The aim of this study is to explore the adoption of a joint modelling framework for dealing with dyadic and monadic count outcomes with excess zeros simultaneously via a common latent structure. As a case study, we consider the problem of identifying the different push and pull factors of cross-border forced migration and internal displacement. We consider a full panel data analysis and estimate a random effects joint hurdle model following the Bayesian paradigm; the resultant posterior is approximated through the integrated nested Laplace approximation.
AbelGJ, BrottragerM, CuaresmaJC and MuttarakR (2019) Climate, conflict and forced migration. Global Environmental Change, 54, 239–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.12.003.
2.
AndersonJE (2011) The gravity model. Annual Review of Economics, 3, 133–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-111809125114.
3.
AndersonJE and van WincoopE (2003) Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle. The American Economic Review, 93, 170–92. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3132167
4.
AsmarianN, AyatollahiSMT, SharafiZ and ZareN (2019) Bayesian spatial joint model for disease mapping of zero-inflated data with r-inla: a simulation study and an application to male breast cancer in iran. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16, 4460. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224460.
5.
BackhausA, Martinez-ZarzosoI and MurisC (2015) Do climate variations explain bilateral migration? a gravity model analysis. IZA Journal of Migration, 4, 1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40176-014-0026-3.
6.
BaltagiBH, EggerP and PfaffermayrM (2003) A generalized design for bilateral trade flow models. Economic Letters, 80, 391–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(03)00115-0.
7.
BaltagiBH, EggerP and PfaffermayrM (2015) Panel data gravity models of international trade. InBaltagiB. H., editor,The Oxford handbook of panel data, pages 608-42. Oxford University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199940042.013.0020.
8.
BosettiV, CattaneoC and PeriG (2021) Should they stay or should they go? climate migrants and local conflicts. Journal of Economic Geography, 21, 619–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/bbaa002.
9.
BurgerM, van OortF and LindersG (2009) On the specification of the gravity model of trade: zeros, excess zeros and zero-inflated estimation. Spatial Economic Analysis, 4, 167–90. doi:10.1080/17421770902834327.
10.
BuzzancaL, ConiglianiC and CostantiniV (2023) Conflicts and natural disasters as drivers of forced migrations in a gravity-type approach. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 10. doi:https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2023.10.3(17).
11.
ConiglioND and PesceG (2015) Climate variability and international migration: an empirical analysis. Environmental and Development Economics, 20, 434–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X14000722.
12.
da SilvaJG and FanS (2017) Conflict, migration, and food security: the role of agriculture and rural development. FAO-IFPRI Joint Brief. Rome Italy and Washington D.C.:Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
13.
EggerP (2002) An econometric view on the estimation of gravity models and the calculation of trade potentials. The World Economy, 25, 297–312. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9701.00432.
14.
EGRIS (2018) International recommendations on refugee statistics (IRRS). United Nations and Eurostat Manuals and Guidelines. doi:https://doi.org/10.2785/52866.
15.
FreemanR and LewisJ (2021) Gravity model estimates of the spatial determinants of trade, migration, and trade-and-migration policies. Economic Letters, 204. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2021.109873.
16.
GelmanA (2008) Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations. Statistics in Medicine, 27, 2865–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3107.
17.
GelmanA, JakulinA, PittauMG and SuY (2008) A weakly informative default prior distribution for logistic and other regression models. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 2, 1360–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1214/08-AOAS191.
18.
Gómez-RubioV (2020) Bayesian inference with INLA. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.
19.
HansonTE, BranscumAJ and JohnsonWO (2014) Informative g-priors for logistic regression. Bayesian Analysis, 9, 597–612. doi:https://doi.org/10.1214/14-BA868.
20.
HartmannB (2010) Rethinking climate refugees and climate conflict: Rhetoric, reality and the politics of policy discourse. Journal of International Development, 22, 233–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1676.
21.
HeadK and MayerT (2014) Gravity equations: workhorse, toolkit, and cookbook. InGopinathG., HelpmanE. and RogoffK., editors, Handbook of international economics, volume 4, pages131–95. Elsevier.
22.
HelpmanE, MelitzM and RubinsteinY (2008) Estimating trade flows: trading partners and trading volumes. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, 441–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2008.123.2.441.
23.
HermanPR (2023) Gravity estimation: best practices and useful approaches. Economics Working Paper Series, U.S. International Trade Commission (2023-10-C).
KleinertJ and ToubalF (2010) Gravity for FDI. Review of International Economics, 18, 1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9396.2009.00869.x.
26.
