Comparative perspectives on crime and violence have paid little attention to the institutional context of the polity with few exceptions. Steven Pinker’s The Better Angels of Our Nature (2011) presents an underlying narrative of institutional change and the evolvement of democratic institutions to the secular process of decreasing violence, between as well as within states. Do democracies have comparative advantages in curbing violence? This paper translates Pinker’s diachronic perspective into a synchronic and cross-sectional analysis of violence in contemporary societies between 2005 and 2009. Its largely descriptive exploration ranges from the micro-foundations of democracies to the institutional breakdown in processes of state failure, using different descriptive indicators of institutional patterns as diagnostic tools.
AcemogluDRobinsonJA (2012) Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. London: Profile Books.
2.
BarkerV (2009) The Politics of Imprisonment: How the Democratic Process Shapes the Way America Punishes Offenders. New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
BrownleeJ (2007) Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
CavadinoMDignanJ (2006) Penal Systems: A Comparative Approach. London: Sage.
5.
DinnenSBraithwaiteJ (2009). Reinventing policing through the prism of colonial kiap. Policing and Society19(2): 161–173.
6.
EisnerM (2001) Modernization, self-control and lethal violence. British Journal of Criminology41(4): 618–638.
7.
EisnerM (2003) Long-term historical trends in violent crime. Crime and Justice30: 83–142.
8.
EliasN (1976) Über den Prozess der Zivilisation. Soziogenetische und psychogenetische Untersuchungen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Engl. trans. The Civilizing Process, vols 1–2 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978).
9.
EpsteinDBatesRGoldstoneJA. (2006) Democratic transitions. American Journal of Political Science 50(3): 551–569.
10.
EstyDCGoldstoneJAGurrTRHarffB. (1998) State Failure Task Force Report . Phase II Findings. Working Papers, 31July, University of Maryland.
11.
EULEX (2010) EULEX Programme Report. Building Sustainable Change Together. European Union Rule of Law Mission. Kosovo: Brussels.
12.
FrevertU (1995) Men of Honour: A Social and Cultural History of the Duel. Cambridge: Polity Press.
GeertzC (1973) Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In: GeertzC, The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books, 3–30.
15.
GleditschNP (2008) The liberal moment fifteen years on. International Studies Quarterly52(4): 691–712.
16.
GoldsmithA (2005). Police reform and the problem of trust. Theoretical Criminology9(4): 443–470.
17.
GurrTR (1981) Historical trends in violent crime: A critical review of the evidence. Crime and Justice3: 295–393.
18.
HallPATaylorRC (1996) Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies44(4): 936–957.
19.
HelmkeGLevitskyS (eds) (2006) Informal Institutions and Democracy: Lessons from Latin America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
20.
HofstedeGHofstedeGJ (eds) (2010) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, revised and expanded 2nd edn.New York: McGraw-Hill Professional.
21.
InglehartRWelzelC (2005) Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
JaggersKGurrT (1995) Tracking democracy’s third wave with the Polity III data. Journal of Peace Research32: 469–482.
23.
KarstedtS (2014) Global hotspots of violence: How to focus intervention and prevention. Global Violence Reduction Conference, Cambridge, 17–19 September.
24.
KarstedtS (2001) Die moralische Stärke schwacher Bindungen: Individualismus und Gewalt im Kulturvergleich [The moral strength of weak ties: A cross-cultural comparison of individualism and violence]. Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform84(3): 226–243.
25.
KarstedtS (2006) Democracy, values and violence: Paradoxes, tensions, and comparative advantages of liberal inclusion. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science605: 50–81.
26.
KarstedtS (2008) Democratization and violence: European and international perspectives. In: Body-GendrotSSpierenburgP (eds) Violence in Europe: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. New York: Springer, 205–226.
27.
KarstedtS (2010) New institutionalism in criminology: Approaches, theories and themes. In: McLaughlinENewburnT (eds) The Sage Handbook of Criminological Theory. London: Sage, 337–359.
28.
KarstedtS (2011) Liberty, equality and justice: Democratic culture and punishment. In: CrawfordA (ed.) International and Comparative Criminal Justice and Urban Governance: Convergence and Divergence in Global, National and Local Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 356–385.
29.
KarstedtS (2012) Democracy and the project of liberal inclusion. In: CarringtonKBallMO’BrienETauriJ (eds) Crime, Justice and Social Democracy. London: Routledge, 16–33.
30.
KarstedtSLaFreeG (2006a) Democracy, crime and justice. Annals of the American Academy of Political Science605: 6–25.
31.
KarstedtSLaFreeG (eds) (2006b) Democracy, Crime and Justice. Special Issue of The Annals of the American Academy of Political Science 605. Sage.
32.
LaceyN (2008) The Prisoners’ Dilemma: Political Economy and Punishment in Contemporary Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
LaFreeGTseloniA (2006) Democracy and crime: A multilevel analysis of homicide trends in forty-four countries, 1950–2000. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science605: 26–49.
35.
LaFreeGCurtisKMcDowallD (2015) How effective are our ‘better angels’? Assessing country-level declines in homicide since 1950. European Journal of Criminology12: 482–504.
36.
LandmannTCarvalhoE (2010) Measuring Human Rights. London: Routledge.
37.
LehtiM (2013) NRILP Comparative Homicide Time Series (NRILP-CHTS). Homicide trends from 1950 until 2012. NRILP Research Brief 32/2013. Helsinki: NRILP.
38.
LevitskySWayLA (2010) Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
MannM (2005) The Dark Side of Democracy: Explaining Ethnical Cleansing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MarshallMJaggersK (2010) Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions 1800–2010, Polity Level 2004–2008. URL (accessed 20 April 2015): http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscrdata.html.
42.
Massachusetts Body of Liberties (1641) The Liberties of the Massachusets Collonie in New England. Hanover Historical Texts Project. URL (accessed 16 April 2015): http://history.hanover.edu/texts/masslib.html.
43.
MessnerSRosenfeldR (2007) Crime and the American Dream, 4th edn.Belmont: Thomson and Wadsworth; first published1994.
44.
OakleyRDziedzikMGoldbergE (eds) (2002) Policing the New World Disorder: Peace Operations and Public Security. Honolulu, HI: University Press of the Pacific.
45.
PinkerS (2011) The Better Angels of Our Nature: The Decline of Violence in History and Its Causes. London & New York: Allen Lane.
46.
PrattenDSenA (eds) (2008) Global Vigilantes. New York: Columbia University Press.
47.
RotbergRI (ed.) (2004) When States Fail: Causes and Consequences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
48.
StrangeCCribbRForthCE (eds) (2014) Honour, Violence and Emotions in History. London: Bloomsbury.
49.
TriandisHCTrafimovD (2001) Cross-national prevalence of collectivism. In: SedikidesCBrewerMB (eds) Individual Self, Relational Self, Collective Self. Ann Arbor, MI: Taylor & Francis, 261–291.
50.
UggenCManzaJThompsonM (2006) Citizenship, democracy and the civic reintegration of offenders. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science605: 281–310.
51.
Van DijkJ (2008) The World of Crime. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52.
WhitmanJ (2003) Harsh Justice: Criminal Punishment and the Widening Divide between America and Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
53.
WilkinsonRGPickettKE (2009) Income inequality and social dysfunction. Annual Review of Sociology35: 493–511.
ZimringFHawkinsGKaminS (2001) Punishment and Democracy: Three Strikes and You Are Out in California. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
