The recent deep cuts to police force budgets in the United Kingdom have reawakened longstanding debates about the effect of police numbers and organization on the crime rate and public confidence in the police. Whereas some claim that a reduction in numbers is likely to have a deleterious effect, others argue that raw numbers are less important than how the police are organized and deployed. By cutting red tape and focusing staffing reductions on ‘back-office’ functions, the argument goes, it should be possible to maintain a consistent ‘frontline’ presence, which is a key aspect of policing for maintaining citizen confidence in the service. In this article we use administrative data linked to the British Crime Survey in order to assess the relative importance of police numbers and police visibility in determining public confidence in the police. We find, as expected, that visibility has a significant and positive effect on confidence. However, we also find a significant and positive effect of police numbers over and above the effect of visibility. Moreover, because the extent to which police are visible in local areas is itself a function of the number of police employed, we find that the number of police has an additional indirect influence on public confidence through its direct effect on visibility. By implication, reducing police numbers is likely to erode public confidence in the police, even if frontline visibility is maintained through organizational efficiency.
BradfordBJacksonJStankoE (2009) Contact and confidence: Revisiting the impact of public encounters with the police. Policing and Society19(1): 20–46.
8.
BradfordB (2011) Convergence, not divergence?: Trends and trajectories in public contact and confidence in the police. British Journal of Criminology51(1): 179–200.
9.
BrownBBenedictWM (2002) Perceptions of the police: Past findings, methodological issues, conceptual issues and police implications. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management23(3): 543–580.
10.
Brunton-SmithISturgisP (2011) Do neighbourhoods generate fear of crime? An empirical test using the British Crime Survey. Criminology49(2): 331–369.
11.
BullockK (2010) Generating and using community intelligence: The case of neighbourhood policing. International Journal of Police Science and Management12(1): 1–11.
CameronS (1988) The economics of crime deterrence: A survey of theory and evidence. Kyklos41: 301–323.
14.
DaiMJohnsonR (2009) Is neighbourhood context a confounder? Exploring the effects of citizen race and neighbourhood context on satisfaction with the police. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management32(4): 595–612.
15.
DeckerS (1981) Citizen attitudes toward the police: A review of past findings and suggestions for future policy. Journal of Science and Administration9(1): 80–87.
16.
DhaniA (2012) Police Service Strength: England and Wales, 31 March 2012. London: Home Office.
17.
DhaniAKaizaP (2011) Police Service Strength: England and Wales, 31 March 2011. London: Home Office.
18.
Di TellaRSchargrodskyE (2004) Do police reduce crime? Estimates using the allocation of police forces after a terrorist attack. American Economic Review94(1): 115–133.
19.
DracaMMachinSWittR (2011) Panic on the Streets of London: Police, Crime and the July 2005 Terror Attacks. London: Centre for Economic Performance.
20.
EckJMaguireE (2000) Have changes in policing reduced violent crime? An assessment of the evidence. In: BlumsteinAWallmanJ (eds) The Crime Drop in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
GoldsteinHKounaliDRobinsonA (2008) Modelling measurement errors and category misclassifications in multilevel models. Statistical Modelling8(3): 243–261.
23.
GrilichesZHausmanJ (1986) Errors in variables in panel data. Journal of Econometrics31(1): 93–118.
24.
HawdonJRyanJ (2003) Police–resident interactions and satisfaction with police: An empirical test of community policing assertions. Criminal Justice Policy Review14(1): 55–74.
25.
HerringtonVMillieA (2006) Applying reassurance policing: Is it ‘business as usual’?Policing & Society16(2): 146–163.
26.
HMIC [Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary] (2008) Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary – Serving Neighbourhoods and Individuals. London: HMIC.
27.
HoxJ. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Home Office (2010) Policing in the 21st Century: Reconnecting Police and the People. London: Home Office.
35.
HoughMJacksonJBradfordBMyhillAQuintonP (2010) Procedural justice, trust, and institutional legitimacy. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice4(3): 203–210.
36.
HoxJ (2002) Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
InnesM (2007) The reassurance function. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice1(2): 132–141.
38.
JacksonJBradfordB (2009) Crime, policing and social order: On the expressive nature of public confidence in policing. British Journal of Sociology60(3): 493–521.
39.
JacksonJSunshineJ (2007) Public confidence in policing: A neo-Durkheimian perspective. British Journal of Criminology47(2): 214–233.
40.
JacksonJBradfordBHohlKFarrallS (2009) Does the fear of crime erode public confidence in policing?Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice3(1): 100–111.
41.
JacksonJBradfordBHoughMMyhillAQuintonPTylerT (2012) Why do people comply with the law? Legitimacy and the influence of legal institutions. British Journal of Criminology52(6): 1051–1071.
42.
KuhaJ (2011) Group means as explanatory variables in multilevel models. Conference on Social Statistics Honouring the Scientific Contributions of Professor emeritus David Bartholomew, London School of Economics, 12–13 December.
43.
LoaderI (1997) Policing and the social: Questions of symbolic power. British Journal of Sociology48(1): 1–18.
44.
MachinSMarieO (2011) Crime and police resources: The Street Crime Initiative. Journal of the European Economic Association9(4): 678–701.
45.
MartinD (2002) Geography for the 2001 census in England and Wales. Population Trends108: 7–15.
PateAWycoffMSkoganWShermanL (1986) Reducing Fear of Crime in Houston and Newark: A Summary Report. Washington, DC: Police Foundation.
54.
PoveyK (2001) Open All Hours: A Thematic Inspection Report on the Role of Police Visibility and Accessibility in Public Reassurance. London: HMIC.
55.
QuintonPMorrisJ (2008) Neighbourhood Policing: The Impact of Piloting and Early National Implementation. London: Home Office.
56.
ReavesB (2011) Census of State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies, 2008. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
57.
ReisigMParksR (2000) Experience, quality of life, and neighbourhood context: A hierarchical analysis of satisfaction with police. Justice Quarterly17(3): 607–630.
58.
SampsonRJeglum-BartuschD (1998) Legal cynicism and (subcultural?) tolerance of deviance: The neighbourhood context of racial differences. Law & Society Review32(4): 777–804.
59.
SchaferJAHuebnerBMBynumTS (2003) Citizen perceptions of police services: Race, neighbourhood context, and community policing. Police Quarterly6(4): 440–468.
60.
SchuckARosenbaumDHawkinsD (2008) The influence of race/ethnicity, social class, and neighbourhood context on residents’ attitudes toward the police. Police Quarterly11(4): 496–519.
61.
SigurdssonJDhaniA (2010) Police Service Strength: England and Wales, 31 March 2011. London: Home Office.
62.
SindallKSturgisPJenningsW (2012) Public confidence in the police: A time-series analysis. British Journal of Criminology52(4): 744–764.
63.
SkoganW (2005) Citizen satisfaction with police encounters. Police Quarterly8: 298–321.
64.
SkoganW (2009) Concern about crime and confidence in the police. Police Quarterly12(3): 301–318.
65.
SkoganWHartnettS (1997) Community Policing, Chicago Style. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
66.
SnijdersTBoskerR (1999) Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. London: Sage.
67.
StankoEBradfordB (2009) Beyond measuring ‘how good a job’ police are doing: The MPS model of confidence in policing. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice3(4): 322–330.
