Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Automatic detection method for loose bolts in steel frame structures based on wearable lightweight impedance system and multi-channel information fusion deep learning model
Bolt connection is widely utilized in small and medium-sized engineering structures. However, due to the cumulative effects of environmental factors, loading conditions, and other variables, bolts are prone to loosening, posing significant threats to structural safety. The objective of this research is to develop an efficient and accurate automatic detection method for bolt loosening in steel frame structures. To achieve this, a novel approach integrating a wearable lightweight impedance system and a deep learning model that fuses multi-source information is proposed. A wearable impedance monitoring system with a multi-channel wearable washer and a miniature impedance assessment board is designed, eliminating the need for pre-pasting sensors and overcoming the limitations of traditional impedance monitoring devices. Additionally, a signal transformation method converting one-dimensional signals into multivariate recursive graphs and extracting recursive characteristics is developed to better represent bolt-loosening states. The innovative MonitTransformer model is then proposed to process these graphs, automatically identifying bolt loosening states without manual feature engineering. Experimental results on steel frame structures indicate that the wearable impedance monitoring system can effectively detect bolt loosening, and the MonitTransformer model outperforms existing methods in recognition accuracy. This research provides a practical solution for real-time monitoring and rapid assessment of large-scale bolt loosening in IoT-based structural health monitoring, demonstrating great potential for enhancing the safety and reliability of engineering structures.
JamiaNJalaliHTaghipourJ, et al. An equivalent model of a nonlinear bolted flange joint. Mech Syst Signal Process2021; 153: 107507.
2.
NikraveshSMYGoudarziM. A review paper on looseness detection methods in bolted structures. Lat Am J Solids Struct2017; 14(12): 2153–2176.
3.
MiaoRShenRZhangS, et al. A review of bolt tightening force measurement and loosening detection, Sensors2020; 20(11): 3165.
4.
LiuYHuoLsSongGb. Automatic detection on the bolt loose based on digital image processing. In: Proceedings of the 2018 structures congress, Incheon, Republic of Korea, 2018, pp. 27–31. Reston, Virginia: American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE).
5.
RamanaLChoiWChaYJ.Fully automated vision-based loosened bolt detection using the Viola–Jones algorithm. Struct Health Monit2019; 18(2): 422–434.
6.
SunJXieYChengX.A fast bolt-loosening detection method of running train’s key components based on binocular vision. IEEE Access2019; 7: 32227–32239.
7.
WangCWangNHoS-C, et al. Design of a new vision-based method for the bolts looseness detection in flange connections. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2019; 67(2): 1366–1375.
8.
LiQJingX.Fault diagnosis of bolt loosening in structures with a novel second-order output spectrum–based method. Struct Health Monit2020; 19(1): 123–141.
9.
TranDQKimJWTolaKD, et al. Artificial intelligence-based bolt loosening diagnosis using deep learning algorithms for laser ultrasonic wave propagation data. Sensors2020; 20(18): 5329.
10.
WangFHoSCMSongG.Modeling and analysis of an impact-acoustic method for bolt looseness identification. Mech Syst Signal Process2019; 133: 106249.
11.
FuWZhouRGuoZ.Automatic bolt tightness detection using acoustic emission and deep learning. Structures2023; 55: 1774–1782.
12.
RamassoEDenoeuxTChevallierG.Clustering acoustic emission data streams with sequentially appearing clusters using mixture models. Mech Syst Signal Process2022; 181: 109504.
13.
RamassoETeloliROMarcelR.On the condition monitoring of bolted joints through acoustic emission and deep transfer learning: generalization, ordinal loss, and super-convergence. Struct Health Monit2024; 23: 14759217241259668.
14.
ShinHJLeeJRParkCY.Loosening monitoring of bolted joints using optical fiber bending sensor for aircraft lug assembly. Appl Mech Mater2012; 225: 540–545.
15.
ShinH-JLeeJ-RParkC-Y.A novel fiber optic bolt loosening monitoring sensor system for aircraft bolt joints. J Intell Mater Syst Struct2014; 25(5): 647–653.
16.
YeagerMWhitakerAToddM.A method for monitoring bolt torque in a composite connection using an embedded fiber Bragg grating sensor. J Intell Mater Syst Struct2018; 29(3): 335–344.
