Planning rights' (PRs) implications for planning theory and practice are traced in
several directions. One explores the complex planning process, where PRs can link
the micro-scale to the macro-level of theory and analysis. Another addresses the
opposition between planning and property rights, which the concept of PRs resolves.
For evaluation in planning, awareness of PRs implies revisions in theory and
practice, balancing utilitarian-analytic with normative-dialogic approaches.
Recognizing PRs also revitalizes the Public Interest. PRs have positive implications
too for the meta-ethics of planning, integrating consequential-utilitarianism with
value-based normative judgment. This will affect enacted planning practice and
enable real application of professional ethics.
Alexander, E.R.
(1992) `
A Transaction-Cost Theory of Planning
', Journal of the American Planning Association58(2):
190—200
.
2.
Alexander, E.R.
(1998) `
Doing the Impossible: Notes for a General Theory of Planning'
, Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design25(5):
667—80
.
3.
Alexander, E.R.
(2001) `
Why Planning vs. Markets is an Oxymoron: Asking the Right Question
', Planning & Markets4(1), available online at: [http://www.pam.usc.edu/index.html].
4.
Alexander, E.R.
(2002a) `
Planning Rights: Toward Normative Criteria for Evaluating Plans',
International PlanningStudies7(3):
191—212
.
5.
Alexander, E.R.
(2002b) `
The Public Interest in Planning: From Legitimation to Substantive Plan Evaluation
', Planning Theory1(3):
226—49
.
6.
Alexander, E.R.
(2005) `Implementing Norms in Practice: The Institutional
Design of Evaluation', in
D. Miller
and
D. Patassini
(eds) Beyond Benefit—Cost Analysis: Accounting for Non-Market
Values in Planning Evaluation, pp.
295—310.
Aldershot: Ashgate
.
7.
Alexander, E.R.
(2006) `Problems and Prospects: Dilemmas in Evaluation and
Directions for the Future', in
E.R. Alexander
(ed.) Evaluation in Planning: Evolution and Prospects, pp.
267—76.
Aldershot: Ashgate
.
8.
Alexander, E.R.
(2007) `
Planning Rights in Theory and Practice: The Case of Israel', International PlanningStudies12(1):
3—19
.
9.
Barbanente, A.
and
Khakee, A.
(2005) `Scenarios as an Exploratory Evaluation Approach
— Some Experiences from Southern Mediterranean', in
D. Miller
and
D. Patassini
(eds) Beyond Benefit—Cost Analysis: Accounting for Non-Market
Values in Planning Evaluation, pp.
225—48.
Aldershot: Ashgate
.
10.
Borri, D.
,
Concilio, G.
,
Selicato, F.
and
Torre, C.
(2005) `Ethical and Moral Reasoning and Dilemmas in
Evaluation Processes — Perspectives for Intelligent Agents', in
D. Miller
and
D. Patassini
(eds) Beyond Benefit—Cost Analysis: Accounting for Non-Market
Values in Planning Evaluation, pp.
249—73.
Aldershot : Ashgate
.
11.
Buchanan, J.
(1993) Property as a Guarantor of Liberty.
Aldershot: Edward Elgar
.
12.
Dworkin, R.
(1978) Taking Rights Seriously.
London : Duckworth
.
13.
Eagle, S.J.
(2001) `The Birth of the Property Rights Movement', Cato
Policy Analysis 404 (26/6/2001),
Washington, DC: The Cato Institute
, available online at: [www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-404es.html ].
14.
Ellis, H.
(2000) `
Planning and Empowerment: Third Party Rights in Development Control'
, Planning Theory & Practice1(2):
203—17
.
15.
Ems
(2000) Ecological Land Use Planning, available online
at: [www.livinglakes.org/images/ecolup.pdf ].
16.
Fairlie, S.
(2000) Submission to the Government White Paper on Land Use
(Edited) (3/8/2000)Tinkers Bubble Trust
, available online at: [www.mondodesigno.com/bubble.html].
17.
Forester, J.
(1996) `Argument, Power and Passion in Planning
Practice ', in
S.J. Mandelbaum
,
L. Mazza
and
R. Burchell
(eds) Explorations in Planning Theory, pp.
241—62.
New Brunswick: Center for Urban Policy
Research, Rutgers State University of New Jersey
.
18.
Friends of the Earth
(2004) `
Dr. Know: Know your Planning Rights in England
', Change Your World48 (Aug/Sept):
22
.
19.
Friends of the Irish Environment
(2003) Planning Rights Denied (7/1/2003), available
online at: [ www.friendsoftheirishenvironment.net/carbon.html].
20.
Fusco Girard, L.
(2006) `Towards Sustainable Planning: Agenda 21,
Habitat ', in
E.R. Alexander
(ed.) Evaluation in Planning: Evolution and Prospects, pp.
85—100.
Aldershot: Ashgate
.
21.
Garcia-Zamor, J.-C.
(2001) `
Conundrums of Urban Planning in a Global Context: The Case of Frankfurt Airport
', Public Organization Review1:
415—35
.
22.
Giddens, A.
(1984) The Constitution of Society.
