In this article, the simultaneous use of ultrasonic testing and impedance-based technique to monitor the health of structural waveguides is proposed. Methods based on the propagation of guided waves are increasingly used in all those structural health monitoring applications that benefit from built-in transduction, moderately large inspection ranges, and high sensitivity to small flaws. In the meantime, impedance-based method promises to adequately assess the structural integrity of simple and complex structures that include welds and bolts. As both wave-based and impedance-based approaches can utilize piezoelectric transducers (lead zirconate titanate) bonded or embedded to the structure being monitored, this article describes a unified structural health monitoring paradigm where these techniques are employed simultaneously, driven by the same sensing/hardware/software unit. Specifically, we propose to use two lead zirconate titanates controlled by a National Instruments–PXI running in LabVIEW. An ad hoc LabVIEW Virtual Instrument controls signal output and input as well as processing and storage. To assess the feasibility of this unified system, an aluminum plate and a steel pipe were monitored. Damage was simulated by changing the boundary conditions of each structure. The results show that the proposed system is robust and can be developed further to address the challenges associated with the structural health monitoring of complex structures.
AlleyneDNCawleyP. The excitation of Lamb waves in pipes using dry-coupled piezoelectric transducers. J Nondestruct Eval1996; 15(1): 11–20.
2.
FrommePSayirMB. Detection of cracks at rivet holes using guided waves. Ultrasonics2002; 40: 199–203.
3.
ZhuXRizzoPMarzaniA. Ultrasonic guided waves for NDE/SHM of Trusses. Meas Sci Technol2010; 21: 045701.
4.
GiurgiutiuV. Tuned lamb wave excitation and detection with piezoelectric wafer active sensors for structural health monitoring. J Intel Mat Syst Str2005; 16(4): 291–305.
5.
LeeBCStaszewskiWJ. Modelling of lamb waves for damage detection in metallic structures: part I. Wave propagation. Smart Mater Struct2003; 12: 804–814.
6.
LeeBCStaszewskiWJ. Modelling of Lamb waves for damage detection in metallic structures: part II. Wave interactions with damage. Smart Mater Struct2003; 12: 815–824.
7.
RizzoPLanza di ScaleaF. Ultrasonic inspection of multi-wire steel strands with the aid of the wavelet transform. Smart Mater Struct2005; 14: 685–695.
8.
WordenKPierceSGMansonG. Detection of defects in composite plates using Lamb waves and novelty detection. Int J Syst Sci2000; 31: 1397–1409.
9.
RizzoPCammarataMDuttaD. Unsupervised learning algorithm for fatigue crack detection in waveguides. Smart Mater Struct2009; 18: 025016 (11pp.).
10.
LuYMichaelsJE. Feature extraction and sensor fusion for ultrasonic structural health monitoring under changing environmental conditions. IEEE Sens J2009; 9: 1462–1471.
MichaelsJEMichaelsTE. Detection of structural damage from the local temporal coherence of diffuse ultrasonic signals. IEEE T Ultrason Ferr2005; 52: 1769–1782.
13.
ParkSLeeJYunC. Electro-mechanical impedance-based wireless structural health monitoring using pca-data compression and k-means clustering algorithms. J Intel Mat Syst Str2008; 19(4):509–520.
14.
OverlyTGSParkGFarinholtKM. Development of an extremely compact impedance-based wireless sensing device. Smart Mater Struct2008; 17: 065011.
15.
LiangCSunFRogersCA. An impedance method for dynamic analysis of active material systems. J Vib Acoust1994; 116: 120–128.
16.
LiangCSunFRogersCA. Coupled electro-mechanical analysis of adaptive material systems—determination of the actuator power consumption and system energy transfer. J Intel Mater Syst Str1994; 5: 12–20.
ZhouSLiangCRogersCA. Integration and design of piezoceramic elements in intelligent structures. J Intel Mater Syst Str1995; 6(6): 733–742.
19.
BhallaSSohCK. Structural health monitoring by piezo-impedance transducers. I: modeling. J Aerospace Eng2004; 17(4): 154.
20.
ParkGInmanDJ. Impedance-based structural health monitoring damage prognosis for aerospace, civil and mechanical systems part II. New York: Wiley, 2005, pp.275–292.
21.
ParkGSohnHFarrarCR. Overview of piezoelectric impedance-based health monitoring and path forward. Shock Vib Dig2003; 35(6): 451–463.
22.