17.
HudaFKajiwaraIHosoyaN, et al. Bolt loosening analysis and diagnosis by non-contact laser excitation vibration tests. Mech Syst Signal Process2013; 40(2): 589–604.
18.
KongQZhuJHoSCM, et al. Tapping and listening: a new approach to bolt looseness monitoring. Smart Mater Struct2018; 27(7): 07LT02.
19.
WangFSongG.Bolt-looseness detection by a new percussion-based method using multifractal analysis and gradient boosting decision tree. Struct Health Monit2020; 19(6): 2023–2032.
20.
MeyerJJAdamsDE.Using impact modulation to quantify nonlinearities associated with bolt loosening with applications to satellite structures. Mech Syst Signal Process2019; 116: 787–795.
21.
YuanRLvYKongQ, et al. Percussion-based bolt looseness monitoring using intrinsic multiscale entropy analysis and BP neural network. Smart Mater Struct2019; 28(12): 125001.
22.
MinJParkSYunC-B, et al. Impedance-based structural health monitoring incorporating neural network technique for identification of damage type and severity. Eng Struct2012; 39: 210–220.
23.
PereraRMontesJGómezA, et al. Unsupervised autoencoders with features in the electromechanical impedance domain for early damage assessment in FRP-strengthened concrete elements. Eng Struct2024; 315: 118458.
24.
AiDZhangR.Deep learning of electromechanical admittance data augmented by generative adversarial networks for flexural performance evaluation of RC beam structure. Eng Struct2023; 296: 116891.
25.
DengXLiuJGongH, et al. Detection of loosening angle for mark bolted joints with computer vision and geometric imaging. Autom Constr2022; 142: 104517.
DuCLiuJGongH, et al. Percussion-based loosening detection method for multi-bolt structure using convolutional neural network DenseNet-CBAM. Struct Health Monit2024; 23(4): 2183–2199.
28.
ZhouYWangSZhouM, et al. Percussion-based bolt looseness identification using vibration-guided sound reconstruction. Struct Control Health Monit2022; 29(2): e2876.
29.
MielkeIII CDasDYinJ-X, et al. Time-reversal symmetry-breaking charge order in a kagome superconductor. Nature2022; 602(7896): 245–250.
30.
DengSWangTTanB, et al. Theoretical and experimental study on FBG bending sensor for quantitative monitoring of bolt looseness. Measurement2023; 216: 113002.
31.
MaTFengQTanZ, et al. Optical phase mode analysis method for pipeline bolt looseness identification using distributed optical fiber acoustic sensing. Struct Health Monit2024; 23(3): 1547–1559.
32.
ZhaoSFCuiXVolkovPA, et al. Time-reversal symmetry breaking superconductivity between twisted cuprate superconductors. Science2023; 382(6677): 1422–1427.
33.
TanBWangTFangQ, et al. Bolt looseness monitoring using dynamic mode decomposition with piezoelectric active sensing. Measurement2024; 238: 115204.
34.
ChenYWeiJGaoZ, et al. Multibolt looseness monitoring of steel structure based on multitask active sensing method and substructure cross-domain transfer learning. Struct Health Monit2024; 23(6): 3486–3504.
35.
WuJChenYWangJ, et al. Electromechanical impedance instrumented wearable piezoelectric ring-type sensor for bolted connection monitoring. IEEE Sens J2023; 23(13): 14872–14881.
36.
NaWS.Bolt loosening detection using impedance based non-destructive method and probabilistic neural network technique with minimal training data. Eng Struct2021; 226: 111228.
37.
AiDMoFHanY, et al. Automated identification of compressive stress and damage in concrete specimen using convolutional neural network learned electromechanical admittance. Eng Struct2022; 259: 114176.
38.
HuoLWangFLiH, et al. A fractal contact theory based model for bolted connection looseness monitoring using piezoceramic transducers. Smart Mater Struct2017; 26(10): 104010.
39.
ZhaoZChenPZhangE, et al. Health monitoring of bolt looseness in timber structures using PZT-enabled time-reversal method. J Sens2019; 2019(1): 2801638.
40.
