This study engages with current debate around global education and internationalization of higher education(HE). There is an identified need to critically reflect on how global education commitments are introduced to HE students, and how the debates are brought to individual as well as institutional levels. The study explores how students in a Finnish university develop their understanding of global education, citizenship and potential dispositions towards global responsibility. The students participated in an international seminar on the global Education for All (EFA) process, with purposefully planned participatory activities and cross-cultural dialogues, and reflected on their learning about the global process in assignments. A rigorous qualitative thematic analysis was conducted on the students’ written learning assignments (n = 43). The analysis revealed that students learned about the global EFA process and targets, and reflected on general and personal significance of the process as well as the connections between the local and global. They placed the responsibility for educational transformation in three distinct levels: the ‘other’; ‘we’; and ‘I’. The findings suggest that purposefully designed learning activities guide students to develop their understanding of global education and to disposition themselves as responsible future education professionals, both prerequisites of global citizenship and transformation of education.
Andreotti de OliveiraV (2015/2016) Critical literacy: Theories and practices (Brazil). In: DarderAMayoPParaskevaJ (eds) International Critical Pedagogy Reader. New York, NY: Routledge, pp.193–202.
2.
Andreotti de OliveiraVBiestaGAhenakewC (2015) Between the nation and the globe: Education for global mindedness in Finland. Globalisation, Societies and Education13(2): 246–259.
3.
Andreotti de OliveiraVSteinSPashbyK. (2016) Social cartographies as performative devices in research on higher education. Higher Education Research & Development35(1): 84–99.
4.
BamberBBullivantASteadD (2013) Measuring attitudes towards global learning among future educators in England. International Assignment of Development Education and Global Learning5(3): 5–27.
5.
BarrettAM (2011) A Millennium Learning Goal for education post-2015: A question of outcomes or processes. Comparative Education47(1): 119–133.
6.
BaumanZ (2013) Culture in a Liquid Modern World. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
7.
BaumanZ (2014/2016) Education in liquid modernity. In: DarderAMayoPParaskevaP (eds) International Critical Pedagogy Reader. New York, NY: Routledge, pp.109–117.
8.
BexellMJönssonK (2016) Responsibility and the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals. Forum for Development Studies44(1): 13–29.
9.
BoniALopez-FoguesAWalkerM (2016) Higher education and the post-2015 agenda: A contribution from the human development approach. Journal of Global Ethics12(1): 17–28.
10.
BournD (2012) Students as global citizens. In: JonesE (ed.) Internationalisation and the Student Voice: Higher Education Perspectives. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis, pp.18–29.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
13.
CliffordVMontgomeryC (2014) Challenging conceptions of Western higher education and promoting graduates as global citizens. Higher Education Quarterly68(1): 28–45.
14.
CroslingGMahendhiranNVaithilingamS (2014) A creative learning ecosystem, quality of education and innovative capacity: A perspective from higher education. Studies in Higher Education40(7): 1147–116.
15.
de Sousa SantosB (2014) Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide. New York, NY: Routledge.
16.
de Sousa SantosB (2014) Epistemologies of the South and the future. From the European South1(1): 17–29.
17.
DensonNBowmanN (2013) University diversity and preparation for a global society: The role of diversity in shaping intergroup attitudes and civic outcomes. Studies in Higher Education38(4): 555–570.
18.
FinkLD (2013) Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley and Sons.
19.
JosephC (2012) Internationalizing the curriculum: Pedagogy for social justice. Current Sociology60(2): 239–257.
20.
KingK (2016) The global targeting of education and skill: Policy history and comparative perspectives. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education46(6): 952–975
21.
LanasM (2014) Failing intercultural education? ‘Thoughtfulness’ in intercultural education for student teachers. European Journal of Teacher Education37(2): 171–182.
22.
LeeWOArthurJ (2015) Series Foreword. In: MaguthBMHilburnJ (eds) The State of Global Education: Learning with the World Its People. New York, NY: Routledge, pp.xiii–xv.
23.
LehtomäkiEPosti-AhokasHMoateJ (2015) Meaningful internationalisation at home: Education students’ voices on the value of cross-cultural learning dialogue. In: KrickeMKürtenL (eds) Internationalisierung der LehrerInnenbildung [In German. Internationalisation of Teacher Education]. Münster: Waxmann, pp.101–111.
24.
LehtomäkiEMoateJPosti-AhokasH (2016) Global Connectedness in Higher Education: Student voices on the value of cross-cultural learning dialogue. Studies in Higher Education41(11): 2011–2027.
