Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article draws parallels between my experience of undertaking insider research and the original sin the biblical Adam and Eve committed when they ate the forbidden fruit from the tree of knowledge. I examine my motivation for undertaking research and consider how my focus shifted from my original research questions onto me and my role as both a senior executive and a researcher. I discuss my experience of the need to discover and develop my own interpretation distinct from the orthodoxy of the organization. I identify the influences that caused me to embrace the inherent conflict of being both an insider and a researcher and the consequences that ensued. Although ultimately I found I could not resolve this conflict, I have few regrets and I hope my article will do more to encourage others, rather than deter them from making a similar commitment to undertake insider research in their own organizations.

Keywords

conflict governance insider action research research motives self-awareness

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Argyris, C. (1990). Overcoming organizational defenses. Boston, MA: Ally and Bacon .

Bohm, D. (1996). On dialogue. London; Routledge .

Brannen, P. (1987). Working on directors: Some methodological issues. In G. Moyser & M. Wagstaffe (Eds.), Research methods for elite studies. London: Allen & Unwin .

Carson, E. D. (2002). Public expectations and nonprofit sector realities: A growing divide with disastrous consequences . Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31(3), 429-436 .

Coghlan, D. (2001). Insider action research-Implications for practising managers . Management Learning, 32(1), 49-60 .

Coghlan, D. , & Brannick, T. (2001). Doing action research in your own organization. London: Sage .

Davies, C. A. (1999). Reflexive ethnography-A guide to researching selves and others. London: Routledge .

Ellis, C. , & Bochner, A. P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity - Researcher as subject. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .

Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books .

10.

Herzberg, F. (1968). One more time: How do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review, 46, 53-62 .

11.

Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .

12.

Kegan, R. (1994). In over our heads-The mental demands of modern life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .

13.

Krishnamurti, J. (1969). Freedom from the known. New York: Harper and Row .

14.

Marx, K. (1843). Critique of Hegel’s ‘Philosophy of Right’ (1976 edn). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

15.

Murphy, J. (2000). An interview with Ortrun Zuber-Skerritt: A personal perspective . Action Research International, Paper 4. Retrieved from: http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/gcm/ar/ari/p-jmuphy00.html.

16.

Perriton, L. (2000). Incestuous fields: Management research, emotion and data analysis . Sociological Research Online, 5(3). Retrieved 3 June 2004 from: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/5/3/perriton.html.

17.

Rosen, M. (1991). Coming to terms with the field: Understanding and doing organizational ethnography . Journal of Management Studies, 28(1), 1-24 .

18.

Schon, D. A. (1991). The reflective practitioner-How professionals think in action. Aldershot: Ashgate .

19.

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .

20.

Young, M. (1991). An inside job: Policing and police culture in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press .