WangFSongG.Bolt early looseness monitoring using modified vibro-acoustic modulation by time-reversal. Mech Syst Signal Process2019; 130: 349–360.
41.
QinXPengCZhaoG, et al. Full life-cycle monitoring and earlier warning for bolt joint loosening using modified vibro-acoustic modulation. Mech Syst Signal Process2022; 162: 108054.
42.
ZhaoNHuoLSongG.A nonlinear ultrasonic method for real-time bolt looseness monitoring using PZT transducer–enabled vibro-acoustic modulation. J Intell Mater Syst Struct2020; 31(3): 364–376.
43.
ShamshirsazMEhsaniMSadighiM, et al. Theoretical and experimental investigations on controllable parameters of piezo-based vibro-acoustic modulation health monitoring of contact acoustic nonlinearity in a sandwich beam. Appl Acoust 2023; 201: 108702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2022.108702
44.
ChenYZhuLGaoZ, et al. Multi-bolt looseness positioning using multivariate recurrence analytic active sensing method and MHAMCNN model. Struct Health Monit2025; 24(2): 812–829.
45.
WangFHoSCMHuoL, et al. A novel fractal contact-electromechanical impedance model for quantitative monitoring of bolted joint looseness. IEEE Access2018; 6: 40212–40220.
46.
ShaoJWangTYinH, et al. Bolt looseness detection based on piezoelectric impedance frequency shift. Appl Sci2016; 6(10): 298.
47.
HuoLChenDKongQ, et al. Smart washer—a piezoceramic-based transducer to monitor looseness of bolted connection. Smart Mater Struct2017; 26(2): 025033.
48.
WandowskiTMalinowskiPOstachowiczW.Calibration problem of AD5933 device for electromechanical impedance measurements. In: EWSHM-7th European workshop on structural health monitoring, Nantes, France, 8–11 July 2014. Rennes, France: Inria Rennes - Bretagne Atlantique.
49.
WandowskiTMalinowskiPOstachowiczW.Improving the EMI-based damage detection in composites by calibration of AD5933 chip. Measurement2021; 171: 108806.
50.
YusoffMAM. Development of an ad5933-based impedance meter prototype for impedimetric sensor applications. Procedia Chem2016; 20: 56–59.
51.
MeherUMishraSKSunnyMR.Impedance-based looseness detection of bolted joints using artificial neural network: an experimental study. Struct Control Health Monit2022; 29(10): e3049.
52.
XuJDongJLiH, et al. Looseness monitoring of bolted spherical joint connection using electro-mechanical impedance technique and BP neural networks. Sensors2019; 19(8): 1906.
53.
LuoWLiuTLiW, et al. Pitting corrosion prediction based on electromechanical impedance and convolutional neural networks. Struct Health Monit2023; 22(3): 1647–1664.
54.
de RezendeSWFde MouraJRDNetoRMF, et al. Convolutional neural network and impedance-based SHM applied to damage detection. Eng Res Express2020; 2(3): 035031.
55.
ZhouLChenSXChoyA, et al. Monitoring of rail bolted joint looseness with PZT network-based EMI technique under a deep learning framework. In: 12th International workshop on structural health monitoring: enabling intelligent life-cycle health management for industry internet of things (IIOT), IWSHM2019, 2019, pp. 2841–2848. Lancaster (PA): DEStech Publications Inc.
56.
HeSChenJChenZ, et al. An exploratory study of underwater bolted connection looseness detection using percussion and a shallow machine learning algorithm. Acta Mech Sin2023; 39(4): 722360.
57.
TanZFengQMaT, et al. Development of an AD5933-based impedance calibration and measurement technology using piezoceramic transducers. Measurement2023; 210: 112527.
58.
LiangYChenYZhangZ, et al. Experimental evaluation of miniature impedance board for loosening monitoring of the threaded pipe connection. Front Phys2021; 9: 723260.
59.
WangLYuanBXuZ, et al. Synchronous detection of bolts looseness position and degree based on fusing electro-mechanical impedance. Mech Syst Signal Process2022; 174: 109068.
60.
YuHGuoCLiN, et al. Research on bolt looseness monitoring based on electromechanical impedance transmissibility technology. Smart Mater Struct2023; 32(9): 095009.
