In this essay, the authors extend their ongoing conversations within the overarching project on “critique as signature pedagogy in the arts and humanities” by considering how the position of literary studies within this broader context may explain some of the difficulties students have with a cornerstone activity of the undergraduate literature classroom. Heinert and Chick unpack the work of literary analysis as a pedagogy that helps students develop the habits of mind of the discipline. While literary analysis has long been the signature assessment of literary studies, Heinert and Chick demonstrate how and why it can also be seen as a signature pedagogy.
ArnoldM (1884) Essays in Criticism. First Series, 4th edn. London: Macmillan and Co.
2.
BassR (1999) The scholarship of teaching: What’s the problem?Invention1(1): 1–13.
3.
BassRLinkonSL (2008) On the evidence of theory: Close reading as a disciplinary model for writing about teaching and learning. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education7: 245–261.
4.
BresslerCE (1999) Literary Criticism: An Introduction to Theory and Practice, 2nd edn. New Jersey: Prentice hall.
5.
ChickNL (2009) Unpacking a signature pedagogy in literary studies. In: GurungRARChickNLHaynieA (eds) Exploring Signature Pedagogies: Approaches to Teaching Disciplinary Habits of Mind, Sterling, VA: Stylus, pp. 36–55.
6.
Chick NL, Hassel H and Rybak C (in process) ‘All they want to do’: Novice misconceptions and practices in literary studies.
7.
CicconeT (2009) Foreword. In: GurungRARChickNLHaynieA (eds) Exploring Signature Pedagogies: Approaches to Teaching Disciplinary Habits of Mind, Sterling, VA: Stylus, pp. xi–xvi.
8.
Linkon SL (2011) Literary Learning: Teaching the English Major. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
9.
MelzerD (2014) Assignments Across the Curriculum: A National Study of College Writing, Logan: Utah State University Press.
10.
MeyerJLandR (2003) Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines. In: RustC (ed.) Improving Student Learning. Improving Student Learning Theory and Practice – 10 years on, Oxford: OCSLD, pp. 412–424.
11.
ScholesR (2002) The transition to college English. Pedagogy2(2): 165–171.
12.
ShulmanL (2005) Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus134: 52–59.
13.
WigginsGMcTigheJ (2005) Understanding by Design, 2nd edn. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
14.
WolfeJ (2003) A method for teaching invention in the gateway literature course. Pedagogy3: 399–425.