Berkeley: University of California Press
.
23.
Gillespie, K.
(2002) `
Ruling Protects Rentals, City Says: Court Upholds Right to Limit Developers
', Toronto Star, 22 February, available online at:
[www.ontariotenants.ca/ts-02b22.phtml ].
24.
Gilroy, L.
(2006) `
States Take Action to Protect Property Rights
', Planetizen 8/5/06, available online at: [www.planetizen.com.node/19705].
25.
Gwartney, J.D.
and
Stroup, R.L.
(1982) Economics: Private and Public Choice.
New York: Academic Press
.
26.
Hayek, F.A.
(1988) The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
27.
Healey, P.
(1996) `The Communicative Work of Development Plans',
in
S.J. Mandelbaum
,
L. Mazza
and
R. Burchell
(eds) Explorations in Planning Theory, pp.
263—88.
New Brunswick : Center for Urban Policy
Research, Rutgers State University of New Jersey
.
28.
Jänicke, M.
(1990) State Failure: The Impotence of Politics in Industrial
Society.
Cambridge: Polity Press
.
Kanegae, H.
,
Kaji, H.
,
Velasquez, G.T.
and
Ishibashi, K.
(2000) Web-based Gaming Simulations: UNCRD's PANGAEA Regional
Sustainable Development and Planning. UNU Discussion Paper Series June
2000 ,
United Nations University, Tokyo
, available online at:
[http://202.253.138.71/ENV/Files/Pangaea_DiscussionPaper.pdf ].
31.
Lai, L.W.
(2005) `
Neo-institutional Economics and Planning Theory
', Planning Theory4(1):
7—19
.
32.
Lauria, M.
(ed.) (1997) Reconstructing Urban Regime Theory: Regulating
Urban Politics in a Global Economy.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
.
33.
Marcuse, P.
(1976) `
Professional Ethics and Beyond: Values in Planning
', Journal of the American Institute of Planners42(3):
264—74
.
34.
Markusen, A.
(2000) `Planning as Craft and as Philosophy', in
L. Rodwin
and
B. Sanyal
(eds) The Profession of City Planning, pp.
261—74.
New Brunswick: Center for Urban Policy
Research, Rutgers State University of New Jersey
.
35.
Miers, T.
(2006) `Planning Powers to the People'; text of speech
by Tom Miers, Executive Director,
Policy Institute, Edinburgh
, Scotland, available online at:
[www.policyinstitute.info/ShowNewsOrEvent.php?RowNum-60 ].
36.
Miller, D.
and
Patassini, D.
(eds) (2005) Beyond Benefit—Cost Analysis:
Accounting for Non-Market Values in Planning Evaluation.
Aldershot: Ashgate
.
37.
Moroni, S.
(2006) `The Ethics Behind Evaluation: Lichfield's Approach
and the Utilitarian Tradition', in
E.R. Alexander
(ed.) Evaluation in Planning: Evolution and Prospects, pp.
21—38.
Aldershot: Ashgate
.
38.
Moulaert, F.
and
Cabaret, K.
(2006) `
Planning, Networks and Power Relations: Is Democratic Planning under
Capitalism Possible
?', Planning Theory5(1):
51—70
.
39.
Nederveen, A.A.J.
(2001) `Social Aspects and Citizen Participation in
Decision-making of Road and Railroad Planning', PhD thesis,
Technical UniversityDelft
, Abstract available online at: [http://www.tbm.tudelft.n/webstaff/jann/trail98.htm].
40.
Nozick, R.
(1974) Anarchy, State and Utopia.
New York: Basic Books
.
41.
Oed
(1971) The Compact Edition of the Oxford English
Dictionary.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
42.
Pennington, M.
(2000) Planning and the Political Market: Public Choice and
the Politics of Government Failure.
London: Athlone Press
.
43.
Sager, T.
(1994) Communicative Planning Theory.
Aldershot: Avebury Press
.
44.
Scottish Environment Link
(2003) Real Planning Rights for Communities: Planning White
Paper Briefing, available online at:
[www.scotlink.org/About_LINK/Planning_MSP_Briefing.pdf ].
45.
Upton, W.
(2006) Update: Neighbors and the Law, Chapter 7 (Planning
Control) ¶ 7.08, available online at:
[www.ealaw.co.uk/supplement/chapter_7_htm ].
46.
Verity, W.
and
Davies, A.
(2003) `
Councils Battle to Maintain Local Role in Planning Rights'
, Sydney Morning Herald, 13 February, available online at: [www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/02/12].
47.
Verma, N.
(ed.) (2006) Institutions and Planning.
Oxford: Elsevier
.
48.
Voogd, H.
(ed.) (2001) Recent Developments in Evaluation in Spatial,
Infrastructure and Environmental Planning .
Groningen
, Netherlands:
Geo Press
.
49.
Vreeker, R.
and
Nijkamp, P.
(2006) `Methods for Evaluating Development Scenarios: An
Application to Thailand', in
E.R. Alexander
(ed.) Evaluation in Planning: Evolution and Prospects, pp.
173—203.
Aldershot: Ashgate
.
