This study presents a numerical investigation into the aeroacoustic characteristics of a helicopter configuration featuring both main and tail rotors operating in subsonic flow. Particular emphasis is placed on analyzing the aerodynamic interaction between the rotors and their impact on noise generation. Unsteady aerodynamic loads on the rotor blades are predicted using a boundary element-based panel method, which accurately captures the complex flow structures around the rotating blades. The resulting surface pressure distributions are subsequently used as input for an acoustic prediction model based on the Ffowcs Williams-Hawkings (FW-H) equation to evaluate far-field noise radiation. The results reveal that the aerodynamic interaction between the main and tail rotors significantly influences both the aerodynamic performance and noise emission characteristics. Specifically, this interaction modifies the unsteady loading patterns, leading to pronounced variations in sound pressure levels and noise directivity in both hover and forward flight conditions. The findings provide valuable insights into the aeroacoustic behavior of interacting rotor systems and support the development of more effective noise reduction strategies in helicopter design.
DollUMiglioriniMBaikieJ, et al.Non-intrusive flow diagnostics for unsteady inlet flow distortion measurements in novel aircraft architectures. Prog Aero Sci2022; 130: 100810.
5.
SobronALundströmDKrusP. A review of current research in subscale flight testing and analysis of its main practical challenges. Aerospace2021; 8(3): 74.
6.
YinJPAhmedSR. Helicopter main-rotor/tail-rotor interaction. J Am Helicopter Soc2000; 45(4): 293–302.
7.
FletcherTMBrownRE. Modelling the interaction of helicopter main rotor and tail rotor wakes. Aeronaut J2007; 111(1124): 637–643.
8.
FletcherTMBrownRE. Main rotor-tail rotor interaction and its implications for helicopter directional control. J Am Helicopter Soc2008; 53(2): 125–138.
9.
MartinRMBurleyCLElliottJW. Acoustic test of a model rotor and tail rotor results for the isolated rotors and combined configuration. NASA TM1989: 101550.
10.
BalchDT. Experimental study of main Rotor/Tail Rotor/Airframe interaction in hover. J Am Helicopter Soc1985; 30(2): 49–56.
11.
Ffowcs WilliamsJHawkingsD. Sound generation by turbulence and surfaces in arbitrary motion. Roy Soc London-Philosophical Trans Ser A1969; 264(1151): 321–342.
12.
PasqualiCPoggiCBernardiniG, et al.Aeroacoustic analysis of helicopter rotors in ground effect. 25th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conf. 2019.
13.
CongressITheOFSciencesA. Numerical analysis of interaction noise between main rotor and tail rotor of helicopter. Aerospace.
14.
YinJ. Main rotor and tail rotor blade vortex interaction noise under the influence of the fuselage. 38th Eur. Rotorcr. Forum 2012, ERF2012; 2: 1024–1041.
15.
YangCAoyamaTKondoN, et al.Aerodynamic/acoustic analysis for main rotor and tail rotor of helicopter. Trans Japan Soc Aero S Sci2008; 51(171): 28–36.
16.
KohlheppJFitzgerald. Research investigation of helicopter main rotor/tail rotor interaction noise. Nasa Contract. Rep1988.
17.
YinJPAhmedSR. Aerodynamics and aeroacoustics of helicopter main-rotor/tail-rotor interaction. 5th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conf. Exhib, 1999, pp. 834–844.
18.
ChenMLiuLChenY, et al.Aeroacoustic and aerodynamic measurements at the rotor plane in the interaction of a small rotor with wings. J Acoust Soc Am2024; 156(4): 2816–2826.
19.
AraghizadehMSSenguptaBLeeH, et al.Aeroacoustic investigation of side-by-side urban air mobility aircraft in full configuration with ground effect. Phys Fluids2024; 36(8): 087160.
20.
YinJRossignolKSRottmannL, et al.Numerical studies on small rotor configurations with validation using acoustic wind tunnel data. CEAS Aeronaut J2024; 15(3): 671–702.
21.
WangWChenXYangT, et al.Numerical research on the rotor ‘super blade/vortex interaction noise’ generation mechanism in helicopter roll maneuver state. Phys Fluids2025; 37(1): 017162.
22.
AzizAShiY. Impact of rotor-to-rotor interactions on the tonal noise characteristics of different octocopter configurations. Aerospace2024; 11(12): 1022.
23.
SunDChenXZhaoQ, et al.Numerical analyses of aerodynamic and aeroacoustic interaction characteristics of rear-mounted propeller on highspeed helicopter. Aerospace2025; 12(4): 343.
24.
SessiniF, Numerical aeroacoustic investigation of the phase shift method for multirotor directional noise reduction, 2025.
25.
Kangni CombeyMFElsayedOAQaissiK. Numerical analysis of multirotor aerodynamic interactions in one-after-another configuration. Delft International Conference on Urban Air Mobility 2024 (DICUAM-2024).
26.
LiYMaZZhouP, et al.A numerical investigation of the aerodynamic and aeroacoustic interactions between components of a multi-rotor vehicle for urban air mobility. J Sound Vib2024; 571: 118002.
27.
Najafi-YazdiABrésGAMongeauL. An acoustic analogy formulation for moving sources in uniformly moving media. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci2011; 467(2125): 144–165.
28.
FarassatF. Derivation of formulations 1 and 1A of farassat. Nasa/TM-2007-2148532007; 214853: 1–25.
29.
WellsVLHanAY. Acoustics of a moving source in a moving medium with application to propeller noise. J Sound Vib1995; 184(4): 651–663.
ConnerDAHoadDR. Reduction of high-speed impulsive noise by blade planform modification of a model helicopter rotor. NASA Tech. Memo., 1982.
32.
BrentnerKS. Prediction of helicopter rotor discrete frequency noise: a computer program incorporating realistic blade motions and advanced acoustic formulation. NASA Tech Memo1986.
33.
PiccininiRTugnoliMZanottiA. Numerical investigation of the rotor-rotor aerodynamic interaction for evtol aircraft configurations. Energies2020; 13(22): 5995.
34.
QiHWangPJiangL, et al.Investigation on aerodynamic noise characteristics of coaxial rotor in hover. Appl Sci2022; 12(6): 2813.
