What is the purpose of knowledge? Is it an end product only, or a means for action for change? Who is expected to take action – the researcher, research subjects, both, or some unknown others who may come across the knowledge produced? The larger question then is: is it health research, or research for health, equity and development? This article raises these concerns in context of a study conducted in Pakistan entitled Women’s Empowerment in Muslim Contexts (WEMC). This article argues that participatory action research (PAR) provides a bridge to the separation of knowledge and action. It proposes, especially, in resource poor countries, combining health research with Paolo Freire’s view of participation and change; and sees action by research participants as an outcome of the development of their critical consciousness.
AzizA.ShamsM.KhanK. S. (2013) Participatory action research as the approach for women’s empowerment. Action Research, 9(3): 303–323. Retrieved 26 April 2012, from http://arj.sagepub.com/content/9/3/303.full.pdf+html.
3.
BargalD. (2006) Personal and intellectual influences leading to Lewin’s paradigm on action research: Towards the 60th anniversary of Lewin’s ‘Action research and minority problems (1946)’. Action Research, 4(4): 367–388.
4.
Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action (BDPA). (1995). United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women. Retrieved 29 December 2011, from http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/platform/.
5.
BulbeckC. (2000) Re-orienting western feminisms: Women’s diversity in a postcolonial worldCambridgeCambridge University Press.
6.
CastilloM. T.VigaM. D.DickinsonF.(2007) Changing the culture of dependency to allow for successful outcomes in participatory research: Fourteen years of experience in Yucatan, Mexico. In: ReasonP.BradburyH. (eds) Handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practiceLondonSAGE522–533.
7.
ChambersR. (1997a) Whose reality counts? Putting the first lastLondonIntermediate Technology Publications.
CliffordJ.MarcusG. (1986) Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnographyBerkeleyUniversity of California Press.
10.
Commission on Health Research for Development (COHRED) (1990) Health research: Essential link to equity in developmentOxfordOxford University PressRetrieved 15 December 2011, from http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/health research/files/essentiallinktoequityindevelopment.pdf.
GilmoreD. (2001) Misogyny: The male maladyPhiladelphiaUniversity of Pennsylvania Press.
16.
GMIF. (2003). UNESCO’S Gender Mainstreaming Implementation Framework (GMIF) for 2002–2007. The Section for Women and Gender Equality of the Bureau of Strategic Planning, Paris, France. Retrieved 17 August 2012, from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001318/131854e.pdf.
17.
HullD. M.SaxonT. F. (2009) Negotiation of meaning and co-construction of knowledge: An experimental analysis of asynchronous online instruction. Computers & Education, 52624–639. Retrieved from PubMed 15 December 2011, from http://web.utk.edu/∼cdavis80/EP535/hull.pdf.
18.
International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD). (1994). Retrieved 29 December 2011, from http://www.un.org/popin/icpd2.htm.
19.
KemmisS.McTaggartR. (1988) The action research planner3rd edGeelong, VictoriaDeakin University.
20.
KincheloeJ. L.McLarenP.(2002) Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In: ZouY.TruebaY. (eds) Ethnography and schools: Qualitative approaches to the study of educationLanham, MDRowman & Littlefield Publishers87–138.
21.
LemertC. (2010) Social theory: The multicultural and classic readingsBoulder, COWestview Press.
22.
Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts: Selected papers on group dynamics (Ed. Gertrude W. Lewin). New York: Harper & Row.
23.
MolyneuxM. (1985) Mobilization without emancipation? Women’s interests, the state, and revolution in Nicaragua. Feminist Studies, 11(2): 227–254. Retrieved 7 January 2011, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3177922.
24.
Muñoz, C. S. (n.d.). Political responsibility in the construction of the public realm: Reflections based on Hannah Arendt. Retrieved 29 December 2011, from http://hannaharendt.net/research/sanchezV.html.
25.
Neilsen, E. H. (2006). But let us not forget John Collier: Commentary on David Bargal’s ‘Personal and intellectual influences leading to Lewin’s paradigm on action research’. Action Research, 4(4): 389–399. Retrieved 26 April 2012, from http://arj.sagepub.com/content/4/4/389.full.pdf.
Page, N., & Czuba, C. E. (1999). Empowerment: What is it? Journal of Extension, 37(5), 5COM1. Retrieved 20 April 2009, from http://www.joe.org.
28.
ReasonP.BradburyH.(2001) Introduction: Inquiry and participation in search of a world worthy of human aspiration. In: ReasonP.BradburyH. (eds) Handbook for action research: Participative inquiry and practiceLondonSAGE1–14. Retrieved 26 April 2012, from http://www.peterreason.eu/Papers/Handbook_Introduction.pdf.
29.
RonaldF. (2003) Mappers of society: The lives, times, and legacies of great sociologistsWestport, CTPraeger Publishers.
30.
SaidE. W. (2001) OrientalismNew DelhiPenguin Books.
31.
ScottJ.MarshallG. (2005) Oxford dictionary of sociologyNew YorkOxford University Press.
Tirmizi, B. (2011). Mind over matter. Retrieved 29 December 2011, from http://www.dawn.com/(2011)/05/17/mind-over-matter.html.
35.
WEMC. (2008). Women empowering themselves: A framework that interrogates and transforms. Women’s Empowerment in Muslim Contexts, Gender, Poverty, and Democratization from the Inside Out. Retrieved 17 August 2012, from http://www.wemc.com.hk/web/rf/3_WEMC_Research_Framework.pdf.
36.
2nd World Conference on Women (WCW). (1980). Retrieved 29 December 2011, from http://www.choike.org/(2009)/eng/informes/1454.html.
Whitehead, A. (1979). Some preliminary notes on subordination of women. Retrieved 23 December 2011, from http://community.eldis.org/?233@@.598d23f2!enclosure=.598d23f3&ad=1.
40.
Whitelaw, S., Beattie, A., Balogh, R., & Watson, J. (2003). A review of the nature of action research. Sustainable Health Action Research Programme, Wales Health Promotion Division. Cardiff: Welsh Assembly Government.
41.
WillisP. (2006) The ethnographic imaginationCambridgePolity Press.
42.
ZouY.TruebaE. T. (2002) Ethnography and schools: Qualitative approaches to the study of educationLanham, MDRowman & Littlefield Publishers.
