers” to strategic investors. This study demonstrates how digital platforms can enable meaningful perceived empowerment within traditional constraints.
AdkinsLDeverM (2016a) The financialisation of social reproduction: domestic labour and promissory value. In: The Post-Fordist Sexual Contract: Working and Living in Contingency. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 129–145.
2.
AdkinsLDeverM (eds) (2016b) The Post-Fordist Sexual Contract. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
3.
BagdoganS (2019) The connection of Turkish “housewives” to the world by handmade yarn products. Lund University.
4.
BandeljNWherryFFZelizerVA (2017) Money Talks: Explaining How Money Really Works. London: Princeton University Press.
5.
BaxterPJackS (2010) Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researchers. Qualitative Report13(4): 544–559.
6.
BoraA (2005) Kadınların Sınıfı :Ücretli Ev Emeği ve Kadın Öznelliğinin İnşası. İletişim Yayınları.
7.
BurgoyneCB (1990) Money in marriage: how patterns of allocation both reflect and conceal power. The Sociological Review38(4): 634–665.
8.
BurgoyneC (2004) Heart-strings and Purse-Strings: money in heterosexual marriage. Feminism & Psychology14(1): 165–172.
9.
ÇeliK VarolM (2022) Second-hand consumption as an example of sustainability. Kritik İletişim Çalışmaları Dergisi4(1): 58.
10.
ChibAMayJBarrantesR (eds) (2015) Impact of Information Society Research in the Global South. Singapore: Springer.
11.
ChuH (2013) A conceptual model of motivations for consumer resale on C2C websites. Service Industries Journal33(15–16): 1527–1543.
12.
ÇiftçiHirlak (2016) The barriers to the labor force participation of housewives. JASS.
13.
CloseS (2016) The political economy of creative entrepreneurship on digital platforms: case study of Etsy.com In:2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 1901–1908.
14.
Deloitte (2019) Global digital consumer survey. Global Digital Consumer Survey.
15.
Deloitte (2020) What Is Digital Economy?Technology: Deloitte Malta.
16.
DenginHPS (2011) İkinci El Giysi Pazarları ve Türkiye’deki Durumu. Akdeniz Sanat4(8): 110–111.
17.
DildarY (2015) Patriarchal norms, Religion, and female labor supply: evidence from Turkey. World Development76: 40–61.
18.
DolanCScottL (2009) Lipstick evangelism: avon trading circles and gender empowerment in South Africa. Gender and Development17(2): 203–218.
19.
DufloEUdryC (2004) Intrahousehold Resource Allocation in Cote d’Ivoire: Social Norms, Separate Accounts and Consumption Choices. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, w10498.
20.
D’AntonioV (2019) From Tupperware to Scentsy: the gendered culture of women and direct sales. Sociology Compass13(5): e12692.
21.
ErtzMDurifFArcandM (2018) Business at the fingertips of consumers: a scale for measuring resale motivations in online settings. International Review of Retail Distribution & Consumer Research28(1): 92–114.
22.
Esen (2018) Research on family structure in türkiye - advanced statistical analyses, 2018. In: Republic of Turkey Ministry of Family, Labour and Social Services.
23.
FehimKN (1999) A Comparison between Women Living in Traditional Turkish Houses and Women Living in Apartments in Historical Context. Master Thesis. Ankara: Middle East Technical University.
24.
Heilingloh (2021) Understanding value creating processes on digital social marketplaces the case of depop. Leopold-Franzens-Universität Innsbruck.
25.
HuwsU (2019) The hassle of housework: digitalisation and the commodification of domestic labour. Feminist Review123(1): 8–23.
26.
İşçioğluTE (2018) İkinci el giyim motivasyonlari ve sürdürülebilirlik üzerine keşifsel bir araştirma. Pazarlama Teorisi ve Uygulamaları Dergisi.
27.
IzzatiFF (2020) “Women’s work” in Indonesia’s social Media-based online store business: social reproduction and the feminization of work. Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities10(1): 35–46.
28.
JourdainANaulinS (2020) Making money out of leisure: the marketization of handicrafts and food blogging. In: NaulinSJourdainA (eds) The Social Meaning of Extra Money: Capitalism and the Commodification of Domestic and Leisure Activities. Cham: Springer International Publishing (Dynamics of Virtual Work), 61–95.
29.
KaplanM (2011) Kaplumbağa’nin özgürlüğü. kadinlar ve ev içi emek’.
30.
KarakayaH (2018) Görünmez emek ve ev kadinlari. Fırat Üniversitesi Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi2(1): 73–94.
31.
Koçak TurhanoğluFABeklan ÇetiNO (2023) Toplumsal cinsiyet bağlaminda ‘ev’in anlami ve ev ile kurulan ilişkinin farklilaşmasi. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi26(1): 40–60.
32.
KPMG (2018) Market size of global platform economy surpasses $7 trillion mark. Consultancy.org.
33.
KüçükerT (2011) An analysis on the intersection of Patriarchy, capitalism and women in Turkey. İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi.
34.
