Biologists are keen to understand how processes in cells react to environmental changes. Differential gene expression analysis allows biologists to explore functions of genes with data generated from different environments. However, these data and analysis lead to unique challenges since tasks are ill-defined, require implicit domain knowledge, comprise large volumes of data, and are, therefore, of explanatory nature. To investigate a scalable visualization-based solution, we conducted a design study with three biologists specialized in differential gene expression analysis. We stress our contributions in three aspects: first, we characterize the problem domain for exploring differential gene expression data and derive task abstractions and design requirements. Second, we investigate the design space and present an interactive visualization system, called VisExpress. Third, we evaluate the usefulness of VisExpress via a Pair Analytics study with real users and real data and report on insights that were gained by our experts with VisExpress.
KeimDAZhangLKrstajićM. Solving problems with visual analytics: challenges and applications. J Multimed Process Technol2012; 3(1): 1–11.
2.
SedlmairMMeyerMMunznerT. Design study methodology: reflections from the trenches and the stacks. IEEE T Vis Comput Gr2012; 18(12): 2431–2440. DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2012.213.
3.
SimonSMittelstädtSKeimDA. Bridging the gap of domain and visualization experts with a Liaison. In: Eurographics conference on visualization (EuroVis)—short papers, Cagliari, Italy, 25—29 May 2015, pp. 127—133, Geneva: The Eurographics Association DOI:10. 2312/eurovisshort.20151137.
4.
YiJSKangYaStaskoJT. Understanding and characterizing insights: how do people gain insights using information visualization? In:Proceedings of the 2008 workshop on BEyond time and errors: novel evaLuation methods for information visualization (BELIV ’08), Florence, 5–10 April 2008, pp. 4:1–4:6. New York: ACM. DOI:10.1145/1377966.1377971.
5.
Arias-HernandezRKaastraLGreenT. Pair analytics: capturing reasoning processes in collaborative visual analytics. In: Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS), Kauai, HI, 4–7 January 2011, pp. 1–10. New York: IEEE. DOI:10.1109/HICSS.2011.339.
6.
LiJJiangHWongWH. Modeling non-uniformity in short-read rates in RNA-Seq data. Genome Biol2010; 11(5): R50. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-5-r50.
7.
CoordinatorsNR. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res2013; 41(D1): D8–D20. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks1189.
8.
BrehmerMMunznerT. A multi-level typology of abstract visualization tasks. IEEE T Vis Comput Gr2013; 19(12): 2376–2385. DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2013.124.
9.
GehlenborgNO’DonoghueSIBaligaNS. Visualization of omics data for systems biology. Nat Methods2010; 7(3 Suppl.): S56–S68. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.1436.
10.
SaeedAISharovVWhiteJ. TM4: a free, open-source system for microarray data management and analysis. Biotechniques2003; 34(2): 374–378.
HarrowerMBrewerCA. ColorBrewer.org: an online tool for selecting colour schemes for maps. Cartogr J2003; 40(1): 27–37. DOI: 10.1179/000870403235002042.
14.
XiaJLyleNHMayerML. INVEX—a web-based tool for integrative visualization of expression data. Bioinformatics2013; 29(24): 3232–3234. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt562.
15.
GehlenborgNDietzschJNieseltK. A framework for visualization of microarray data and integrated meta information. Inform Visual2005; 4(3): 164–175. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500094.
16.
GonçalvesJPMadeiraSCOliveiraAL. BiGGEsTS: integrated environment for biclustering analysis of time series gene expression data. BMC Res Notes2009; 2(1): 124. DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-2-124.
17.
MeyerMMunznerTDePaceA. MulteeSum: a tool for comparative spatial and temporal gene expression data. IEEE T Vis Comput Gr2010; 16(6): 908–917. DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2010.137.
18.
SantamaríaRTherónRQuintalesL. BicOverlapper: a tool for bicluster visualization. Bioinformatics2008; 24(9): 1212–1213. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn076.
HungJHYangTHHuZ. Gene set enrichment analysis: performance evaluation and usage guidelines. Brief Bioinform2012; 13(3): 281–291. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbr049.
21.
WestenbergMAvan HijumSaFTKuipersOP. Visualizing genome expression and regulatory network dynamics in genomic and metabolic context. Comput Graph Forum2008; 27(3): 887–894. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8659.2008.01221.x.
22.
MeyerMWongBStyczynskiM. Pathline: a tool for comparative functional genomics. Comput Graph Forum2010; 29(3): 1043–1052. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8659.2009.01710.x.
23.
ShneidermanB. The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In: Proceedings of IEEE symposium on visual languages 1996, Boulder, CO, 3–6 September 1996, pp. 336–343. New York: IEEE. DOI:10.1109/VL.1996.545307.
24.
R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2013.
25.
GentlemanRCCareyVJBatesDM. Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol2004; 5: R80. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2004-5-10-r80.
26.
KeimDOelkeD. Literature fingerprinting: a new method for visual literary analysis. In: Proceedings of IEEE symposium on visual analytics science and technology (VAST, 2007), Sacramento, CA, 30 October–1 November 2007, pp. 115–122. New York: IEEE. DOI:10.1109/VAST.2007.4389004.
27.
