Although action research uses both qualitative and quantitative methods, few contributions have addressed the specific role of the latter in this kind of research. This paper focuses on how quantitative methods can be integrated with participatory dynamics in action research designs. Four types of integration are defined and exemplified. The paper concludes with some reflections on how the integration of quantitative methods in these designs must address epistemological and methodological issues.
AndersonG. L.HerrK.NihlenA. S. (1994) Studying your own school: An educator’s guide to qualitative practitioner research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
Barahona, C., & Levy, S. (2003). How to generate statistics and influence policy using participatory methods in research: Reflections on work in Malawi 1999–2002 (Working Paper 2012). Brighton, England: Institute of Development Studies.
3.
Brown, E. R., Holtby, S., Zahnd, E., & Abbott, G. B. (2005). Community-based participatory research in the California Health Interview Survey. Preventing Chronic Disease, 2(4). Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2005/oct/05_0046.htm.
4.
ChambersR. (1994) Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): Analysis of experience. World Development22(9): 1253–1268.
5.
ChampionD.StowellF. (2003) Validating action research field studies: PEArL. Systemic Practice and Action Research16(1): 21–36.
6.
ChandlerD.TorbertB. (2003) Transforming inquiry and action interweaving 27 flavors of action research. Action Research1(2): 133–152.
7.
CreswellJ. W. (2002) Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research, Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
8.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2007) Designing and conducting mixed methods research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
DabaiehM. (2013) Participatory action research as a tool in solving desert vernacular architecture problems in the Western Desert of Egypt. Action Research11(3): 279–298.
10.
DefoerT.De GrooteH.HilhorstT.KantéS.BudelmanA. (1998) Participatory action research and quantitative analysis for nutrient management in southern Mali: A fruitful marriage?Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment71(1): 215–228.
11.
DelbecqA. L.Van de VenA. H.GustafsonD. H. (1975) Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nominal group and Delphi processes, Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman & Co.
12.
DienelP. C.HarmsH. (2000) Repensar la democracia: Los núcleos de investigación participativa. [Rethinking democracy: The Planning Cells] (H. Harms, Trans.). Barcelona, Spain: El Serbal.
13.
EnnisG.WestD. (2010) Exploring the potential of social network analysis in asset-based community development practice and research. Australian Social Work63(4): 404–417.
14.
EnnisG.WestD. (2013) Using social network analysis in community development practice and research: A case study. Community Development Journal48(1): 40–57.
15.
FioramontiL. (2014) How numbers rule the world. The use and abuse of statistics in global politics, London: Zed Books.
16.
Fontalvo-HerazoM. L.GlaserM.Lobato-RibeiroA. (2007) A method for the participatory design of an indicator system as a tool for local coastal management. Ocean & Coastal Management50(10): 779–795.
17.
FraserD. M. (1999) Delphi technique: One cycle of an action research project to improve the pre-registration midwifery curriculum. Nurse Education Today19(6): 495–501.
18.
GamperM.SchönhuthM.KronenwettM. (2012) Bringing qualitative and quantitative data together: Collecting network data with the help of the software tool VennMaker. In: SafarM.MahdiK. A. (eds) Social networking and community behavior modeling: Qualitative and quantitative measures, Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp. 193–213.
19.
GodetM. (2000) The art of scenarios and strategic planning: Tools and pitfalls. Technological Forecasting and Social Change65(1): 3–22.
20.
GreenwoodD.LevinM. (1998) Introduction to action research. Social research for social change, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
HeronJ. (1996) Quality as primacy of the practical. Qualitative Inquiry2(1): 41–56.
22.
Ibáñez, J. (1992). Perspectivas de la investigación social: El diseño en las tres perspectivas [Social research perspectives: Research design in three perspectives]. In M. García Ferrando, J. Ibáñez, & F. Alvira (Eds), El análisis de la realidad social [The analysis of social reality] (3rd ed., pp. 49–83). Madrid, Spain: Alianza Editorial.
23.
IvankovaN. V. (2014) Mixed methods applications in action research: From methods to community action, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
KingsleyB. C.ChapmanS. A. (2013) Questioning the meaningfulness of rigour in community-based research: Navigating a dilemma. International Journal of Qualitative Methods12: 551–569.
25.
KothariA.HamelN.MacDonaldJ. A.MeyerM.CohenB.BonnenfantD. (2014) Exploring community collaborations: Social network analysis as a reflective tool for public health. Systemic Practice and Action Research27(2): 123–137.
26.
LawJ.UrryJ. (2004) Enacting the social. Economy and Society33(3): 390–410.
27.
LinstoneH. A.TuroffM. (1975) The Delphi method: Techniques and applicationsVol. 29: Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
28.
Martí, J. (2003, April). La integració metodológica en la investigació acció: el quadern de debat [Methodological integration in action research. The case of ‘Household Debate’]. Associació Catalana de Sociologia: IV Congrés Català de Sociologia, Reus, Spain.
29.
Martí, J. & Villasante, T. R. (2009). Quality in action research: Reflections for second-order inquiry. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 22(5), 383–396.
