Implications of Institutional Review Board (IRB) decisions, especially for qualitative inquirers, may be that already marginalized voices continue to go unvoiced. Using a constructivist inquiry as a case study, this article examines IRB assessment of risk for interpretive qualitative research.
Antle, B.J. and Regehr, C. (2003) `Beyond Individual Rights and Freedoms: Metaethics in Social Work Research', Social Work48(1): 135-43.
2.
Browne, K. (2005) `Snowball Sampling: Using Social Networks to Research Non-Heterosexual Women', International Journal of Social Research Methodology8(1): 47-61.
3.
Childress, H. (2006) `The Anthropologist and the Crayons: Changing our Focus from Avoiding Harm to Doing Good', Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics2(1): 79-88.
4.
Felson, R.B. and Outlaw, M.C. (2007) `The Control Motive and Marital Violence', Violence and Victims22(4): 387-408.
5.
Forster, D.G. (2002) `Privacy and Confidentiality', in E. A. Banker and R. J. Amdur (eds) Institutional Review Board: Management and Function, pp. 169-75. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
6.
Gallant, D.R. (2006) `Qualitative Social Science Research', in E. A. Banker and R. J. Amdur (eds) Institutional Review Board: Management and Function, pp. 403-6. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
7.
Gambrill, E. (2001) `Social Work: An Authority-based Profession', Research on Social Work Practice11(2): 166-75.
8.
Israel, M. and Hay, L. (2006) Research Ethics for Social Scientists. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
9.
Johnson, H. (2004) `Investigating the Dilemmas of Ethical Social Research' , Journal of International Women's Studies6(1): 41-51.
10.
Kaplan, C.D., Korf, D. and Sterk, C. (1987) `Temporal and Social Contexts of Heroin-using Populations: An Illustration of the Snowball Sampling Technique', Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease175(9): 566-74.
11.
Lederman, R. (2006) `The Perils of Working at Home: IRB "Mission Creep" as Context and Content for an Ethnography of Disciplinary Knowledges', American Ethnologist33(4): 482-91.
12.
Leisey, M. (2007) `The Multiple Meanings of Domestic Violence: A Constructivist Inquiry', PhD thesis, Virginia Commonwealth University.
13.
Makkar, B.D. (2002) `Roles and Responsibilities in Researching Poor Women in Brazil', in T. Welland and L. Pugsley (eds) Ethical Dilemmas in Qualitative Research, pp. 75-93. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing.
14.
Malone, R.E., Yerger, V.B., McGruder, C. and Froelicher, E. (2006) `It's like Tuskegee in Reverse': A Case Study of Ethical Tensions in Institutional Review Board Review of Community-based Participatory Research', American Journal of Public Health96(11): 1914-19.
15.
Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE .
16.
Moeran, B. (2005) The Business of Ethnography. New York: Berg.
17.
Monette, D.R., Sullivan, T.J. and DeJong, C.R. (2005) Applied Social Research: A Tool for the Human Services, 6th edn. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
18.
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavior Research (1979) The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/mpa/belmont (consulted June 2007).
19.
Pritchard, I.A. (2002) `Travelers and Trolls: Practitioner Research and Institutional Review Boards', Educational Researcher31(3): 3-13.
20.
Rodwell, M.K. (1998) Social Work Constructivist Research. New York: Garland Publishing.
21.
Shaw, I.F. (2003) `Ethics in Qualitative Research and Evaluation' , Journal of Social Work3(1): 9-29.
22.
Shore, N. (2006) `Re-conceptualizing the Belmont Report: A Community-based Participatory Research Perspective', Journal of Community Practice14(4): 5-26.
23.
Ungar, M. and Nichol, G. (2002) `The Harmony of Resistance: Qualitative Research and Ethyical Practice in Social Work', in W. C. van Den Hoonaard (ed.) Walking the Tightrope: Ethical Issues for Qualitative Researchers, pp. 137-51. Toronto, CA: University of Toronto Press.
24.
White, R.F. (2007) `Institutional Review Board Mission Creep: The Common Rule, Social Science, and the Nanny State', The Independent Review11(4): 547-64.