KeimDAAnkerstMKriegelHP. Recursive pattern: a technique for visualizing very large amounts of data. In: Proceedings of the 6th conference on visualization’95, Atlanta, GA, 29 October–3 November 1995, pp. 279–286. New York: IEEE Computer Society.
28.
KeimDHaoMDayalU. Pixel bar charts: a new technique for visualizing large multi-attribute data sets without aggregation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE symposium on information visualization 2001 (INFOVIS’01), San Diego, CA, 22–23 October 2001, pp. 113–120. New York: IEEE Computer Society.
29.
OelkeDHaoMRohrdantzC. Visual opinion analysis of customer feedback data. In: Proceedings of the IEEE symposium on visual analytics science and technology (VAST, 2009), Atlantic City, NJ, 12–13 October 2009, pp. 187–194. New York: IEEE. DOI:10.1109/VAST. 2009.5333919.
30.
MittelstädtSJäckleDStoffelF. ColorCAT: guided design of colormaps for combined analysis tasks. In: Eurographics conference on visualization (EuroVis)—short papers, Cagliari, Italy, 25—29 May 2015, pp. 115—119. Geneva: The Eurographics Association. DOI:10. 2312/eurovisshort.20151135.
31.
WangLGiesenJMcDonnellKT. Color design for illustrative visualization. IEEE T Vis Comput Gr2008; 14(6): 1739–1754. DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2008.118.
32.
WainerHFrancoliniCM. An empirical inquiry concerning human understanding of two-variable color maps. Am Stat1980; 34(2): 81–93. DOI: 10.1080/00031305.1980.10483006.
33.
WatsonABAhumadaAJ. A standard model for foveal detection of spatial contrast. J Vis2005; 5(9): 6. DOI: 10.1167/5.9.6.
34.
BerndtDJCliffordJ. Using dynamic time warping to find patterns in time series. In: Knowledge discovery in databases: papers from the 1994 AAAI workshop, Seattle, Washington, DC, July 1994. Technical Report WS-94-03, pp. 359—370. AAAI Press.
35.
BrulsMHuizingKvan WijkJJ. Squarified treemaps. In: De LeeuwWvan LiereR (eds) Proceedings of joint Eurographics and IEEE TCVG symposium on visualization. Geneva: The Eurographics Association, 2000, pp. 33–42. DOI:10.2312/VisSym/VisSym00/033-042
36.
ViegasFWattenbergMFeinbergJ. Participatory visualization with Wordle. IEEE T Vis Comput Gr2009; 15(6): 1137–1144. DOI:10.1109TVCG.2009.171.
37.
BatemanSGutwinCNacentaM. Seeing things in the clouds: the effect of visual features on tag cloud selections. In: Proceedings of the nineteenth ACM conference on hypertext and hypermedia (HT ’08), Pittsburgh, PA, 19–21 June 2008, pp. 193–202. New York: ACM. DOI:10.1145/1379092.1379130.
38.
BaroukhCJenkinsSLDannenfelserR. Genes2WordCloud: a quick way to identify biological themes from gene lists and free text. Source Code Biol Med2011; 6: 15. DOI: 10.1186/1751-0473-6-15.
HealeyCG. Choosing effective colours for data visualization. In: Proceedings of visualization’96, San Francisco, CA, 28–29 October 1996, pp. 263–270. New York: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/VISUAL.1996.568118.
41.
van WijkJvan de WeteringH. Cushion treemaps: visualization of hierarchical information. In: Proceedings of the IEEE symposium on information visualization, 1999 (Info Vis ’99), San Francisco, CA, 24–29 October 1999, pp. 73–78. New York: IEEE. DOI:10.1109/INFVIS. 1999.801860.
42.
HilbertD. Über die stetige Abbildung einer Line auf ein Flächenstück. Math Ann1891; 38(3): 459–460.
43.
HeerJKongNAgrawalaM. Sizing the horizon: the effects of chart size and layering on the graphical perception of time series visualizations. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI ’09), Boston, MA, 4–9 April 2009, pp. 1303–1312. New York: ACM. DOI: 10.1145/1518701.1518897.
44.
MortazaviA.WilliamsB. A.McCueK.SchaefferL.WoldB. (2008). Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-seq. Nat Methods, 5(7): 621—628.
45.
SachaDStoffelAStoffelF. Knowledge generation model for visual analytics. IEEE T Vis Comput Gr2014; 20(12): 1604–1613. DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2014.2346481.
BrooksFPJr.The computer scientist as toolsmith II. Commun ACM1996; 39(3): 61–68.
48.
MittelstädtSHaoMCDayalU. Advanced visual analytics interfaces for adverse drug event detection. In: Proceedings of the 2014 international working conference on advanced visual interfaces, Como, 27–30 May 2014, pp. 237–244. New York: ACM. DOI:10.1145/2598153. 2598156.
49.
BertiniEStrobeltHBraunJ. HiTSEE: a visualization tool for hit selection and analysis in high-throughput screening experiments. In: Proceedings of the IEEE symposium on biological data visualization (BioVis, 2011), Providence, RI, 23–24 October 2011, pp. 95–102. New York: IEEE. DOI:10.1109/BioVis.2011. 6094053.
50.
van den ElzenSvan WijkJJ. Multivariate network exploration and presentation: from detail to overview via selections and aggregations. IEEE T Vis Comput Gr2014; 20(12): 2310–2319. DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2014.2346441.