LetouzéE, PurserM, RodriguezF and CumminsM (2009) Revisiting the migration-development nexus: a gravity model approach. Human Development Research Papers, 44. URL https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/19227
27.
LewerJJ and Van den BergH (2008) A gravity model of immigration. Economics Letters, 99, 164–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2007.06.019.
28.
MartinW and PhamCS (2020) Estimating the gravity model when zero trade flows are frequent and economically determined. Applied Economics, 52, 2766–79. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2019.1687838.
29.
MartinoS and RueH (2008) Implementing approximate Bayesian inference using integrated nested Laplace approximation: a manual for the INLA program. Technical Report, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim.
30.
MartinoS and RueH (2010) Case studies in Bayesian computation using INLA. InMantovanP. and SecchiP., editors, Complex data modeling and computationally intensive statistical methods. Contributions to statistics, pages 99–114, Milano, 2010. Springer. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1386-5_8.
31.
MartinsTG, SimpsonD, LindgrenF and RueH (2013) Bayesian computing with inla: new features. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 67, 68–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2013.04.014.
32.
MizutoriM and Guha-SapirD (2017) Economic losses, poverty and disasters 1998–2017. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR).
33.
Morales-MunozH, JhaS, BonattiM, AlffH, KurtenbachS and SieberS (2020) Exploring connections-environmental change, food security and violence as drivers of migration-a critical review of research. Sustainability, 12, 5702. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145702.
34.
MullahyJ (1986) Specification and testing of some modified count data models. Journal of Econometrics, 33, 341–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90002-3.
35.
OkawaY and van WincoopE (2013) Gravity in international finance. Journal of International Economics, 87, 205–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2012.01.006.
36.
ReuvenyR (2007) Climate change-induced migration and violent conflict. Polititical Geography: Climate Change and Conflict, 26, 656–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2007.05.001.
37.
RueH and HeldL (2005) Gaussian Markov random fields: theory and applications. Chapman & Hall/CRC. doi:https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203492024.
38.
RueH, MartinoS and ChopinN (2009) Approximate Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models by using integrated nested Laplace approximations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 71, 319–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2008.00700.x.
39.
Santos SilvaJMC and TenreyroS (2006) The log of gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88, 641–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.88.4.641.
40.
SimpsonD, RueH, RieblerA, MartinsTG and SørbyeSH (2017a) Penalising model component complexity: a principled, practical approach to constructing priors. Statistical Science, 32, 1–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1214/16-STS576.
41.
SimpsonD, RueH, RieblerA, MartinsTG and SørbyeSH (2017b) You just keep on pushing my love over the borderline: a rejoinder. Statistical Science, 32, 44–6. URL https://www.jstor.org/stable/26408119
42.
StinaH (2021) Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP) Georeferenced Event Dataset (GED) Codebook version 21.1. Department of Peace and Conflict Research, UPPSALA University.
43.
SundbergR and MelanderE (2013) Introducing the Uppsala conflict data program georeferenced event dataset. Journal of Peace Research, 50, 523–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343313484347.
44.
TierneyL and KadaneJ (1986) Accurate approximations for posterior moments and marginal densities. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 82–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1986.10478240.
45.
TufisCD and HudsonA (2023) The global state of democracy indices codebook, Version 7. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, Stockholm. doi:https://doi.org/10.31752/idea.2023.37.
46.
Van BergeijkP and BrakmanSE (2010) The gravity model in international trade: advances and applications. Cambridge University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511762109.
47.
Van NiekerkJ, BakkaH and RueH (2019) Joint models as latent gaussian models not reinventing the wheel. https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.09365
48.
Van NiekerkJ, BakkaH and RueH (2021a) Competing risks joint models using r-inla. Statistical Modelling, 21, 56–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1471082X20913654.
49.
Van NiekerkJ, BakkaH, RueH and SchenkO (2021b) New frontiers in Bayesian modeling using the inla package in r. Journal of Statistical Software, 100. doi:https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v100.i02.
50.
Van NiekerkJ, KrainskiE, RustandD and RueH (2023) A new avenue for Bayesian inference with INLA. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 181, 107692. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2023.107692.
51.
WatanabeS (2010) Asymptotic equivalence of bayes cross validation and widely applicable information criterion in singular learning theory. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11, 3571–94.
52.
YotovYV (2022) On the role of domestic trade flows for estimating the gravity model of trade. Contemporary Economic Policy, 40, 526–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/coep.12567.
53.
ZellnerA (1983) Applications of Bayesian analysis in econometrics. The Statistician, 32, 23–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2987589.
54.
ZellnerA (1983) Applications of Bayesian analysis in econometrics. The Statistician, 32, 23–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2987589.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