25.
MaguthBMHilburnJ (eds) (2015) The State of Global Education: Learning with the World Its People. New York, NY: Routledge.
26.
MannionGBiestaGPriestleyM. (2011) The global dimension in education and education for global citizenship: Genealogy and critique. Globalisation, Societies and Education9(3–4): 443–456.
27.
MaringeFFoskettN (2010) Introduction: Globalization and universities. In: MaringeFFoskettN (eds) Globalization and Internationalization in Higher Education: Theoretical, Strategic and Management Perspectives. London, UK: Continuum, pp.1–16.
28.
Miller-IdrissCShamiS (2012) Graduate student training and the reluctant internationalism of social science in the USA. Research in Comparative and International Education7(1): 50–60.
29.
NussbaumM (2002) Education for citizenship in an era of global connection. Studies in Philosophy and Education21(4–5): 289–303.
30.
PatelT (2015) Crossing disciplinary, epistemological and conceptual boundaries in search of better cultural sense-making tools: A review of principal cultural approaches from business and anthropology literatures. Journal of Organizational Change Management28(5): 728–748.
31.
Posti-AhokasHJanhonen-AbruquahHLongforR (2016) GET OUT! Developing pedagogical practice for extended learning spaces in intercultural education. In: ItkonenTDervinF (eds) Silent Partners in Multicultural Education: Research in Multicultural Education and International Perspectives. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, pp.147–172.
32.
PriestleyMBiestaGMannionG. (2010) Education in a global space: The framing of ‘education for citizenship’. In: WiselyTBarrIBrittonA. (eds) Education in a Global Space: Emerging Research and Practice in Initial Teacher Education. Edinburgh: IDEAS/SCOTDEC, pp.27–36.
33.
RäsänenR (2009) Transformative global education and teacher education in Finland. International Assignment of Development Education and Global Learning1(2): 25–40.
34.
RenshawPD (2004) Dialogic teaching, learning and instruction: Theoretical roots and analytical frameworks. In van denLinden JRenshawP (eds) Dialogic Learning: Shifting Perspectives to Learning, Instruction, and Teaching. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, pp.1–15.
35.
RobsonS (2011) Internationalization: A transformative agenda for higher education?Teachers and Teaching17(6): 619–630.
36.
RumbleyLEAltbachPG (2016) The local and the global in higher education internationalization: A crucial nexus. In: JonesECoelenRBeelenJ. (eds) Global and Local Internationalization. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers, pp.7–13.
37.
SayedYAhmedR (2015) Education quality, and teaching and learning in the post-2015 education agenda. International Journal of Educational Development40(A1–A2): 330–338.
38.
ScheunpflugA (2011) Global education and cross-cultural learning: A challenge for a research-based approach to international teacher education. International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning3(3): 29–44.
39.
SchweisfurthM (2012) Are sojourners natural comparativists? Critical perspectives on the learning experiences of international students. Research in Comparative and International Education7(1): 81–89.
40.
SinghM (2011) The place of social justice in higher education and social change discourses. Compare41(4): 481–494.
41.
SteinSAndreottideOliveiraVSušaR (2016) ‘Beyond 2015’, within the modern/colonial global imaginary? Global development and higher education. Critical Studies in Education, DOI: 10.1080/17508487.2016.1247737.
42.
TianMLoweJ (2009) Existentialist internationalisation and the Chinese student experience in English universities. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education39(5): 659–676.
43.
TiklyL (2015) What works, for whom, and in what circumstances? Towards a critical realist understanding of learning in international and comparative education. International Journal of Educational Development40(A1–A2): 237–249.
44.
UN (2015) Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform. Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/ (accessed 2 February 2017).
45.
UNESCO (2014a) Global Citizenship Education: Preparing Learners for the Challenges of the 21st Century. Paris, France: UNESCO.
46.
UNESCO (2014b) Teaching and Learning: Achieving quality for all. Education for All Global Monitoring Report 2013/14. Paris, France: UNESCO. http://en.unesco.org/gem-report/reports/2013/ (accessed 25 February 2017).
47.
VärriVM (2010) Opettajankoulutuksen sivistystehtävät globaalin vastuun aikakaudella [The cultivating aims of teacher education in an age of global responsibility]. In: LindforsEPullinenJ (eds) Cygnaeuksen Viitoittamalla Tiellä [Cygnaeus’s Way Down the Road]. Tampere, Finland: Tampereen yliopisto, pp.35–55. [In Finnish.]