ParkGCudneyHHInmanDJ. Feasibility of using impedance-based damage assessment for pipeline structures. Earthquake Eng Struct D2001; 30: 1463–1474.
23.
ParkGCudneyHHInmanDJ. Impedance-based health monitoring of civil structural components. J Infrastruct Syst2000; 6(4): 153.
24.
PeairsDMTarazagaPAInmanDJ. Frequency range selection for impedance-based structural health monitoring. J Vib Acoust2007; 129(6): 701.
25.
BhallaSSohCK. Electromechanical impedance modeling for adhesively bonded piezo-transducers. J Intel Mat Syst Str2004; 15: 955–972.
26.
WangSYouCA. Circuit design for impedance-based structural health monitoring. J Intel Mat Syst Str2008; 19(9): 1029–1040.
27.
BhallaSGuptaABansalS. Ultra low-cost adaptations of electro-mechanical impedance technique for structural health monitoring. J Intel Mat Syst Str2009; 20: 991–999.
28.
ParkGKabeyaKCundneyHH. Impedance-based structural health monitoring for temperature varying applications. JSME Int J A-Mech M1999; 42(2): 249–258.
29.
PeairsDMParkGInmanDJ. Low cost impedance monitoring using smart materials. In: Proceedings of the first European workshop on structural health monitoring, Ecole Normale Superieure, Cachan, Paris, France, 10–12 July 2002.
30.
PeairsDMParkGInmanDJ. Improving accessibility of the impedance-based structural health monitoring method. J Intel Mat Syst Str2004; 15:129–139.
31.
XuBGiurgiutiuV. A low-cost and field portable electromechanical (E/M) impedance analyzer for active structural health monitoring. In: 5th international workshop on SHM, Stanford, CA, 12–14 September 2005.
32.
GiurgiutiuVXuB. Development of a field-portable small-size impedance analyzer for structural health monitoring using the electromechanical impedance technique. In: SPIE’s 11th annual international symposium on smart structures and materials and 9th annual international symposium on NDE for health monitoring and diagnostics, San Diego, CA, 2004, 14–18 March 2004 SPIE 5391.
33.
RizzoPLanza di ScaleaF. Wavelet-based unsupervised and supervised learning algorithms for ultrasonic structural monitoring of waveguides. In: ReecePeter L (ed.) Progress in smart materials and structures research. NOVA publishers, Hauppage, New York2007, ch. 8, pp.227–290.
34.
Lanza di ScaleaFRizzoPMarzaniA. Propagation of ultrasonic guided waves in lap-shear adhesive joints: case of incident a0 lamb wave. J Acoust Soc Am2004; 115(1): 146–156.
35.
RizzoPLanza di ScaleaF. Wave propagation in multi-wire strands by wavelet-based laser ultrasound. Exp Mech2004; 44(4): 407–415.
36.
WilcoxPLoweMCawleyP. Omnidirectional guided wave inspection of large metallic plate structures using an EMAT array. IEEE T Ultrason Ferr2005; 52(4): 653–665.
37.
EdwardsRSDixonSJianX. Characterisation of defects in the railhead using ultrasonic surface waves. NDT&E Int2006; 39: 468–475.
38.
NaWBKunduT. A combination of PZT and EMAT transducers for interface inspection. J Acoust Soc Am2002; 111(5): 2128–2139.
39.
RizzoPLanza di ScaleaF. Monitoring in cable stays via guided wave magnetostrictive ultrasonics. Mater Eval2004; 62(10): 1057–1065.
40.
Lanza di ScaleaFRizzoPSeibleF. Stress measurement and defect detection in steel strands by guided stress waves. J Mater Civ Eng2003; 15(3): 211–304.
41.
ParkSAntonSRKimJK. Instantaneous baseline structural damage detection using a miniaturized piezoelectric guided waves system. KSCE J Civ Eng2010; 14(6): 889–895.
42.
CammarataMRizzoPDuttaD. Application of principal component analysis and wavelet transform to fatigue crack detection in waveguides. Smart Mater Struct2010; 6(4): 349–362.
43.
ZhaoXGaoHZhangG. Active health monitoring of an aircraft wing with embedded piezoelectric sensor/actuator network: I. Defect detection, localization and growth monitoring. Smart Mater Struct2007; 16: 1208.
44.
RaghavanACesnikCES. Effects of elevated temperature on guided-wave structural health monitoring. J Intel Mat Syst Str2008; 19(12): 1383–1398.
45.