LevesqueRJR (2016) Commodification. In: LevesqueRJR (ed) Encyclopedia of Adolescence. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 1–5.
35.
LuckmanS (2015) Women’s micro-entrepreneurial homeworking. Australian Feminist Studies30(84): 146–160.
36.
LuckmanSAndrewJ (2018) Online Selling and the Growth of Home-Based Craft Micro-enterprise: The “New Normal”. of Women’s Self-(under)Employment’, 19–39.
37.
NaulinSJourdainA (eds) (2020) The Social Meaning of Extra Money: Capitalism and the Commodification of Domestic and Leisure Activities. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
38.
Nelson (1990) Negotiated care: the experience of family day care providers on JSTOR. Feminist Stud15: 7–33.
39.
NiaVKSoolaFE (2016) Ideology of patriarchy and the concept of money for Iranian women in the family.
40.
NordJHLeeT-RÇetinF, et al. (2016) Examining the impact of social technologies on empowerment and economic development. International Journal of Information Management36(6): 1101–1110.
41.
NymanC (2003) The social nature of money: meanings of Money in Swedish Families. Women's Studies International Forum26(1): 79–94.
42.
OffensendE (2000) Crafting a Space: A Feminist Analysis of the Relationship between Women, Craft, Business and Technology on Etsy.com. Dissertations and Theses. Portland State University.
43.
ÖzmenFADönmezRÖ (2013) Gendered Identities: Criticizing Patriarchy in Turkey. Lexington Books.
44.
O’NeilML (2019) Türkiye’de toplumsal cinsiyet ve kadin algisi araştirmasi 2019. Kadir Has University.
45.
Palacios and López (2020) The online reselling experience. A conceptual model and research agenda. Buscando nuevos enfoques de marketing para afrontar los cambios.
46.
PerrenRKozinetsRV (2018) Lateral exchange markets: how social platforms operate in a networked economy. Journal of Marketing82(1): 20–36.
47.
RashidYRashidAWaseemA, et al. (2019) Case study method: a step-by-step guide for business researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods18.
48.
RinkUBarrosL (2021) Spending or saving? Female empowerment and financial decisions in a matrilineal society. World Development141: 105342.
49.
Secore LevisM (2011) Working toward women’s economic empowerment: using information and communication technology in developing areas to market traditional crafts. In: JackoJA (ed) Human-Computer Interaction. Users and Applications. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 266–273. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science).
50.
SimmelG (2011) The Philosophy of Money. London: Routledge.
51.
Statista (2022) Secondhand apparel market value worldwide 2012-2025.
52.
SteelG (2021) Going global – going digital. Diaspora networks and female online entrepreneurship in Khartoum, Sudan. Geoforum120: 22–29.
53.
SuterC (ed) (2021) The Future of Work. Seismo Verlag AG. DOI: 10.33058/seismo.30818.
54.
TakvimiM (2015) Eski giyeceklerimizi sadaka vermek. Mevlana Takvimi.
VoglerC (1998) Money in the household: some underlying issues of power. The Sociological Review46(4): 687–713.
57.
VoglerCPahlJ (1993) Social and economic change and the Organisation of money within marriage. Work, Employment & Society7(1): 71–95.
58.
VoglerCLyonetteCWigginsRD (2008) Money, power and spending decisions in intimate relationships. The Sociological Review56(1): 117–143.
59.
WaightE (2019) Mother, consumer, trader: gendering the commodification of second-hand economies since the recession. Journal of Consumer Culture19(4): 532–550.
60.
Webrazzi (2021) 5 yaşına giren ve 1 milyar 450 milyon liralık satış yapılan Dolap’ın öne çıkan verileri. Webrazzi.
61.
WebsterJMichailidouM (2018) Building gender perspectives in the analysis of virtual work. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics14(1): 3–18.
62.
WilkisA (2017) Wilkis, ariel (2017) the moral power of money. In: Morality and Economy in the Life of the Poor. Standford: Stanford University Press.
63.
WilsonA (1999) The empire of direct sales and the making of Thai entrepreneurs. Critique of Anthropology19(4): 401–422.
64.
YükselCUKayaÇ (2020) “Eşya Kütüphanesi” Ve “Bebe Dönüşüm”: Türkiye’de Kültüre Dayali Paylaşim Servis Sistemleri Örnekleri. Sanat Dergisi35: 32–40.
65.
ZelizerVA (1989) The social meaning of money: “special monies”. American Journal of Sociology95(2): 342–377.
66.
ZelizerVA (1994) The creation of domestic currencies. The American Economic Review84(2): 138–142.
67.
ZelizerV (2006) Circuits in economic life. Economic Sociology8(1).
68.
ZelizerVA (2009) The Purchase of Intimacy. Oxford, England: Princeton University Press.
69.
ZelizerVA (2021) The Social Meaning of Money: Pin Money, Paychecks, Poor Relief, and Other Currencies, the Social Meaning of Money. Oxford, England: Princeton University Press.
70.
ZhangJ (2019) From Self Isolator to Business Owner: Social Standing and Economic Mobility Among Chinese Housewives in Japan. SSRN.
