This article contributes to the discursive and interactional study of strategizing by drawing attention to the communicative practices through which strategy progressively materializes itself. Drawing on the interactions between the partners and members of a community-based organization participating in a strategic planning exercise, our study reveals that communication plays a key role in the initial formulation of strategy, that is, in deciding which issues matter most for the organization. We identify four communicative practices through which concerns gradually become strategic: presentifying, substantiating, attributing, and crystallizing matters of concern. The article contributes to the strategy-as-practice tradition by proposing that communication materializes strategic concerns and that strategizing takes place through that materializing process.
AbdallahCLangleyA (2014) The double edge of ambiguity in strategic planning. Journal of Management Studies51(2): 235–264.
2.
AggerholmHKAsmußBThomsenC (2012) The role of recontextualization in the multivocal, ambiguous process of strategizing. Journal of Management Inquiry21(4): 413–428.
3.
AndersonL (2006) Analytic autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography35(4): 373–395.
4.
AntebyM (2013) Relaxing the taboo on telling our own stories: Upholding professional distance and personal involvement. Organization Science24(4): 1277–1290.
5.
ArnaudNMillsCELegrandC, et al. (2016) Materializing strategy in mundane tools: The key to coupling global strategy and local strategy practice?British Journal of Management27(1): 38–57.
6.
AshcraftKLKuhnTCoorenF (2009) Constitutional amendments: “Materializing” organizational communication. The Academy of Management Annals3(1): 1–64.
7.
AsmußBAggerholmHK (2016) A practice perspective on strategic communication: The discursive legitimization of managerial decisions. Journal of Communication Management20(3): 195–214.
8.
BalogunJBestKLêJ (2015) Selling the object of strategy: How frontline workers realize strategy through their daily work. Organization Studies36(10): 1285–1313.
9.
BartunekJM (2008) Insider/outsider team research: The development of the approach and its meanings. In: BashniABAdlerNMohrmanSA, et al. (eds) Handbook of Collaborative Management Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 73–92.
10.
BeauregardRA (2012) Planning with things. Journal of Planning Education and Research32(2): 182–190.
11.
BourgoinAMuniesaF (2016) Building a rock-solid slide: Management consulting, PowerPoint, and the craft of signification. Management Communication Quarterly30(3): 390–410.
12.
BourgoinABencherkiNFarajS (2019) “And who are you?” A performative perspective on authority in organizations. Academy of Management Journal. Epub ahead of print 25 July. DOI: 10.5465/amj.2017.1335.
13.
BrannickTCoghlanD (2007) In defense of being “native”: The case for insider academic research. Organizational Research Methods10(1): 59–74.
14.
CarlilePR (2015) The irony of making materiality of consequence. British Journal of Management26: S22–S25.
15.
ChandlerAD (1962/1990) Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16.
ChangHNgunjiriFHernandezK-AC (2012) Collaborative Autoethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
17.
ClarkeIKwonWWodakR (2012) A context-sensitive approach to analysing talk in strategy meetings. British Journal of Management23(4): 455–473.
18.
CoorenF (ed.) (2007) Interacting and Organizing: Analyses of a Management Meeting (LEA’s Communication Series). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19.
CoorenF (2010) Action and Agency in Dialogue: Passion, Ventriloquism and Incarnation. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
20.
CoorenF (2015) In medias res: Communication, existence, and materiality. Communication Research and Practice1(4): 1–15.
21.
CoorenF (2018) Materializing communication: Making the case for a relational ontology. Journal of Communication68(2): 278–288.
22.
CoorenFFairhurstGT (2008) Dislocation and stabilization: How to scale up from interactions to organization. In: PutnamLLNicoteraAM (eds) The Communicative Constitution of Organization: Centering Organizational Communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 117–152.
23.
CoorenFBencherkiNChaputM, et al. (2015) The communicative constitution of strategy-making: Exploring fleeting moments of strategy. In: GolsorkhiDRouleauLSeidlD, et al. (eds) The Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 370–393.
24.
CoorenFFairhurstGTHuëtR (2012) Why matter always matters in (organizational) communication. In: LeonardiPMNardiBAKallinikosJ (eds) Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 296–314.
25.
CornutFGirouxHLangleyA (2012) The strategic plan as a genre. Discourse & Communication6(1): 21–54.
26.
CorvellecHRisbergA (2007) Sensegiving as mise-en-sens—The case of wind power development. Scandinavian Journal of Management23(3): 306–326.
27.
CraigRT (2017) Definitions and Concepts of Communication (Oxford Bibliographies Online). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
CunliffeA (2003) Reflexive inquiry in organizational research: Questions and possibilities. Human Relations56(8): 983–1003.
29.
DameronSLêJKLeBaronC (2015) Materializing strategy and strategizing material: Why matter matters. British Journal of Management26(S1): S1–S12.
30.
DavisF (1973) The Martian and the convert: Ontological polarities in social research. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography2(3): 333–343.
31.
EveredRLouisMR (1981) Alternative perspectives in the organizational sciences: “Inquiry from the inside” and “inquiry from the outside.”Academy of Management Review6(3): 385–395.
32.
FentonCLangleyA (2011) Strategy as practice and the narrative turn. Organization Studies32(9): 1171–1196.
