Public spaces in global South cities are being redeveloped, often displacing informal workers and leading to conflicts over access. In sub-Saharan African cities, land is often collectively owned by ethnic communities under customary laws, creating a complex governance system. This article examines the use of public spaces by informal workers in urban Africa, highlighting their negotiation for access through plural institutions. Using case studies from Ghana, our findings reveal the ambivalent relationship between planning and customary power, impacting urban development. The article suggests that integrating customary realities into planning could lead to more inclusive and effective urban development.
AcheampongR A (2019) The Urban Book Series Spatial Planning in Ghana Origins, Contemporary Reforms and Practices, and New Perspectives. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
2.
AddiB.AmoakoC.TakyiS. A., et al. (2024). Exploring the street economy in African cities: A review of practices, regulatory policies, and challenges of urban governance in Ghana. Journal of Urban Affairs, 1-20.
3.
Al SayyadN (Ed.). (2004). The end of tradition?Psychology Press.
4.
AmanorK S (2012) Land Governance in Africa: How historical context has shaped key contemporary issues relating to policy on land. Framing the Debate Series, no. 1. ILC, Rome. ISBN: 978-92-95093-72-0.
5.
BanksNLombardMMitlinD (2020) Urban Informality as a Site of Critical Analysis. Journal of Development Studies56(2): 223–238.
6.
BentonL (1994) Beyond legal pluralism: Towards a new approach to law in the informal sector. Social & Legal Studies3: 223–242.
7.
BerryS (2017) Struggles over Land and Authority in Africa. African Studies Review60(3): 105–125. Cambridge University Press.
8.
BoamahE FAmoakoC (2020) Planning by (mis) rule of laws: The idiom and dilemma of planning within Ghana’s dual legal land systems. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space38(1): 97-115.
CainA (2014) African urban fantasies: Past lessons and emerging realities. Environment and Urbanization26(2): 561–567.
11.
ChatterjeeP (2023) The inheritance and repetition of colonial practices of dispossession. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space41(5): 805-825.
12.
ChenM (2023) The Pandemic, Informality and Poverty: Rethinking Economic Policy Responses to the Informal Economy, CPAN Policy Brief 9. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
DoshiS (2013) The politics of the evicted: Redevelopment, subjectivity, and difference in Mumbai’s slum frontier. Antipode, 45(4): 844–865.
15.
Du PlessisJ (2005) The growing problem of forced evictions and the crucial importance of community-based, locally appropriate alternatives. Environment and Urbanization, 17(1), 123-134.
16.
GaldiniRDe NardisS (2023) Urban informality and users-led social innovation: Challenges and opportunities for the future human centred city. Futures, 150.
17.
GerberJ DLieberherrEKnoepfelP (2020) Governing contemporary commons: The Institutional Resource Regime in dialogue with other policy frameworks. Environmental Science and Policy, 112, 155–163.
18.
GrantR (2006) Out of place? Global Citizens in Local Spaces: A Study of the Informal Settlements in the Korle Lagoon Environs in Accra, Ghana. Urban Forum17(1): 1-24.
KameteA Y (2013) On handling urban informality in southern Africa. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography95(1): 17-31.
23.
KanburR (2009) Conceptualising Informality: Regulation and Enforcement. Available at: papers.ssrn.com.
24.
KnoepfelPLarrueCVaroneF, et al. (2011) Public policy analysis. Policy Press.
25.
LahoudC (2018) Global Public Space Programme–annual report 2018. UN Habitat, Global Public Space Programme.
26.
LindellIAmpaireCByerleyA (2019) Governing urban informality: Re-working spaces and subjects in Kampala, Uganda. International Development Planning Review41(1): 63–84.
27.
NorthD C (1991) Institutions. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1): 97–112.
28.
PeckJTheodoreNBrennerN (2009) Neoliberal urbanism. The SAIS Review of International Affairs29(1): 49-66.
29.
PorterLLombardMHuxleyM, et al. (2011) Informality, The Commons and The Paradoxes for Planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 12(1): 115-153.
30.
PradoD SSeixasC SFutemmaC R T (2021) From self-governance to shared governance: Institutional change and bricolage in Brazilian extractive reserves. Environmental Science & Policy123: 106-113.
31.
PurcellM (2014) Possible worlds: Henri Lefebvre and the right to the city. Journal of Urban Affairs36(1): 141–154.
32.
RobinsonJRoyA (2016) Debate on global urbanisms and the nature of urban theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research40(1): 181-186.
33.
RoyA (2005) Urban informality; toward an epistemology of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association71(2): 147-158.
34.
SteelW FUjoranyiT DOwusuG (2014) Why evictions do not deter street traders: Case study in Accra, Ghana. Ghana Social Science Journal, 11(2), 52-76.
35.
Cititv (2020). Umaru Sanda Amadu interviews the Greater Accra Regional Minister, Henry Quartey in this edition of Face to Face on Citi TV. Cititv, July 22.
36.
UN Charter on Public Spaces (2013). Vital Public Spaces: Designing and managing public spaces for inclusive, safe, and sustainable cities. Geneva: Palais des Nations.
37.
van NoorloosFKloosterboerM (2018) Africa’s new cities: The contested future of urbanisation. Urban Studies, 55(6): 1223–1241.
38.
WatsonV (2003) Conflicting Rationalities: Implications for Planning Theory and Ethics. Planning Theory & Practice4(4): 395-407.
39.
WatsonV (2009a) Seeing from the South: Refocusing urban planning on the globe’s central urban issues. Urban Studies, 46(11): 2259–2275.
40.
WatsonV (2009b) ‘The Planned City Sweeps the Poor Away…’: Urban Planning and 21st Century Urbanisation. Progress in Planning72(3): 151-193.
41.
WatsonV (2016) Shifting approaches to planning theory: Global North and South. Urban Planning, 1(4): 32–41.