30.
MartínP. (1999) El sociograma como instrumento que desvela la complejidad [The sociogram as a tool that reveals complexity]. Empiria, Revista de Metodología de Ciencias Sociales. 2, 129–151.
31.
MayouxL.ChambersR. (2005) Reversing the paradigm: Quantification, participatory methods and pro-poor impact assessment. Journal of International Development17(2): 271–298.
32.
McVicarA.Munn-GiddingsC.Abu-HelilC. (2012) Exploring the development of action research in nursing and social care in the UK: A comparative bibliometric review of action research designs in social work (2000–2010). Action Research10(1): 79–101.
33.
MertensD. M. (2007) Transformative paradigm mixed methods and social justice. Journal of Mixed Methods Research1(3): 212–225.
34.
MertensD. M.BledsoeK.SullivanM.WilsonA. (2010) Utilization of mixed methods for transformative purposes. In: TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (eds) Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 193–214.
35.
MorseJ. M. (2003) Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design. In: TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (eds) Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavorial research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 189–208.
36.
Munn-GiddingsC.McVicarA.SmithL. (2008) Systematic review of the uptake and design of action research in published nursing research, 2000–2005. Journal of Research in Nursing13(6): 465–477.
37.
NussbaumR. H.HooverP. P.GrossmanC. M.NussbaumF. D. (2004) Community-based participatory health survey of Hanford, WA, downwinders: A model for citizen empowerment. Society and Natural Resources17(6): 547–559.
38.
ParradoE. A.McQuistonC.FlippenC. A. (2005) Participatory survey research integrating community collaboration and quantitative methods for the study of gender and HIV risks among Hispanic migrants. Sociological Methods & Research34(2): 204–239.
39.
Pereda, C., Prada, M., & Actis, W. (2003, June). Investigación acción participativa: propuesta para un ejercicio activo de la ciudadanía [Participatory action research: Proposal for an active exercise of citizenship]. Encuentro de la Consejería de Juventud, Córdoba, Spain.
40.
PorterT. (1995) Trust in numbers. The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41.
ReasonP. (2006) Choice and quality in action research practice. Journal of Management Inquiry6(15): 187–203.
42.
ReasonP.BradburyH. (2001) Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice, London: Sage Publications.
43.
RussellK.WalshD.ScottI.McIntoshT. (2014) Effecting change in midwives' waterbirth practice behaviours on labour ward: An action research study. Midwifery30(3): e96–e101.
44.
SchifferE.HauckJ. (2010) Net-Map: Collecting social network data and facilitating network learning through participatory influence network mapping. Field Methods22(3): 231–249.
45.
SchulzA. J.ParkerE. A.IsraelB. A.BeckerA. B.MaciakB. J.HollisR. (1998) Conducting a participatory community-based survey for a community health intervention on Detroit's east side. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice4(2): 10–24.
46.
ShuaybM. (2014) Appreciative inquiry as a method for participatory change in secondary schools in Lebanon. Journal of Mixed Methods Research8(3): 299–307.
47.
StoeckerR. (2009) Are we talking the walk of community-based research?Action Research7(4): 385–404.
48.
TagueN. R. (2005) The quality toolbox, Milwaukee, WI: American Society for Quality.
49.
TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (2003) Handbook of mixed method research in the social and behavioral sciences, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50.
TeddlieC.TashakkoriA. (2009) Foundations of mixed methods research. Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51.
TorbertW. (2000) Transforming social science: Integrating quantitative, qualitative, and action research. In: ShermanW.TorbertF. (eds) Transforming social inquiry, transforming social action, Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 67–92.
52.
TorranceH. (2012) Triangulation, respondent validation, and democratic participation in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research6(2): 111–123.
53.
Travers, R., Pyne, J., Bauer, G., Munro, L., Giambrone, B., Hammond, R., & Scanlon, K. (2013). ‘Community control’ in CBPR: Challenges experienced and questions raised from the Trans PULSE project. Action Research, 11(4), 403–422.
54.
Valente, T. W. (2012). Network interventions. Science, 337, 49–53.
55.
VillasanteT. R.MartínP. (2007) Redes y conjuntos de acción: Para aplicaciones estratégicas en los tiempos de la complejidad social [Networks and action groups: Strategic applications in times of social complexity]. Política y Sociedad44(1): 125–140.
56.
Viswanathan, M., Ammerman, A., Eng, E., Garlehner, G., Lohr, K. N., Griffith, D., … & Whitener, L. (2004). Community-based participatory research: Assessing the evidence (Evidence Report/Technology Assessment, 99, AHRQ Publication 04-E022-2). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
57.
WingS. (2002) Social responsibility and research ethics in community-driven studies of industrialized hog production. Environmental Health Perspectives110(5): 437–444.
58.
WrightS. (2014) Quantitative research performing other worlds: Lessons from sustainable agriculture in the Philippines. Australian Geographer45(1): 1–18.
59.
Zuber-SkerrittO.FletcherM. (2007) The quality of an action research thesis in the social sciences. Quality Assurance in Education15(4): 413–436.