SunFPChaudryZRogersCA. Automated real-time structure health monitoring via signature pattern recognition. Proc SPIE1995; 2443:236–247.
46.
WetherholdRMesserMPatraA. Optimization of directionally attached piezoelectric actuators. J Eng Mater Technol2003; 125(2): 148–152.
47.
MadhavAVGSohCK. Multiplexing and uniplexing of PZT transducers for structural health monitoring. J Intel Mat Syst Str2008; 19(4): 457–467.
48.
MadhavAVGSohCK. An electromechanical impedance model of piezoceramic transducer—structure in presence of thick adhesive bonding. Smart Mater Struct2007; 16(3): 673–686.
49.
KabeyaKJiangZCudneyH. Structural health monitoring by impedance and wave propagation measurements. In: Proceedings of international motion and vibration control, ETH-Zurich, 25–28 August 1998. Switzerland, August, 1998, pp. 207–212.
50.
LiYJiangZChonanS. Impedance-based technique and wave propagation measurement for non-destructive evaluation. In: Proceedings of international conference on vibration engineering, 6–9 August 1998, Dalian, China. 1998, pp.476–481.
51.
JiangZKabeyaKChonanS. Longitudinal wave propagation measuring technique for structural health monitoring. In: Proceedings of 4th SPIE conference on smart structures and integrated systems, 1999.
52.
GiurgiutiuVZagraiABaoJJ. Piezoelectric wafer embedded active sensors for aging aircraft structural health monitoring. Struct Health Monit2002; 1(1): 41–61.
53.
ParkSLeeJ-JYunC-B. A built-in active sensing system-based structural health monitoring technique using statistical pattern recognition. J Mech Sci Technol2007; 21: 896–902.
54.
ParkSInmanDJLeeJ-J. Piezoelectric sensor-based health monitoring of railroad tracks using a two-step support vector machine classifier. J Infrastruct Syst2008; 14(1): 80–88.
55.
AnY-KSohnH. Integrated impedance and guided wave based damage detection under temperature variation. Proc SPIE2011; 7981: 79811Q.
56.
ZagraiADoyleDGigineishviliV. Piezoelectric wafer active sensor structural health monitoring of space structures. J Intel Mat Syst Struct2010; 21: 921–940.
57.
AnnamdasVGMSohCK. Three dimensional electromechanical impedance model for multiple piezoceramic transducers-structure interaction model. J Aerospace Eng2008; 21 (1): 35–44.
58.
BaptistaFGFilhoJV. A new impedance measurement system for PZT-based structural health monitoring. IEEE T Instrum Meas2009; 58(10): 3602–3608.
59.
AchenbachJD. Wave propagation in elastic solids. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1973.
60.
GraffKF. Wave motion in elastic solids. New York: Dover, 1991.
61.
KunduT. Ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation: engineering and biological material. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA. 2004.
62.
RoseJL. Ultrasonic waves in solid media. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
63.
LoweMJS. Matrix techniques for modeling ultrasonic waves in multilayered media. IEEE T Ultrason Ferr1995; 42: 525–542.
64.
PavlakovicBNLoweMJSAlleyneDN. Disperse: a general purpose program for creating dispersion curves. In: ThompsonDChimentiD (eds) Review of progress in quantitative NDE, vol. 16. New York: Plenum, 1997, pp.185–192.
65.
PavlakovicBNLoweMJS. A general purpose approach to calculating the longitudinal and flexural modes of multi-layered, embedded, transversely isotropic cylinders. In: ThompsonDChimentiD (eds) Review of progress in quantitative NDE, vol. 18. New York: Plenum, 1999, pp.239–246.
66.
NelsonRBDongSBKalraRD. Vibrations and waves in laminate orthotropic circular cylinders. J Sound Vib1971; 18(3): 429–444.
67.
AalamiB. Waves in prismatic guides of arbitrary cross section. J Appl Mech1973; 40: 1067–1072.
68.
BartoliIMarzaniALanza di ScaleaF. Modeling wave propagation in damped waveguides of arbitrary cross-section. J Sound Vib2006; 295: 685–707.
69.
MarzaniAViolaEBartoliI. A semi-analytical finite element formulation for modeling stress wave propagation in axisymmetric damped waveguides. J Sound Vib2008; 318(3): 488–505.
70.
WordenKSohnHFarrarCR. Novelty detection in a changing environment: regression and interpolation approaches. J Sound Vib2002; 258: 741–761.
71.
BarnettVLewisT. Outliers in statistical data. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1994.