33.
GarreauLMouricouPGrimandA (2015) Drawing on the map: An exploration of strategic sensemaking/giving practices using visual representations. British Journal of Management26(4): 689–712.
34.
GioiaDAChittipeddiK (1991) Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal12(6): 433–448.
35.
GondJ-PCabantousLKrikorianF (2018) How do things become strategic? “Strategifying” corporate social responsibility. Strategic Organization16(3): 241–272.
36.
JarzabkowskiPSpeeAP (2009) Strategy-as-practice: A review and future directions for the field. Journal of Management Studies11(1): 69–95.
37.
JarzabkowskiPBurkeGSpeeP (2015) Constructing spaces for strategic work: A multimodal perspective. British Journal of Management26(S1): S26–S47.
38.
KaplanS (2010) Strategy and PowerPoint: An inquiry into the epistemic culture and machinery of strategy making. Organization Science22(2): 320–346.
39.
KwonWClarkeIWodakR (2014) Micro-level discursive strategies for constructing shared views around strategic issues in team meetings. Journal of Management Studies51(2): 265–290.
40.
LangleyATsoukasH (2010) Introducing “Perspectives on process organization studies.” In: HernesTMaitlisS (eds) Process, Sensemaking, and Organizing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–26.
41.
LatourB (2004) Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry30(2): 225–248.
42.
LatourB (2008) What Is the Style of Matters of Concern? (Spinoza Lectures). Assen: Royal Van Gorcum.
43.
LeBaronCJarzabkowskiPPrattMG, et al. (2018) An introduction to video methods in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods21(2): 239–260.
44.
LeonardiPM (2015) Materializing strategy: The blurry line between strategy formulation and strategy implementation. British Journal of Management26: S17–S21.
45.
MacbethD (2001) On “reflexivity” in qualitative research: Two readings, and a third. Qualitative Inquiry7(1): 35–68.
46.
NeylandDWhittleA (2018) Garfinkel on strategy: Using ethnomethodology to make sense of “rubbish strategy.”Critical Perspectives on Accounting53: 31–42.
47.
PälliPVaaraESorsaV (2009) Strategy as text and discursive practice: A genre-based approach to strategizing in city administration. Discourse & Communication3(3): 303–318.
48.
ParoutisSFrancoLAPapadopoulosT (2015) Visual interactions with strategy tools: Producing strategic knowledge in workshops. British Journal of Management26: S48–S66.
49.
PomerantzA (1986) Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies9(2): 219–229.
50.
PomerantzAFehrB (1997) Conversation analysis: An approach to the study of social action as sense making practices. In: van DijkTA (ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 64–91.
51.
PomerantzASandersREBencherkiN (2018) Communication as the study of social action: On the study of language and social interaction. An interview with Anita Pomerantz and Robert E. Sanders, by Nicolas Bencherki. Communiquer: Revue de Communication Sociale et Publique22: 103–118.
52.
RobertsonJ (2000) The three Rs of action research methodology: Reciprocity, reflexivity and reflection-on-reality. Educational Action Research8(2): 307–326.
53.
RouleauLBalogunJ (2011) Middle managers, strategic sensemaking, and discursive competence. Journal of Management Studies48(5): 953–983.
54.
Samra-FredericksD (2003) Strategizing as lived experience and strategists’ everyday efforts to shape strategic direction. Journal of Management Studies40(1): 141–174.
55.
Samra-FredericksD (2005) Strategic practice, “discourse” and the everyday interactional constitution of “power effects.”Organization12(6): 803–841.
56.
SmetsMBurkeGJarzabkowskiP, et al. (2014) Charting new territory for organizational ethnography: Insights from a team-based video ethnography. Journal of Organizational Ethnography3(1): 10–26.
57.
SpeeAPJarzabkowskiP (2011) Strategic planning as communicative process. Organization Studies32(9): 1217–1245.
58.
SpeePJarzabkowskiP (2017) Agreeing on what? Creating joint accounts of strategic change. Organization Science28(1): 152–176.
59.
SpenderJ-C (2014) Business Strategy: Managing Uncertainty, Opportunity, and Enterprise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
60.
TeulierRRouleauL (2013) Middle managers’ sensemaking and interorganizational change initiation: Translation spaces and editing practices. Journal of Change Management13(3): 308–337.
61.
VaaraE (2010) Taking the linguistic turn seriously: Strategy as a multifaceted and interdiscursive phenomenon. In: JoelACBLampelJ (eds) Advances in Strategic Management. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 29–50.
62.
VaaraEKleymannBSeristöH (2004) Strategies as discursive constructions: The case of airline alliances. Journal of Management Studies41(1): 1–35.
63.
VásquezCBencherkiNCoorenF, et al. (2018) From “matters of concern” to ‘matters of authority’: Reflecting on the performativity of strategy in writing a strategic plan. Long-Range Planning51(3): 417–435.
64.
VásquezCSchoenebornDSergiV (2016) Summoning the spirits: Organizational texts and the (dis)ordering properties of communication. Human Relations69(3): 629–659.
65.
WhiteheadAN (1920) The Concept of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66.
WhittingtonR (1996) Strategy as practice. Long Range Planning29(5): 731–735.
